Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
 Hi,
 
  In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just 
copied the 
patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 
4.2.99.3 
package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
   
   As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.
 
  Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
  required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
  on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
  on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
  work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
  with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
  on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
  available).
 
  Where I can download these packages and sources?
 
  I'm also working to update patches for xfree86.deb to next version.
  They are already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/hppa/m68k,
 and also testing on sparc(but does not complete yet.)
 
  deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/
  deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/
  deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/
 
  I want to merge these works to your experimental package, if I can.

Hi Ishikawa-san!
My packages (i386/powerpc) are available at:
deb http://capricorn.woot.net/~daniels/current/sid/$(ARCH)/ ./

I plan to do sarge and woody backports soon, too. I'm in the middle of
making -2, which will fix the conflict with Xft2, fix the unclean
upgrade issue, split Mesa and xlibs as Branden is doing, and more.

Enjoy, and thankyou!
:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne


pgpwuXseptWoG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-09 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
 Hi,
 
  In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the 
patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
   
   As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.
 
  Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
  required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
  on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
  on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
  work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
  with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
  on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
  available).
 
  Where I can download these packages and sources?
 
  I'm also working to update patches for xfree86.deb to next version.
  They are already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/hppa/m68k,
 and also testing on sparc(but does not complete yet.)
 
  deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/
  deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/
  deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/
 
  I want to merge these works to your experimental package, if I can.

Hi Ishikawa-san!
My packages (i386/powerpc) are available at:
deb http://capricorn.woot.net/~daniels/current/sid/$(ARCH)/ ./

I plan to do sarge and woody backports soon, too. I'm in the middle of
making -2, which will fix the conflict with Xft2, fix the unclean
upgrade issue, split Mesa and xlibs as Branden is doing, and more.

Enjoy, and thankyou!
:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne



msg05270/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
 
  In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
   On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
  vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
  hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).
 
  e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.

Does it have to be dummy? We don't have legacy hardware on PowerMacs
either, but we have a (partly at least) working vgaHW, though I think it
depends on some kernel support which may not be available on sparc.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-05 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 In 1041815288.1927.18.camel@thor 
   Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:

On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
   vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
   hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).
  
   e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.

 Does it have to be dummy? We don't have legacy hardware on PowerMacs
 either, but we have a (partly at least) working vgaHW, though I think it
 depends on some kernel support which may not be available on sparc.

 Perhaps, No it doesn't. It is an example. Currently I don't know
detail about `we should implement vgaHW* functions as full functions?,
dummy? or other way??'

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-05 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
 
  In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
 
   On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
  vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
  hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).
 
  e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.

Does it have to be dummy? We don't have legacy hardware on PowerMacs
either, but we have a (partly at least) working vgaHW, though I think it
depends on some kernel support which may not be available on sparc.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast



Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-05 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Son, 2003-01-05 at 03:10, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:

On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
   vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
   hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).
  
   e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.

 Does it have to be dummy? We don't have legacy hardware on PowerMacs
 either, but we have a (partly at least) working vgaHW, though I think it
 depends on some kernel support which may not be available on sparc.

 Perhaps, No it doesn't. It is an example. Currently I don't know
detail about `we should implement vgaHW* functions as full functions?,
dummy? or other way??'

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-04 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 03:54:26PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi scrawled:
  In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the 
patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
   
   As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.
 
  Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
  required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
  on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
  on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
  work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
  with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
  on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
  available).
 
  Where I can download these packages and sources?
 
  I'm also working to update patches for xfree86.deb to next version.
  They are already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/hppa/m68k,
 and also testing on sparc(but does not complete yet.)
 
  deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/
  deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/
  deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/
 
  I want to merge these works to your experimental package, if I can.

Hi Ishikawa,
I'm currently experiencing severe problems with Freetype, but everything
else is working out perfectly. Once I sort out the Freetype mess, I'll
send you a sources list. My packages currently work on i386 and powerpc,
and will eventually work on hppa. How complete and tested are your
packages?

-- 
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer - http://kopete.kde.org, http://www.kde.org



msg05185/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi,

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Ishikawa,
 I'm currently experiencing severe problems with Freetype, but everything
 else is working out perfectly. Once I sort out the Freetype mess, I'll
 send you a sources list.

 Thanks :-)

  My packages currently work on i386 and powerpc,
 and will eventually work on hppa. How complete and tested are your
 packages?

 My packages works fine for me (and for some testers) on i386
environment (radeon, i830 drivers are very well tested).
But I'm also experience Xft (or fontconfig?) related problem.
Mozilla-xft shows Japanese YEN mark incorrectly (YEN mark displays
as double-wide ' mark)

(XF86Config parser is also broken currently, but this is fixed in
today's CVS commit.)

 On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).

 Broken drivers list for sparc:

  Standard drivers: (ati is fixed by #082 patch)

   vga, vesa, mga, tdfx, (ati)

  Devel drivers: (perhaps we will drop to support them for sparc when release)

   apm, ark, chips, cirrus, i128, i740,  neomagic, nv, rendition,
   s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, trident, vmware

 On alpha/m68k/powerpc/hppa plathome, I've done `build test' only.
(I'll test them after finish to solve sparc issue...)

 Anyone interest to test them on these plathome?

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Humm...

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

  On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
 vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
 hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).

 e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.

Sorry...

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi,

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
   debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just 
   copied the 
   patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 
   4.2.99.3 
   package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
   conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
  
  As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.

 Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
 required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
 on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
 on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
 work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
 with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
 on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
 available).

 Where I can download these packages and sources?

 I'm also working to update patches for xfree86.deb to next version.
 They are already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/hppa/m68k,
and also testing on sparc(but does not complete yet.)

 deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/
 deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/
 deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/

 I want to merge these works to your experimental package, if I can.

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi,

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Ishikawa,
 I'm currently experiencing severe problems with Freetype, but everything
 else is working out perfectly. Once I sort out the Freetype mess, I'll
 send you a sources list.

 Thanks :-)

  My packages currently work on i386 and powerpc,
 and will eventually work on hppa. How complete and tested are your
 packages?

 My packages works fine for me (and for some testers) on i386
environment (radeon, i830 drivers are very well tested).
But I'm also experience Xft (or fontconfig?) related problem.
Mozilla-xft shows Japanese YEN mark incorrectly (YEN mark displays
as double-wide ' mark)

(XF86Config parser is also broken currently, but this is fixed in
today's CVS commit.)

 On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).

 Broken drivers list for sparc:

  Standard drivers: (ati is fixed by #082 patch)

   vga, vesa, mga, tdfx, (ati)

  Devel drivers: (perhaps we will drop to support them for sparc when release)

   apm, ark, chips, cirrus, i128, i740,  neomagic, nv, rendition,
   s3virge, savage, siliconmotion, trident, vmware

 On alpha/m68k/powerpc/hppa plathome, I've done `build test' only.
(I'll test them after finish to solve sparc issue...)

 Anyone interest to test them on these plathome?

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-04 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Humm...

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

  On sparc plathome, I'm not success to build because many drivers uses
 vgaHW* function call. We should write patches like #082 or some other
 hacks (e.g dummy vgaHW* call add to sparc environment).

 e.g dummy vgaHW* functions add to sparc environment.

Sorry...

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
 I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged 
 on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and 
 looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the =900 patches up to speed with 
 4.3. The build system apparently tries to apply patches from the old-patches 
 directory.

Er, no, it doesn't.

 What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
 debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the 
 patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
 package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
 conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?

As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux   |when they take over a country is to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks



msg05177/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-03 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:44:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
 On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
  I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 packaged 
  on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and 
  looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the =900 patches up to speed with 
  4.3. The build system apparently tries to apply patches from the old-patches 
  directory.
 
 Er, no, it doesn't.
 
  What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
  debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the 
  patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
  package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
  conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
 
 As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.

Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
available).

Cheers!
:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer - http://kopete.kde.org, http://www.kde.org



msg05180/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-03 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
Hi,

 In [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
   debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the 
   patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
   package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
   conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
  
  As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.

 Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
 required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
 on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
 on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
 work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
 with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
 on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
 available).

 Where I can download these packages and sources?

 I'm also working to update patches for xfree86.deb to next version.
 They are already success to build on i386/alpha/powerpc/hppa/m68k,
and also testing on sparc(but does not complete yet.)

 deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/$(ARCH)/
 deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/
 deb-src http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/source/

 I want to merge these works to your experimental package, if I can.

-- 
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-03 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
 I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 
 packaged 
 on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and 
 looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the =900 patches up to speed with 
 4.3. The build system apparently tries to apply patches from the old-patches 
 directory.

Er, no, it doesn't.

 What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
 debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied the 
 patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
 package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
 conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?

As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux   |when they take over a country is to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks


pgp54UcK73wGg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: here is an updated patch 908 for 4.2.99.3

2003-01-03 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 04:44:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
 On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:34:45AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
  I didn't see any information about starting work on getting xfree 4.3 
  packaged 
  on the X Strike Force page. Therefore, I am taking a little initiative and 
  looking at patches in the 4.2 and bringing the =900 patches up to speed 
  with 
  4.3. The build system apparently tries to apply patches from the 
  old-patches 
  directory.
 
 Er, no, it doesn't.
 
  What is the proper way to shuffle patches around in the 
  debian/patches and debian/old-patches directories? I actually just copied 
  the 
  patches dir from the 4.2.1 sources to the old-patches dir of the 4.2.99.3 
  package dir. Of course there are lots of conflicts. Should I dump the 
  conflicting patches that do not deal with debian or what?
 
 As I understand it, Daniel Stone is already working on this.

Right. As soon as I sort out with upstream which version of Freetype is
required, I'll hopefully have fully working packages (they were working
on a month-old snapshot, then I updated). I'll aim to keep CVS updating
on a weekly basis, and also include 4.2.99.4, and 4.3.0. Currently they
work on i386 and powerpc, and I've subverted an hppa machine to test
with as well, so it should work on at least 3 architectures (depending
on time constraints, I might also work on the alpha and sparcs I have
available).

Cheers!
:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer - http://kopete.kde.org, http://www.kde.org


pgpwBpx7vSvwu.pgp
Description: PGP signature