Re: Proposed debconf templates rewrite to follow the Developer's Reference 6.5

2006-05-10 Thread Stepan Golosunov
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
 I personnally prefer experimented over advanced because advanced
 is negative towards other users.

What is experimented user? Did you mean experienced?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Proposed debconf templates rewrite to follow the Developer's Reference 6.5

2006-05-10 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2006 11:07, Stepan Golosunov escribió:
 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
  I personnally prefer experimented over advanced because advanced
  is negative towards other users.

 What is experimented user? Did you mean experienced?

Heh, I think so. In French/Spanish, we would say experimented, as we do 
not 
have different forms for this word as English has. :-)


Ender.
-- 
Los sistemas me pasado los correos de las personas contradas pero los 
@red.es.
-- Jesús Sanz de las Heras (RedIRIS).
--
Desarrollador de Debian
Debian developer


pgpQTniI3mwFt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Proposed debconf templates rewrite to follow the Developer's Reference 6.5

2006-05-10 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2006 08:21, Christian Perrier escribió:
 I already mentioned here and there that the xorg package debconf
 templates do not follow the recommendations given in the developer's
 reference, which are mostly aimed at achieving overall writing style
 consistency in questions seen by users.

 Attached to this mail is a rewrite of the two .templates files
 currently used in xorg's SVN.

 I included a diff file for both and both individual files. All
 compressed for size reasonssorry if that make quoting a little
 more complicated for some of you.

 I've just subscribed to debian-x to follow the discussion in case
 comments are made (and I hope there'll be some!).

 As those of you who know me well can guess, I also propose to handle
 the translation update round that will follow if these changes (or
 even some of them) are applied...

 Rationale, change by change (similar changes are explained only once):

I do not have any problem with the proposed changes.

Best regards,


Ender.
-- 
Another C-3PO: E chu ta!
C-3PO: How rude!
-- C-3PO (The Empire Strikes Back).
--
Desarrollador de Debian
Debian developer


pgpj7Rxy86AEE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Proposed debconf templates rewrite to follow the Developer's Reference 6.5

2006-05-10 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Stepan Golosunov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
  I personnally prefer experimented over advanced because advanced
  is negative towards other users.
 
 What is experimented user? Did you mean experienced?


Yep. Guess why I have proposed the rewrite for review...:-)

/me happily s/experimented/experienced



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature