Bug#256863: This bug can probably be closed

2004-07-11 Thread Bruce Stephens
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> Well, I think what the code does is make buttons that were formerly
> numbered 6 and 7 numbered 4 and 5 instead.

Ah, that sounds right.

>> > How recently did you notice this change in scroll wheel behavior?
>> > What version of the xfree86 packages were you running previously?
>> 
>> Very recently (in the last couple of weeks).  So September 2003
>> doesn't seem possible.  I've been running unstable for about a year,
>> (updating most days) so I've presumably been running 4.2.1-12 and
>> later for a long time.
>
> You didn't happen to have your X server up for a good 8--10 months, did
> you?

No, that can't be it.  I was running X from an experimental source for
a while, so I guess it's possible that I somehow missed it before.  It
doesn't feel likely, but these things happen.  Anyway, everything's
working now with the mouse.

[...]





Bug#256863: This bug can probably be closed

2004-07-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:38:37AM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I wonder if this would be explained by the following changelog entry:
> >
> > xfree86 (4.2.1-12) unstable; urgency=high
> > [...]
> >   * patch #097: new; add Bartosz Zapalowski's patch for supporting wheel 
> > mice
> > with large numbers of buttons; the ZAxisMapping option "pushes up" the
> > other buttons so that the mouse behaves sanely.  This addresses problems
> > with how the X server parses wheel data from at least some devices that
> > use the ExplorerPS/2 protocol. (Closes: #166550)
> > [...]
> >  -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:48 -0500
> 
> Could be that.  The changelog doesn't describe the behaviour I saw,
> but it certainly looks like the right area of code.

Well, I think what the code does is make buttons that were formerly
numbered 6 and 7 numbered 4 and 5 instead.

> > How recently did you notice this change in scroll wheel behavior?
> > What version of the xfree86 packages were you running previously?
> 
> Very recently (in the last couple of weeks).  So September 2003
> doesn't seem possible.  I've been running unstable for about a year,
> (updating most days) so I've presumably been running 4.2.1-12 and
> later for a long time.

You didn't happen to have your X server up for a good 8--10 months, did
you?

:)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| I'm not going to waste my precious
Debian GNU/Linux   | flash memory with Perl when I can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do so much more with it.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Joey Hess


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#256863: This bug can probably be closed

2004-07-09 Thread Bruce Stephens
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> I wonder if this would be explained by the following changelog entry:
>
> xfree86 (4.2.1-12) unstable; urgency=high
> [...]
>   * patch #097: new; add Bartosz Zapalowski's patch for supporting wheel mice
> with large numbers of buttons; the ZAxisMapping option "pushes up" the
> other buttons so that the mouse behaves sanely.  This addresses problems
> with how the X server parses wheel data from at least some devices that
> use the ExplorerPS/2 protocol. (Closes: #166550)
> [...]
>  -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:48 -0500

Could be that.  The changelog doesn't describe the behaviour I saw,
but it certainly looks like the right area of code.

> How recently did you notice this change in scroll wheel behavior?
> What version of the xfree86 packages were you running previously?

Very recently (in the last couple of weeks).  So September 2003
doesn't seem possible.  I've been running unstable for about a year,
(updating most days) so I've presumably been running 4.2.1-12 and
later for a long time.




Bug#256863: This bug can probably be closed

2004-07-08 Thread Branden Robinson
tag 256863 + moreinfo
thanks

On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:42:19PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> If I change the ZAxisMapping line to
> 
>Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
> 
> then scrolling works, and the other buttons become button-6 and 7.  So
> I think it's quite likely that previously the ZAxisMapping line (the
> one mapping to "6 7") was being misread, and in fact the wheel was
> always being mapped to "4 5".

I wonder if this would be explained by the following changelog entry:

xfree86 (4.2.1-12) unstable; urgency=high
[...]
  * patch #097: new; add Bartosz Zapalowski's patch for supporting wheel mice
with large numbers of buttons; the ZAxisMapping option "pushes up" the
other buttons so that the mouse behaves sanely.  This addresses problems
with how the X server parses wheel data from at least some devices that
use the ExplorerPS/2 protocol. (Closes: #166550)
[...]
 -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:34:48 -0500

How recently did you notice this change in scroll wheel behavior?  What
version of the xfree86 packages were you running previously?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   The last Christian died on the
Debian GNU/Linux   |   cross.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   -- Friedrich Nietzsche
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#256863: This bug can probably be closed

2004-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 256863 + moreinfo
Bug#256863: xserver-xfree86: Mouse wheel no longer scrolls things, mouse has 
more buttons than is usual
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#256863: This bug can probably be closed

2004-06-29 Thread Bruce Stephens
If I change the ZAxisMapping line to

   Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"

then scrolling works, and the other buttons become button-6 and 7.  So
I think it's quite likely that previously the ZAxisMapping line (the
one mapping to "6 7") was being misread, and in fact the wheel was
always being mapped to "4 5".

That still leaves the vanishing sawfish bindings as a mystery, but
they're dynamic, so it's not impossible to imagine them going, and
it's of no particular consequence anyway.