Your message dated Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:51:15 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2004 06:38:04 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 23:38:04 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0Dtb-0005LU-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:38:04 -0700 Received: from guillem by gluck.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0DtT-00074a-00; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:38:01 -0600 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:36:35 +0200 From: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xfree86: may FTBFS if current locale makes sort ordering differ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i Sender: Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6+SVN (r1741) Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, While building r1741 to test the patch on #260099, I got a FTBFS in the MANIFEST check. The problem here is that one sort uses LC_ALL=C and the others does not, so if the current locale is different from C it will use a differenr sorting order. On my build system I had LANG=C, LC_COLLATE=ca_ES and LC_CTYPE=ca_ES. Attached is a trivial patch (against trunk's HEAD) that solves this possible problem, thus not RC severity, although I think it should get into -6. regards, guillem --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1-6+SVN_FTFBS_locale_sort.patch" Index: rules =================================================================== --- rules (revision 1755) +++ rules (working copy) @@ -352,12 +352,12 @@ # Construct MANIFEST files from MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in and # MANIFEST.$(ARCH).all or MANIFEST.all. if expr "$(findstring -DBuildFonts=NO,$(IMAKE_DEFINES))" : "-DBuildFonts=NO" >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ - sort -u debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in >debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH); \ + LC_ALL=C sort -u debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in >debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH); \ else \ if [ -e debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).all ]; then \ - sort -u debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).all >debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH); \ + LC_ALL=C sort -u debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).all >debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH); \ else \ - sort -u debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in debian/MANIFEST.all >debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH); \ + LC_ALL=C sort -u debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH).in debian/MANIFEST.all >debian/MANIFEST.$(ARCH); \ fi; \ fi # confirm that the installed file list has not changed --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 268116-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2004 05:51:17 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 27 22:51:17 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C0w7R-000165-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 22:51:17 -0700 Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C04968C002; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:51:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 00:51:15 -0500 From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fixed bug Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I fixed this bug in SVN r1756. Since this bug was never actually any Debian package release (not even to unstable), I'm closing it immediately. Thanks for diagnosing this problem, Guillem; I had no idea what was causing Fabio's trouble, and was totally stumped. --=20 G. Branden Robinson | Psychology is really biology. Debian GNU/Linux | Biology is really chemistry. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Chemistry is really physics. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Physics is really math. --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkEwHVMACgkQ6kxmHytGonzhOACfVhdH8//XYAsC/wSSZLLShGUP yYsAnjy7n4ywJPG4QxrAAZNYK3RSYZJn =XDh1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--