Bug#251319: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#251319: [xbase-clients] /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc calls X the wrong way)

2004-06-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:10:27PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:27:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > You're exaggerating my position.  In fact I'm tempted to agree with you;
> > the main problem is that the XF86Config-4 file doesn't supposrt a "DPI"
> > configuration option.  It supports "DisplaySize", but that's not quite
> > the same thing.
> 
> I'm sorry, I didn't mean to exaggerate. While I still do not see what
> advantages a "DPI" option has, I don't think this is a topic worthy of
> elaborate discussion. Your point is taken.

You haven't seen the bitmap rasterizer try to scale bitmap fonts,
obviously.  :)

(It's pretty horrendous...)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| There's something wrong if you're
Debian GNU/Linux   | always right.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Glasow's Law
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#251319: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#251319: [xbase-clients] /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc calls X the wrong way)

2004-06-01 Thread Daniel
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:27:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You're exaggerating my position.  In fact I'm tempted to agree with you;
> the main problem is that the XF86Config-4 file doesn't supposrt a "DPI"
> configuration option.  It supports "DisplaySize", but that's not quite
> the same thing.

I'm sorry, I didn't mean to exaggerate. While I still do not see what
advantages a "DPI" option has, I don't think this is a topic worthy of
elaborate discussion. Your point is taken.

Regards,
Daniel




Bug#251319: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#251319: [xbase-clients] /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc calls X the wrong way)

2004-06-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 12:38:55PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
> Hm, I still disagree with you about whether the commandline of the
> Xserver is the right place to put hardware-specific information

You're exaggerating my position.  In fact I'm tempted to agree with you;
the main problem is that the XF86Config-4 file doesn't supposrt a "DPI"
configuration option.  It supports "DisplaySize", but that's not quite
the same thing.

> and wether a default value should be put there.

That's for consistency in the (default) Debian user experience.

> But if you insist on doing that, what about showing a notice to that
> effect during the installation? Would have saved me half an hour of
> finding the culprit.

Actually, I used to have a debconf note to this effect years ago.

It was considered "debconf abuse", so I removed it[1].

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-sparc-changes/2001/12/msg00349.html

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   If we believe absurdities, we
Debian GNU/Linux   |   shall commit atrocities.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   -- Voltaire
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#251319: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#251319: [xbase-clients] /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc calls X the wrong way)

2004-05-29 Thread Daniel
Hm, I still disagree with you about whether the commandline of the
Xserver is the right place to put hardware-specific information and
wether a default value should be put there. But if you insist on doing
that, what about showing a notice to that effect during the
installation? Would have saved me half an hour of finding the culprit.

regards,
Daniel