Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:20:08AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: On 04-May-12 04:25, Branden Robinson wrote: Hmmm. When you submitted the original patch, you said it was tested. In the future, please don't oversell the state of a patch you submit. Come on, I did not oversell anything. [...] With the help of others working on the amd64 port and two small changes/additions to my patch there is now a patch which seems to make xfree86 work on amd64. What would be the correct way to proceed now? I have commited your further patches to Debian's XFree86 SVN; I'd like for some AMD64 users to test packages built from the SVN trunk. I do thank your for your contributions, and look forward to hearing reports of how these packages work. I'd like to be able to claim amd64 as a supported architecture in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2. -- G. Branden Robinson| Psychology is really biology. Debian GNU/Linux | Biology is really chemistry. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Chemistry is really physics. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Physics is really math. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: On 04-May-09 17:47, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:14:13PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Yes, you can find my xfree86 patch in the BTS (#240889). It simply switches off the 'lib64' installation feature in the original xfree86 sources for amd64 and uses 'lib' instead. Please try my second patch (the first one was incomplete). Great. Did you build glide, too? I cannot find any patches of yours in the bts and xfree86 build-depends on it. This is a bug in my patch. I do not have any patch for glide on amd64. Hmmm. When you submitted the original patch, you said it was tested. In the future, please don't oversell the state of a patch you submit. I'm happy to apply finished patches to the SVN trunk, and I'm happy to grant you SVN access so you can get AMD64 support mature on a branch for subsequent merge, but let's please not confuse the purpose of one with the other. -- G. Branden Robinson| When I die I want to go peacefully Debian GNU/Linux | in my sleep like my ol' Grand [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Dad...not screaming in terror like http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | his passengers. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
On 04-May-12 04:25, Branden Robinson wrote: Hmmm. When you submitted the original patch, you said it was tested. In the future, please don't oversell the state of a patch you submit. Come on, I did not oversell anything. The original bug report stated two build problems on amd64 and described a possible solution. You added the 'help' tag to the bug and requested a patch against the current svn trunk. I tried to figure out how to do that, created a patch and checked if it solved the build problems stated in the original bug report. It did solve those build problems and I posted the patch to the BTS with the statement that 'it works for me'. What I meant with this was that it solves the build problems stated in the original bug report. This patch still stands as I originally posted it. I never claimed that this patch solves all problems for the amd64 architecture. However, I tried to create another patch to solve the remaining xfree86 build problems on amd64 and posted the result of these efforts to the BTS. With the help of others working on the amd64 port and two small changes/additions to my patch there is now a patch which seems to make xfree86 work on amd64. What would be the correct way to proceed now? Regards Andreas Jochens
Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
On 04-May-09 17:47, Frederik Schueler wrote: Hi, On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:14:13PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Yes, you can find my xfree86 patch in the BTS (#240889). It simply switches off the 'lib64' installation feature in the original xfree86 sources for amd64 and uses 'lib' instead. Please try my second patch (the first one was incomplete). Great. Did you build glide, too? I cannot find any patches of yours in the bts and xfree86 build-depends on it. This is a bug in my patch. I do not have any patch for glide on amd64. xfree86 build-depends on libglide2-dev and libglide3-dev for i386 only. I just added the build-depends for amd64 when I first experimented with xfree86 on amd64 and simply forgot to remove them later. You can just remove the dependencies on libglide2-dev and libglide3-dev for amd64 from the Build-Depends in debian/control in my patch. Then xfree86 compiles without problems (at least for me). I will send an updated patch without these Build-Depends to the BTS in a separate mail. Please report if you can successfully build and install xfree86 on amd64. Regards Andreas Jochens
Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
Hi, attached another patch for xserver-xfree86.config.in - without it, the preinst fails and xserver-xfree86 does not install at all. On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: I will send an updated patch without these Build-Depends to the BTS in a separate mail. this is in my patch as well. Please report if you can successfully build and install xfree86 on amd64. I could succesfully build it, install and configure it and it works, I have now X11 on my pure64 system =) I am actually rebuilding a full source upload in order to upload it to alioth this night. Thanks Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG diff -ruN xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/control xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1.new/debian/control --- xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/control 2004-05-09 20:04:58.688048766 +0200 +++ xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1.new/debian/control 2004-05-09 17:52:14.0 +0200 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org Uploaders: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: dpkg (= 1.7.0), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (= 4.1.16), html2text, libglide2-dev ( 2001.01.26) [amd64 i386], libglide3-dev (= 2002.04.10-3) [alpha amd64 i386], linux-kernel-headers [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh], linux-kernel-headers (= 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc], libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4 +Build-Depends: dpkg (= 1.7.0), flex, bison, bsdmainutils, groff, zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libpam0g-dev | libpam-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpaperg, libstdc++5-dev | libstdc++-dev, tetex-bin, po-debconf, debhelper (= 4.1.16), html2text, libglide2-dev ( 2001.01.26) [i386], libglide3-dev (= 2002.04.10-3) [alpha i386], linux-kernel-headers [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sh], linux-kernel-headers (= 2.5.999-test7-bk-15) [sparc], libpng12-dev | libpng-dev, libexpat1-dev, libfontconfig1-dev, fontconfig, bzip2, libxft-dev (= 2.1.2), libxrender-dev (= 0.8.3), libxcursor-dev, dbs, m4 Build-Conflicts: cpp-3.3 ( 1:3.3.3-0pre1) Package: lbxproxy diff -ruN xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1.new/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in --- xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-09 20:00:17.361622249 +0200 +++ xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1.new/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-09 20:06:58.131274986 +0200 @@ -591,6 +591,9 @@ alpha) DRIVER_LIST=ati, cirrus, glint, mga, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, tdfx, tga, vga ;; +amd64) + DRIVER_LIST=apm, ark, ati, chips, cirrus, cyrix, fbdev, glide, glint, i128, i740, i810, imstt, mga, neomagic, newport, nsc, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, sis, tga, trident, tseng, vesa, vga + ;; arm|hppa) DRIVER_LIST=ati, chips, fbdev, glint, mga, nv, s3, s3virge, savage, sis, tdfx, trident, vga ;;
Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
On 04-May-09 20:13, Frederik Schueler wrote: I could succesfully build it, install and configure it and it works, I have now X11 on my pure64 system =) I am actually rebuilding a full source upload in order to upload it to alioth this night. Great. +amd64) + DRIVER_LIST=apm, ark, ati, chips, cirrus, cyrix, fbdev, glide, glint, i128, i740, i810, imstt, mga, neomagic, newport, nsc, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, sis, tga, trident, tseng, vesa, vga + ;; Should 'glide' be deleted from DRIVER_LIST since we dropped the build-dependency on libglide[2|3]-dev ? Regards Andreas Jochens
Bug#240889: AMD64 Port: Almost all packages are ready to be uploaded
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:57:06PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Should 'glide' be deleted from DRIVER_LIST since we dropped the build-dependency on libglide[2|3]-dev ? Indeed. find a corrected patch attached. Thanks Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG --- xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1.orig/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-09 23:20:29.533011000 +0200 +++ xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in 2004-05-09 23:26:26.497916449 +0200 @@ -591,6 +591,9 @@ alpha) DRIVER_LIST=ati, cirrus, glint, mga, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, tdfx, tga, vga ;; +amd64) + DRIVER_LIST=apm, ark, ati, chips, cirrus, cyrix, fbdev, glint, i128, mga, neomagic, nv, rendition, s3, s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, sis, tdfx, tga, trident, tseng, vesa, vga + ;; arm|hppa) DRIVER_LIST=ati, chips, fbdev, glint, mga, nv, s3, s3virge, savage, sis, tdfx, trident, vga ;;
