Re: xfree4.0.1 - xlib6g depends on xlibs-dev

2000-09-24 Thread Patrick Mauritz

On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:18:25PM +0200, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
  I'm just downloading your packages of xf401. Why is there a dependency of
  xlib6g-dev to xlibs-dev? xlibs-dev is quite large and I don't think that
  static libraries are really required to compile some x-apps
 
 Please review Debian policy.  Static libraries are shipped in -dev packages.
no problem with that - but aren't static libraries optional? (esp. when they are as
big as xlib)
atm they are required to install xlib6g-dev (where I expect the headers of xlib6
to work with shared-libs)

please tell me, if I missed something

P. Mauritz


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: xfree4.0.1 - xlib6g depends on xlibs-dev

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
Please send messages to the debian-x mailing list, not to me privately.

On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:18:25PM +0200, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
 I'm just downloading your packages of xf401. Why is there a dependency of
 xlib6g-dev to xlibs-dev? xlibs-dev is quite large and I don't think that
 static libraries are really required to compile some x-apps

Please review Debian policy.  Static libraries are shipped in -dev packages.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|Any man who does not realize that he is
Debian GNU/Linux   |half an animal is only half a man.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |-- Thornton Wilder
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |


pgp02PXxAWeaX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: xfree4.0.1 - xlib6g depends on xlibs-dev

2000-09-24 Thread Patrick Mauritz
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:18:25PM +0200, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
  I'm just downloading your packages of xf401. Why is there a dependency of
  xlib6g-dev to xlibs-dev? xlibs-dev is quite large and I don't think that
  static libraries are really required to compile some x-apps
 
 Please review Debian policy.  Static libraries are shipped in -dev packages.
no problem with that - but aren't static libraries optional? (esp. when they 
are as
big as xlib)
atm they are required to install xlib6g-dev (where I expect the headers of xlib6
to work with shared-libs)

please tell me, if I missed something

P. Mauritz



Re: xfree4.0.1 - xlib6g depends on xlibs-dev

2000-09-24 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 10:24:44AM +0200, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
 On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:07:34AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
  Please review Debian policy.  Static libraries are shipped in -dev packages.
 no problem with that - but aren't static libraries optional? (esp. when they 
 are as
 big as xlib)

No, and even if they were I'd still ship them.

 atm they are required to install xlib6g-dev (where I expect the headers of 
 xlib6
 to work with shared-libs)
 
 please tell me, if I missed something

You missed the fact that my X packages are going to comply with Debian
policy come hell or high water.  You might as well take your complaint to
debian-policy, since it's the policy you're having a problem with.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux| // // //  / /
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | EI 'AANIIGOO 'AHOOT'E
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgpM2z4u3vr6W.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: xfree4.0.1 - xlib6g depends on xlibs-dev

2000-09-24 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
 please tell me, if I missed something
 
yes - you did.
branden answered this question about two or three times in the last few
days ...
look at the list archives.

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Real programmers don't comment their code.
It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.
--
Become part of the world's biggest computer cluster - 
join http://www.distributed.net/



Re: XFree4.0.1

2000-07-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 09:54:40PM +0200, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
  Hi, i just installed the .debs and i've encountered the following
  problems so far:
 
  - xpm4g had to be removed, some packages referred to it.. i
  removed them too. they probably should depend to
  libxpm4, isn't it?

Many packages depend on the old xpm package name; they should use libxpm4
instead.  If they are rebuilt against a recent version of xpm4g, they will
get the correct dependencies.

Or, once we're in Phase 3 (release of XFree86 4.0.1 to woody), these
packages can simply be built against xlib6g.

  - some minor dependency problems... mesag3 was involved

Not sure yet exactly what Conflicts/Replaces/Provides dance I need to do to
make this smooth; I've got some but apparently it isn't enough.  I guess I
should talk to James Treacy about it.

  - maybe the debs should Conflict with other server-card.deb

No, there is no need to conflict with the 3.x servers.  We will be able to
support both (and we should, see the XFree86 4.x Driver Status document).

  - I had to move the XF86Config file in the right place

That should not have been necessary; see the XF86Config manual page.

  - i had to add XFree86 in  Xserver

/usr/bin/X11/XFree86 ?  Yes, that will be necessary for a little while.

  - the server tried to retrieve SecurityPolicy in the wrong path,
  a symlink solved. 

That should not have happened.  I also haven't had this problem myself.
What error did you get?  Did you uninstall all of your XFree86 3.x .debs
before installing these, as the README tells you to?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   What influenced me to atheism was
Debian GNU/Linux   |   reading the Bible cover to cover.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   Twice.
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ |   -- J. Michael Straczynski


pgpLIvVqFxN7w.pgp
Description: PGP signature