Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-08 Thread djw
Well, k6 will work just fine for athlon. Looks like k7 is either removed
or buggy.

-- 
**  Derek J Witt**
*   Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
*   Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/   *
*** Houston, the Eagle has landed and laid an egg! -- Unknown **



Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-07 Thread Michael Meding

Hi there,


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 there's a different flag for athlon, it's -march=k7 (vs. -march=k6 for
  ^^^ guess that is not
going to work with gcc-2.95.2.

So what is best for athlon (classic, duron, thunderbird) then ? Took
some from www.athlonlinux.org but I am still not quite sure how to
produce fastest code with gcc-2.95.2 for athlons.

Anybody any ideas ?


Thanks in advance.


Greetings


Michael Meding


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-07 Thread Seth Arnold

* Michael Meding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001107 19:50]:
[..athlon..]
 Anybody any ideas ?

Chances are good there will be very few ideas coming from debian-x. Try
google, usenet, gcc mailling lists, perhaps debian-user. (Sadly, the gcc
manpage didn't seem to shout the right answer to me. It did mention
loads of other CPU types though...)

-- 
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-07 Thread djw

Well, k6 will work just fine for athlon. Looks like k7 is either removed
or buggy.

-- 
**  Derek J Witt**
*   Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
*   Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/   *
*** "Houston, the Eagle has landed and laid an egg!" -- Unknown **


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-07 Thread Michael Meding
Hi there,


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 there's a different flag for athlon, it's -march=k7 (vs. -march=k6 for
  ^^^ guess that is not
going to work with gcc-2.95.2.

So what is best for athlon (classic, duron, thunderbird) then ? Took
some from www.athlonlinux.org but I am still not quite sure how to
produce fastest code with gcc-2.95.2 for athlons.

Anybody any ideas ?


Thanks in advance.


Greetings


Michael Meding



Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-07 Thread Michael Meding
Hi Seth,

Seth Arnold wrote:
 
 * Michael Meding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001107 19:50]:
 [..athlon..]
  Anybody any ideas ?
 
 Chances are good there will be very few ideas coming from debian-x. Try
 google, usenet, gcc mailling lists, perhaps debian-user. (Sadly, the gcc
 manpage didn't seem to shout the right answer to me. It did mention
 loads of other CPU types though...)

Sure that may be the case. But maybe there is somebody also trying to
figure out
which compiler flags to use to get the most optimized *.deb files for XF
and maybe also
doing benchmarks on it.

With best regards


Michael Meding



Re: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1 -- OT

2000-11-07 Thread Seth Arnold
* Michael Meding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001107 19:50]:
[..athlon..]
 Anybody any ideas ?

Chances are good there will be very few ideas coming from debian-x. Try
google, usenet, gcc mailling lists, perhaps debian-user. (Sadly, the gcc
manpage didn't seem to shout the right answer to me. It did mention
loads of other CPU types though...)

-- 
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''