Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:22:48 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327179: replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf upon upgrading.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2005 07:55:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 00:55:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from foolab.org [67.18.92.211]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDHFg-0002Op-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:55:20 -0700
Received: from uniball (unknown [212.103.170.135])
by foolab.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AF77D832;
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:55:18 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by uniball (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9DDBF9732C; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:55:19 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:55:19 +0300
From: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf upon upgrading.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: wishlist
I guess this'd be nice, Maybe when etch is released and people do a
dist-upgrade.
Not sure.
Best wishes,
- --
- ----------------
- -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
- --
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDH+5ny2aOKaP9DfcRAtPbAKCMDPo/H8+ocq7Ei5f0ABKqPxdClQCgi0XA
Cph5ZKWEBhHrmnnJR1XzU5M=
=TzsE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 327179-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2005 13:21:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 06:21:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from visp.inabox.net (ephemera.fooishbar.org) [203.49.196.168]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDML2-0002g1-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 06:21:13 -0700
Received: from ephemera.fooishbar.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by ephemera.fooishbar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C0927C11A;
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:22:48 +1000 (EST)
Subject: Re: Bug#327179: replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf upon upgrading.
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:22:48 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:57 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
> [it's not DDX, but really DRI]
DRI modules are loaded as a result of what the driver tells libGL to
load (as a rather simplified overview), rather than anything in the
configuration file. So, things will just work. No configuration file
messing needed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
