Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:52:04PM -0800, Chris Ruvolo wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:29:49AM -0800, cruvolo wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: According to Mike, the real test would be 'real' OpenGL apps like Quake, does it pass that? Quake1, Quake2 and Q3A all work. Tested for several minutes of play and demo playback. I may have spoken too soon. Subsequently, X crashed with a SIGSEGV upon starting Quake. It is certainly intermittent. I didn't have this problem with 4.2.1. Would a stack trace be helpful? I'll try installing the -dbg package when I get home from work. Yes, a stack trace would be helpful. -- G. Branden Robinson| When dogma enters the brain, all Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual activity ceases. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Robert Anton Wilson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
retitle 234388 xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB Voodoo Banshee rev 3 and Voodoo3 rev 1 -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:51:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: This is due to the patch 035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff, which contains the comment: Michel, thanks for the pointer to this patch. I have made a build without this patch, and it is functioning normally on my Voodoo3 rev 1. DRI is working with an X res of 1600x1200. I am able to change VTs and am able to change X resolutions without issue. I do not use a framebuffer console. I'm also changing the title to reflect that this is not exclusive to the Banshee: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB Voodoo Banshee rev 3 and Voodoo3 rev 1 If anyone else is having the same problem, feel free to try my build. It is versioned as 4.3.0-3.0.tdfx: deb http://chris.ruvolo.net/debian/ xfree86-tdfx/binary-i386/ deb-src http://chris.ruvolo.net/debian/ xfree86-tdfx/source/ Thanks, - -Chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFARX78KO6EG1hc77ERAkZtAKCcYVoB0+ZBLZrEHnEz4J0b/wag7gCZAcpG PWo1RImfvjlfUu592VHohFY= =/N8I -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: Re: Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 234388 xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support above 1024x768 on 16MB Voodoo Banshee rev 3 and Voodoo3 rev 1 Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want DRI support at 1280x960 on Voodoo Banshee rev 3 Changed Bug title. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: According to Mike, the real test would be 'real' OpenGL apps like Quake, does it pass that? Quake1, Quake2 and Q3A all work. Tested for several minutes of play and demo playback. -Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Michel [ISO-8859-1] D�nzer wrote: On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:51:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: This is due to the patch 035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff, which contains the comment: Michel, thanks for the pointer to this patch. I have made a build without this patch, and it is functioning normally on my Voodoo3 rev 1. DRI is working with an X res of 1600x1200. I am able to change VTs and am able to change X resolutions without issue. According to Mike, the real test would be 'real' OpenGL apps like Quake, does it pass that? Right, running glxgears or some simple cheesy app is not enough. You must POUND the hell out of the driver with an intensive 3D application, such as Quake III or something else intensive. It may take anywhere from a few seconds to 30-45 minutes for the crash to occur, so this isn't the type of problem that someone can configure the driver to use 1600x1200, fire it up for 10 seconds, run glxgears and say hmm, well it works for me.
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:29:49AM -0800, cruvolo wrote: On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:47:15PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: According to Mike, the real test would be 'real' OpenGL apps like Quake, does it pass that? Quake1, Quake2 and Q3A all work. Tested for several minutes of play and demo playback. I may have spoken too soon. Subsequently, X crashed with a SIGSEGV upon starting Quake. It is certainly intermittent. I didn't have this problem with 4.2.1. Would a stack trace be helpful? I'll try installing the -dbg package when I get home from work. -Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 13:51, Michel Dänzer wrote: /* Disable DRI if using a 16Mb card with virtual resolution higher than * 1024x768 because DRI does not have enough memory available for textures * at higher resolutions, and will not operate correctly. */ See also http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38717 . Now, this is an odd explanation; 16 MB should be plenty enough for the DRI at say 1280x1024x16. Mike, do you have a better explanation for this limit? The note about tdfx in the Texture management section on http://dri.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/MesaDriver might explain. A better solution might still be possible, but likely not trivially. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Michel [ISO-8859-1] D�nzer wrote: It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not added in 4.3.0. I don't see anything that is obviously causing this to be triggered. However, I am unsure about how this code fits in the wider implementation. This is due to the patch 035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff, which contains the comment: /* Disable DRI if using a 16Mb card with virtual resolution higher than * 1024x768 because DRI does not have enough memory available for textures * at higher resolutions, and will not operate correctly. */ See also http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38717 . Now, this is an odd explanation; 16 MB should be plenty enough for the DRI at say 1280x1024x16. Mike, do you have a better explanation for this limit? It's been quite a long time now since I created that patch. I was receiving bug reports of DRI enabled tdfx configurations crashing randomly when running 3D software, usually video games. The problem didn't usually occur instantly, but would occur over a short period of time, and usually only with rather 3D intensive games like Quake III and the like. When the games were played at a lower resolution, the problems went away. Research into the problem, discovered that it was due to the majority of the video memory being given to the framebuffer, and starving texture memory. I do not remember the gory details, but it should be in dri-devel archives from 1.5-2 years ago. At the time, people proposed that the problem could be solved by modifying the tdfx code to work better in low memory (read as high-resolution) situations. I don't believe anyone ever cared enough about the problem to do that work though, or if it did get done, it certainly has slipped past me unnoticed. ;o) For our (Red Hat) purposes however, I was more concerned with desktop stability than the ability of 3Dfx hardware users to play Quake III at high resolution and crash their machine. My solution was to patch our driver to disable configurations known to cause crashes or other instabilities in certain circumstances, and to remove the patch should the real problem ever be fixed in upstream sources down the line. The patch remains in my current rpm packages for 4.3.0, and I believe many other distributions have borrowed the patch also to prevent the instability problems. Has the tdfx driver been fixed so that memory starvation isn't an issue any more? If so, it's probably a good idea to drop this patch nowadays. I don't have time to do a runtime test personally and bash the driver with some intense 3D. Could someone else do that perhaps? -- Mike A. Harris
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
There was talk in the DRI weekly meating about tdfx. There is definatly interested non-DRI developers, however motivation is the biggest thing holding tdfx back. Alan Cox has reportedly been working on the voodoo 12 series drivers. If there is consumer intrest then programers might be more likely to acctualy do the work. I know I get a jolt when sombody says tuxnes is the best emulator thay could find. --- Mike A. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not added in 4.3.0. I don't see anything that is obviously causing this to be triggered. However, I am unsure about how this code fits in the wider implementation. This is due to the patch 035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff, which contains the comment: /* Disable DRI if using a 16Mb card with virtual resolution higher than * 1024x768 because DRI does not have enough memory available for textures * at higher resolutions, and will not operate correctly. */ See also http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38717 . Now, this is an odd explanation; 16 MB should be plenty enough for the DRI at say 1280x1024x16. Mike, do you have a better explanation for this limit? It's been quite a long time now since I created that patch. I was receiving bug reports of DRI enabled tdfx configurations crashing randomly when running 3D software, usually video games. The problem didn't usually occur instantly, but would occur over a short period of time, and usually only with rather 3D intensive games like Quake III and the like. When the games were played at a lower resolution, the problems went away. Research into the problem, discovered that it was due to the majority of the video memory being given to the framebuffer, and starving texture memory. I do not remember the gory details, but it should be in dri-devel archives from 1.5-2 years ago. At the time, people proposed that the problem could be solved by modifying the tdfx code to work better in low memory (read as high-resolution) situations. I don't believe anyone ever cared enough about the problem to do that work though, or if it did get done, it certainly has slipped past me unnoticed. ;o) For our (Red Hat) purposes however, I was more concerned with desktop stability than the ability of 3Dfx hardware users to play Quake III at high resolution and crash their machine. My solution was to patch our driver to disable configurations known to cause crashes or other instabilities in certain circumstances, and to remove the patch should the real problem ever be fixed in upstream sources down the line. The patch remains in my current rpm packages for 4.3.0, and I believe many other distributions have borrowed the patch also to prevent the instability problems. Has the tdfx driver been fixed so that memory starvation isn't an issue any more? If so, it's probably a good idea to drop this patch nowadays. I don't have time to do a runtime test personally and bash the driver with some intense 3D. Could someone else do that perhaps? -- Mike A. Harris __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:43:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: XFree86 refuses to use DRI at resolutions higher than 1024x768 on a 3dfx Voodoo Banshee and complains with this message on the logs: (WW) TDFX(0): [dri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, you must invoke the server using a maximum resolution of 1024x768 or lower. I think this behaviour is not justified by any technical reason, This seems a hasty conclusion to reach if you're not very familiar with the driver code and the video hardware. Branden, I am seeing this too. The important point here is that this is a regression from 4.2.1, where the hardware is capable of DRI within an X session of 1600x1200. Note that the resolution in question here is not the resolution of the GLX graphic, but the resolution of the X display. That is, the accelerated graphic I had working was at 640x480 and would appear windowed or fullscreen via DGA. Now glxinfo with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose is reporting: libGL error: XF86DRIQueryDirectRenderingCapable failed Perhaps you could review the changes made to the tdfx driver between XFree86 4.2.1 and 4.3.0 (the tdfx driver has not, to date, been changed on xf-4_3-branch). It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not added in 4.3.0. I don't see anything that is obviously causing this to be triggered. However, I am unsure about how this code fits in the wider implementation. -Chris signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 10:55, Chris Ruvolo wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:43:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not added in 4.3.0. I don't see anything that is obviously causing this to be triggered. However, I am unsure about how this code fits in the wider implementation. This is due to the patch 035_tdfx_disable_dri_on_16mb_with_highres.diff, which contains the comment: /* Disable DRI if using a 16Mb card with virtual resolution higher than * 1024x768 because DRI does not have enough memory available for textures * at higher resolutions, and will not operate correctly. */ See also http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38717 . Now, this is an odd explanation; 16 MB should be plenty enough for the DRI at say 1280x1024x16. Mike, do you have a better explanation for this limit? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Re: Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 20:17, Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:27:47PM +0100, Rieker Flaik wrote: Claudio Martins wrote: (WW) TDFX(0):Tondri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, you must invoke the server using a maximum resolution of 1024x768 or lower. Yes, I have the same errormessage. So I changed back to 1024x768 and in /var/log/XFree86.0.log it's said that DRI has been loaded. (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) TDFX(0): [DRI] installation complete (==) TDFX(0): Direct rendering enabled (==) RandR enabled But when I tried to play Descent2 with OpenGL there was no Hardwareacceleration. $ glxinfo direct rendering: No You're probably seeing Debian Bug #229984 (plus 6 duplicate bugs). So how do I get back my good old ability to run 3d-Hardwareaccelerated games? Downgrade to xlibmesa-dri 4.3.0-0pre1v5, or wait for xlibmesa-dri 4.3.0-3 (well, probably -- no i386 user has yet reported to me that the fix actually works). okay, let me be the first to do so: Yes, the fix (000_stolen_from_Mesa_CVS.diff ) does indeed work! thanks. Christian
Re: Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
Claudio Martins wrote: (WW) TDFX(0):Tondri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, you must invoke the server using a maximum resolution of 1024x768 or lower. Yes, I have the same errormessage. So I changed back to 1024x768 and in /var/log/XFree86.0.log it's said that DRI has been loaded. (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI (II) TDFX(0): [DRI] installation complete (==) TDFX(0): Direct rendering enabled (==) RandR enabled But when I tried to play Descent2 with OpenGL there was no Hardwareacceleration. $ glxinfo direct rendering: No So how do I get back my good old ability to run 3d-Hardwareaccelerated games? regards
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 03:47:23PM +, Claudio Martins wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: important Tags: sid XFree86 refuses to use DRI at resolutions higher than 1024x768 on a 3dfx Voodoo Banshee and complains with this message on the logs: (WW) TDFX(0): [dri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, you must invoke the server using a maximum resolution of 1024x768 or lower. I think this behaviour is not justified by any technical reason, This seems a hasty conclusion to reach if you're not very familiar with the driver code and the video hardware. nor does it make any sense, since this card has functioned correctly using DRI and OpenGL at resolutions as high as 1280x960, up to XFree86 version 4.2.x. Even if running certain OpenGL apps at 1280x960 would be too slow (like quake3), switching to lower res. modes like 1024x768 or 800x600 used to work okay, but now with this version the X server simply refuses to use DRI and the kernel doesn't even automatically load the drm module like it used to. Perhaps you could review the changes made to the tdfx driver between XFree86 4.2.1 and 4.3.0 (the tdfx driver has not, to date, been changed on xf-4_3-branch). It looks to me like the error message you're complaining of was not added in 4.3.0. xfree86/cvs/HEAD/xc % cvs diff -u -r xf-4_2_1 -r xf-4_3_0 programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx Index: programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/Imakefile === RCS file: /cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/Imakefile,v retrieving revision 1.21 retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -u -r1.21 -r1.22 --- programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/Imakefile 21 May 2001 21:43:55 - 1.21 +++ programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/Imakefile 17 Feb 2003 17:06:44 - 1.22 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -XCOMM $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/Imakefile,v 1.21 2001/05/21 21:43:55 dawes Exp $ +XCOMM $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/Imakefile,v 1.22 2003/02/17 17:06:44 dawes Exp $ XCOMM XCOMM This is the Imakefile for the TDFX driver. XCOMM @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ -I$(XF86SRC)/xaa -I$(XF86SRC)/rac -I$(XF86SRC)/int10 \ -I$(SERVERSRC)/fb -I$(XF86SRC)/xaa -I$(XF86SRC)/ramdac \ -I$(XF86SRC)/vgahw -I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86SRC)/i2c \ - -I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86OSSRC)/vbe -I$(SERVERSRC)/Xext \ + -I$(XF86SRC)/ddc -I$(XF86SRC)/vbe -I$(SERVERSRC)/Xext \ -I$(FONTINCSRC) -I$(SERVERSRC)/include -I$(XINCLUDESRC) \ -I$(EXTINCSRC) -I$(SERVERSRC)/render \ $(DRIINCLUDES) Index: programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx.h === RCS file: /cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx.h,v retrieving revision 1.25 retrieving revision 1.27 diff -u -u -r1.25 -r1.27 --- programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx.h 18 Aug 2001 02:51:13 - 1.25 +++ programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx.h 17 Oct 2002 01:02:08 - 1.27 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Copyright: 1998,1999 */ -/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx.h,v 1.25 2001/08/18 02:51:13 dawes Exp $ */ +/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx.h,v 1.27 2002/10/17 01:02:08 dawes Exp $ */ #ifndef _TDFX_H_ #define _TDFX_H_ @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ unsigned char *MMIOBase[MAXCHIPS]; unsigned char *FbBase; unsigned char *myFbBase; - unsigned int PIOBase[MAXCHIPS]; + IOADDRESS PIOBase[MAXCHIPS]; long FbMapSize; int pixelFormat; int stride; @@ -219,6 +219,8 @@ int videoKey; void (*VideoTimerCallback)(ScrnInfoPtr, Time); FBLinearPtr overlayBuffer; + FBLinearPtr overlayBuffer2; /* for double-buffering */ + int whichOverlayBuffer; /* flip-flop */ FBAreaPtr textureBuffer; Bool TextureXvideo; XF86VideoAdaptorPtr overlayAdaptor; Index: programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx_dri.c === RCS file: /cvs/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx_dri.c,v retrieving revision 1.23 retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -u -r1.23 -r1.25 --- programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx_dri.c 21 May 2001 21:43:55 - 1.23 +++ programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx_dri.c 8 Feb 2003 21:26:59 - 1.25 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx_dri.c,v 1.23 2001/05/21 21:43:55 dawes Exp $ */ +/* $XFree86: xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/tdfx/tdfx_dri.c,v 1.25 2003/02/08 21:26:59 dawes Exp $ */ #include xf86.h #include xf86_OSproc.h @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ else pConfigs[i].doubleBuffer = FALSE; pConfigs[i].stereo = FALSE; - pConfigs[i].bufferSize = 16; + pConfigs[i].bufferSize = (pScrn-bitsPerPixel==32) ? 32 : 24;
Bug#234388: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] X server refuses to use DRI at 1280x960 resolution
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-2 Severity: important Tags: sid XFree86 refuses to use DRI at resolutions higher than 1024x768 on a 3dfx Voodoo Banshee and complains with this message on the logs: (WW) TDFX(0): [dri] To use DRI, with a 16Mb Voodoo 3 or Banshee card, you must invoke the server using a maximum resolution of 1024x768 or lower. I think this behaviour is not justified by any technical reason, nor does it make any sense, since this card has functioned correctly using DRI and OpenGL at resolutions as high as 1280x960, up to XFree86 version 4.2.x. Even if running certain OpenGL apps at 1280x960 would be too slow (like quake3), switching to lower res. modes like 1024x768 or 800x600 used to work okay, but now with this version the X server simply refuses to use DRI and the kernel doesn't even automatically load the drm module like it used to. Thanks for your attention Best regards C. Martins -- Package-specific info: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: 3Dfx Interactive, Inc. Voodoo Banshee (rev 03) 01:00.0 Class 0300: 121a:0003 (rev 03) # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexconf, the # Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page. # (Type man XF86Config at the shell prompt.) Section Files # FontPathunix/:7100# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these #FontPath/usr/share/fonts/truetype FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc FontPath/usr/share/fonts/truetype/openoffice FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic EndSection Section ServerFlags EndSection Section Module Loadddc LoadGLcore Loaddbe Loaddri Loadextmod Loadglx Loadpex5 Loadrecord Loadxie Loadbitmap Loadfreetype Loadspeedo Loadtype1 Loadvbe Loadint10 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driver keyboard Option CoreKeyboard Option XkbRules xfree86 Option XkbModel pc101 Option XkbLayout us EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 # Option Emulate3Buttons true Option Buttons 5 Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Mouse Driver mouse Option SendCoreEventstrue Option Device/dev/psaux Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section Device Identifier Generic Video Card Driver tdfx Option UseFBDev true EndSection Section Monitor Identifier Generic Monitor HorizSync 30-96 VertRefresh 50-160 Option DPMS EndSection Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Device Generic Video Card Monitor Generic Monitor DefaultDepth16 SubSection Display Depth 1 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 4 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 8 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 15 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 16 Modes 1280x960 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 24 Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection EndSection Section ServerLayout Identifier Default Layout Screen Default Screen InputDevice Generic Keyboard InputDevice Configured Mouse #
