Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:24:24AM -0500, David Starner wrote: On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for X, I figured I'd ask here first. Come up with a patch to the source, and either submit it to me or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I mentioned it on i18n@xfree86.org, and it didn't sound like they would be interested in such a patch. It's fairly Debian specific, as I don't think anyone else has a eo_EO locale. I probably wouldn't apply that patch, since glibc2.2 doesn't have a eo_EO locale, and eo_XX (which X supports) is closer to correct. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race. Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning. -- RHPS
Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for X, I figured I'd ask here first. Come up with a patch to the source, and either submit it to me or [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux|If ignorance is bliss, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |is omniscience hell? http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | PGP signature
Re: eo_EO added to locale.alias
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:17:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 04:14:34PM -0500, David Starner wrote: Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for X, I figured I'd ask here first. Come up with a patch to the source, and either submit it to me or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I mentioned it on i18n@xfree86.org, and it didn't sound like they would be interested in such a patch. It's fairly Debian specific, as I don't think anyone else has a eo_EO locale. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race. Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning. -- RHPS --- /usr/lib/X11/locale/locale.aliasFri Sep 22 15:30:28 2000 +++ locale.aliasSat Sep 23 22:46:44 2000 @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ eo eo_XX.ISO8859-3 eo_XX eo_XX.ISO8859-3 eo_XX.ISO8859-3eo_XX.ISO8859-3 +eo_EO eo_XX.ISO8859-3 +eo_EO.ISO8859-3eo_XX.ISO8859-3 es es_ES.ISO8859-1 es_AR es_AR.ISO8859-1 es_AR.iso88591 es_AR.ISO8859-1 @@ -618,6 +620,8 @@ eo:eo_XX.ISO8859-3 eo_XX: eo_XX.ISO8859-3 eo_XX.ISO8859-3: eo_XX.ISO8859-3 +eo_EO: eo_XX.ISO8859-3 +eo_EO.ISO8859-3: eo_XX.ISO8859-3 es:es_ES.ISO8859-1 es_AR: es_AR.ISO8859-1 es_AR.iso88591:es_AR.ISO8859-1
eo_EO added to locale.alias
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code (if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for X, I figured I'd ask here first. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http/ftp: dvdeug.dhis.org And crawling, on the planet's face, some insects called the human race. Lost in space, lost in time, and meaning. -- RHPS
