Re: why? [was: Re: reopening 234575]
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 08:56:30PM +0200, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:36, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hmm, I was a bit uncritical in my interpretation of Mr. Tikan's mail > > with respect to the original report. > > > > How about we just retitle the existing bug, repurposing it? Do you > > think that's bad form? > > my only point is, that reading logs of #234575 is a bit confusing, now. > even after retitling *g* I don't think this is a fatal defect. Just MHO. -- G. Branden Robinson| No math genius, eh? Then perhaps Debian GNU/Linux | you could explain to me where you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | got these... PENROSE TILES! http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Stephen R. Notley signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: why? [was: Re: reopening 234575]
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:36, Branden Robinson wrote: > retitle 234575 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] does not wakeup from level S3 > suspend on Radeon R250 Lf [Radeon Mobility 9000 M9] rev 1 > thanks > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:53:02PM +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > > Hmm, I don't understand why this bug has been reopened. > > The original bug report dealt with a problem with ati's fgrlx driver, > > and has therefore been closed by Michel. > > > > On March 4th, Tarko Tikan incorrectly followed up this bug. From the > > Subject: > > xserver-xfree86: Xfree 4.3.0-3 + radeon 9000 mobility (M9) + acpi = no > > picture after S3 > > > > Now the bug has been reopened and tagged with patch, pending and upstream. > > > > I therefore suggest to open a new bug ( I have not found a similar one in > > the BTS ) > > titled: > > [radeon] radeon 9000 mobility (M9) + acpi = no > > picture after S3 > > > > and add the patch and the correct tags to this bug. Tarko Tikan's email > > could be added, too. > > I also suggest to remove the tags from 234575 and close it again. > > Hmm, I was a bit uncritical in my interpretation of Mr. Tikan's mail > with respect to the original report. > > How about we just retitle the existing bug, repurposing it? Do you > think that's bad form? my only point is, that reading logs of #234575 is a bit confusing, now. even after retitling *g* - Christian
Processed: Re: why? [was: Re: reopening 234575]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 234575 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] does not wakeup from level S3 > suspend on Radeon R250 Lf [Radeon Mobility 9000 M9] rev 1 Bug#234575: ati mobility radeon 9000 igp Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: why? [was: Re: reopening 234575]
retitle 234575 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] does not wakeup from level S3 suspend on Radeon R250 Lf [Radeon Mobility 9000 M9] rev 1 thanks On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:53:02PM +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote: > Hmm, I don't understand why this bug has been reopened. > The original bug report dealt with a problem with ati's fgrlx driver, > and has therefore been closed by Michel. > > On March 4th, Tarko Tikan incorrectly followed up this bug. From the > Subject: > xserver-xfree86: Xfree 4.3.0-3 + radeon 9000 mobility (M9) + acpi = no > picture after S3 > > Now the bug has been reopened and tagged with patch, pending and upstream. > > I therefore suggest to open a new bug ( I have not found a similar one in the > BTS ) > titled: > [radeon] radeon 9000 mobility (M9) + acpi = no > picture after S3 > > and add the patch and the correct tags to this bug. Tarko Tikan's email could > be added, too. > I also suggest to remove the tags from 234575 and close it again. Hmm, I was a bit uncritical in my interpretation of Mr. Tikan's mail with respect to the original report. How about we just retitle the existing bug, repurposing it? Do you think that's bad form? -- G. Branden Robinson|Humor is a rubber sword - it allows Debian GNU/Linux |you to make a point without drawing [EMAIL PROTECTED] |blood. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Mary Hirsch signature.asc Description: Digital signature
why? [was: Re: reopening 234575]
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 22:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > > reopen 234575 > Bug#234575: ati mobility radeon 9000 igp > Bug reopened, originator not changed. > Hmm, I don't understand why this bug has been reopened. The original bug report dealt with a problem with ati's fgrlx driver, and has therefore been closed by Michel. On March 4th, Tarko Tikan incorrectly followed up this bug. From the Subject: xserver-xfree86: Xfree 4.3.0-3 + radeon 9000 mobility (M9) + acpi = no picture after S3 Now the bug has been reopened and tagged with patch, pending and upstream. I therefore suggest to open a new bug ( I have not found a similar one in the BTS ) titled: [radeon] radeon 9000 mobility (M9) + acpi = no picture after S3 and add the patch and the correct tags to this bug. Tarko Tikan's email could be added, too. I also suggest to remove the tags from 234575 and close it again. cheers. Christian
