Bug#975298: Xfce 4.14 5 seconds for the first click on the "Applications" button
Package: xfce4 Version: 4.14 Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, In Xfce 4.14, the response time to the first click on the "Applications" button takes 5 seconds. Subsequent clicks are triggered instantly. In Xfce 4.12, the first click is triggered instantly. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages xfce4 depends on: ii libxfce4ui-utils 4.14.1-1+b1 ii thunar 1.8.15-1 ii xfce4-appfinder 4.14.0-1+b1 ii xfce4-panel 4.14.4-1 ii xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin 0.4.3-1 ii xfce4-session4.14.2-2 ii xfce4-settings 4.14.2-1 ii xfconf 4.14.3-2 ii xfdesktop4 4.14.3-1 ii xfwm44.14.6-1 Versions of packages xfce4 recommends: ii desktop-base 10.0.3 ii tango-icon-theme 0.8.90-8 ii thunar-volman 0.9.5-1+b1 ii xfce4-notifyd 0.6.1-1 ii xorg 1:7.7+21 Versions of packages xfce4 suggests: ii xfce4-goodies4.14.0 ii xfce4-power-manager 1.6.6-1 -- no debconf information
Bug#974682: xfce4: No GTK 2.0 in Default Xfce 4.14 theme
Package: xfce4 Version: 4.14 Severity: minor * What led up to the situation? I changed the default theme for a moment, then I couldn't come back to the previous GTK 3.0 theme, because there's no option for it, since all themes that only have a GTK 2.0 rc file are not available for selection any more. I managed to work around it editing the xsettings.xml file and deleting all GTK 3.0 themes I left this line like so: In ~/.config/xfce4/xfconf/xfce-perchannel-xml/xsettings.xml Restarted to the session and got the default theme back. However, this Default theme had no GTK 2.0 folder, so I copied the one that's on /usr/share/themes/Xfce/ and everything went back to normal. I still can't select the Default theme in the Apparience Menu. It would be ideal to add a Default entry in this menu, that combines the default GTK 3.0 theme, and the default Xfce GTK 2.0 theme (for GTK 2.0 applications). Thank you for your time. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=es_AR:es Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages xfce4 depends on: ii libxfce4ui-utils 4.14.1-1+b1 ii thunar 1.8.15-1 ii xfce4-appfinder 4.14.0-1+b1 ii xfce4-panel 4.14.4-1 ii xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin 0.4.3-1 ii xfce4-session4.14.2-2 ii xfce4-settings 4.14.2-1 ii xfconf 4.14.3-1 ii xfdesktop4 4.14.3-1 ii xfwm44.14.6-1 Versions of packages xfce4 recommends: ii desktop-base 10.0.3 ii tango-icon-theme 0.8.90-8 ii thunar-volman 0.9.5-1+b1 ii xfce4-notifyd 0.6.1-1 ii xorg 1:7.7+21 Versions of packages xfce4 suggests: pn xfce4-goodies ii xfce4-power-manager 1.6.6-1 -- no debconf information
Re: Xfce 4.14
Sorry for the delay, I've backported missing packages from goodies and also pushed buster-backports branches to https://salsa.debian.org/users/Valdaer/projects (I can't create merge requests in the Xfce main repos because these are new branches not meant to merge to existing ones). These were made from appropriate tags and as I've said earlier I hadn't need to made any changes/patches except changelog entries generated by dch --bpo. As a reminder backported packages are on debian.mentors here: https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com So I don't know what now, can you give me at least temporary push access for new branches in Xfce main repos? Or maybe one of you will push these branches from https://salsa.debian.org/users/Valdaer/projects to https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team ? Regards, Sławomir Wójcik On 17.04.2020 10:12, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 10:05 +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: Hi, Slawomir. I, personally, could sponsor uploads, but we need to get Ok from the team, so we could communicate through salsa's repos (https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team) Hi Alexander and Slawomir and team, that's great news. As you may have understdood, I'm quite overwhelmed these days and can't really maintain an active workflow on Xfce, and especially not on backports. If someone wants to do it (or has already done it) it's great, but I'd prefer it to be done inside the team so things can be shared. You should be able to propose merge requests for the work you did and we can take a look (Unit 193 / Mateusz could you take it?). Something which would be really nice as well is to look at bugs affecting Stable and try to see if they're fixed in unstable and in the backports. Regards, and again thanks for your work! On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:47:31 +0200 Sławomir Wójcik wrote: Hello, Recently I've actually backported Xfce 4.14 packages to buster and wrote a proposition on xfce mailing list here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-xfce/2020/04/msg00030.html , the packages are at debian.mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com and have been working great for me these few weeks. No one replied yet probably because they didn't notice it I haven't address anyone specifically only the mailing list. I can track the packages in testing and periodically backport the new ones if someone from Xfce team is willing to spent a tiny bit of time on sponsoring/reuploading these backported by me packages. Regards, Sławomir Wójcik On 13.04.2020 09:04, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: Nicolas, there is only 4.14.0 in Debian right now, you should wait for 4.14.2 for a month may be (less or more). Folks, Yves-Alexis, what do you think about backporting 4.14 to buster? By you team, or by some other maintainer? On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:24:10 +0200 (CEST) nic...@net-c.com wrote: Dear developers and maintainers, Since xfce 4.14.2 desktop seems to have reached its maturity, may we hope to have it into Buster backports ? Dearly. Thanks. Nicolas - -- Yves-Alexis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl6ZZNQACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFtW7gf8CIB4182RFCQRAeo1yaqkGJnsrBtnRJ7dPJHNlE6OkU+nkl8WDp/4JIb4 jYFe6DpQl/Cda0iOC3MkmvokWvGznr14MDSjnpc2HeeNjFVGIkU+NXdrLQzBYby+ n1ljLdul+aWoTfVHUz4pZfZBOnRtiaocig2ldFKsBWur8UF0obcZsvdxlPhbjSD6 2LcI+9Pe5aYuEdoCo+kouOvjRYAIxKo0sE9U/B0jCnWL7px/lhlibrBc99r8aiQI 4pZipa3fCWh2n7lQN4gVYM3pRvBOhN29O715Yl7lTqgVfKFvl05Tb+GIrAfTtQ7e i/qkx6lCrtrsfNgJhrCW8DMbmWzcLA== =ynjx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Xfce 4.14
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 10:05 +0300, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > Hi, Slawomir. > > I, personally, could sponsor uploads, but we need to get Ok from the > team, so we could communicate through salsa's repos > (https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team) Hi Alexander and Slawomir and team, that's great news. As you may have understdood, I'm quite overwhelmed these days and can't really maintain an active workflow on Xfce, and especially not on backports. If someone wants to do it (or has already done it) it's great, but I'd prefer it to be done inside the team so things can be shared. You should be able to propose merge requests for the work you did and we can take a look (Unit 193 / Mateusz could you take it?). Something which would be really nice as well is to look at bugs affecting Stable and try to see if they're fixed in unstable and in the backports. Regards, and again thanks for your work! > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:47:31 +0200 > Sławomir Wójcik wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Recently I've actually backported Xfce 4.14 packages to buster and > > wrote a proposition on xfce mailing list here: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-xfce/2020/04/msg00030.html , the > > packages are at debian.mentors: > > https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com and > > have been working great for me these few weeks. No one replied yet > > probably because they didn't notice it I haven't address anyone > > specifically only the mailing list. I can track the packages in > > testing and periodically backport the new ones if someone from Xfce > > team is willing to spent a tiny bit of time on > > sponsoring/reuploading these backported by me packages. > > > > Regards, > > Sławomir Wójcik > > > > On 13.04.2020 09:04, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > > > Nicolas, there is only 4.14.0 in Debian right now, you should wait > > > for 4.14.2 for a month may be (less or more). > > > > > > > > > Folks, Yves-Alexis, what do you think about backporting 4.14 to > > > buster? By you team, or by some other maintainer? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:24:10 +0200 (CEST) > > > nic...@net-c.com wrote: > > > > > > > Dear developers and maintainers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since xfce 4.14.2 desktop seems to have reached its maturity, may > > > > we hope to have it into Buster backports ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dearly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - -- Yves-Alexis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl6ZZNQACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFtW7gf8CIB4182RFCQRAeo1yaqkGJnsrBtnRJ7dPJHNlE6OkU+nkl8WDp/4JIb4 jYFe6DpQl/Cda0iOC3MkmvokWvGznr14MDSjnpc2HeeNjFVGIkU+NXdrLQzBYby+ n1ljLdul+aWoTfVHUz4pZfZBOnRtiaocig2ldFKsBWur8UF0obcZsvdxlPhbjSD6 2LcI+9Pe5aYuEdoCo+kouOvjRYAIxKo0sE9U/B0jCnWL7px/lhlibrBc99r8aiQI 4pZipa3fCWh2n7lQN4gVYM3pRvBOhN29O715Yl7lTqgVfKFvl05Tb+GIrAfTtQ7e i/qkx6lCrtrsfNgJhrCW8DMbmWzcLA== =ynjx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Xfce 4.14
Hi, Slawomir. I, personally, could sponsor uploads, but we need to get Ok from the team, so we could communicate through salsa's repos (https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team) On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:47:31 +0200 Sławomir Wójcik wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I've actually backported Xfce 4.14 packages to buster and > wrote a proposition on xfce mailing list here: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-xfce/2020/04/msg00030.html , the > packages are at debian.mentors: > https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com and > have been working great for me these few weeks. No one replied yet > probably because they didn't notice it I haven't address anyone > specifically only the mailing list. I can track the packages in > testing and periodically backport the new ones if someone from Xfce > team is willing to spent a tiny bit of time on > sponsoring/reuploading these backported by me packages. > > Regards, > Sławomir Wójcik > > On 13.04.2020 09:04, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > > Nicolas, there is only 4.14.0 in Debian right now, you should wait > > for 4.14.2 for a month may be (less or more). > > > > > > Folks, Yves-Alexis, what do you think about backporting 4.14 to > > buster? By you team, or by some other maintainer? > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:24:10 +0200 (CEST) > > nic...@net-c.com wrote: > > > >> Dear developers and maintainers, > >> > >> > >> > >> Since xfce 4.14.2 desktop seems to have reached its maturity, may > >> we hope to have it into Buster backports ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Dearly. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> > >> > >> Nicolas > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- Best regards, Alexander Gerasiov Contacts: e-mail: a...@gerasiov.net WWW: http://gerasiov.net TG/Skype: gerasiov PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49 BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1
Re: Xfce 4.14
Hello, Recently I've actually backported Xfce 4.14 packages to buster and wrote a proposition on xfce mailing list here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-xfce/2020/04/msg00030.html , the packages are at debian.mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com and have been working great for me these few weeks. No one replied yet probably because they didn't notice it I haven't address anyone specifically only the mailing list. I can track the packages in testing and periodically backport the new ones if someone from Xfce team is willing to spent a tiny bit of time on sponsoring/reuploading these backported by me packages. Regards, Sławomir Wójcik On 13.04.2020 09:04, Alexander Gerasiov wrote: Nicolas, there is only 4.14.0 in Debian right now, you should wait for 4.14.2 for a month may be (less or more). Folks, Yves-Alexis, what do you think about backporting 4.14 to buster? By you team, or by some other maintainer? On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:24:10 +0200 (CEST) nic...@net-c.com wrote: Dear developers and maintainers, Since xfce 4.14.2 desktop seems to have reached its maturity, may we hope to have it into Buster backports ? Dearly. Thanks. Nicolas
Re: Xfce 4.14
Nicolas, there is only 4.14.0 in Debian right now, you should wait for 4.14.2 for a month may be (less or more). Folks, Yves-Alexis, what do you think about backporting 4.14 to buster? By you team, or by some other maintainer? On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 08:24:10 +0200 (CEST) nic...@net-c.com wrote: > Dear developers and maintainers, > > > > Since xfce 4.14.2 desktop seems to have reached its maturity, may we > hope to have it into Buster backports ? > > > > Dearly. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Nicolas > > > -- Best regards, Alexander Gerasiov Contacts: e-mail: a...@gerasiov.net WWW: http://gerasiov.net TG/Skype: gerasiov PGP fingerprint: 04B5 9D90 DF7C C2AB CD49 BAEA CA87 E9E8 2AAC 33F1
Xfce 4.14 backport to debian buster
Hello, I've backported most of the Xfce 4.14 packages to debian buster(uploaded to debian.mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com), had been using these for more than a couple of days and these have been working very well so far. I've seen on reddit and some other forums that some debian users would want to use Xfce 4.14 on debian stable so maybe it is worth to upload these to debian-backports. I could track these packages for newer versions in backports and maybe in future I could help in packaging/maintenance of Xfce debian packages. I have some knowledge in debian packaging, I have my small private repo and I've been backporting and packaging some packages(some from Xfce too) over the past few years. These debian.mentors uploaded packages (https://mentors.debian.net/packages/uploader/valdaer%40gmail.com) were built by gbp buildpackage with sbuild builder on debian buster created schroot from https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team repos with appropriate tags, I have local git branches however there weren't any patches/changes needed and there only are changelog entries generated by dch --bpo. Please reply if you are interested, and if yes let me know which packages are missing or already outdated. I've backported all packages which had newer version in testing from https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team/desktop, https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team/apps and most from the https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team/goodies. Also when these packages will be ready to be accepted to debian-backports please let me know what is in your opinion best way to upload these. Will one of you reupload it? or can you give me debian maintainer rights(at least temporary if it's possible)? I've read about processes for new maintainers but it's not that clear to me. I'm not sure this topic shouldn't be on the debian-backports mailing list too but even on backports page contribution section there is info to contact concrete package maintainers/teams first. Regards, Sławomir Wójcik
Bug#942141: xfce4: Xfce 4.14 XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/share:/usr/local/share:/usr/share"
Package: xfce4 Version: 4.14 Severity: normal Tags: patch -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=ru_RU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages xfce4 depends on: ii libxfce4ui-utils 4.14.1-1+b1 ii thunar 1.8.9-1+b1 ii xfce4-appfinder 4.14.0-1+b1 ii xfce4-panel 4.14.1-1 ii xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin 0.4.2-1 ii xfce4-session4.14.0-1+b1 ii xfce4-settings 4.14.1-1 ii xfconf 4.14.1-1 ii xfdesktop4 4.14.1-1 ii xfwm44.14.0-2 Versions of packages xfce4 recommends: ii desktop-base 10.0.3 ii tango-icon-theme 0.8.90-7 ii thunar-volman 0.9.5-1+b1 ii xfce4-notifyd 0.4.4-1+b1 ii xorg 1:7.7+19 Versions of packages xfce4 suggests: pn xfce4-goodies ii xfce4-power-manager 1.6.5-2 -- no debconf information In the terminal window, in the output of the "env" command, I found the line: XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/share/xfce4:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/:/usr/share/ It made me think. In "/usr/bin/startxfce4" in the block if test "x$XDG_DATA_DIRS" = "x" then if test "x/usr/share" = "x/usr/local/share" -o "x/usr/share" = "x/usr/share"; then XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/local/share:/usr/share" else XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/share:/usr/local/share:/usr/share" fi else XDG_DATA_DIRS="$XDG_DATA_DIRS:/usr/share" fi excluded duplication for XDG_DATA_DIRS - line XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/share:/usr/local/share:/usr/share" replaced by XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/share:/usr/local/share" This did not solve the problem. Commenting a line: XDG_DATA_DIRS="$XDG_DATA_DIRS:/usr/share" after “else”, the “Login” window reappears to enter Debian and there is no way out of this cycle. Installing Debian 10.1 on another blank disk from scratch will repeat the situation: Duplicate rows in the Select Application window Transferring “*.desktop” files from “/usr/share/applications/” to “/usr/local/share/applications/” solves the situation, but the question remains why, if there are “* .desktop” files in “/usr/share/applications/" duplication of lines occurs only for these files. But in the “Thunar 1.8.9” file manager, line duplication does not occur with “Open with”. Replacing the line finally solved the problem: else XDG_DATA_DIRS="$XDG_DATA_DIRS:/usr/share" on else XDG_DATA_DIRS="$ XDG_DATA_DIRS" Now when executing the “env” command, I find the line: XDG_DATA_DIRS=/usr/share/xfce4:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/ Problem Duplication of lines in the "Application Selection" window was resolved, lines no longer duplicated under Doublecmd. Changed normal code block in "/usr/bin/startxfce4" is: if test "x$XDG_DATA_DIRS" = "x" then if test "x/usr/share" = "x/usr/local/share" -o "x/usr/share" = "x/usr/share"; then XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/local/share:/usr/share" else XDG_DATA_DIRS="/usr/share:/usr/local/share" fi else XDG_DATA_DIRS="$XDG_DATA_DIRS" fi
Re: XFCE 4.14 for Buster.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 11:47 +0200, Sebastien CHAVAUX wrote: > I am writing to ask if it is possible, to have version 4.14 of XFCE for > Buster. I do not know if it takes a lot of work, but I think it would be > nice to have this office in its latest version in our Stable. > > If you do not have an advice and a method to do this work that I can do > it on my side and you send it then if you're interested? Hi Sébastien, this won't happen, Buster is a stable release with strict release policy, and Xfce 4.14 release happened way after it was frozen. The only thing possible is for someone to make backports and upload them to the backports archive. At that point it's not planned, but it might happen eventually. Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl1mTyoACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFsHQAf6AkJ+OVQtIz0hF3GotDGZf6CpjfeimfQd6bwZr17+69i4CvDtnsQUrwAV l5gy6CNo9xbpmN2s51krkAFb/C2kemeeWrehoK/UiuegqHd7/3h6LNU81a30gu/I JJQY3wNXP32qVneTW+9HkOHOIyVuJ9E8JtdKUt1StaRyZzGfPRLXfxZXdLpLMNu4 4wQeqKZ/Mxww1MftdyaOtQCojMU3g5yxNaWO+Zj8QM+KKKBAGkfSa4FO0u/yedEL EH3w5fqof+s65OaAJP8WXrpkDBNFSApCXBnbuq+r8vp1b3red3tz4jj4x8nZeRsm KFXnKbSoDr+XWHs2EOPgfb3D1N9wRQ== =rWhX -END PGP SIGNATURE-
XFCE 4.14 for Buster.
Hello; I am writing to ask if it is possible, to have version 4.14 of XFCE for Buster. I do not know if it takes a lot of work, but I think it would be nice to have this office in its latest version in our Stable. If you do not have an advice and a method to do this work that I can do it on my side and you send it then if you're interested? Sincerely Seb. Bonjour; Je me permet de vous écrire pour vous demander si c'est possible, d'avoir la version 4.14 de XFCE pour Buster. Je sais pas si ça demande beaucoup de travail, mais je pense que ça serait pas mal d'avoir ce bureau dans sa dernière version dans notre Stable. Sinon avez vous un conseille et une méthode pour faire ce travail que je puisse le faire de mon coté et vous l'envoyer ensuite si ça vous intéresse? Bien cordialement Seb.
Re: Xfce 4.14 upload to unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2019-08-15 at 16:00 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Hi release team, > > Xfce 4.14 was recently released. We started doing the packaging in > experimental for the 4.13 pre-releases, and now that Buster is out we would > like to proceed with the 4.14 upload to unstable. > [team only] I've prepared all the packages, which are ready for upload *locally on my box*. I've not yet pushed all the commits and tags, because I'd prefer pushing when uploading. The status is tracked on an issue in the xfce4 repository on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/xfce-team/desktop/xfce4/issues/1 While we wait for the release team feedback, please refrain to touch anything which is unchecked on the “upload stuff” task list. I'd prefer uploading in the relevant order, but if the RT approval takes too much time I might start uploading the non-transition stuff and we'll request binNMUs later. Thanks all for the work on the 4.13/4.14 packaging! Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl1WZ00ACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFtNlgf+Ii0gAKfvJLQr9DgIckYoF4YEjF75qDVCriTBzleguXzxzKvar9k/d9bg XZ8ta9v2/toT0xRRqS9LoJmS7YSeBhoFz6K7vmrzu6Ldn/TIbzqH4GQsAVnpN5hd +ct3Oeg6Ok+XWEDDXm6ts+wyD9zsA8yMXS6SxJahJYjxDFB3mMXVvJHg9OVem8l8 JKEKu3I2cvR5xEyP1V+X/MI3sZlCo19b9qXTQduZacoNXRTgbDLv2Qy/9qdn/UwS fZp4PtRuMKrkj0CKC89lkZdqXBgXZfG4RLieWAcqeNPCOXY8SBWvve15GoaYp+k7 wgmwzTv/fdwDo/97jamLOZhbIQKaVQ== =ltaS -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Xfce 4.14 upload to unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi release team, Xfce 4.14 was recently released. We started doing the packaging in experimental for the 4.13 pre-releases, and now that Buster is out we would like to proceed with the 4.14 upload to unstable. As far as I can tell, there are two concerns for the release team: - - xfconf has a soname bump, which is apparently already tracked (maybe through experimental) at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-xfconf.html which will require some binNMUs (although at least part of the packages will see a sourceful upload anyway) - - xfce4-panel require a rebuild of panel plugins built against libxfce4panel- 1.0 (in the xfce4-panel) because of the forced dependencies we manually add (that should disappear with plugins built against libxfce4panel-2.0 which is in a separate package). We would like to request permission to start uploading 4.14 packages, including the two above. Is that ok with you, and how can we help having a smooth process for you? Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAl1VZZkACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFv4+wgAr2s3pgdGEJKFGRWOJtiFNJiXzu3l0NC+PsWSQtEXnsTYuZZLUje9nDIp vz52WAwKH4di/2mem1rdyaP2fg6Xezyc7CGBNvWGWWTJV63N1843B99Jz7yvTC/c ygoYywzsrnjAxTPi5uK43A0WAq1vkuspezdIF3P2gY4Ubu/oEalQWLLcAZSshXK8 c9xiOz03CWx6OX8fGp8ZogY8WS5Xq+A7117bmvQoBUXu+1WcQToXv+hNbtw9FkRG N2du1dd5c5HNi532S4BlmN5sEyhF7XNDMhfWNz2fm0QLa03CrYr4l+B815KN1ULt A+N71jkD8pQJwEPU6yfD7YHFJe0uxg== =9mue -END PGP SIGNATURE-
