Re: i845 patch for 4.2.1 debs

2002-11-26 Thread Scott Dier
* Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [112502 18:44]:
> The i845 driver does provide 2d acceleration, it just doesn't respect
> refresh rate settings, so it can't be used with lcd screens. 

I was wondering if you found a patch about that.  But your response is
great.  Thanks.

I'll probally just backport 4.2.x to woody and integrate that i845
patch.  Of course, I'll try and get it up to
www.cs.umn.edu/~sdier/debian/updates/wup/ , where I've been keeping my
'update' repository of woody apt-get-able updates.

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/



Re: i845 patch for 4.2.1 debs

2002-11-26 Thread Scott Dier
* Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [112502 18:44]:
> The i845 driver does provide 2d acceleration, it just doesn't respect
> refresh rate settings, so it can't be used with lcd screens. 

I was wondering if you found a patch about that.  But your response is
great.  Thanks.

I'll probally just backport 4.2.x to woody and integrate that i845
patch.  Of course, I'll try and get it up to
www.cs.umn.edu/~sdier/debian/updates/wup/ , where I've been keeping my
'update' repository of woody apt-get-able updates.

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: i845 patch for 4.2.1 debs

2002-11-25 Thread Scott Dier
* Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [103102 12:00]:
> I might email upstream and ask them if they can show me what part of
> the patch fixes that problem, because its a very large patch. (I also
> might just wait for 4.3 to be released!)

No pressure, (I've told the locals who bought i845 chipset machines that
they are SOL for a few months at best) but is there any new information
on this?  I'm willing to look into it later this year if nothing new has
happened by then. (After school gets out, most likely.)

Of course, I might just wait for 4.3 too.

Thanks.

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/



Re: i845 patch for 4.2.1 debs

2002-11-25 Thread Scott Dier
* Michael Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [103102 12:00]:
> I might email upstream and ask them if they can show me what part of
> the patch fixes that problem, because its a very large patch. (I also
> might just wait for 4.3 to be released!)

No pressure, (I've told the locals who bought i845 chipset machines that
they are SOL for a few months at best) but is there any new information
on this?  I'm willing to look into it later this year if nothing new has
happened by then. (After school gets out, most likely.)

Of course, I might just wait for 4.3 too.

Thanks.

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> KC0OBS http://www.ringworld.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Scott Dier
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020510 11:17]:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here?  Did RedHat
> > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms?  Or is something
> > wrong with what I am doing?
> It may also be possible to get the "ati" driver working with you card
> even under 4.1 by specifying the ChipId of a similar supported chipset
> in your XF86Config-4 file.

Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI Technologies Inc. Rage 128 Ultra [TF]"
Driver      "ati"
ChipID  0x5246
EndSection


-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ati rage 128 pro ultra tf on X4.1.0

2002-05-10 Thread Scott Dier

* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020510 11:17]:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:20:19AM -0500, Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> > Does anyone have any input about what is going on here?  Did RedHat
> > backport support for this card into their 4.1 rpms?  Or is something
> > wrong with what I am doing?
> It may also be possible to get the "ati" driver working with you card
> even under 4.1 by specifying the ChipId of a similar supported chipset
> in your XF86Config-4 file.

Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI Technologies Inc. Rage 128 Ultra [TF]"
Driver      "ati"
ChipID  0x5246
EndSection


-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Scott Dier
* Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]:
> UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available.
> See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS

Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so if someone
uses a automated bug tool that branden can kill bugs with this version?

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just say NO to Product Activation!



Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Scott Dier

* Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]:
> UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available.
> See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS

Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so if someone
uses a automated bug tool that branden can kill bugs with this version?

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  #[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Just say NO to Product Activation!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: proposed alt/meta change to /etc/X11/symbols/us

2001-10-08 Thread Scott Dier
* Derek J Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011008 00:17]:
> Yeah, I'm used to the separate keys. I still don't like the position of
> the caps lock on a sun5 keyboard (I think that's the type on an Ultra

Wow, I wish all users were so civil about the keymappings on suns. :)

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of
urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure."
- Justice Thurgood Marshall (1989)



Re: proposed alt/meta change to /etc/X11/symbols/us

2001-10-07 Thread Scott Dier

* Derek J Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011008 00:17]:
> Yeah, I'm used to the separate keys. I still don't like the position of
> the caps lock on a sun5 keyboard (I think that's the type on an Ultra

Wow, I wish all users were so civil about the keymappings on suns. :)

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  #[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of
urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure."
- Justice Thurgood Marshall (1989)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [dan.kortschak@adelaide.edu.au: Xfree 4.0.3 dpkg-buildpackage make: /bin/sh: c++: command not found]

2001-09-09 Thread Scott Dier
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010909 21:11]:
> /bin/sh: c++: command not found.

Under woody this is handled under the alternatives system.  Since gcc
and friends are part of the packages not required to be versioned nor
mentioned in build-deps they arent mentioned as a required version
there.

I would just make the symbolic link for c++.

teela:~> ls -l /usr/bin/c++
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   21 Aug 22 18:02 /usr/bin/c++ ->
/etc/alternatives/c++
teela:~> ls -l /etc/alternatives/c++
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   12 Aug 26 22:46
/etc/alternatives/c++ -> /usr/bin/g++

(Also, next time to keep Branden sane, email to
debian-x@lists.debian.org)

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dan.kortschak@adelaide.edu.au: Xfree 4.0.3 dpkg-buildpackage make: /bin/sh: c++: command not found]

2001-09-09 Thread Scott Dier

* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010909 21:11]:
> /bin/sh: c++: command not found.

Under woody this is handled under the alternatives system.  Since gcc
and friends are part of the packages not required to be versioned nor
mentioned in build-deps they arent mentioned as a required version
there.

I would just make the symbolic link for c++.

teela:~> ls -l /usr/bin/c++
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   21 Aug 22 18:02 /usr/bin/c++ ->
/etc/alternatives/c++
teela:~> ls -l /etc/alternatives/c++
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   12 Aug 26 22:46
/etc/alternatives/c++ -> /usr/bin/g++

(Also, next time to keep Branden sane, email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  #[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Help needed, TDFX [Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 23, 2001]

2001-03-25 Thread Scott Dier
* Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010324 13:48]:
> (FWIW, almost all 2D/3D cards have the same.)

Uh. uh. ah. uh.  Are you trying to say that windowed opengl with
multiple opengl contexts and 2d-apps side-by-side doesn't work on most
pc cards?  Nvidia cards do it fine.

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"When's the last time you used duct tape on a duct?" -Larry Wall


pgpUaTHJRq53Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Help needed, TDFX [Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 23, 2001]

2001-03-25 Thread Scott Dier

* Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010324 13:48]:
> (FWIW, almost all 2D/3D cards have the same.)

Uh. uh. ah. uh.  Are you trying to say that windowed opengl with
multiple opengl contexts and 2d-apps side-by-side doesn't work on most
pc cards?  Nvidia cards do it fine.

-- 
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ringworld.org/  #linuxos@efnet

"When's the last time you used duct tape on a duct?" -Larry Wall

 PGP signature