Re: patch for arm link failure & MANIFEST problem
hi, On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Thank you so much for doing this! I will have more work for the ARM > porting team soon, heh heh heh... oh, let's hope i can cope with it :). so long Othmar
Re: patch for arm link failure & MANIFEST problem
hi, On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:11:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Thank you so much for doing this! I will have more work for the ARM > porting team soon, heh heh heh... oh, let's hope i can cope with it :). so long Othmar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: patch for arm link failure & MANIFEST problem
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: [...] > anyway, with the great help of Michel Daenzer I created a patch > and it seems to fix it so far, it linked without any errors. what > it does is simply to add a defined(__NetBSD__) to the #if which includes > the include statement for sysarch.h and otherwise just an empty > function. > > patch attached. you can change the name/number of the patch to > your likeing, i am not really creative when it comes to give it > sound names ;). [...] > i have attached the diff of the MANIFEST.arm which just showed up > while buidling the debian packages. hope it's ok. Thank you so much for doing this! I will have more work for the ARM porting team soon, heh heh heh... > btw. is it ok that there were quite many debconf-mergetemplate > messages, dropping things? or whole templates dropped, etc? Yes, this is what happens when translations get out of date. Not much I can do but hope that people send me new ones. -- G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] | contest with a monstrous entity http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | that has sixteen legs and no arse. pgpCtEpX6SUKG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: patch for arm link failure & MANIFEST problem
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: [...] > anyway, with the great help of Michel Daenzer I created a patch > and it seems to fix it so far, it linked without any errors. what > it does is simply to add a defined(__NetBSD__) to the #if which includes > the include statement for sysarch.h and otherwise just an empty > function. > > patch attached. you can change the name/number of the patch to > your likeing, i am not really creative when it comes to give it > sound names ;). [...] > i have attached the diff of the MANIFEST.arm which just showed up > while buidling the debian packages. hope it's ok. Thank you so much for doing this! I will have more work for the ARM porting team soon, heh heh heh... > btw. is it ok that there were quite many debconf-mergetemplate > messages, dropping things? or whole templates dropped, etc? Yes, this is what happens when translations get out of date. Not much I can do but hope that people send me new ones. -- G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] | contest with a monstrous entity http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | that has sixteen legs and no arse. msg03989/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: patch for arm link failure & MANIFEST problem
hi part 2, On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > furthermore, the arm .debs for X 4.2.1 are in > ~othmar/public_html/xfree86_4.2.1-0pre1v2 on gluck if > you want to use them for your X task force. or will be there > shortly. they are already there, so up for being used, or whatever people want to do with them. so long Othmar PS: oh, btw. please CC me always, thanks :).
Re: patch for arm link failure & MANIFEST problem
hi part 2, On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:53:15AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > furthermore, the arm .debs for X 4.2.1 are in > ~othmar/public_html/xfree86_4.2.1-0pre1v2 on gluck if > you want to use them for your X task force. or will be there > shortly. they are already there, so up for being used, or whatever people want to do with them. so long Othmar PS: oh, btw. please CC me always, thanks :). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
