Processed: Re: Bug#248263: Detailed output isn't detailed

2004-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 248263 gdm
Bug#248263: Detailed output isn't detailed
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `gdm'.

> retitle 248263 detailed output isn't detailed
Bug#248263: Detailed output isn't detailed
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#248263: Detailed output isn't detailed

2004-05-28 Thread Chris Walker
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:50:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> retitle 248263 xserver-xfree86: detailed output isn't detailed
> tag 248263 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > Version: 4.3.0-7
> > 
> > The debconf screen displayed when the video driver doesn't work asks
> > if you would like to view the detailed X-server output as well - but
> > the screen you see is identical to the first (and doesn't include much
> > detail - certainly not what video card it thought it had detected).
> 
> I'm afraid I have no idea what screen you're talking about.

Sorry about that.  It was clear to me what I meant when I wrote it
but looking at it again, it isn't. 


> 
> Can you paste some of the exact language from the debconf template in
> question into a mail and follow-up to this bug report?

The below should be roughly correct - but I typed it in by hand, so
may have made errors.

"I cannot start the X server (your graphical interface). It is likely
that it is not set up correctly. Would you like to view the X server
output to diagnose the problem?"

If you click on yes, you get:

"This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be rported to XFree86@Xfree86.org and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bus in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFRee86 CVS repository
(http://www.XFree86.org/cvs).

Xfree86 version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 20040428170728
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Release date: 15 August 2003
X Protocol Version 11,Revision0, Release 6.6
Build operating system: Linux 2.4.23 i686 [ELF]
Build Date: 28 April 2004
Before reporting problems, check http://www.XFree86.org/ to make
sure that you have the latest verion.  
 Module loader present

  OK

---

If you hit return, you get asked


"Would you like to see the detailed X server output as well?"

If you select Yes, you get a repeat of the above screen. 

This is a) no more detail. B) not much use.
What you really want is the rest of /var/log/XFree86.0.log

In fact, it would seem that what you display is the head of this very
file - but only the first (and therefore not particularly useful bit).




Chris





Bug#248263: Detailed output isn't detailed

2004-05-21 Thread Branden Robinson
retitle 248263 xserver-xfree86: detailed output isn't detailed
tag 248263 + moreinfo
thanks

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:36:44AM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> 
> The debconf screen displayed when the video driver doesn't work asks
> if you would like to view the detailed X-server output as well - but
> the screen you see is identical to the first (and doesn't include much
> detail - certainly not what video card it thought it had detected).

I'm afraid I have no idea what screen you're talking about.

Can you paste some of the exact language from the debconf template in
question into a mail and follow-up to this bug report?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux   |when they take over a country is to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#248263: Detailed output isn't detailed

2004-05-10 Thread Chris Walker
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-7

The debconf screen displayed when the video driver doesn't work asks
if you would like to view the detailed X-server output as well - but
the screen you see is identical to the first (and doesn't include much
detail - certainly not what video card it thought it had detected).



Chris