Re: CVS X debs for sid.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First off, I'm going to say that these are i386 only, and that the sources will not build for other arches until someone gets all of the patches for said arch to apply against the CVS tree, updates the manifest files, and a few other things. Secondly I am going to stress that if you install these you WILL NOT file ANY bug reports on anything that so much as a ls on any X files, let alone on X itself or programs that run under X. (I have this thing about breathing, I like doing it, and if I survive this I know I would not survive if someone were to file bug reports with these installed.) Thirdly you should be aware that these are from X CVS, and are thus likely to be a bit unstable, you have been warned. Yet another XFree86 CVS .debs for sid on the apt line bellow: deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/ deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/ deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/ They are semi-automatic built every day (on i386) The are test to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/sparc/hppa/sh4 and already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/hppa. TODO: bumped up version number. more, more and more cleanup cleanup source tar ball (tar balls are it still contains some non DFSG fonts). cleaup patches some pending staff - Is #100 PCI domain patch needed? current XFree86 CVS have PCI domain support. - Is #102 type6_kdb_xf86Events needed? It is already reported to BTS. - cleanup fonts.alias (#12 patch) on SPARC remove some unresolve vgaHW* function calls. update MANIFEST on other plat homes. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:20:39AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Yet another XFree86 CVS .debs for sid on the apt line bellow: deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/ deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/ deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/ They are semi-automatic built every day (on i386) The are test to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/sparc/hppa/sh4 and already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/hppa. Interesting, did you disable the various sanity checks on the patches and the manifest stuff, or go through and make it all work with them? I'm actually going back to readd some of the fonts either later today or tomorrow as it seems that some I removed as DFSG non-free are actually not copyrightable and are thus free. Zephaniah E. Hull. TODO: bumped up version number. more, more and more cleanup cleanup source tar ball (tar balls are it still contains some non DFSG fonts). cleaup patches some pending staff - Is #100 PCI domain patch needed? current XFree86 CVS have PCI domain support. - Is #102 type6_kdb_xf86Events needed? It is already reported to BTS. - cleanup fonts.alias (#12 patch) on SPARC remove some unresolve vgaHW* function calls. update MANIFEST on other plat homes. -- 1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] 92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801 CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested. Sir, barked one of those useless aristocratic generals to William Howard Russell, the great Times war correspondent, I do not like what you write. Then, sir, retorted Russell, I suggest you do not do what I write about. msg05052/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)] On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:20:39AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Yet another XFree86 CVS .debs for sid on the apt line bellow: deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/ deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/ deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/ They are semi-automatic built every day (on i386) The are test to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/sparc/hppa/sh4 and already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/hppa. Interesting, did you disable the various sanity checks on the patches and the manifest stuff, or go through and make it all work with them? Patches sanity checks is disabled on this source. But MANIFEST check is enabled. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:09:26AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Patches sanity checks is disabled on this source. You may wish to lift my patch changes then. (With the exception of 09[23] and 908. 092 and 093 are evdev input patches which I have not sent upstream yet, you might of might not want them. 908 will be ready for taking for font exclusion tomorrow, right now it kills too much.) I did not do the arch specific ones because I can't test them, however they all apply cleanly, some of them without changes, er, did /not/ do the right thing. Zephaniah E. Hull. But MANIFEST check is enabled. -- 1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] 92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801 CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested. I am ecstatic that some moron re-invented a 1995 windows fuckup. -- Alan Cox msg05054/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
Neat. I've mirrored the binaries at: deb http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/users/tom/mirrors/x_cvs/ ./ deb-src http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/users/tom/mirrors/x_cvs/ ./ This is updated daily. --Tom Joseph On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 08:53, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: First off, I'm going to say that these are i386 only, and that the sources will not build for other arches until someone gets all of the patches for said arch to apply against the CVS tree, updates the manifest files, and a few other things. Secondly I am going to stress that if you install these you WILL NOT file ANY bug reports on anything that so much as a ls on any X files, let alone on X itself or programs that run under X. (I have this thing about breathing, I like doing it, and if I survive this I know I would not survive if someone were to file bug reports with these installed.) Thirdly you should be aware that these are from X CVS, and are thus likely to be a bit unstable, you have been warned. Now, with that out of the way, on to the main event. YOU WILL NOT FILE ANY BUG REPORTS ABOUT SYSTEMS WITH THESE PACKAGES INSTALLED. deb http://people.debian.org/%7Ewarp/x_cvs/ ./ deb-src http://people.debian.org/%7Ewarp/x_cvs/ ./ YOU WILL NOT FILE ANY BUG REPORTS ABOUT SYSTEMS WITH THESE PACKAGES INSTALLED. These are clean replacements for all packages generated from the XFree86 source package. Several fonts that exist in the official debs are NOT in these for copyright reasons, see the bug about it and the post to -legal, hopefully either the copyrights will be straightened out and I will re-add them, or Branden will pull them from the official debs, I don't really care. If you are using these debs I would appreciate knowing about it. Zephaniah E. Hull. P.S.: YOU WILL NOT FILE ANY BUG REPORTS IF YOU HAVE THESE PACKAGES INSTALLED!!! -- Tom Joseph Archive Maintainer Wuarchive - http://wuarchive.wustl.edu
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First off, I'm going to say that these are i386 only, and that the sources will not build for other arches until someone gets all of the patches for said arch to apply against the CVS tree, updates the manifest files, and a few other things. Secondly I am going to stress that if you install these you WILL NOT file ANY bug reports on anything that so much as a ls on any X files, let alone on X itself or programs that run under X. (I have this thing about breathing, I like doing it, and if I survive this I know I would not survive if someone were to file bug reports with these installed.) Thirdly you should be aware that these are from X CVS, and are thus likely to be a bit unstable, you have been warned. Yet another XFree86 CVS .debs for sid on the apt line bellow: deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/ deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/ deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/ They are semi-automatic built every day (on i386) The are test to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/sparc/hppa/sh4 and already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/hppa. TODO: bumped up version number. more, more and more cleanup cleanup source tar ball (tar balls are it still contains some non DFSG fonts). cleaup patches some pending staff - Is #100 PCI domain patch needed? current XFree86 CVS have PCI domain support. - Is #102 type6_kdb_xf86Events needed? It is already reported to BTS. - cleanup fonts.alias (#12 patch) on SPARC remove some unresolve vgaHW* function calls. update MANIFEST on other plat homes. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)] On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:20:39AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Yet another XFree86 CVS .debs for sid on the apt line bellow: deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/ deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/ deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/ They are semi-automatic built every day (on i386) The are test to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/sparc/hppa/sh4 and already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/m68k/hppa. Interesting, did you disable the various sanity checks on the patches and the manifest stuff, or go through and make it all work with them? Patches sanity checks is disabled on this source. But MANIFEST check is enabled. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVS X debs for sid.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:09:26AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Patches sanity checks is disabled on this source. You may wish to lift my patch changes then. (With the exception of 09[23] and 908. 092 and 093 are evdev input patches which I have not sent upstream yet, you might of might not want them. 908 will be ready for taking for font exclusion tomorrow, right now it kills too much.) I did not do the arch specific ones because I can't test them, however they all apply cleanly, some of them without changes, er, did /not/ do the right thing. Zephaniah E. Hull. But MANIFEST check is enabled. -- 1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED] 92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801 CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested. I am ecstatic that some moron re-invented a 1995 windows fuckup. -- Alan Cox pgp9yoYns3VGf.pgp Description: PGP signature
