Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T . Steigies" wrote:
> 
> > (II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> > unresolved!
> > Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> > unresolved!
> 
> This smells fishy. The standard libc functions should be wrapped by xf86xxx
> via #defines.
> 
> 
> > Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to
> > the new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?
> 
> It's possible that the X headers get confused by the m68k glibc 2.2 headers.
> I'm afraid you'll have to find out yourself...
I've built it (RC4) again, with glibc2.1 and glibc2.2. Both versions fail
with the memcpy error. And if I have found the place where it come from:
 xfree86-4.0.1pre2.RC4/build-tree/xc/lib/font/bitmap
the source hasn't changes for some time, I wonder why the problem did not
appear with 4.0.1? I know I have to find that out myself... maybe next year.

Christian.



Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-25 Thread Christian T. Steigies

On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 12:37:16PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> "Christian T . Steigies" wrote:
> 
> > (II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> > unresolved!
> > Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> > unresolved!
> 
> This smells fishy. The standard libc functions should be wrapped by xf86xxx
> via #defines.
> 
> 
> > Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to
> > the new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?
> 
> It's possible that the X headers get confused by the m68k glibc 2.2 headers.
> I'm afraid you'll have to find out yourself...
I've built it (RC4) again, with glibc2.1 and glibc2.2. Both versions fail
with the memcpy error. And if I have found the place where it come from:
 xfree86-4.0.1pre2.RC4/build-tree/xc/lib/font/bitmap
the source hasn't changes for some time, I wonder why the problem did not
appear with 4.0.1? I know I have to find that out myself... maybe next year.

Christian.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
"Christian T . Steigies" wrote:

> (II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> unresolved!
> Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> unresolved!

This smells fishy. The standard libc functions should be wrapped by xf86xxx
via #defines.


> Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to
> the new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?

It's possible that the X headers get confused by the m68k glibc 2.2 headers.
I'm afraid you'll have to find out yourself...


Michel


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and The DRI Project



Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-22 Thread Michel Dänzer

"Christian T . Steigies" wrote:

> (II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> unresolved!
> Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> unresolved!

This smells fishy. The standard libc functions should be wrapped by xf86xxx
via #defines.


> Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to
> the new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?

It's possible that the X headers get confused by the m68k glibc 2.2 headers.
I'm afraid you'll have to find out yourself...


Michel


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and The DRI Project


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-21 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:06:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 
> > BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
> > exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
> > downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?
> 
> I don't think there is anything in the X source tree that requires glibc
> 2.2.  X is written to be portable as hell and in any case I don't think
> there's anything new in 2.2 that X really needs.

I never said that X build-depends on glibc 2.2, I said X *depends* on it,
because Branden is building X against glibc 2.2.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'



Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-21 Thread Ben Collins

On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:06:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 
> > BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
> > exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
> > downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?
> 
> I don't think there is anything in the X source tree that requires glibc
> 2.2.  X is written to be portable as hell and in any case I don't think
> there's anything new in 2.2 that X really needs.

I never said that X build-depends on glibc 2.2, I said X *depends* on it,
because Branden is building X against glibc 2.2.

Ben

-- 
 ---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:54:25PM +0100, Christian T . Steigies wrote:
> Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
> unresolved!
> 
> Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 11.  Server aborting
> 
[...]
> 
> I do have some heavy dependency problems, so not all X packages are installed
> properly (ie I have no new xlib6?), xterm depends on xlib6g (>= 3.3-5),
> maybe I have to remove all X packages when building X4.0 (Build-conflicts?)

The "new xlib6" is the xlibs package.  Plus libxaw7 if needed.

> but I think I have enough installed to at least start X.
> Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to the
> new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?

No idea, but I kind of doubt it.

> Since libbitmap is loaded before libpcidata the problem with libpcidata does
> not show up yet? Merdre...
> 
> BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
> exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
> downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?

I don't think there is anything in the X source tree that requires glibc
2.2.  X is written to be portable as hell and in any case I don't think
there's anything new in 2.2 that X really needs.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux|   The noble soul has reverence for itself.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   -- Friedrich Nietzsche
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgptdL5edVlJ3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-21 Thread Christian T . Steigies
Hi,
I have a new problem with my self built X on m68k

XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 14 December 2000
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ)
Operating System: Linux 2.2.17cts m68k [ELF] 
Module Loader present
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 21 20:26:03 2000
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "Generic Monitor"
(**) |   |-->Device "Generic Video Card"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) XKB: model: "pc104"
(**) XKB: layout: "us"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse"
(WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(**) FontPath set to 
"unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
(==) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
(==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
(--) using VT number 7

(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module XFree86 Font Renderer: vendor="XFree86 Font Renderer"
compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is 
unresolved!

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting


When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I do have some heavy dependency problems, so not all X packages are installed
properly (ie I have no new xlib6?), xterm depends on xlib6g (>= 3.3-5),
maybe I have to remove all X packages when building X4.0 (Build-conflicts?)
but I think I have enough installed to at least start X.
Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to the
new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?

Since libbitmap is loaded before libpcidata the problem with libpcidata does
not show up yet? Merdre...

BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?

Anyhow, merry christmas everybody,
Christian



Re: XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-21 Thread Branden Robinson

On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:54:25PM +0100, Christian T . Steigies wrote:
> Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
> 
> Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 11.  Server aborting
> 
[...]
> 
> I do have some heavy dependency problems, so not all X packages are installed
> properly (ie I have no new xlib6?), xterm depends on xlib6g (>= 3.3-5),
> maybe I have to remove all X packages when building X4.0 (Build-conflicts?)

The "new xlib6" is the xlibs package.  Plus libxaw7 if needed.

> but I think I have enough installed to at least start X.
> Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to the
> new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?

No idea, but I kind of doubt it.

> Since libbitmap is loaded before libpcidata the problem with libpcidata does
> not show up yet? Merdre...
> 
> BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
> exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
> downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?

I don't think there is anything in the X source tree that requires glibc
2.2.  X is written to be portable as hell and in any case I don't think
there's anything new in 2.2 that X really needs.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux|   The noble soul has reverence for itself.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   -- Friedrich Nietzsche
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |

 PGP signature


XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3)

2000-12-21 Thread Christian T . Steigies

Hi,
I have a new problem with my self built X on m68k

XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 14 December 2000
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ)
Operating System: Linux 2.2.17cts m68k [ELF] 
Module Loader present
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Thu Dec 21 20:26:03 2000
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "Generic Monitor"
(**) |   |-->Device "Generic Video Card"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) XKB: model: "pc104"
(**) XKB: layout: "us"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse"
(WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(**) FontPath set to 
"unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
(==) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
(==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
(--) using VT number 7

(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module XFree86 Font Renderer: vendor="XFree86 Font Renderer"
compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting


When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I do have some heavy dependency problems, so not all X packages are installed
properly (ie I have no new xlib6?), xterm depends on xlib6g (>= 3.3-5),
maybe I have to remove all X packages when building X4.0 (Build-conflicts?)
but I think I have enough installed to at least start X.
Any idea where this problem could come from? Maybe it could be related to the
new glibc2.2 I installed _before_ building X4.0?

Since libbitmap is loaded before libpcidata the problem with libpcidata does
not show up yet? Merdre...

BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?

Anyhow, merry christmas everybody,
Christian


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]