Bug#172550: marked as done (xfree86: split xlibs into one lib, one dev, and one dbg package per shared library)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#172550: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2002 19:08:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 10 13:08:03 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx-outgoing.verbum.org (monk.verbum.org) [216.226.142.159] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Lpjf-0002NP-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:08:03 -0600 Received: from space-ghost.verbum.private (dhcp024-208-189-249.columbus.rr.com [24.208.189.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN space-ghost.verbum.org, Issuer verbum.org CA (verified OK)) by monk.verbum.org (Postfix (Debian/GNU)) with ESMTP id 3E1B174002EE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:08:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by space-ghost.verbum.private (Postfix (Debian/GNU), from userid 1000) id 73E9113C418; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:59:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev) From: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: The Debian Project Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 10 Dec 2002 13:59:02 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xlibs-dev On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:15, Branden Robinson wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:44:31AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: reopen 170559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Branden, I've changed my mind; since I have another package (fontilus) which requires fontconfig/xft2, I'd like to go ahead and upload these packages to Debian, if you have no objections. Let me know if you do. It would still be great if you could split xlibs-dev, though. Please file a wishlist bug against the xlibs package. The debian-x list will see this. I'd like to get a discussion rolling about just how much we should split up xlibs. One package per shlib, plus a package for the arch-indep data? Something else? Well, it's up to you, really. If you split out just xft1, that would work for me. However, as you said on IRC, if you're going to split it, you might as well split it all the way. That way if anything else comes along later it will be less of a pain. You could still make xlibs-dev a metapackage which depends on all the others, or something. Feel free to quote this mail when filing your bug. To satisfy you, though, all I need to do is split out libXft1, right? Yes, I think that's all I need for right now. --- Received: (at 172550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2004 15:38:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 18 07:38:28 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AtTmN-0002Xy-00; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:38:27 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AtTgq-0004Xq-00; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500 From: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#172550: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:32:44 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_18 X-Spam-Level: Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-2_powerpc.deb
Bug#172550: marked as done (xfree86: split xlibs into one lib, one dev, and one dbg package per shared library)
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:19:19 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#172550: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2002 19:08:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 10 13:08:03 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx-outgoing.verbum.org (monk.verbum.org) [216.226.142.159] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Lpjf-0002NP-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:08:03 -0600 Received: from space-ghost.verbum.private (dhcp024-208-189-249.columbus.rr.com [24.208.189.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN space-ghost.verbum.org, Issuer verbum.org CA (verified OK)) by monk.verbum.org (Postfix (Debian/GNU)) with ESMTP id 3E1B174002EE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:08:02 -0500 (EST) Received: by space-ghost.verbum.private (Postfix (Debian/GNU), from userid 1000) id 73E9113C418; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:59:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev) From: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: The Debian Project Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 10 Dec 2002 13:59:02 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.7 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: xlibs-dev On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:15, Branden Robinson wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:44:31AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: reopen 170559 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Branden, I've changed my mind; since I have another package (fontilus) which requires fontconfig/xft2, I'd like to go ahead and upload these packages to Debian, if you have no objections. Let me know if you do. It would still be great if you could split xlibs-dev, though. Please file a wishlist bug against the xlibs package. The debian-x list will see this. I'd like to get a discussion rolling about just how much we should split up xlibs. One package per shlib, plus a package for the arch-indep data? Something else? Well, it's up to you, really. If you split out just xft1, that would work for me. However, as you said on IRC, if you're going to split it, you might as well split it all the way. That way if anything else comes along later it will be less of a pain. You could still make xlibs-dev a metapackage which depends on all the others, or something. Feel free to quote this mail when filing your bug. To satisfy you, though, all I need to do is split out libXft1, right? Yes, I think that's all I need for right now. --- Received: (at 172550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2004 02:23:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 26 18:23:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AlIst-Fd-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:23:24 -0800 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AlIox-0003D1-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:19:19 -0500 From: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $ Subject: Bug#172550: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:19:19 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: xfree86 Source-Version: 4.3.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_4.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0-1_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0-1_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0-1_i386.deb libdps1_4.3.0-1_i386.deb to
