Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Matt




Statistics will give you a general idea.  We generally hold messages at
a score of 10 or 13, but we stop processing custom filters using
SKIPIFWEIGHT when the score reaches 25 and we separate those messages
from the others since we feel +99.99% confident that they are spam and
this allows us to concentrate on reviewing the small amount that gets
held but scores lower.  It's clear that after the RBL's and Sniffer run
over 90% of the spam is already beyond this weight, and our legitimate
message volume is less than 15%, so saying that our filters are run 25%
of the time is an understatement, it's more like 18% on our system. 
YYMV of course.  We take extra steps to move obvious patterns and
sources from our hold range to a score at or above 25 in order to
lighten the load of reviewing.

Since custom filters in Declude are the costliest in terms of
processing power, having a tight system and using a safe SKIPIFWEIGHT
value (beta/interim releases only) can save you at least 75% of the
load of JunkMail.  We have probably about 8,000 lines of custom filters
presently and it only appears to cause spikes on large legitimate
messages which aren't common enough to be problematic at our current
volume.  AV scanning however is a problem, one that could be helped
immensely by optimizations within Declude Virus, but that isn't your
problem.

Matt




Dave Doherty wrote:

  Matt-

My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run.  Is htere a convenient way to tell?

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


  
  
Scott,

I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.

If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
(much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.

Matt



R. Scott Perry wrote:



  
One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.

  

  
  As
  
  

  
soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
30-40%,
then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.

  
  
It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.

One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.

The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
mailservers since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  

-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

  
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
  
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  
  

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  


-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=




Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Scott-

My body filter runs last. It's set now to skip messages with attachments
(Thanks, Rick Davidson for that one!). SKIPIFWEIGHT is just above my delete
weight.

I tried to derive from the daily report and WAMLOG how many times the filter
runs, and my best guess is that it runs for around 25% of the messages. It
would be nice to know if that is even close. Sounds like it might be if
SKIPIFWEIGHT drops 80% of yours before the filter runs.

-d


- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


I haven't found any easy way to tell. The information is in the logs at high
level.

But I can chime in that SKIPIFWEIGHT bypasses about 80% of my e-mail that is
obviously spam. TESTSFAILED ENDS for "friendly domains/revdns" drop off
about 8% of e-mail that is most likely not spam, leaving about 12% of the
e-mail that I run body filters on.



Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/04 12:03PM >>>
Matt-

My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run.  Is htere a convenient way to tell?

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> Scott,
>
> I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
> they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
> SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
>
> If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
> Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
> a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
> JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
> about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
> Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
> (much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
> processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> R. Scott Perry wrote:
>
> >
> >> One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.
As
> >> soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
> >> 30-40%,
> >> then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
> >
> >
> > It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
> >
> > One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
> > 200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
> > usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.
> >
> > The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
> > \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
> > be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
> > idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.
> >
> >-Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
> > mailservers since 2000.
> > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
> > mailserver vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> =
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/
> =
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declud

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Rick Davidson
I am not sure which Imail release included the log anylizer, 8.1 I think, if
you have that version you can run the anylizer on your declude log files and
just select "unknown log lines" It is a dirty way to do it but it gives you
the info you are looking for

Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message - 
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


I haven't found any easy way to tell. The information is in the logs at high
level.

But I can chime in that SKIPIFWEIGHT bypasses about 80% of my e-mail that is
obviously spam. TESTSFAILED ENDS for "friendly domains/revdns" drop off
about 8% of e-mail that is most likely not spam, leaving about 12% of the
e-mail that I run body filters on.



Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/04 12:03PM >>>
Matt-

My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run.  Is htere a convenient way to tell?

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> Scott,
>
> I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
> they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
> SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
>
> If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
> Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
> a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
> JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
> about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
> Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
> (much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
> processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> R. Scott Perry wrote:
>
> >
> >> One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.
As
> >> soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
> >> 30-40%,
> >> then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
> >
> >
> > It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
> >
> > One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
> > 200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
> > usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.
> >
> > The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
> > \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
> > be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
> > idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.
> >
> >-Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
> > mailservers since 2000.
> > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
> > mailserver vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> =
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/
> =
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viru

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Scott Fisher
I haven't found any easy way to tell. The information is in the logs at high level.

But I can chime in that SKIPIFWEIGHT bypasses about 80% of my e-mail that is obviously 
spam. TESTSFAILED ENDS for "friendly domains/revdns" drop off about 8% of e-mail that 
is most likely not spam, leaving about 12% of the e-mail that I run body filters on.



Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/04 12:03PM >>>
Matt-

My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run.  Is htere a convenient way to tell?

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> Scott,
>
> I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
> they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
> SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
>
> If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
> Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
> a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
> JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
> about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
> Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
> (much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
> processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> R. Scott Perry wrote:
>
> >
> >> One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.
As
> >> soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
> >> 30-40%,
> >> then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
> >
> >
> > It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
> >
> > One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
> > 200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
> > usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.
> >
> > The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
> > \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
> > be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
> > idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.
> >
> >-Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
> > mailservers since 2000.
> > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
> > mailserver vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)] 
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> =
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/ 
> =
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Matt-

My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run.  Is htere a convenient way to tell?

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> Scott,
>
> I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
> they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
> SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
>
> If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
> Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
> a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
> JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
> about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
> Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
> (much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
> processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> R. Scott Perry wrote:
>
> >
> >> One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.
As
> >> soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
> >> 30-40%,
> >> then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
> >
> >
> > It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
> >
> > One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
> > 200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
> > usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.
> >
> > The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
> > \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
> > be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
> > idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.
> >
> >-Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
> > mailservers since 2000.
> > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
> > mailserver vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> =
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/
> =
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi, Matt-

We're running Declude JunkMail and Hijack. No AV on the mail server,
primarily to keep the load down. We have a firewall antivirus appliance and
a gateway server to take care of that.

-d


- Original Message - 
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> Scott,
>
> I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
> they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
> SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.
>
> If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
> Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
> a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
> JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
> about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
> Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
> (much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
> processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> R. Scott Perry wrote:
>
> >
> >> One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.
As
> >> soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
> >> 30-40%,
> >> then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
> >
> >
> > It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
> >
> > One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
> > 200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
> > usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.
> >
> > The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
> > \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
> > be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
> > idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.
> >
> >-Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
> > mailservers since 2000.
> > Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
> > mailserver vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> =
> MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
> http://www.mailpure.com/software/
> =
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Matt
Scott,
I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that 
they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with 
SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time.

If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.  
Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on 
a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude 
JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On 
about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10 
Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled 
(much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average 
processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours.

Matt

R. Scott Perry wrote:

One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range. As
soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at 
30-40%,
then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.

It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the 
200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU 
usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.

The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the 
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to 
be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better 
idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail 
mailservers since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in 
mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
OK, the BODY filter is off.

If the problem continues, I'll set the log level to debug and turn the
filter back on.

-Dave


- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


>
> >One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range. As
> >soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
30-40%,
> >then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
>
> It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
>
> One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the 200
> lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU usage
in
> Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.
>
> The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the
> \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to be
> sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better idea of
> where the high CPU usage is occurring.
>
> -Scott
> ---
> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
> since 2000.
> Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
> vulnerability detection.
> Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry

One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range. As
soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at 30-40%,
then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.
It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.
One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the 200 
lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU usage in 
Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.

The other would be to use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG" in the 
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to be 
sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better idea of 
where the high CPU usage is occurring.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
I have one BODY filter that is about 7K in size maybe 200 lines. That's it.

-d



- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


>
> >When  this happens, I usually see about three Declude processes, each in
the
> >25% - 30% neighborhood, and several more showing smaller percentages.
Also,
> >I see the usual Sniffer, SMTP, POP, and IMAP, all much lower.
>
> Do you have a lot of BODY or ANYWHERE filters (the most CPU intensive
tests
> in Declude JunkMail)?
>
> -Scott
> ---
> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
> since 2000.
> Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
> vulnerability detection.
> Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
I just watched it build, max out, and decline.

One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range. As
soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at 30-40%,
then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.

-d



- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


>
> >Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> >resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
> >
> >I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> >attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
>
> That shouldn't be an issue -- for example, with a 1MB file attachment,
> Declude will only scan about the first 5% of it.
>
> What processes are using the CPU time?
>
> -Scott
> ---
> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
> since 2000.
> Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
> vulnerability detection.
> Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
OK, it,s in place. Let's see what happens. Thanks!

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Rick Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> I use  a filter that searches for attachments and causes the email to
bypass
> further filter tests. For example my filter is called BYPASS and contains
> lines like these:
>
> BODY 0 CONTAINS .PDF
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-type: application/msword
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/pdf
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/rtf
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
> BODY 0 CONTAINS X-MS-Attachment:
>
> Then I have this line at the top of all my filters:
> TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS BYPASS
>
> Run the bypass filter before any other filter tests run, this has
eliminated
> alot of false positives for me especially with PDF files.
>
> You can recover alot of CPU processing time by running your tests in a
> logical order, run all your filters that hold or delete mail first and
then
> use the TESTSFAILED END to stop the filtering process on any messages that
> are already flagged for holding or deletion
>
> Rick Davidson
> National Systems Manager
> North American Title Group
> -
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:18 AM
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
>
>
> > Hi-
> >
> > Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> > resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
> >
> > I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> > attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
> >
> > -Dave Doherty
> >  Skywaves, Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Thanks, Rick. I'll try it out.

-d


- Original Message - 
From: "Rick Davidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> I use  a filter that searches for attachments and causes the email to
bypass
> further filter tests. For example my filter is called BYPASS and contains
> lines like these:
>
> BODY 0 CONTAINS .PDF
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-type: application/msword
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/pdf
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/rtf
> BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
> BODY 0 CONTAINS X-MS-Attachment:
>
> Then I have this line at the top of all my filters:
> TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS BYPASS
>
> Run the bypass filter before any other filter tests run, this has
eliminated
> alot of false positives for me especially with PDF files.
>
> You can recover alot of CPU processing time by running your tests in a
> logical order, run all your filters that hold or delete mail first and
then
> use the TESTSFAILED END to stop the filtering process on any messages that
> are already flagged for holding or deletion
>
> Rick Davidson
> National Systems Manager
> North American Title Group
> -
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:18 AM
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments
>
>
> > Hi-
> >
> > Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> > resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
> >
> > I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> > attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
> >
> > -Dave Doherty
> >  Skywaves, Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry

When  this happens, I usually see about three Declude processes, each in the
25% - 30% neighborhood, and several more showing smaller percentages. Also,
I see the usual Sniffer, SMTP, POP, and IMAP, all much lower.
Do you have a lot of BODY or ANYWHERE filters (the most CPU intensive tests 
in Declude JunkMail)?

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Rick Davidson
I use  a filter that searches for attachments and causes the email to bypass
further filter tests. For example my filter is called BYPASS and contains
lines like these:

BODY 0 CONTAINS .PDF
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-type: application/msword
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/pdf
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/rtf
BODY 0 CONTAINS Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
BODY 0 CONTAINS X-MS-Attachment:

Then I have this line at the top of all my filters:
TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS BYPASS

Run the bypass filter before any other filter tests run, this has eliminated
alot of false positives for me especially with PDF files.

You can recover alot of CPU processing time by running your tests in a
logical order, run all your filters that hold or delete mail first and then
use the TESTSFAILED END to stop the filtering process on any messages that
are already flagged for holding or deletion

Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 8:18 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


> Hi-
>
> Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
>
> I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
>
> -Dave Doherty
>  Skywaves, Inc.
>
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Hyslip
I know others have mentioned higher CPU load with body searches and the
like, and most like searching through the entire attachment text for matches
to a filter?

Just a guess here.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

Hi Scott-

When  this happens, I usually see about three Declude processes, each in the
25% - 30% neighborhood, and several more showing smaller percentages. Also,
I see the usual Sniffer, SMTP, POP, and IMAP, all much lower.

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


>
> >Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> >resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
> >
> >I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> >attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
>
> That shouldn't be an issue -- for example, with a 1MB file attachment,
> Declude will only scan about the first 5% of it.
>
> What processes are using the CPU time?
>
> -Scott
> ---
> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
> since 2000.
> Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
> vulnerability detection.
> Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi Scott-

When  this happens, I usually see about three Declude processes, each in the
25% - 30% neighborhood, and several more showing smaller percentages. Also,
I see the usual Sniffer, SMTP, POP, and IMAP, all much lower.

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


>
> >Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> >resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
> >
> >I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> >attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
>
> That shouldn't be an issue -- for example, with a 1MB file attachment,
> Declude will only scan about the first 5% of it.
>
> What processes are using the CPU time?
>
> -Scott
> ---
> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
> since 2000.
> Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
> vulnerability detection.
> Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Scott-

Using 1.79i7

-d


- Original Message - 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments


>
> >Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
> >resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
> >
> >I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
> >attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
>
> That shouldn't be an issue -- for example, with a 1MB file attachment,
> Declude will only scan about the first 5% of it.
>
> What processes are using the CPU time?
>
> -Scott
> ---
> Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
> since 2000.
> Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
> vulnerability detection.
> Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry

Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.
I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?
That shouldn't be an issue -- for example, with a 1MB file attachment, 
Declude will only scan about the first 5% of it.

What processes are using the CPU time?
   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments

2004-06-17 Thread Dave Doherty
Hi-

Many of my users are personnel agencies that send and receive a lot of
resumes as attachments. Some of these attachments are fairly large.

I'm having a growing problem with processor usage. Does Declude scan
attachments? Is there a way to turn that off?

-Dave Doherty
 Skywaves, Inc.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.