[Declude.JunkMail] Unsubscribe from Declude lists not working
When I send an unsubscribe e-mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I receive the following error: "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host smtp1.declude.com[66.92.83.27] said: 550 Recipient not in route list. (in reply to RCPT TO command)" --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Which way to upgrade - SmarterMail or IMail
I am pleased to report we have had no problems using Declude 4.2.20 with SmarterMail 3.3.3269 on Windows Server 2003 R2 hosting 24 domains with 1600+ users. We have had no messages in the "error" folder. However; it should be noted that we have BSD/Postfix (IMGate) gateways in-between the Internet and the SmarterMail server. The gateways reject a lot of unwanted traffic, so the SmarterMail server never receives much of the malicious code and dictionary attacks that frequently occur. In our installation, both SmarterMail and Declude have been very stable. Harry Palmer -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Goran JovanovicSent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 3:58 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Which way to upgrade - SmarterMail or IMail Hi All, I am currently running IMail 8.15 HF2 and Declude 4.1.0. I got new server hardware so it is time to do it all over again. I want to incorporate an address validation gateway on the same box as my Declude system. I gateway pretty much all of my traffic and host very few domains (on the same box). Since I want all this to happen on one box I need to have two IPs both of which listen on port 25, I do not want the Declude portion to be listening on a different port. So I would either need to upgrade to IMail 8.2x since it can listen on only one IP or move to SmarterMail 3.3 as it can do the same thing. Having run IMail for a while I am obviously familiar with the product and have scripts etc that have been created for it. Having said that I am not committed to IMail. I have seen the recent thread about the thousands of messages in the declude error folder with SmarterMail. What are people having luck with? Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks Goran Jovanovic Omega Network Solutions---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: port forwarding
If you are hosting the new webmail on the same IIS server as the old IMail machine, you may do the following to allow users to continue using port 8383: On web server 1.) Start Programs>Administrative Tools>Internet Services Manager 2.) Select webmail>properties>tabWeb Site> Advanced 3.) tabMultiple Identities>Add ipaddr=(All Unassigned), TCP Port=8383, header name=blank 4.) Click OK to exit, then stop and start webmail Webmail will answer on all ip addresses:8383 No redirection necessary - I'm making the jump to a new mailserver this weekend, and I've hit two snags. I know that the answers to both of these questions are in the archives, but the search feature on the list archive appears to be broken currently. My apologies to all, both for the OT question as well as for reasking. Question one: Many, many of our users have existing shortcuts and bookmarks to webmail on our old Imail machine at the webserver:8383 address. The new machine will have the same FQDN, but the webclient won't run on 8383 any more, it will run on 80. We won't have time to track down every user and update those links, so we're looking for ways to accommodate them. What are people using for port forwarding? I tried using stunnel last night to intercept an 8383 session and redirect it to 80, with dismal results. There must be a smarter and more elegant solution. Thanks, John S --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?
Oops - I just restarted the service. It now reports the correct version. Thanks! - Did you stop the service when replacing the executable ? David B www.declude.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 11:06 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12? The response is: Declude Version 3.0.5.12 - Goto your smartermail directory at the command prompt and type Decludeproc -v Which version are you displaying ? David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:34 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12? It appears that Decludeproc v3.0.5.12 for SmarterMail is displaying its version in the header as v3.0.5.11. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?
The response is: Declude Version 3.0.5.12 - Goto your smartermail directory at the command prompt and type Decludeproc -v Which version are you displaying ? David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Palmer Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:34 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12? It appears that Decludeproc v3.0.5.12 for SmarterMail is displaying its version in the header as v3.0.5.11. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Incorrect version number reported by v...12?
It appears that Decludeproc v3.0.5.12 for SmarterMail is displaying its version in the header as v3.0.5.11. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail
Hi David, What is the recommended setting for SmarterMail delivery delay with Declude? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 3:56 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail No, there is not an inherent delay in the delivery of all messages. If Declude does not complete processing within a specified time period, SmarterMail tries to take the file. However, if Declude finishes processing sooner, SmarterMail knows that the Declude process has terminated and delivers the email immediately. - Original Message - From: "David Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]" Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 4:34 PM Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail > Hello David, > > Friday, April 29, 2005, 4:27:38 PM, you wrote: > > DFRD> msg to Declude and, after a set period of time, tries to deliver it. > Taking > DFRD> it out of the spool prevents SmarterMail from grabbing the file > until > DFRD> Declude has finished with it. > > So there is an inherent delay in the delivery of all messages? How > long? > > > -- > Best regards, > Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Any word on the 2.06 release?
We have been running Declude 2.05 with SmarterMail for a month without any problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:24 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Any word on the 2.06 release? Erik wrote: > Me either Declude has been pretty silent with a lack of > communication in all areas. Is anyone running the current version (2.05?) with Smartermail? I've yet to install it with all the problems of late. Jim --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File manager for nonstandard files
Try DeleteFXPfiles available here... http://www.tucows.com/preview/335686.html -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, January 24, 2005 4:23 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - File manager for nonstandard files Hi, all- A colo customer's website was hacked to include a bunch of movie files buried deep in his site. The directories use nonstandard Windows characters, and I can't get to the files through the command prompt or the Windows Explorer. The diruse.exe utility does see them, however. Does anybody here know of a way to get to these files and remove them? -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 301-652-8822 x209
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail -> Postfix
Len Conrad's IMGate at http://imgate.meiway.com works equally well with with SmarterMail and IMail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Jaworski Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:54 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail -> Postfix Anyone have an automated system to interface between SmartMail and Postfix using Postfix only as a gateway to SmarterMail/Declude/Sniffer??? Thanks, Michael Jaworski Puget Sound Network, Inc. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail
The IMGate configuration is by Len Conrad http://imgate.meiway.com/. No changes to IMGate were required for IMGate to work with SmarterMail. To extract SmarterMail users I am using the utility provided by Roger Weiss http://www.plateaultd.com/tools/smartermail/ > Thanks, Harry. What is the interface between Smarter Mail and IMGate? = > Di you write a custom XML export routine? - Original Message - From: Harry Palmer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:51 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail We replaced IMail with SmarterMail on our server hosting 27 sites with 1,800+ users. I don't believe our message volume would be meaningful to you because we also have two IMGates (primary and secondary mxs) between the Internet and the SmarterMail server, same as we had with our IMail server. The IMGates reject a significant amount of worthless traffic, greatly reducing the workload on the SmarterMail server. We export the list of users, aliases and domains from SmarterMail to the IMGates, therefore providing a very effective defense against dictionary attacks. Declude for SmarterMail is still in beta, so we have turned it on and off as we test. We don't yet have enough experience to accurately compare IMail+Declude to SmarterMail+Declude. It wouldn't be appropriate to evaluate the combination anyway, until Declude for SmarterMail is released for production use. Overall, we are quite pleased with SmarterMail and all end user comments have been positive. Hope this helps. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:50 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail What sort of message volume are you testing? The SmarterTools folks say the CPU loads should be lighter with SM than IMal. Can you verify that from your experience? I'm testing it as a "SmartHost" mail cache right now, with volume of about 100,000 a day, and it looks to be holding up well in that environment. I am not testing it with Declude however. It does not appear that Declude functions with their SmartHost service. I've had few issues with SM when using it as a mailcache. The mail issueis that I'm having trouble getting them to understand that the cache needs an address list from the POP server to protect it from dictionary attacks. My cache volmue would probably be about 1,000-3,000 if the cache could send back 550 errors. The spammers and hackers seem to be ignoring 550s from the main server and targeting the higher preference number MX on the cache. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: Harry Palmer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:24 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail We are testing SmarterMail and Declude now. It is working quite well with a few outstanding issues. It's still in beta.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail
We replaced IMail with SmarterMail on our server hosting 27 sites with 1,800+ users. I don't believe our message volume would be meaningful to you because we also have two IMGates (primary and secondary mxs) between the Internet and the SmarterMail server, same as we had with our IMail server. The IMGates reject a significant amount of worthless traffic, greatly reducing the workload on the SmarterMail server. We export the list of users, aliases and domains from SmarterMail to the IMGates, therefore providing a very effective defense against dictionary attacks. Declude for SmarterMail is still in beta, so we have turned it on and off as we test. We don't yet have enough experience to accurately compare IMail+Declude to SmarterMail+Declude. It wouldn't be appropriate to evaluate the combination anyway, until Declude for SmarterMail is released for production use. Overall, we are quite pleased with SmarterMail and all end user comments have been positive. Hope this helps. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:50 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail What sort of message volume are you testing? The SmarterTools folks say the CPU loads should be lighter with SM than IMal. Can you verify that from your experience? I'm testing it as a "SmartHost" mail cache right now, with volume of about 100,000 a day, and it looks to be holding up well in that environment. I am not testing it with Declude however. It does not appear that Declude functions with their SmartHost service. I've had few issues with SM when using it as a mailcache. The mail issueis that I'm having trouble getting them to understand that the cache needs an address list from the POP server to protect it from dictionary attacks. My cache volmue would probably be about 1,000-3,000 if the cache could send back 550 errors. The spammers and hackers seem to be ignoring 550s from the main server and targeting the higher preference number MX on the cache. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. - Original Message - From: Harry Palmer To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:24 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail We are testing SmarterMail and Declude now. It is working quite well with a few outstanding issues. It's still in beta.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail
We are testing SmarterMail and Declude now. It is working quite well with a few outstanding issues. It's still in beta.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders Glitch?
Why not just set the SPAMHEADERS weight to zero in GLOBAL.CFG as a workaround until the problem is fixed by a new release? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail
Title: Declude and Smartermail > Does anyone actually have a production Smarter Mail/Declude server in use? We have a production SmarterMail server hosting 27 sites with 1800+ users. SmarterMail replaced IMail here on December 14, 2004. SmarterMail performance has been very good. We tested Declude with SmarterMail and identified some issues, so we are awaiting the next release of Declude before deploying it on the production SmarterMail server.
IPWHOIS:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text
On domains where the subject is modified, we add "UCE~" to indicate Spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J Porter Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text I had the same concern. I like the question mark idea. I'm currently using [JUNK], [JUNKMAIL], and [FILTERED] .. (with the brackets). I've noticed that even Microsoft email is failing the REVDNS test. It's probably because their server is behind a firewall. Anyone got a good suggestion for how to handle email servers behind firewalls that fail REVDNS?? - Original Message - From: "Dale McDiarmid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:29 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Advice for SUBJECT text > Hello... > > Installed JunkMail on my corporate mailserver (150 employees), and so far, > I've set the SUBJECT text to [Spam]. My boss thinks it should be something > less definate. He suggests [Spam?] in order to give the impression that the > message *may* be spam. > > I'm interested in what other admins who use SUBJECT are doing for your > text, and why. > > Thx, > D. > > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web > site at http://www.declude.com . > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses at HNB.com] > > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com . --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Duplicate warnings and weights.
I just sent them an e-mail with that suggestion. > >X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 > >X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 >Perhaps it would be helpful to add the word "In" or "Out" to the error text? Yes, it would. You may want to contact the people that run the ORBZ tests and see if they could do that. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com . --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Duplicate warnings and weights.
Perhaps it would be helpful to add the word "In" or "Out" to the error text? >X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 >X-RBL-Warning: Open relay. Please see http://orbz.org/?165.252.48.3 >X-RBL-Warning: Blocked - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?165.252.48.3 >X-RBL-Warning: This E-mail was sent from a mail server [No Reverse DNS] with >no reverse DNS entry. > > Notice the duplicate Open Relay warning. It appears as though > this warning Actually, if you look closely, you'll see they are different -- the first one has two spaces after the ".", but the second one only has one space. What is happening is that the E-mail is being sent from a mail server listed in both the ORBZIN and ORBZOUT databases. So it is failing two different (yet similar) tests. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.37 released
Sniffer with works with 1.37 beta here. Thanks! - Declude v1.37 released We have just released Declude v1.37 (as a beta, although it only includes fixes). For Declude JunkMail, it takes care of two issues with the "fromfile" test type, gets variables to work properly in the subject, and gets weighting to work with the "external" test type. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Some way to tell which tests failed?
One way to accomplish your objectives is as follows: In your global.cfg... Assign a weight of at least 1 to each test you choose to perform Add the following line WEIGHT1 weight x x 1 0 and place the line below in your $default$junkmail WEIGHT1 WARNX-RBL-Warning: Tests-Failed-> %TESTSFAILED% (This will cause the list of all tests failed to appear in the header when at least one test fails.) Also, in global.cfg, assign weights to be used to trigger various actions, such as... WEIGHT15weight x x 15 0 WEIGHT20weight x x 20 0 WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0 and in $default$junkmail, determine actions for each weight, for example, WEIGHT15LOG WEIGHT20WARN WEIGHT30HOLD set the actions for all other performed tests in $default$junkmail to LOG Good luck! - I also use only the Weight system and would like a way to tell just what test failed. But sometimes I get lost following these threads that cross several days worth of e-mails. So if I'm redundant, please excuse my lack of attention. I would like to have one line in the e-mail header that lists all the tests that failed (for e-mails that get through) and one entry in the dec.log that lists the all the tests that failed (for those e-mails that get deleted - just in case I need to trace a problem). If you would be so kind to help me with the following: 1) write the line for $defaule$ to put in the %testsfailed% in the header. 2) put log entries in dec.log 3) and last if I'm using only the weight system, should I set all the tests to WARN or something else so my log doesn't fill up with redundant information. Thanks in advance for your help. Ken --- [This E-mail was scanned by the balloons.com anti-virus system.] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
[Declude.JunkMail] Thinking about about buying declude junkmail pro
We have been using Declude JunkMail Pro for approximately one year. We have found it easy to administer and very effective. We are pleased to recommend Declude JunkMail Pro as well as Declude Virus. They are excellent products with excellent technical support. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer
Thanks, Scott. I have just installed sniffer this afternoon. It's working very well. >Is it possible to assign a weight to sniffer? Yes. >If so, what is the proper syntax? SNIFFER external nonzero "C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\sniffer.exe " 10 0 That would define a weight of 10 for E-mails that were caught by Sniffer. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer
FTC Plans Crackdown on Junk E-mail http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,44477,00.html --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
[Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer
Is it possible to assign a weight to sniffer? If so, what is the proper syntax? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
RE: [Declude.JunkMail] header confusion
Perhaps MSG_BODY_BEGIN MSG_BODY_END or MSG_BODY_TOP MSG_BODY_BOTTOM - By the way, can anyone think of a better names than HEADER/FOOTER when dealing with text added to the body of the E-mail? That *is* very confusing (especially when trying to explain it "The HEADER action adds a header (no, not a real header...)". -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
