Re: [Declude.JunkMail] too funny

2006-04-19 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom

This is the best part,

Registration is via a confidential money transfer.

Send your bank's name, account number, your name, address, telephone number, 
and fax numbers. Please note again that this transaction is strictly 
confidential and as such should be kept secret. Be rest assured that this 
transaction is 100% risk free.


Mike



- Original Message - 
From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] too funny



Saw this in a security newsletter:

http://j-walk.com/other/conf/index.htm
Nigerian Email Conference

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.4/318 - Release Date: 4/18/2006




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-22 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom



Actually it was Novell that intro'd this word to 
the PC server world, Microsoft just intro'd it to the masses:-)
 
Mike
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Nick 
  Hayer 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 
  16:51
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  Decludeproc abend
  John T (Lists) wrote: 
  




Is abend some 
kind of French word?AbnormalEnding. - 
  circa 1985 - coined with the introduction of Microsoft 
  products.-Nicko
  

 
;)
 

John 
T
eServices For 
You
 

-Original 
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Goran 
JovanovicSent: 
Wednesday, December 21, 
2005 1:13 
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc 
abend
 
I have had 
decludeproc 3.0.5.22 abend on me twice today. Is there anything I should be 
doing to capture information about this? I have automatic restart enabled so 
it starts again but I am not super happy with it abending.
 
Any hints on what 
(if anything) I can/should be doing?
 

Goran 
Jovanovic
Omega 
Network Solutions
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 
  12/21/2005


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] does anyone punish email from these folks?

2005-12-20 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom



We outright reject all their mail.
 
We started by just holding and found lots of 
'suspicious' activity like identical emails with different "from" domains, etc. 
Normal spam type stuff CC offers, grant money, etc.
 
The we started blocked one /24, then they switched 
to other subnets so we blocked their entire IP space.
 
No complaints from users.
 
Mike
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Nick 
  Hayer 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 
  10:36
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] does anyone 
  punish email from these folks?
  I sure do get allot of spam from this ip space - are they legit 
  and are lacking in their monitoring or ?Thanks --NickOrgName:WholeSale Internet 
OrgID:  WHOLE-125
Address:1102 Grand Ave Suite 905
City:   Kansas City
StateProv:  MO
PostalCode: 64106
Country:US

NetRange:   69.30.192.0 - 69.30.239.255 
CIDR:   69.30.192.0/19, 69.30.224.0/20 
NetName:WHOLESALEINTERNET
  
  

  No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free 
  Edition.Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: 
  12/16/2005


Re: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom
Postfix with postgrey does exactly this.
Delays 5 minutes and maintains a db of subnet, sender & recipient combo.
Mike
- Original Message - 
From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 13:56
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

I meant to also add that I recently had many hours of planned downtime
on my MTA in my absolute lowest ham window - late Saturday evening
through early Sunday morning.  I saw very little spam increase once the
MTA was back up.
This tells me that the spammers have not yet implemented full MTAs that
retry their queued spam.  An MTA that tells them to try again later
(greylisting) would work well for me.
If greylisting that was configurable by hours was available to me, I
might turn it off during business hours for maximum "safety".  I would
also want a feature to gather addresses/domains/IPs from my outbound
mail to create an autowhitelist*.
Andrew 8)
* http://eservicesforyou.com/ John Tolmachoff, do you still sell
AutoWhite?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 6:49 AM
To: Darin Cox
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name
On Friday, February 11, 2005, 9:28:28 AM, Darin wrote:
DC> Hi Pete,
DC> Right... but the first few typically slip through before they're
DC> added to your filters (like they would for anyone)...so we add them
DC> on the first report to us as well.
I'll raise the feature request again --- as soon as I get my flameproof
suit on:
Declude should have a test/feature to delay a message by x hours if the
sender is not recognized. This gives all filtering mechanisms time to
adapt to new spam sources. Once the delay time has expired the message
is passed through as if it were new so that the presumably updated BLs,
filters, etc will have the ability to filter the message (if needed).
To revive and put to rest past arguments about this:
Big reason not to do this: It is unforgivable and in all other ways a
bad idea to delay any message by any amount of time and huge amounts of
money or even lives may be lost if this happens.
To which I contend...
If this is the first time you have ever received a message from a
particular source then there is no expectation yet for the time to
delivery and email systems in general may impose end-to-end delays of
between minutes to hours depending upon many unknown factors at any time
(queues, down servers, down connectivity, graylisting (force retry at
first connect)).
Since only _new_ connections would be effected, this feature would go
almost un-noticed in the vast majority of cases. All other email
sources, where there is an expectation, would be passed at full speed
with normal filtering.
Also, IF you happen to be in a position where you really can't afford to
impose any delays on new messages then: A) You probably aren't filtering
anyway since that would be dangerous [ a conflict in policy ] and B) You
_can_ turn it off ;-)
Those are my thoughts on that ( once again ).
_M
/M retreats to underground bunker & activates shields at full power.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name

2005-02-11 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom
Perhaps a test that looks at the date of registration so new domains could 
be weighted higher.

Mike
- Original Message - 
From: "Nick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 12:25
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a name


I am seeing more and more I guess one would call throw-away domains
like:
.hdcnsowp.com
.hcnmvkofut.com
.eisopfkcnjt.com
.edhcbxgsyi.com
These are generally in the body of an email; is there a way to
determine if a domain is in readable format? I would not fail an
email over this but it would be nice to punish the email at least to
some degree -
-Nick

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ed10.com - E-Dialog

2004-12-10 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom
Ok here
Mike
- Original Message - 
From: "DLAnalyzer Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:29
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ed10.com - E-Dialog


Does anyone have any feedback on E-Dialog.com.  It appears their are 
several reputable companies using them (NFL, Reuters, etc).
Darrell


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Scam letter filter

2004-11-22 Thread Mike K @ NetDotCom
Create a custom body filter that contains a list of the unique phrases, 
misspellings and names they use in the letters. Along with filters like 
Matt's at mailpure.com will catch most if not all of them.

There is a website that has a lot of the phrases also, do a Google for 4_1_9 
and N*i*g*e*r*i*a should turn up the address

Mike
- Original Message - 
From: "John Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 09:23
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Scam letter filter


I've been looking at the archives about the N*i*g*e*r*i*a*n letter filters
and saw a lot of discussion back in January, but couldn't tell what people
concluded would be the best filter for this.  Does anyone have anything to
share?  (Prefer a Declude only solution as I don't have SpamAssassin.)
Thanks,
John
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.