XFree86 X server and FreeType
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: There are two purposes in this change. 1) FreeType2 incompatible problem between freetype 2.1.4-2 and 2.1.4-3, you described above. It is solved by freetype2_2.1.4-4 package. 2) We would like to use same FreeType2 code between Normal Loader X Server (included in xserver-xfree86 package) and Static build Debug X server (included in xserver-xfree86-dbg. Static build X server can build with external shared FreeType2 library, but curretly we can not build X loader server with external FreeType2 shared library(X loader server's freetype font backend module uses `source code level inclusion' scheme of FreeType2). FreeType2 code included in xfree86 source tree and libfreetype6's one are not same (diffrent version and too difficult to sync..), so if debug X server linked with external FreeType2 and normal loader server does not, we can not debug X server internal FreeType2 related thigs. Yes, 1) problem is gone. But 2) problem is remaing. Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation: 1) we want to be sure that the normal X server package (xserver-xfree86) and the debugging X server package (xserver-xfree86-dbg) use the same FreeType library. 2) we'd *like* it if we could achieve this by both packages dynamically linking against the system's FreeType library; however, 3) The normal X server package (xserver-xfree86) *cannot* be built dynamically linked against the FreeType library because of upstream code/design issues; 4) Therefore, we encapsulate XFree86's internal fork of the FreeType library into *both* xserver-xfree86 and xserver-xfree86-dbg. Have I got that correct? -- G. Branden Robinson| There's nothing an agnostic can't Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he [EMAIL PROTECTED] | believes in it or not. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: XFree86 X server and FreeType
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation: 1) we want to be sure that the normal X server package (xserver-xfree86) and the debugging X server package (xserver-xfree86-dbg) use the same FreeType library. 2) we'd *like* it if we could achieve this by both packages dynamically linking against the system's FreeType library; however, 3) The normal X server package (xserver-xfree86) *cannot* be built dynamically linked against the FreeType library because of upstream code/design issues; 4) Therefore, we encapsulate XFree86's internal fork of the FreeType library into *both* xserver-xfree86 and xserver-xfree86-dbg. Have I got that correct? Exactly yes. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFree86 X server and FreeType
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:22:00PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Okay, just to make sure I understand the situation: 1) we want to be sure that the normal X server package (xserver-xfree86) and the debugging X server package (xserver-xfree86-dbg) use the same FreeType library. 2) we'd *like* it if we could achieve this by both packages dynamically linking against the system's FreeType library; however, 3) The normal X server package (xserver-xfree86) *cannot* be built dynamically linked against the FreeType library because of upstream code/design issues; 4) Therefore, we encapsulate XFree86's internal fork of the FreeType library into *both* xserver-xfree86 and xserver-xfree86-dbg. Have I got that correct? Exactly yes. -- ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
