Bug#519221: libpixman-1-0: libpixman in testing (0.14.0) causes terminal to be unusably slow (with regression test)

2010-04-11 Thread Alexander Dorokhine
Hi,

I don't think I'm going to be in a position to test this bug again.
I'm running a different card with a different driver, and also a
different desktop environment now. Maybe it's best to just close it
since I can't provide the info you need.

Sorry about that,
Alexander



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/u2l87855ac61004111500gfe00e4a5mad2454c554b03...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#519221: libpixman-1-0: libpixman in testing (0.14.0) causes terminal to be unusably slow (with regression test)

2009-05-20 Thread Soeren Sandmann
Arren Lex  writes:

> Thanks for your reply;
> 
> Two days ago I switched video cards with another computer, and I no
> longer see this problem. I will try to reproduce it on the other
> machine, or, at worst, switch the cards back for this test, but
> because of this there will be a slight delay before I can give you
> results.
> 
> Should I be doing anything in particular on my computer while this
> profiler runs? How long should I let it run before I click the profile
> button?

Just do the thing that was slow in the terminal. Letting it run for a
couple of thousand samples should be fine. Note that you'll need
debuginfo for both the server and pixman.

> Are there any other tests you want me to run while I have my old
> card?

I susepct the problem can be worked around by setting AccelMethod XAA
in xorg.conf; you may want to verify that.

Thanks,



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#519221: libpixman-1-0: libpixman in testing (0.14.0) causes terminal to be unusably slow (with regression test)

2009-05-20 Thread Arren Lex
Thanks for your reply;

Two days ago I switched video cards with another computer, and I no
longer see this problem. I will try to reproduce it on the other
machine, or, at worst, switch the cards back for this test, but
because of this there will be a slight delay before I can give you
results.

Should I be doing anything in particular on my computer while this
profiler runs? How long should I let it run before I click the profile
button?

Are there any other tests you want me to run while I have my old card?

Thanks,
Alex.

2009/5/19 Julien Cristau :
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 20:06:23 -0600, Arren Lex wrote:
>
>> I am tracking testing. Recently after the release of lenny I noticed
>> that my terminal emulator
>> (konsole) became almost unusably slow. The lines refresh about twice
>> as fast as I can read them
>> -- that is, when I do 'ls', I can almost follow along as the output appears!
>>
> Hi Arren,
>
> Søren (upstream maintainer of pixman, CCed) would like to see sysprof
> output with pixman 0.10.0 and 0.12.0, or pixman 0.12.0 with and without
> sse2 optimization.  Would you be willing to provide that?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Julien
>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#519221: libpixman-1-0: libpixman in testing (0.14.0) causes terminal to be unusably slow (with regression test)

2009-05-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 20:06:23 -0600, Arren Lex wrote:

> I am tracking testing. Recently after the release of lenny I noticed
> that my terminal emulator
> (konsole) became almost unusably slow. The lines refresh about twice
> as fast as I can read them
> -- that is, when I do 'ls', I can almost follow along as the output appears!
> 
Hi Arren,

Søren (upstream maintainer of pixman, CCed) would like to see sysprof
output with pixman 0.10.0 and 0.12.0, or pixman 0.12.0 with and without
sse2 optimization.  Would you be willing to provide that?

Thanks in advance,
Julien



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#519221: libpixman-1-0: libpixman in testing (0.14.0) causes terminal to be unusably slow (with regression test)

2009-03-10 Thread Arren Lex
Package: libpixman-1-0
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: important

I am tracking testing. Recently after the release of lenny I noticed
that my terminal emulator
(konsole) became almost unusably slow. The lines refresh about twice
as fast as I can read them
-- that is, when I do 'ls', I can almost follow along as the output appears!

After some testing I have narrowed it to libpixman-1-0. I checked out
the git and did a bisect,
and determined the problem is the following commit:

92ef26dfed3337831dd5156bfe0d20b132a26a29 is first bad commit
commit 92ef26dfed3337831dd5156bfe0d20b132a26a29
Author: André Tupinambá 
Date:   Wed Apr 23 00:18:39 2008 -0400

Add SSE2 implementations of many compositing operations.

:100644 100644 0f52b87fa20e215a1cbd7e77928686c8c5686940
637f835221631b0f3d79d8f0f3b256883d34770b M  configure.ac
:04 04 8a345622711e2e9c7a357a702635bb1e052bf10a
8844fa5f04805106ede92dab9db61f2fd95bacea M  pixman


This happened a bit after the version 0.11.1 tag (lenny has 0.10.0 and
squeeze has 0.14.0).
I hope this can be fixed, as it makes my terminal incredibly frustrating to use.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (1001, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libpixman-1-0 depends on:
ii  libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

libpixman-1-0 recommends no packages.

libpixman-1-0 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org