Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
> Until fixed packages reach the archive, nvidia and fglrx users should > stick to mesa 7.10.2-3 packages, currently available in testing. Sorry for the noise, just found what I've missed ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110623003909.ga17...@lenovo.hq.fstein.net
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
The libgl1-mesa-glx with Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives results in problems for nvidia users: Since packages like xorg, x11-utils, ... directly depend on "libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1", users are forced to uninstall them as well as higher level packages depending on them due to nvidia-glx. For example: Install metapackage xorg on current vanilla sid. Then try to install nvidia-glx, which will result in this conflict. Is there something I'm missing? Looks like there are some libgl1* packages which are not ready for this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110622232642.ga9...@lenovo.hq.fstein.net
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Am 17.06.2011 10:25, schrieb Patrick Matthäi: > Am 17.06.2011 09:41, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: >> Hi Mario. >> >> Mario Palomo (17/06/2011): >>> […] >>> So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too. >> >> I know. The question is which package and which version. I suspect >> fglrx-glx(*), but no idea when a multiarch-aware version will be >> released, and with which version number. >> >> Adding uploaders to cc now, in case alioth lists are not fully up >> to speed. > > Hi, I already read your request yesterday. I hope I will find some time > for fglrx this weekend, but I do not know. The problem is, that I need > some more different changes, since AMD changed some internal. > > So it would be nice to give us some time :) No need for more time, already spend too much time with this multiarch foo and now it again just searches in u/l/xorg/* for drivers, no interest. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfbde3b.9020...@debian.org
Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Am 17.06.2011 11:16, schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
Patrick Matthäi (17/06/2011):
It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly)
Wild guess, we need a Breaks on: fglrx-glx (<< 1:11-6-1)
from libgl1-mesa-glx, correct?
It is right, that fglrx-glx-ia32 is no longer needed then so that I just
can install the i386 and amd64 libs with the fglrx-glx/amd64 package in
/usr/lib/{xwhateveramd,xwhateveri386} ? If yes, the breaks would be correct
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfb2113.9000...@debian.org
Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Patrick Matthäi (17/06/2011): > It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly) Wild guess, we need a Breaks on: fglrx-glx (<< 1:11-6-1) from libgl1-mesa-glx, correct? Not sure how your stuff works. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Patrick Matthäi (17/06/2011): > It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly) Ah, giving you more time = 1 minute and 19 seconds? Fine. :D Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Patrick Matthäi (17/06/2011): > So it would be nice to give us some time :) In which case that's going to be for the next revision. Please file your own bug against src:mesa once you know what you need. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630710: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Am 17.06.2011 09:43, schrieb Julien Cristau: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 00:57:14 +0200, Mario Palomo wrote: Cyril Brulebois (16/06/2011): I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we received some days ago. FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be the time to request it. :) I have FGLRX installed and composition work in KDE (¿software emulated?), but glxinfo output is: $ glxinfo name of display: :0 Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig And I can't run 3D software like blender. Now, this is workaround for me: # apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dev=7.10.2-3 libgl1-mesa-dri=7.10.2-3 libgl1-mesa-glx=7.10.2-3 libglu1-mesa=7.10.2-3 libglu1-mesa-dev=7.10.2-3 mesa-common-dev=7.10.2-3 So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too. We can add that, if we know what the fixed version is going to be... It should be 1:11-6-1 (where it will be fixed hopefuly) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfb0fb0.9040...@debian.org
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Am 17.06.2011 09:41, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: Hi Mario. Mario Palomo (17/06/2011): […] So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too. I know. The question is which package and which version. I suspect fglrx-glx(*), but no idea when a multiarch-aware version will be released, and with which version number. Adding uploaders to cc now, in case alioth lists are not fully up to speed. Hi, I already read your request yesterday. I hope I will find some time for fglrx this weekend, but I do not know. The problem is, that I need some more different changes, since AMD changed some internal. So it would be nice to give us some time :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dfb0f61.9000...@debian.org
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 00:57:14 +0200, Mario Palomo wrote: > Cyril Brulebois (16/06/2011): > > I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we > > received some days ago. > > > > FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be the time to request it. :) > > I have FGLRX installed and composition work in KDE (¿software > emulated?), but glxinfo output is: > $ glxinfo > name of display: :0 > Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig > > And I can't run 3D software like blender. > > Now, this is workaround for me: > # apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dev=7.10.2-3 libgl1-mesa-dri=7.10.2-3 > libgl1-mesa-glx=7.10.2-3 libglu1-mesa=7.10.2-3 > libglu1-mesa-dev=7.10.2-3 mesa-common-dev=7.10.2-3 > > So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too. > We can add that, if we know what the fixed version is going to be... Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110617074324.ga21...@coloquinte.cristau.org
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Hi Mario. Mario Palomo (17/06/2011): > […] > So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too. I know. The question is which package and which version. I suspect fglrx-glx(*), but no idea when a multiarch-aware version will be released, and with which version number. Adding uploaders to cc now, in case alioth lists are not fully up to speed. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Cyril Brulebois (16/06/2011): > I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we > received some days ago. > > FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be the time to request it. :) I have FGLRX installed and composition work in KDE (¿software emulated?), but glxinfo output is: $ glxinfo name of display: :0 Error: couldn't find RGB GLX visual or fbconfig And I can't run 3D software like blender. Now, this is workaround for me: # apt-get install libgl1-mesa-dev=7.10.2-3 libgl1-mesa-dri=7.10.2-3 libgl1-mesa-glx=7.10.2-3 libglu1-mesa=7.10.2-3 libglu1-mesa-dev=7.10.2-3 mesa-common-dev=7.10.2-3 So, I think that FGLRX needs a Breaks too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktiksnogs1buljhvkrnzfpum2juc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Hi Andreas, Andreas Beckmann (16/06/2011): > could you add >Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1) > to libgl1-mesa-glx? (Best before the multiarch change moves to testing). I'll try and get that done tomorrow, along with the CXXFLAGS patch we received some days ago. FGLRX folks, want a Breaks too? Now would be the time to request it. :) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#630710: please add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1)
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx Version: 7.10.2-4 Severity: normal Hi KiBi, could you add Breaks: libgl1-nvidia-alternatives (<= 275.09.07-1) to libgl1-mesa-glx? (Best before the multiarch change moves to testing). The multiarch move of MESA breaks current diversion handling (many bugreports). I'm working on updates (but this will have to go through NEW), but for now people could keep working nvidia systems using the Xorg/MESA versions in testing. 275.09.07-1 is a new upstream release to be uploaded soon and will be the last version without a multiarch mesa fix. Thanks Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110616131209.29078.82260.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
