Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?

2006-06-12 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > It looks a bit like this:
> > 
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html
> > 
> > Although not affecting as many apps..
> 
> Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm
> reassigning it to libx11-6.

Can you please reassign it back to lyx-xforms?
At the moment, there is nothing in this bugreport to support your claim
that it is caused by libx11-6.  The backtrace shows
 0xa7db4cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList (structure=0xc09, number=1040697125)
and these arguments look clearly wrong, but we do not know where they do
come from.
Please work first with bug submitter to reproduce it, and then reassign
it to libx11-6 if there is indeed a bug there, with explanations on how
to reproduce it.  I am afraid that Debian X maintainers cannot investigate
random bugs in any X application.
For instance, the following informations may be helpful:
 * Is X a local or remote display?
 * Does it crash when launched from a newly created account?
 * Does it crash at startup, or when processing a particular file?
 * Any special in user configuration?
 ...
Thanks.

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?

2006-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 368858 lyx-xforms
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Bug reassigned from package `libx11-6' to `lyx-xforms'.

> tag 368858 help
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: help

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?

2006-06-12 Thread Per Olofsson
reassign 368858 lyx-xforms
tag 368858 help
thanks

Denis Barbier:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > > It looks a bit like this:
> > > 
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html
> > > 
> > > Although not affecting as many apps..
> > 
> > Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm
> > reassigning it to libx11-6.
> 
> Can you please reassign it back to lyx-xforms?
> At the moment, there is nothing in this bugreport to support your claim
> that it is caused by libx11-6.  The backtrace shows
>  0xa7db4cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList (structure=0xc09, number=1040697125)
> and these arguments look clearly wrong, but we do not know where they do
> come from.
> Please work first with bug submitter to reproduce it, and then reassign
> it to libx11-6 if there is indeed a bug there, with explanations on how
> to reproduce it.  I am afraid that Debian X maintainers cannot investigate
> random bugs in any X application.
> For instance, the following informations may be helpful:
>  * Is X a local or remote display?
>  * Does it crash when launched from a newly created account?
>  * Does it crash at startup, or when processing a particular file?
>  * Any special in user configuration?
>  ...

OK, I understand. I thought that this was maybe a known bug.

I think lyx-xforms is deprecated anyway.

-- 
Pelle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?

2006-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 368858 libx11-6
Bug#368858: lyx-xforms segfaults
Bug reassigned from package `lyx-xforms' to `libx11-6'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?

2006-06-12 Thread Per Olofsson
reassign 368858 libx11-6
thanks

James Stone:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:10:44PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > tag 368858 unreproducible
> > thanks
> > 
> > James Stone:
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0xa7dd0cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6
> > > 
> > > I think it may be related to the fact I have the proprietary
> > > NVidia driver installed.
> > 
> > Does the problem go away if you switch to the nv driver?
> > 
> > If it indeed does have to do with the proprietary nVidia driver, I'm
> > afraid I can't do much to help you.
> >
> 
> Sorry, should have checked that.. It still segfaults with the nv
> driver. I have built the lyx-xforms by hand with debug enabled,
> and there is no further info, but it still segfaults.
> 
> It looks a bit like this:
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html
> 
> Although not affecting as many apps..

Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm
reassigning it to libx11-6.

-- 
Pelle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]