Your message dated Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:32:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306616: mention XF86 in x-w-s-c description has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: xfree86 Severity: wishlist x-window-system-core does not mention XFree86 in its description, while x-window-system does. It would be nice to make the descriptions more similar, since many users want the -core package instead for their minimal installations, but a lot don't even know about the -core dependency package -- it does not turn up in searches a lot. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-wing Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "america may be unique in being a country which has leapt from barbarism to decadence without touching civilization." -- john o'harasignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---x-window-system-core is just a transitional package for Etch nowadays. The description has been completely rewritten and does not have anything to do with XFree86 anymore. Closing. Brice
--- End Message ---