Processed: Re: Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 509034 moreinfo Bug #509034 [xserver-xorg-video-ati] ATI driver of poor flash video performance Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 509034: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509034 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129830971918839.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
tag 509034 moreinfo thanks Brice Goglin (15/07/2010): > ati driver 6.13.1, KMS, kernel 2.6.32 with DRM from 2.6.33 in > testing, 2.6.34 in experimental And now: ati 6.14.0, kernel 2.6.37, etc. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
On 09.07.2010 23:45, Brice.Goglin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:34:29PM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote: >>> Hm, I have tested with nVidia TNT2 32M, and the result is very similar. It >>> may not be fault of ATI driver. However, tested with Ubuntu 8.10, installed >>> the recommended Adobe Flash Plugin 10, it works fine. Could it possibly be >>> an issue of some plugin? >> >> Maybe, it's hard to say. >> Do you still have problems with latest X packages from unstable ? > > Ping? > > Brice Hi, something new? Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c3ebadc.8030...@misbb.sk
Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
Le 15/07/2010 09:38, Peter Tuhársky a écrit : > On 09.07.2010 23:45, Brice.Goglin wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:34:29PM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote: >>> Hm, I have tested with nVidia TNT2 32M, and the result is very similar. It may not be fault of ATI driver. However, tested with Ubuntu 8.10, installed the recommended Adobe Flash Plugin 10, it works fine. Could it possibly be an issue of some plugin? >>> Maybe, it's hard to say. >>> Do you still have problems with latest X packages from unstable ? >>> >> Ping? >> >> Brice >> > Hi, > something new? > ati driver 6.13.1, KMS, kernel 2.6.32 with DRM from 2.6.33 in testing, 2.6.34 in experimental Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c3ec08e.20...@ens-lyon.org
Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:34:29PM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote: > > Hm, I have tested with nVidia TNT2 32M, and the result is very similar. It > > may not be fault of ATI driver. However, tested with Ubuntu 8.10, installed > > the recommended Adobe Flash Plugin 10, it works fine. Could it possibly be > > an issue of some plugin? > > Maybe, it's hard to say. > Do you still have problems with latest X packages from unstable ? Ping? Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100709214534.ga12...@inria.fr
Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 08:34:29PM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote: > Hm, I have tested with nVidia TNT2 32M, and the result is very similar. It > may not be fault of ATI driver. However, tested with Ubuntu 8.10, installed > the recommended Adobe Flash Plugin 10, it works fine. Could it possibly be > an issue of some plugin? Maybe, it's hard to say. Do you still have problems with latest X packages from unstable. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100306112101.ga29...@loulous.org
Bug#509034: ATI driver of poor flash video performance
Peter Tuhársky wrote: > > Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati > > Version: 1:6.9.0-1+lenny4 > > > > Go to the website > > http://video.markiza.sk/tv-archiv/telerano/22158 > > and play back some flash video (the "real" or "big" videos have > playback controls available on the bottom, the advertisement videos > don't -the problem is with the "big" videos). The playback is less > than a slide show, CPU is 100% used (AMD Sempron 2200+), the top shows > 65% CPU activity for X.org process. > I don't see any problem on my Radeon X300 (but the machine is faster than yours). And I am not sure I am playing the right video... Please send your xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log. Also make sure you're using Flash plugin 10 here as well since your other mail wasn't very clear about the version you used on radeon. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#509034: (ATI driver of poor flash video performance)
Hm, I have tested with nVidia TNT2 32M, and the result is very similar. It may not be fault of ATI driver. However, tested with Ubuntu 8.10, installed the recommended Adobe Flash Plugin 10, it works fine. Could it possibly be an issue of some plugin? Peter
