Bug#773303: libgl1-mesa-dev: Symlink error for libGL.so
Yeah.. After some more check I'm now sure it's a bug in driver side. Sadly Parallels doesn't have open source drivers so I can't patch it's installing behavior... (Ugly non-free software!) Sorry for the misplaced bug report. > 在 2014年12月17日，下午4:34，Simon McVittie 写道： > >> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 at 14:52:33 +0800, Shan Ting wrote: >> sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so >> File: ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so’ -> ‘libGL.so.1.2.0’ > > OK so far... > >> sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 >> stat: cannot stat ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0’: No such file >> or directory > > ... but that seems wrong for the packages you have installed. You said > you have: > >> Package: libgl1-mesa-dev >> Version: 10.3.2-1 >> ... >> ii libgl1-mesa-glx 10.3.2-1 > > but those same packages on the same (amd64) architecture do provide > libGL.so.1.2.0: > > % dpkg -s libgl1-mesa-dev > ... > Version: 10.3.2-1 > Depends: ..., libgl1-mesa-glx (= 10.3.2-1), ... > ... > % dpkg -L libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64 > ... > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 > >> I’m not using lx-alternative-fglrx, glx-alternative-nvidia or >> glx-diversions. The libGL.so.10.1.1.28614 is come from my graphic card >> driver(parallels). > > Then I think this is a bug in your graphics card driver: it is overwriting > and deleting files owned by the packaging system, but not finishing the job > by taking responsibility for setting the target of the libGL.so symlink > (and not participating in glx-alternatives like the non-free drivers > packaged by Debian developers do, which would be the ideal thing). > >> Is there some reasons to use libGL.so.1.2.0 directly rather than >> libGL.so.1? > > That's how libraries' development symlinks normally work. For instance, > picking a random library for which I have development files > installed (Gtk 2): > > % ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 10 18:57 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so -> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > default|archetype% ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Oct 10 18:57 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 -> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > % ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4501992 Oct 10 18:57 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.25 > > The real file is the versioned one, and the development symlink and the > SONAME (runtime) symlink both point to it. > > Regards, >S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5bb95a48-5d4c-4640-9093-4f5234be9...@gmail.com
Bug#773303: libgl1-mesa-dev: Symlink error for libGL.so
Hello Simon, In my system, sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so File: ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so’ -> ‘libGL.so.1.2.0’ Size: 14 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 symbolic link Device: 802h/2050d Inode: 3834685 Links: 1 Access: (0777/lrwxrwxrwx) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/root) Access: 2014-12-17 14:39:23.341047921 +0800 Modify: 2014-10-27 19:44:20.0 +0800 Change: 2014-12-17 14:39:15.077181919 +0800 Birth: - sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 stat: cannot stat ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0’: No such file or directory But sudo stat /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 File: ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1’ -> ‘libGL.so.10.1.1.28614’ Size: 21 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 symbolic link Device: 802h/2050d Inode: 3805950 Links: 1 Access: (0777/lrwxrwxrwx) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/root) Access: 2014-12-16 22:42:01.312669993 +0800 Modify: 2014-12-12 02:10:05.88000 +0800 Change: 2014-12-12 02:10:05.88000 +0800 Birth: - I’m not using lx-alternative-fglrx, glx-alternative-nvidia or glx-diversions. The libGL.so.10.1.1.28614 is come from my graphic card driver(parallels). I believe that which file libGL.so.1 link to is system dependent, so that hard code libGL.so to libGL.so.1.2.0 may break in some system. Is there some reasons to use libGL.so.1.2.0 directly rather than libGL.so.1? As your information suggested, libGL.so.1 is pointed to the libGL.so.1.2.0 in normal system without a non-free graphic card driver, and as libGL.so.1 also point to the right file when using a non-free graphic card driver. Will that be more elegant to just put libGL.so to libGL.so.1 so that the package can work across all platforms? Sincerely, VXST > 在 2014年12月17日，上午5:26，Simon McVittie 写道： > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 at 23:59:13 +0800, Shan Ting wrote: >> libGL.so included in libgl1-mesa-dev has a wrong symlink which refer to a >> file >> that's not exist. > > Where does/did the symlink point? > > It seems fine here: > > % dpkg-query -W libgl1-mesa-dev > libgl1-mesa-dev:amd64 10.3.2-1 > % dpkg-query -W libgl1-mesa-glx > libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64 10.3.2-1 > libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 10.3.2-1 > % ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Oct 27 11:44 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so -> > libGL.so.1.2.0 > % ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Oct 27 11:44 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 > -> libGL.so.1.2.0 > % dpkg -L libgl1-mesa-glx:amd64 | grep libGL > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1 > % dpkg -L libgl1-mesa-dev | grep libGL > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so > > Do you have glx-alternative-fglrx, glx-alternative-nvidia or glx-diversions > installed? If you do, please send the output of > "reportbug --template glx-diversions". > > Regards, >S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cafab6fd-347d-4cc6-ab47-6b79c4a83...@gmail.com
libgl1-mesa-dev，libGL.so symlink error?
Hello everyone, In my debian sid system, libgl1-mesa-dev package has a wrong symlink, which make libGL.so ref to a file that doesn’t exists. I believe it should be changed to libGL.so.1 as I successfully compiled some openGL programs using that setting. VXSTmailto:v...@vxst.org>>
