Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
No virus scanner on this machine. I dont see any large files being corrupted only small files like you see too. The files we are having problems with is all small jpg files. H. Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi, Yes it started around this weekend - and, in our case too, those are small JPEG/GIF thumbnail images of up to 4K (so probably exactly one allocation unit). I've asked my client to intentionally change the compression factor to create the files slightly larger than 4096 bytes - to see if this theory holds true. It's pretty unlikely that no larger files would be effected by a hardware error, considering that they should have a higher chance to be effected (due to their larger size). Are you using an on-access virus scanner? We use McAfee - just trying to cover every base. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 06:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. Windows 2000 server. I have no clue what it could be at this time. It started around this weekend I think. Please keep me posted if you find something. H. Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi, I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later the data is corrupted. I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always see the byte pattern of 0xDF. I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the data it would either get good or bad data. However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 MB large. Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: Decludeproc -v displays the version and build Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Dave - That's what I call catch 22: D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag Invalid command line parameter: -install Install Declude -diagPrint diagnostics Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out what's wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters are... "-install" and "-diag"? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Hi Dave, thanks. Next question: I noticed that your Virus.CFG is missing two options from Version 2: AUTOFORGE ON BANEZIPEXTS ON If I recall correctly, the idea was that: BANZIPEXTS OFF # BANEXT EZIP BANEZIPEXTS ON would PERMIT banned ex
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
This is why I tend to hold off a while before applying the monthly hotfixes unless there is an active exploit. The July one for Windows 2003 relied on having the files to uninstall a very old hotfix (a change in some Australia time zone thing). I deleted old hotfix uninstall files on all of my servers months ago, and as a result the update would fail every time. There were lots of postings on support lists all over the place concerning this. Where Microsoft has reps, they were pretty much mum except to say that they had heard of some having issues. Then about 25 days later, that hotfix disappeared from my Windows Update queue. There was never a KB article or nuttin'. I guess the moral of this story is that you might not find confirmation from Microsoft unless it gets press, and you also probably not see a fix for weeks...if it is their fault. Uninstalling the most recent hotfixes seems to make a lot of sense. Keep in mind also that this probably affects more than just <= 4KB images. Matt Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi, Yes it started around this weekend - and, in our case too, those are small JPEG/GIF thumbnail images of up to 4K (so probably exactly one allocation unit). I've asked my client to intentionally change the compression factor to create the files slightly larger than 4096 bytes - to see if this theory holds true. It's pretty unlikely that no larger files would be effected by a hardware error, considering that they should have a higher chance to be effected (due to their larger size). Are you using an on-access virus scanner? We use McAfee - just trying to cover every base. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 06:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. Windows 2000 server. I have no clue what it could be at this time. It started around this weekend I think. Please keep me posted if you find something. H. Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi, I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later the data is corrupted. I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always see the byte pattern of 0xDF. I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the data it would either get good or bad data. However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 MB large. Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: Decludeproc -v displays the version and build Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Dave - That's what I call catch 22: D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag Invalid command line parameter:
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
One thing to remember going in a different direction is that all hard drives contain errors, even brand spanking new shiny ones. And all hard drives degrade over time. However, it seems like this is something else. John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy > Schmidt > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 6:29 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files > > Hi, > > Yes it started around this weekend - and, in our case too, those are small > JPEG/GIF thumbnail images of up to 4K (so probably exactly one allocation > unit). > > I've asked my client to intentionally change the compression factor to > create the files slightly larger than 4096 bytes - to see if this theory > holds true. > > It's pretty unlikely that no larger files would be effected by a hardware > error, considering that they should have a higher chance to be effected (due > to their larger size). > > Are you using an on-access virus scanner? We use McAfee - just trying to > cover every base. > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir > Eidskrem > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 06:46 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files > > > we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. > We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. > They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. > > Windows 2000 server. > > I have no clue what it could be at this time. > It started around this weekend I think. > > Please keep me posted if you find something. > > H. > > > Andy Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) > > running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). > > > > Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP > > space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while > > later the data is corrupted. > > > > I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to > > appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 > > bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a > > share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always > > see the byte pattern of 0xDF. > > > > I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure > > enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad > > clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. > > > > Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was > > truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to > > read the data it would either get good or bad data. > > > > However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on > > an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a > > set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). > > > > So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from > > entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the > > chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. > > Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less > > than 4 MB large. > > > > Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. > > > > Best Regards > > Andy Schmidt > > > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > David Barker > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > > When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and > > the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your > > \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. > > The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: > > > > Decludeproc -v displays the version and build > > > > Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service > > > > Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Andy Schmidt > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > > > > Dave - > > > > That's what I call catch 22: > > > > D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag > > Invalid command line parameter: > > -install Install Declude > > -diagPrint diagnostics > > > > Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out > > what's wrong. But, "-diag" i
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
Hi, Yes it started around this weekend - and, in our case too, those are small JPEG/GIF thumbnail images of up to 4K (so probably exactly one allocation unit). I've asked my client to intentionally change the compression factor to create the files slightly larger than 4096 bytes - to see if this theory holds true. It's pretty unlikely that no larger files would be effected by a hardware error, considering that they should have a higher chance to be effected (due to their larger size). Are you using an on-access virus scanner? We use McAfee - just trying to cover every base. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 06:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. Windows 2000 server. I have no clue what it could be at this time. It started around this weekend I think. Please keep me posted if you find something. H. Andy Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) > running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). > > Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP > space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while > later the data is corrupted. > > I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to > appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 > bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a > share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always > see the byte pattern of 0xDF. > > I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure > enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad > clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. > > Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was > truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to > read the data it would either get good or bad data. > > However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on > an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a > set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). > > So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from > entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the > chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. > Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less > than 4 MB large. > > Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > David Barker > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and > the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your > \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. > The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: > > Decludeproc -v displays the version and build > > Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service > > Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service > > David B > www.declude.com > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Andy Schmidt > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > Dave - > > That's what I call catch 22: > > D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag > Invalid command line parameter: > -install Install Declude > -diagPrint diagnostics > > Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out > what's wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters are... > "-install" and "-diag"? > > > Best Regards > Andy Schmidt > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Andy Schmidt > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > Hi Dave, > > thanks. > > Next question: > > I noticed that your Virus.CFG is missing two options from Version 2: > > AUTOFORGE ON > > BANEZIPEXTS ON > > > If I recall correctly, the idea was that: > BANZIPEXTS OFF > # BANEXT EZIP > BANEZIPEXTS ON > > would PERMIT banned extensions insi
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
Hi, Well - yes, we do install the security fixes on a regular basis - and there has been a round of updates recently. Clients may not have discovered the problem for a few days. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 08:04 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files Any updates or patches recently applied? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Heimir Eidskrem > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:46 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files > > we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. > We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. > They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. > > Windows 2000 server. > > I have no clue what it could be at this time. > It started around this weekend I think. > > Please keep me posted if you find something. > > H. > > > Andy Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase > > years) running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). > > > > Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their > > FTP space, > > and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later > > the data > > is corrupted. > > > > I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear > > with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 > > bytes. When I > > inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but > > if I access the files through some other method, I always see the > > byte pattern of > > 0xDF. > > > > I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, > > sure enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows > > replaced bad clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the > > next day. > > > > Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was > > truly on > > its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the > > data it > > would either get good or bad data. > > > > However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on > > an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a > > set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). > > > > So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from > > entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances > > that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both > > on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 > > MB large. > > > > Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. > > > > Best Regards > > Andy Schmidt > > > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David > > Barker > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 > > anew > > > > When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and > > the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in > > your \Declude > > directory. > > This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options > > on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: > > > > Decludeproc -v displays the version and build > > > > Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service > > > > Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Andy Schmidt > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 > > anew > > > > > > Dave - > > > > That's what I call catch 22: > > > > D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag > > Invalid command line parameter: > > -install Install Declude > > -diagPrint diagnostics > > > > Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out > > what's wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters > > are... "-install" > > and "-diag"? > > > > > > Best Regards > > Andy Schmidt > > > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Andy Schmidt > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 > > anew > > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > thanks. > > > > Next question: > > > > I noticed that y
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
The only thing that comes to mind is the Microsoft updates from last week. But I do think I installed those on Wednesday. H. John T (Lists) wrote: Any updates or patches recently applied? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:46 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. Windows 2000 server. I have no clue what it could be at this time. It started around this weekend I think. Please keep me posted if you find something. H. Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi, I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later the data is corrupted. I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always see the byte pattern of 0xDF. I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the data it would either get good or bad data. However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 MB large. Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: Decludeproc -v displays the version and build Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Dave - That's what I call catch 22: D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag Invalid command line parameter: -install Install Declude -diagPrint diagnostics Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out what's wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters are... "-install" and "-diag"? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Hi Dave, thanks. Next question: I noticed that your Virus.CFG is missing two options from Version 2: AUTOFORGE ON BANEZIPEXTS ON If I recall correctly, the idea was that: BANZIPEXTS OFF # BANEXT EZIP BANEZIPEXTS ON would PERMIT banned extensions inside zipped files (where they could be scanned), but DENY banned extensions if they were contained inside encrypted zipped files. Where those options forgotten in your config file - or are they no longer available in Version 3? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 02:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@d
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
Any updates or patches recently applied? John T eServices For You "Seek, and ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir > Eidskrem > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 3:46 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files > > we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. > We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. > They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. > > Windows 2000 server. > > I have no clue what it could be at this time. > It started around this weekend I think. > > Please keep me posted if you find something. > > H. > > > Andy Schmidt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) > > running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). > > > > Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP space, > > and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later the data > > is corrupted. > > > > I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear > > with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 bytes. When I > > inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but if I > > access the files through some other method, I always see the byte pattern of > > 0xDF. > > > > I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure > > enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad > > clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. > > > > Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was truly on > > its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the data it > > would either get good or bad data. > > > > However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on an > > entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a set of > > relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). > > > > So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from > > entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances > > that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both on > > software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 MB large. > > > > Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. > > > > Best Regards > > Andy Schmidt > > > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David > > Barker > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > > When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and the > > first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your \Declude > > directory. > > This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options on > > decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: > > > > Decludeproc -v displays the version and build > > > > Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service > > > > Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service > > > > David B > > www.declude.com > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy > > Schmidt > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > > > > Dave - > > > > That's what I call catch 22: > > > > D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag > > Invalid command line parameter: > > -install Install Declude > > -diagPrint diagnostics > > > > Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out what's > > wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters are... "-install" > > and "-diag"? > > > > > > Best Regards > > Andy Schmidt > > > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > > Fax:+1 201 934-9206 > > > > > > > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy > > Schmidt > > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew > > > > > > Hi Dave, > > > > thanks. > > > > Next question: > > > > I noticed that your Virus.CFG is missing two options from Version 2: > > > > AUTOFORGE ON > > > > BANEZIPEXTS ON > > > > > > If I recall correctly, the idea was that: > > BANZIPEXTS OFF > > # BANEXT EZIP > > BANEZIPEXTS ON > > > > would PERMIT banned extensions inside zipped files (where they could be > > scanned), but DENY banned extensions if they were contained inside encrypted > > zipped files. > > > > Where those options forgotten in your config file - or are they no longer > > available in Version 3? > > > > > > Best Regards > > Andy Schmidt > > > > Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) > > Fax:+
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
Check out IPlus Info Browser at http://www.martekware.com. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John > Doyle > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:07 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > > > Good morning > > Can anyone recommend a program to strip user and password data to assist > in > loading a gateway. > username, domain and password. > > I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm looking for a > recommendation by someone > who has actually used it. > > Thanks > > John > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
we are having the exact problem on one of our servers. We create small thumbnail pictures about 4k in size. They work fine at first but later they are corrupted. Windows 2000 server. I have no clue what it could be at this time. It started around this weekend I think. Please keep me posted if you find something. H. Andy Schmidt wrote: Hi, I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later the data is corrupted. I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always see the byte pattern of 0xDF. I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the data it would either get good or bad data. However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 MB large. Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: Decludeproc -v displays the version and build Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Dave - That's what I call catch 22: D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag Invalid command line parameter: -install Install Declude -diagPrint diagnostics Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out what's wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters are... "-install" and "-diag"? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Hi Dave, thanks. Next question: I noticed that your Virus.CFG is missing two options from Version 2: AUTOFORGE ON BANEZIPEXTS ON If I recall correctly, the idea was that: BANZIPEXTS OFF # BANEXT EZIP BANEZIPEXTS ON would PERMIT banned extensions inside zipped files (where they could be scanned), but DENY banned extensions if they were contained inside encrypted zipped files. Where those options forgotten in your config file - or are they no longer available in Version 3? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 02:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew The Program Files\Declude is a temp directory that can be deleted after the install. The original purpose of this directory was to make available the latest configs as we do not overwrite your configs. This has since been removed in version 4.x where you will find a \Declude\Resources directory which has the same purpose. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:36 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to ins
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
Exporting to? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Doyle > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 1:44 PM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > > I'm sorry I forgot that. > I'm running Imail 8.22 with the users in the registry. > > John > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of John Dobbin > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:49 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > > > For what mail server? > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > John Doyle > > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:07 AM > > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > > > > > > Good morning > > > > Can anyone recommend a program to strip user and password data to > > assist in loading a gateway. > > username, domain and password. > > > > I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm > looking for > > a recommendation by someone who has actually used it. > > > > Thanks > > > > John > > > > > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > > "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
Sandy I'm looking for something to extract to a file, will this do it? John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:04 PM To: John Doyle Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm looking > for a recommendation by someone who has actually used it. Well, I've used it. Though I did write it. :) The free ldap2aliases script in my sig is designed to sync IMail users and aliases on one server into corresponding aliases on an upstream (IMail) MX. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release / Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/downloa d/release/ http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/re lease/ --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Disk pattern 0xDF in files
Hi, I have two older servers (but not same models or same purchase years) running Windows 2000 with mirrored disks (software Raid-1). Two days ago a customer noticed that they uploaded files to their FTP space, and initially they see the files on the browser - but a while later the data is corrupted. I investigated - and oddly enough the problem so far always seems to appear with small thumbnail graphics files that occupy less than 4095 bytes. When I inspect the files I may see the "correct" data through a share, but if I access the files through some other method, I always see the byte pattern of 0xDF. I ran a standalone checkdisk a day ago against the first server, sure enough, it reported and fixed several problems "Windows replaced bad clusters in file ". But, the problem recurred the next day. Now, my first instinct was that ONE of the two mirrored disks was truly on its way out and depending on which drive was being used to read the data it would either get good or bad data. However, a day later a second customer had the same complaint but on an entirely different machine. In this case, the error occurs with a set of relatively new SCSI drives (not even a year old). So now that I'm looking at two totally different server models, from entirely different years, one with fairly new disks - what are the chances that the SAME problem and symptom would show at the same time. Both on software mirrored disks, in both cases files that are less than 4 MB large. Now I'm wondering if this is some "software" issue. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:53 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew When the decludeproc services start under your windows services and the first email is processed. A file call diags.txt is created in your \Declude directory. This should contain the version and diagnostics. The valid options on decludeproc from the cmd prompt are: Decludeproc -v displays the version and build Decludeproc -i installs the decludeproc service Decludeproc -u uninstalls the decludeproc service David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Dave - That's what I call catch 22: D:\IMail>decludeproc -diag Invalid command line parameter: -install Install Declude -diagPrint diagnostics Hm - so let's see, after "-install", I used "-diag" to figure out what's wrong. But, "-diag" is invalid. The ony valid parameters are... "-install" and "-diag"? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Hi Dave, thanks. Next question: I noticed that your Virus.CFG is missing two options from Version 2: AUTOFORGE ON BANEZIPEXTS ON If I recall correctly, the idea was that: BANZIPEXTS OFF # BANEXT EZIP BANEZIPEXTS ON would PERMIT banned extensions inside zipped files (where they could be scanned), but DENY banned extensions if they were contained inside encrypted zipped files. Where those options forgotten in your config file - or are they no longer available in Version 3? Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 02:43 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew The Program Files\Declude is a temp directory that can be deleted after the install. The original purpose of this directory was to make available the latest configs as we do not overwrite your configs. This has since been removed in version 4.x where you will find a \Declude\Resources directory which has the same purpose. David B www.declude.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:36 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to install Declude 3.1.20 anew Hi, I'm trying to set up a server from scratch and thus downloaded and ran: Declude_IM_N310.exe and chose the option to let it do its install (rather than the option for "experienced" admins). PS - that screen has a typo! The setup created a C:\Program Files\Declude folder that contains just the 5 config
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
> I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm looking > for a recommendation by someone who has actually used it. Well, I've used it. Though I did write it. :) The free ldap2aliases script in my sig is designed to sync IMail users and aliases on one server into corresponding aliases on an upstream (IMail) MX. --Sandy Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/SPAMC32/download/release/ Defuse Dictionary Attacks: Turn Exchange or IMail mailboxes into IMail Aliases! http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/exchange2aliases/download/release/ http://www.imprimia.com/products/software/freeutils/ldap2aliases/download/release/ --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
I'm sorry I forgot that. I'm running Imail 8.22 with the users in the registry. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Dobbin Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 9:49 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question For what mail server? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Doyle > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:07 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > > > Good morning > > Can anyone recommend a program to strip user and password > data to assist in loading a gateway. > username, domain and password. > > I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm > looking for a recommendation by someone who has actually used it. > > Thanks > > John > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] manual install of 4x
Is there a way to do this without the wizard? Thanks for any info -Nick --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
For what mail server? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Doyle > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:07 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question > > > Good morning > > Can anyone recommend a program to strip user and password > data to assist in loading a gateway. > username, domain and password. > > I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm > looking for a recommendation by someone who has actually used it. > > Thanks > > John > > > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be > found at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Gateway question
Good morning Can anyone recommend a program to strip user and password data to assist in loading a gateway. username, domain and password. I know this has come up in the past several times, but I'm looking for a recommendation by someone who has actually used it. Thanks John --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] What Am I missing (Subscribe to the List)
David, I am working with one of your customers on tweaking thier setup and I suggested to them to subscribe to the list. However, when I went to grab that info off the website its no longer listed on the support page? Has the subscribe info moved to another page or am I just missing it? Darrell --- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
