RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent?
As far as I know there is no support for Mailbox Action. The equivalent is Routeto for Smartermail, but still far from the nice functionality of the Mailbox action. I hope some day we have Mailbox action available for smartermail as well. Is an action I miss a lot. Luis Arango > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill > Green dfn Systems > Sent: Martes, 01 de Noviembre de 2005 12:25 p.m. > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Mailbox Action Equivalent? > > > I've been following SmarterMail's growth with interest on > this mailing list since IMail's price debacle last year (or > was it 2 yrs ago?). The dealbreaker for us then was the lack > of an equivalent to the IMail/Declude Mailbox Action where I > could route mail of a certain weight range to a user's > subfolder accessable by the user via WebMail. > This has been extremely popular with our customers and > was actually the feature which drew us to Declude in the first place. > > Now, from what I'm seeing on the IMail list, it looks as if > IpSwitch is again engaging in Sticker Shock on the IMail > Annual Maintenance. I'm looking at SmarterMail with renewed > interest as, I'm sure, are others. > > Have I missed news of a SmarterMail equivalent to the Mailbox > Action, or is one coming soon? > > Bill > > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > __ > [Email scanned for viruses] > [Email escaneado contra virus] > __ [Email scanned for viruses] [Email escaneado contra virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude.cfg
Gary, That file is created manually when you want to override the defaults that they have preconfigured. It makes sense to leave it alone until you know of something specific that you wish to tweak that belongs in there. Matt Gary Steiner wrote: I'm trying to understand the different Declude configuration files. I'm running 3.x Pro with JM and EV under SmarterMail. I've seen mention of the Declude.cfg file, but my configuration doesn't have one. I see global.cfg, virus.cfg, confirm.cfg and hijack.cfg, as well as the $default$.junkmail file. Is Declude.cfg something that gets added with 3.x? Is it something that gets installed with the Setup, or is it something that you have to create manually? Gary --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Declude.cfg
I'm trying to understand the different Declude configuration files. I'm running 3.x Pro with JM and EV under SmarterMail. I've seen mention of the Declude.cfg file, but my configuration doesn't have one. I see global.cfg, virus.cfg, confirm.cfg and hijack.cfg, as well as the $default$.junkmail file. Is Declude.cfg something that gets added with 3.x? Is it something that gets installed with the Setup, or is it something that you have to create manually? Gary --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Diag issue
Yea they have not fixed hta yet. If you are looking for the version do a decludeproc.exe -v Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Kratka > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:03 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Diag issue > > > I have been attempting to run the diag for declude but every time I do I > received the following message > > C:\IMail>decludeproc -diag > > Invalid command line parameter: > > -install Install Declude > -diagPrint diagnostics > > What am I doing wrong. > > Jeff Kratka > > TymeWyse Internet > P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417 > tel: (541) 643-2023 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Diag issue
I have been attempting to run the diag for declude but every time I do I received the following message C:\IMail>decludeproc -diag Invalid command line parameter: -install Install Declude -diagPrint diagnostics What am I doing wrong. Jeff Kratka TymeWyse Internet P.O.Box 84 - 110 Ecklund St., Canyonville, OR 97417 tel: (541) 643-2023 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.18 Posted
Declude 3.0.5.18 ALL - Fixed un-defined variables causing intermittent stop/start with the decludeproc service. JM - Fixed SmarterMail incoming email recipient domain aliases. AV - Fixed un-defined variables, causing incorrect Virus Names. David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted
Mike, If you are not already running the service you will need to run the Declude_setup.exe to get the service installed etc, only thereafter can you upgrade just the decludeproc. David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 2:55 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted David, I only find a Delcude_Setup file that's 6MB. I was looking to just replace the declude.exe file. I will go this route. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:14 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Yes under the Declude Upgrade Section on the My Account Home Page David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete install each time? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Declude 3.0.5.14 ADDED - WINSOCKCLEANUPON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to their network stack causing loss of functionality for basic network operations. The default for this directive is OFF FIX - Memory leaked fixed by forcing windows to close handles once complete (Note this only effected a handful of customers) David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted
Mike, I am sure you know this, but you need to upgrade both declude.exe and decludeproc.exe under 3.x. Darrell --- Incorporate SURBL and other URI blakclists into Declude. Try invURIBL and see how effective intelligent URI filtering is - http://www.invariantsystems.com Mike Wiegers writes: David, I only find a Delcude_Setup file that's 6MB. I was looking to just replace the declude.exe file. I will go this route. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:14 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Yes under the Declude Upgrade Section on the My Account Home Page David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete install each time? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Declude 3.0.5.14 ADDED - WINSOCKCLEANUPON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to their network stack causing loss of functionality for basic network operations. The default for this directive is OFF FIX - Memory leaked fixed by forcing windows to close handles once complete (Note this only effected a handful of customers) David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted
David, I only find a Delcude_Setup file that's 6MB. I was looking to just replace the declude.exe file. I will go this route. Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:14 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Yes under the Declude Upgrade Section on the My Account Home Page David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete install each time? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Declude 3.0.5.14 ADDED - WINSOCKCLEANUPON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to their network stack causing loss of functionality for basic network operations. The default for this directive is OFF FIX - Memory leaked fixed by forcing windows to close handles once complete (Note this only effected a handful of customers) David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
Because counterweighting let's you control how good you think a particular source is. That way, if a really bad email comes in (high score), perhaps from a spammer that is mimicking certain patterns to slip through filters, then you still catch it. Whitelisting would have it go through no matter how bad it really was. We maintain three counterweighting levels to give us the granularity we need. One at our hold weight, one just under our delete weight, and a third at twice our delete weight for the really had senders that a particular customer needs mail from. Darin. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:23 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? I am missing the thought process. Why is counterweighting by a large number so much better than whitelisting if both achieve the same purpose? Just asking, Don - Original Message - From: "Travis Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? > Exactly, counterweight works so much better. Whitelist at the last > possible option. > > I counterweight everything and don't have a single whitelist entry. > > Travis > > - Original Message - > From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:24 PM > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? > > >> We've found that to be too general... You might try a regex or >> phrase-based >> whitelist that looks for unique text in the newsletter to whitelist it >> (or >> rather counterweight it). >> >> Darin. >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Tyler Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:01 PM >> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? >> >> >> Try >> >> Whitelist from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com >> >> Or >> >> Whitelist from @yahoo-inc.com >> >> I have one of these to allow fantasy football and baseball emails through >> to >> my franchisees. I have not seen any spam whitelisted because of this >> setup >> and I have been using it for at least a year. It may not be the best way >> but >> it has worked for me. >> >> Tyler >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists >> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:36 PM >> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com >> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? >> >> >> I'm at my wits end.. These Yahoo news alerts are legitimate messages, >> but >> I can't seem to whitelist them. >> >> So far in my global.cf I've added WHITELIST FROM settings to the >> following >> addresses, but they still don't get to the recipient! >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anybody >> know >> what else I can do to allow these e-mails in? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Cavell >> >> Received: from n10.bulk.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.66.189] by >> cottonwoodfinancial.com >> (SMTPD-8.21) id A1190444; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:12:25 -0600 >> Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys >> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; >> d=yahoo-inc.com; >> >> b=p2OiCTjMDGenNXSS96zFPWPUJWbDSYtXDGfx+d+759EZNpjxhxAkRF35XS37W00BJ3v6G0WpK8 >> rYURzt55Dtrw8e6wXInDswJk67+7vNJnZRNIECCZO7cXBoKKaw2i4B8/wcWwL6WNeIq2lOUW >> rYURzt55Dtrw8e6wXInDswJk67+f8JH >> rYogvNoV28SaQReeLJUYw=; >> Received: from [66.218.69.2] by n10.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov >> 2005 19:12:53 - >> Received: from [66.94.229.26] by mailer2.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; >> 03 >> Nov 2005 19:12:53 - >> Received: from [127.0.0.1] by dlv8.alerts.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 >> Nov >> 2005 19:12:53 - >> X-yahoo-newman-property: alerts >> X-yahoo-newman-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> From: "Yahoo! Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: **SPAM**=?UTF-8?B?S2V5d29yZCBOZXdzOiBbIkFkdmFuY2UgQW1lcmljYSJd?= >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Reply-To: "Yahoo! Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> X-Yahoo-AlertId:5cYJ5LIxGXHDwPmeko3O878bwgWlTAmS >> X-Yahoo-Alerts-Beta: YES >> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:12:53 -0800 >> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-ALLOW: "GOOD SENDER" >> X-RBL-Warning: CMDSPACE: Space found in RCPT TO: command. >> X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM: Domain returns.bulk.y has no MX or A records >> [0301]. >> X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam >> [420e]. >> X-RBL-Warning: SUBJECTCHARS: Subject with at least 50 characters found. >> X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 24 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. >> X-Declude-Sender: >> alerts.kmydqmbqgu2wknrtmy3taljygvxdau3ikndxovs7he3gwx3hhbeha2thovsvmvjxmiyuw >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.218.66.189] >> X-Declude-Spoolname: D611901607008.smd >> X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 3
[Declude.JunkMail] CMDSPACE? Odd failures.
I think (have no real proof) that CMDSPACE is not working right under 3.x? I have been seeing a rash of servers which I would never expect to fail CMDSPACE. I have had CMDSPACE failures from Earthlink, Novell GroupWise, and Prodigy. These are all legit messages (nothing forged to make it look like it was going through those servers. I just find it hard to beleive that Earthlink is not using RFC compliant mail servers? Anyone else seeing anything like this? Darrell --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
I am missing the thought process. Why is counterweighting by a large number so much better than whitelisting if both achieve the same purpose? Just asking, Don - Original Message - From: "Travis Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? Exactly, counterweight works so much better. Whitelist at the last possible option. I counterweight everything and don't have a single whitelist entry. Travis - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? We've found that to be too general... You might try a regex or phrase-based whitelist that looks for unique text in the newsletter to whitelist it (or rather counterweight it). Darin. - Original Message - From: "Tyler Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? Try Whitelist from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com Or Whitelist from @yahoo-inc.com I have one of these to allow fantasy football and baseball emails through to my franchisees. I have not seen any spam whitelisted because of this setup and I have been using it for at least a year. It may not be the best way but it has worked for me. Tyler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:36 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? I'm at my wits end.. These Yahoo news alerts are legitimate messages, but I can't seem to whitelist them. So far in my global.cf I've added WHITELIST FROM settings to the following addresses, but they still don't get to the recipient! [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anybody know what else I can do to allow these e-mails in? Thanks! Cavell Received: from n10.bulk.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.66.189] by cottonwoodfinancial.com (SMTPD-8.21) id A1190444; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:12:25 -0600 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; b=p2OiCTjMDGenNXSS96zFPWPUJWbDSYtXDGfx+d+759EZNpjxhxAkRF35XS37W00BJ3v6G0WpK8 rYURzt55Dtrw8e6wXInDswJk67+7vNJnZRNIECCZO7cXBoKKaw2i4B8/wcWwL6WNeIq2lOUW rYURzt55Dtrw8e6wXInDswJk67+f8JH rYogvNoV28SaQReeLJUYw=; Received: from [66.218.69.2] by n10.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2005 19:12:53 - Received: from [66.94.229.26] by mailer2.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2005 19:12:53 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by dlv8.alerts.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2005 19:12:53 - X-yahoo-newman-property: alerts X-yahoo-newman-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Yahoo! Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: **SPAM**=?UTF-8?B?S2V5d29yZCBOZXdzOiBbIkFkdmFuY2UgQW1lcmljYSJd?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Yahoo! Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yahoo-AlertId:5cYJ5LIxGXHDwPmeko3O878bwgWlTAmS X-Yahoo-Alerts-Beta: YES Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:12:53 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-ALLOW: "GOOD SENDER" X-RBL-Warning: CMDSPACE: Space found in RCPT TO: command. X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM: Domain returns.bulk.y has no MX or A records [0301]. X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [420e]. X-RBL-Warning: SUBJECTCHARS: Subject with at least 50 characters found. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 24 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. X-Declude-Sender: alerts.kmydqmbqgu2wknrtmy3taljygvxdau3ikndxovs7he3gwx3hhbeha2thovsvmvjxmiyuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.218.66.189] X-Declude-Spoolname: D611901607008.smd X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 3.0.5.5 (http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm) for spam. X-Declude-Scan: Score [24] at 13:12:37 on 03 Nov 2005 X-Declude-Tests: MXRATE-ALLOW, CMDSPACE, MAILFROM, SPAMHEADERS, SUBJECTCHARS, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT14, WEIGHT18 X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: U X-UIDL: 424737504 X-IMail-ThreadID: 611901607008 Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient named above. If the receiver of this transmission is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your system. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscr
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted
Yes under the Declude Upgrade Section on the My Account Home Page David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wiegers Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete install each time? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Declude 3.0.5.14 ADDED - WINSOCKCLEANUPON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to their network stack causing loss of functionality for basic network operations. The default for this directive is OFF FIX - Memory leaked fixed by forcing windows to close handles once complete (Note this only effected a handful of customers) David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted
Is there a link we can just get the declude exe file instead of the complete install each time? Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:09 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.Virus@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.5.14 Posted Declude 3.0.5.14 ADDED - WINSOCKCLEANUPON Located in Declude.cfg. Some customers had issues related to their network stack causing loss of functionality for basic network operations. The default for this directive is OFF FIX - Memory leaked fixed by forcing windows to close handles once complete (Note this only effected a handful of customers) David B www.declude.com --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
Exactly, counterweight works so much better. Whitelist at the last possible option. I counterweight everything and don't have a single whitelist entry. Travis - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:24 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? We've found that to be too general... You might try a regex or phrase-based whitelist that looks for unique text in the newsletter to whitelist it (or rather counterweight it). Darin. - Original Message - From: "Tyler Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:01 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? Try Whitelist from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com Or Whitelist from @yahoo-inc.com I have one of these to allow fantasy football and baseball emails through to my franchisees. I have not seen any spam whitelisted because of this setup and I have been using it for at least a year. It may not be the best way but it has worked for me. Tyler -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 6:36 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted? I'm at my wits end.. These Yahoo news alerts are legitimate messages, but I can't seem to whitelist them. So far in my global.cf I've added WHITELIST FROM settings to the following addresses, but they still don't get to the recipient! [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anybody know what else I can do to allow these e-mails in? Thanks! Cavell Received: from n10.bulk.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.66.189] by cottonwoodfinancial.com (SMTPD-8.21) id A1190444; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:12:25 -0600 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=ginc1024; d=yahoo-inc.com; b=p2OiCTjMDGenNXSS96zFPWPUJWbDSYtXDGfx+d+759EZNpjxhxAkRF35XS37W00BJ3v6G0WpK8 rYURzt55Dtrw8e6wXInDswJk67+7vNJnZRNIECCZO7cXBoKKaw2i4B8/wcWwL6WNeIq2lOUW rYURzt55Dtrw8e6wXInDswJk67+f8JH rYogvNoV28SaQReeLJUYw=; Received: from [66.218.69.2] by n10.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2005 19:12:53 - Received: from [66.94.229.26] by mailer2.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2005 19:12:53 - Received: from [127.0.0.1] by dlv8.alerts.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2005 19:12:53 - X-yahoo-newman-property: alerts X-yahoo-newman-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Yahoo! Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: **SPAM**=?UTF-8?B?S2V5d29yZCBOZXdzOiBbIkFkdmFuY2UgQW1lcmljYSJd?= To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: "Yahoo! Alerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Yahoo-AlertId:5cYJ5LIxGXHDwPmeko3O878bwgWlTAmS X-Yahoo-Alerts-Beta: YES Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:12:53 -0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-RBL-Warning: MXRATE-ALLOW: "GOOD SENDER" X-RBL-Warning: CMDSPACE: Space found in RCPT TO: command. X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM: Domain returns.bulk.y has no MX or A records [0301]. X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers consistent with spam [420e]. X-RBL-Warning: SUBJECTCHARS: Subject with at least 50 characters found. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 24 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. X-Declude-Sender: alerts.kmydqmbqgu2wknrtmy3taljygvxdau3ikndxovs7he3gwx3hhbeha2thovsvmvjxmiyuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.218.66.189] X-Declude-Spoolname: D611901607008.smd X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 3.0.5.5 (http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm) for spam. X-Declude-Scan: Score [24] at 13:12:37 on 03 Nov 2005 X-Declude-Tests: MXRATE-ALLOW, CMDSPACE, MAILFROM, SPAMHEADERS, SUBJECTCHARS, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT14, WEIGHT18 X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: U X-UIDL: 424737504 X-IMail-ThreadID: 611901607008 Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient named above. If the receiver of this transmission is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your system. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.
[Declude.JunkMail] Interesting thought on some tests when a front end gateway is involved.
I sent an e-mail to a software vendor requesting answers to some questions. That message was rejected based on a SPF Fail. Yes, I have SPF records setup for my domains. So how did it fail, bad configuration on the recipient side. By reviewing the heads and the rejection notice, I found that my server handed the message of to the MX record for the recipient server as expected. However, the server listed in the MX then forwarded to a different e-mail address on a different server, mail13.atl.registeredsite.com. In this case, the MX record is a Imail 6.06 server. It appears that the Imail 6.06 server recorded its own IP address as being mine during the handshake. (Is this a known bug in Imail 6.06?) It appears that mail13.atl.registeredsite.com then tried to hand the message to mx03.csee.siteprotect.com, but that server ran a SPF query, found my record, saw that the connecting IP was 216.247.37.27 which is the IP for mail13.atl.registeredsite.com and correctly saw a SPF Fail. The problem is, it should not be looking at that IP since it was a forwarded message. Duh. The problem is why are they looking at the wrong IP? Now, my thought on Declude tests such as SPF, REVDNS, HELOBOGUS. If my server which is running those tests is sitting behind other servers of mine which are the front door gateway and MX records, and if I have SKIPIP and listing the IP of my gateway servers, does that effectively make those types of tests useless? SMTP (3090095d44d9) processing F:\Spool\q3090095d44d9.smd SMTP (3090095d44d9) [x] looking up recipientdomain.moc in HOSTS and MX SMTP (3090095d44d9) Trying recipientdomain.moc (0) SMTP (3090095d44d9) [x] Connecting socket to service on host using protocol SMTP (3090095d44d9) [x] using source IP for mail.eservicesforyou.net [67.94.227.39] SMTP (3090095d44d9) Connect recipientdomain.moc [216.25.47.197:25] (1) SMTP (3090095d44d9) 220 X1 NT-ESMTP Server mail.recipientdomain.moc (IMail 6.06 8010-10) SMTP (3090095d44d9) >EHLO mail.eservicesforyou.net SMTP (3090095d44d9) 250-mail.recipientdomain.moc says hello SMTP (3090095d44d9) 250-SIZE 0 SMTP (3090095d44d9) 250-8BITMIME SMTP (3090095d44d9) 250-DSN SMTP (3090095d44d9) 250-ETRN SMTP (3090095d44d9) 250 EXPN Received: from mail.recipientdomain.moc (mail.recipientdomain.moc [216.25.47.197]) by mail13.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA49vpJ2009604 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 04:57:51 -0500 Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.recipientdomain.moc (SMTP32) id A03AC; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 04:57:50 -0500 Received: from mail.eservicesforyou.net [216.25.47.197] by mail.recipientdomain.moc with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A09D5D1300B8; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 04:57:49 -0500 Received: from wks1 [192.168.16.11] by mail.eservicesforyou.net with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.20) id A09006A0; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 01:57:36 -0800 John T eServices For You --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] testing mailserver
H David, What you saw in the message below was all there is, that was the entire message body after my test. First line was the Received: line, last line was the X-IMail-ThreadID: line. As to how to reproduce it, do as I did, I describe exactly what I did. Groetjes, Bonno Bloksma - Original Message - From: David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 8:24 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] testing mailserver Bonno, The text actually did appear as the body of the email. The problem was that the headers were added after the body, which has been an ongoing problem. Declude was not able to determine where the headers actually ended and the body began, so it only *looks* like the text is not in the body. Please send the actual message file as an attachment to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that we can look at the raw data format of the message. With regard to these broken emails where headers are placed in the wrong location, we are still doing some testing and expect to have a solution very shortly. David Franco-Rocha Declude Technical / Engineering - Original Message - From: Bonno Bloksma To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 6:31 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] testing mailserver Hi, I was testing our mailserver by setting up a telnet session on port 25 and then entering the commands. I must have done something realy wrong as my tekst appears in the headers in a way not even Outlook Express can see. ;-0 It will show a blank message. This is wat was delivered to me: Received: from TEST [194.109.165.42] by tio.nl (SMTPD-8.21) id AE3902D0; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:08:41 +0100dit is een testX-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client [8c200041].X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [194.109.165.42]X-Declude-Spoolname: D9DFC01B0059C.SMDX-Declude-Note: Scanned at tio.nl by Declude 2.0.6 (http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm) for spam.X-Declude-Scan: Score [8] at 12:09:30 on 02 Nov 2005X-Declude-Tests: BADHEADERSX-Country-Chain: NETHERLANDS->destination---[E-mail scanned at tio.nl for viruses by Declude Virus]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:09:30 +0100X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Status: UX-UIDL: 383765952X-IMail-ThreadID: 9dfc01b0059c See the "dit is een test" below the received from line? This is what I did: Start (Windows) telnetset LOCAL_ECHOopen mail.tio.nl 25HELO TESTMAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>DATAdit is een test.QUIT Did I make a BIG mistake? I know I should have added a msgid somewhere and a date line to have a proper valid message but is that nessecary in order to have the text after the DATA command appear as the body part of a mail? I'm using Declude 2.0.6 Met vriendelijke groet, Bonno Bloksma hoofd systeembeheer tio hogeschool toerisme en hospitality julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo t 074 255 06 10 / f 074 255 06 16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.tio.nl