RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test
Thanks. I will try this. Also thank you for not just flatly referring me to the manual, where I found this documented after you told me the name of the test. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2004 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test Try this in your global config file, it will cause an email to be unwhitelisted and go through the testing process BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist x y 0 0 where x is the weight you want to assign where y is the amount of recipients required to skip the whitelist no setting is required in $default$.junkmail works wonders for me Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: marc catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test Or some other name if it is possible - I'd like to stop e-mails from being whitelisted because my users have their own name in their address book and someone sends to multiple people as one of my users. Also I'd like to stop e-mails being delivered to multiple recipients because one person has the sender in their address book. SO maybe if there are multiple recipients maybe there could be a test in Declude that causes the most restrictive action (hold, delete, etc) instead of the least restrictive (whitelist) action. This way the user can still get e-mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is sent directly, but if some idiot tries to use this to get around blocks by sending to a list of address it will be deleted. Is this possible? Is there something like this? Thanks - Marc --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test
Try this in your global config file, it will cause an email to be unwhitelisted and go through the testing process BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist x y 0 0 where x is the weight you want to assign where y is the amount of recipients required to skip the whitelist no setting is required in $default$.junkmail works wonders for me Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: marc catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test Or some other name if it is possible - I'd like to stop e-mails from being whitelisted because my users have their own name in their address book and someone sends to multiple people as one of my users. Also I'd like to stop e-mails being delivered to multiple recipients because one person has the sender in their address book. SO maybe if there are multiple recipients maybe there could be a test in Declude that causes the most restrictive action (hold, delete, etc) instead of the least restrictive (whitelist) action. This way the user can still get e-mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is sent directly, but if some idiot tries to use this to get around blocks by sending to a list of address it will be deleted. Is this possible? Is there something like this? Thanks - Marc --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[Declude.JunkMail] Suggestion: Most stringent test
Or some other name if it is possible - I'd like to stop e-mails from being whitelisted because my users have their own name in their address book and someone sends to multiple people as one of my users. Also I'd like to stop e-mails being delivered to multiple recipients because one person has the sender in their address book. SO maybe if there are multiple recipients maybe there could be a test in Declude that causes the most restrictive action (hold, delete, etc) instead of the least restrictive (whitelist) action. This way the user can still get e-mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is sent directly, but if some idiot tries to use this to get around blocks by sending to a list of address it will be deleted. Is this possible? Is there something like this? Thanks - Marc --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
