Re: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?

2013-03-05 Thread SM Admin
Thanks for the heads-up, but I didn’t and still don’t see either my original 
email or the responses.  I just took a look at it via the web interface because 
sometime Microsoft Live Mail (like Outlook Express before it) will not show 
some messages where it doesn’t like the header, but I just don’t see either my 
message or the responses. I’m assuming what happened was exactly what I was 
asking about – those messages were given him spam scores and deleted.

I don’t suppose you could resend those replies to the list?

Thanks,

Ben

From: Randy Armbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:12 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?

Your Friday post did show up and already has 2 or 3 responses to it







Sincerely,



Randy Armbrecht

Global Web Solutions, Inc.

Office: 804.442.5300 x112

Toll Free: 877.800.4562



24 /7 Tech Support!

Your Internet Source.Since 1996!



NEW GlobalSync Remote-BackUp Solutions!



Web Hosting  -  E-Mail  -  Spam/Virus Gateway Services

Hi-Speed DSL, Ethernet and Wireless Internet -  T-1/T-3's

PC Support - Networking - Virus/MalWare Removal



25% discount on most services for Non-Profits!  Call us today!



From: SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?



(I sent this message on Friday but it never showed up, so I thought I’d try 
again.)



Hi,



I don't know if anyone is still here but I'd like some insights into some 
strange anti-spam behavior.



We have latest SmarterMail and Declude, as well as Sniffer. Over the last few 
days I noticed a significant drop in email messages.  Upon further 
investigation, I found that messages were being givn much higher spam scores 
than in the past, with the result that they get classified as spam or just 
outright deleted.  Checking the headers, however, I don't see why the scores 
are coming in so high.  Below are a few examples.  Does anyone see why the spam 
scores come out so high?



Thanks,



Ben



***

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-2998-c
X-Declude-Sender: mstad...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 195938010.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [0] at 17:26:20 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.garrettlaw.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:3, Declude: 0
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 15

*

-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-32767-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159487572.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 16:38:51 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.ghrlawyers.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:7, Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-SpamDetail: 0.0 TVD_SUBJ_ACC_NUM
X-SmarterMail-SpamDetail: 0.0 T_OBFU_PDF_ATTACH
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 28

**

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-32767-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159487567.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 16:35:50 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.ghrlawyers.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 1 [raw: 1], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:10, Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 41

**

Just for comparison, here is an email from the same source from Tuesday (and 
very typical of past headers):



X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-27512-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159486224.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 17:56:38 on 26 Feb 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?

2013-03-05 Thread Randy Armbrecht
Your Friday post did show up and already has 2 or 3 responses to it







Sincerely,



Randy Armbrecht

Global Web Solutions, Inc.

Office: 804.442.5300 x112

Toll Free: 877.800.4562



24 /7 Tech Support!

Your Internet Source.Since 1996!



NEW GlobalSync Remote-BackUp Solutions!



Web Hosting  -  E-Mail  -  Spam/Virus Gateway Services

Hi-Speed DSL, Ethernet and Wireless Internet -  T-1/T-3's

PC Support - Networking - Virus/MalWare Removal



25% discount on most services for Non-Profits!  Call us today!



From: SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 1:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?



(I sent this message on Friday but it never showed up, so I thought I’d try 
again.)



Hi,



I don't know if anyone is still here but I'd like some insights into some 
strange anti-spam behavior.



We have latest SmarterMail and Declude, as well as Sniffer. Over the last few 
days I noticed a significant drop in email messages.  Upon further 
investigation, I found that messages were being givn much higher spam scores 
than in the past, with the result that they get classified as spam or just 
outright deleted.  Checking the headers, however, I don't see why the scores 
are coming in so high.  Below are a few examples.  Does anyone see why the spam 
scores come out so high?



Thanks,



Ben



***

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-2998-c
X-Declude-Sender: mstad...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 195938010.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [0] at 17:26:20 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.garrettlaw.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:3, Declude: 0
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 15

*

-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-32767-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159487572.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 16:38:51 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.ghrlawyers.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:7, Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-SpamDetail: 0.0 TVD_SUBJ_ACC_NUM
X-SmarterMail-SpamDetail: 0.0 T_OBFU_PDF_ATTACH
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 28

**

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-32767-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159487567.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 16:35:50 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.ghrlawyers.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 1 [raw: 1], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:10, Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 41

**

Just for comparison, here is an email from the same source from Tuesday (and 
very typical of past headers):



X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-27512-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159486224.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 17:56:38 on 26 Feb 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.garrettlaw.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 5 [raw: 3], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 5








--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type "unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?

2013-03-05 Thread SM Admin
(I sent this message on Friday but it never showed up, so I thought I’d try 
again.)

Hi,

I don't know if anyone is still here but I'd like some insights into some 
strange anti-spam behavior.

We have latest SmarterMail and Declude, as well as Sniffer. Over the last few 
days I noticed a significant drop in email messages.  Upon further 
investigation, I found that messages were being givn much higher spam scores 
than in the past, with the result that they get classified as spam or just 
outright deleted.  Checking the headers, however, I don't see why the scores 
are coming in so high.  Below are a few examples.  Does anyone see why the spam 
scores come out so high?

Thanks,

Ben

***
X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-2998-c
X-Declude-Sender: mstad...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 195938010.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [0] at 17:26:20 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.garrettlaw.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:3, Declude: 0
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 15
*
-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-32767-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159487572.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 16:38:51 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.ghrlawyers.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:7, Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-SpamDetail: 0.0 TVD_SUBJ_ACC_NUM
X-SmarterMail-SpamDetail: 0.0 T_OBFU_PDF_ATTACH
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 28
**
X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-32767-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159487567.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 16:35:50 on 01 Mar 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.ghrlawyers.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 1 [raw: 1], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
URIBL:10, Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 41
**
Just for comparison, here is an email from the same source from Tuesday (and 
very typical of past headers):

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0
X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-27512-c
X-Declude-Sender: gha...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]
X-Declude-Spoolname: 159486224.eml
X-Declude-RefID:
X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";
X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 17:56:38 on 26 Feb 2013
X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination
X-Declude-Code: 1e
X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com
X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.garrettlaw.com | ghrlawyers.com
X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_SoftFail, ISpamAssassin 5 [raw: 3], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
Declude: -3
X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 5




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] NJABL Shut Down

2013-03-05 Thread Darin Cox
Appreciate the heads up, Andy!

Darin.



From: Andy Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:09 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] NJABL Shut Down

March 1, 2013: NJABL is in the process of being shut down. The DNSBL zones
have been emptied. After "the Internet" has had some time to remove NJABL
from server configs, the NS's will be pointed off into unallocated space
(192.0.2.0/24 TEST-NET-1) to hopefully make the shutdown obvious to those
who were slower to notice.




--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type "unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] NJABL Shut Down

2013-03-05 Thread Andy Schmidt
March 1, 2013: NJABL is in the process of being shut down. The DNSBL zones
have been emptied. After "the Internet" has had some time to remove NJABL
from server configs, the NS's will be pointed off into unallocated space
(192.0.2.0/24 TEST-NET-1) to hopefully make the shutdown obvious to those
who were slower to notice.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.