drm backport to 3.2
Hi, I've pushed to git://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/jcristau/linux 3.2.y+drm3.4.y a backport of the drm subsystem from 3.4.y to the 3.2.y kernel. It works for me so far on a box with intel gm45 graphics, but the only other hardware I have is an old intel 945gm, so I'd appreciate testing by others. In particular I'd be interested in regression (or not) reports for systems where the current sid kernel works fine, and testing on newer hardware that is not (or not so well) supported in sid right now. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: drm backport to 3.2
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: I've pushed to git://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/jcristau/linux 3.2.y+drm3.4.y a backport of the drm subsystem from 3.4.y to the 3.2.y kernel. It works for me so far on a box with intel gm45 graphics, but the only other hardware I have is an old intel 945gm, so I'd appreciate testing by others. In particular I'd be interested in regression (or not) reports for systems where the current sid kernel works fine, and testing on newer hardware that is not (or not so well) supported in sid right now. Wouldn't it make sense to use the new compat-drivers stuff for this instead of a seperate backporting effort (aka formerly compat-wireless)? https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page http://www.do-not-panic.com/2012/08/automatically-backporting-linux-kernel.html The linux-next-based snapshots already contain support for the DRM subsystem. c'ya sven-haegar -- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. - Ben F. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1208241444210.13...@aurora64.sdinet.de
Re: drm backport to 3.2
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 14:48:48 +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote: On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: I've pushed to git://anonscm.debian.org/git/users/jcristau/linux 3.2.y+drm3.4.y a backport of the drm subsystem from 3.4.y to the 3.2.y kernel. It works for me so far on a box with intel gm45 graphics, but the only other hardware I have is an old intel 945gm, so I'd appreciate testing by others. In particular I'd be interested in regression (or not) reports for systems where the current sid kernel works fine, and testing on newer hardware that is not (or not so well) supported in sid right now. Wouldn't it make sense to use the new compat-drivers stuff for this instead of a seperate backporting effort (aka formerly compat-wireless)? https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page http://www.do-not-panic.com/2012/08/automatically-backporting-linux-kernel.html The linux-next-based snapshots already contain support for the DRM subsystem. I haven't looked at that stuff yet, but I kinda chose 3.4 on purpose, because not all releases are equal and I'd like to have something at least vaguely stable. compat-drivers is certainly something I'll keep in mind for the future though. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature