Re: [Declude.JunkMail] console question (yet again)

2002-08-15 Thread R. Scott Perry


>Logic dictates that since there are more tests for a message to fail that 
>there should be a higher percentage of messages showing up as SPAM now 
>than there was before.  I can only come up with 2 theories.
>
>Theory1 - Some spammers now realize their SPAM is not getting through and 
>have since stopped sending to our mailserver.  I consider this HIGHLY 
>unlikely since we don't send out bounces, just delete messages (and also 
>since I doubt this would alter spammer behavior anyway.)

Do you have a "nobody" alias set up to access all misaddressed mail?  If 
so, it could be that spammers were sending mail to those addresses, but 
aren't anymore.  They can send thousands of such E-mails, which can really 
skew the percentage of spam.

>Theory2 - Do messages that fail any test associated with the DELETE action 
>not appear in the console?  I doubt this is the case either, but it would 
>help to explain the drastic drop in the percentage of mail that the 
>console is listing as SPAM.

No, that wouldn't cause a change.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] console question (yet again)

2002-08-15 Thread Stic.Net

In the last two days I have added several ip4r tests to my global.cfg and def.jm 
files, added 2 fromfile blacklist tests, and bumped up the weight of a few tests that 
were already there.  This seems to have significantly cut down on the amount of spam 
getting through without catching much more legit mail.  

So I'm happy, but I have noticed something a bit strange.  The percentage of mail that 
is showing up in the console as SPAM has fallen to the 55-60% range, whereas before I 
made the recent changes it usually hovered around 75-80%.

Logic dictates that since there are more tests for a message to fail that there should 
be a higher percentage of messages showing up as SPAM now than there was before.  I 
can only come up with 2 theories.

Theory1 - Some spammers now realize their SPAM is not getting through and have since 
stopped sending to our mailserver.  I consider this HIGHLY unlikely since we don't 
send out bounces, just delete messages (and also since I doubt this would alter 
spammer behavior anyway.)

Theory2 - Do messages that fail any test associated with the DELETE action not appear 
in the console?  I doubt this is the case either, but it would help to explain the 
drastic drop in the percentage of mail that the console is listing as SPAM.

Anyone have any ideas/theories?

Thanks
Bart Lackorn
STIC.NET
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Country-based DNSRBLs

2002-08-15 Thread Koree A. Smith

The way that I've done it is as such:

CHINAip4rcn.rbl.cluecentral.net   127.0.0.2   5  0

in your global.cfg.  Then, use the CHINA test as you would any other test.

Do this for each country you wish to block.

Koree

Larry French wrote:
> I would love to block almost all foreign countries.  How can this be
> done from this list?
> 
> Larry French
> Marion Computer Center, Inc.
> 740.382.2881
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Koree A. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 5:29 PM
> To: declude.junkmail
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Country-based DNSRBLs
> 
> 
> Has anyone seen these before?  Have any of you used any of them?
> 
> http://www.cluecentral.net/rbl/
> 
> I hate to block entire countries from sending Spam, but there are a few 
> that have 1) Huge numbers of open relays, 2) Spam companies that send 
> out stuff for people all over the world.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Koree
> 
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Variables, Lists and Testing

2002-08-15 Thread R. Scott Perry


>Would it be possible to add a feature that would create a separate temp
>debug log while maintaining the default log file.

It's been added to the suggestion database.  I'm sure that could be very 
useful.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] DSN:Variables, Lists and Testing

2002-08-15 Thread smb

Scott,

Would it be possible to add a feature that would create a separate temp
debug log while maintaining the default log file.

Something likeLOGLEVELMID copy   loglevel   filename

Where if copy (or some key name) follows the primary settings a test logfile
would be created using the loglevel set for that setting.  Or simply a
second loglevel line like  LOGLEVELTEST loglevelfilename  

The JM logfiles (mine at least) can be quite large, a couple of hundred meg
or more and growing. When looking for a possible problem, testing a new
feature, filter file or whatever rather than searching a large log file or
renaming/copying/whatever the current log file several times to get snippets
during this testing then keeping track of these separate files to maintain a
good logfile. Being able to get a separate test log file would help a lot. 

my $.02

Stu



 
-
CSOnline Technical Support hours - Monday thru Saturday 7am - 1am 
CSOnline Technical Support Numbers Seneca814-677-2447 
   Clarion   814-227-3638  
   Meadville 814-425-1696
   Parker724-399-1158   
http://www.csonline.net  http://www.cshowcase.com  http://www.learncenter.com  
-

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.