RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

2002-07-29 Thread John Tolmachoff

I understand your point. I will ponder on it to see if I come up with
anything. (Unless someone else does first. :) )

John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Stic.Net
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)


>But if each person has there own public IP address, I can not see how
>that person would send say 80 or 100 legitimate e-mails internally
>within say 1 hour.

>If there are one or two or a few, it is better to just whitelist those
>specific IP addresses.

These are valid points too.  However, there are still two issues I'm a
bit worried about.  
One, we have a network monitoring server that sends pages to us through
our mailserver.  When things are falling apart around here I'm pretty
sure that thing sends out (or at least tries to) enough messages to get
caught by Hijack.  For various reasons, that box has multiple IPs bound
to it, so I'm not sure whether I'd have to create an ALLOWIP line for
all of its IPs, or just for one of them.  
Secondly, our techsupport staff occasionally gets a request from a
customer to check on some sort of problem with a particular mailbox.
They will then re-direct all messages that were in a mailbox to a
different one, or forward them all to a remote mailserver.  Often there
are enough messages to set off Hijack.  There are about 25-30 tech
machines.

So call me lazy, but I figured that using ALLOWIP for the entire class C
would be the best solution.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

2002-07-29 Thread Stic.Net


>But if each person has there own public IP address, I can not see how
>that person would send say 80 or 100 legitimate e-mails internally
>within say 1 hour.

>If there are one or two or a few, it is better to just whitelist those
>specific IP addresses.

These are valid points too.  However, there are still two issues I'm a bit worried 
about.  
One, we have a network monitoring server that sends pages to us through our 
mailserver.  When things are falling apart around here I'm pretty sure that thing 
sends out (or at least tries to) enough messages to get caught by Hijack.  For various 
reasons, that box has multiple IPs bound to it, so I'm not sure whether I'd have to 
create an ALLOWIP line for all of its IPs, or just for one of them.  
Secondly, our techsupport staff occasionally gets a request from a customer to check 
on some sort of problem with a particular mailbox.  They will then re-direct all 
messages that were in a mailbox to a different one, or forward them all to a remote 
mailserver.  Often there are enough messages to set off Hijack.  There are about 25-30 
tech machines.

So call me lazy, but I figured that using ALLOWIP for the entire class C would be the 
best solution.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

2002-07-29 Thread John Tolmachoff

>Point taken.  But working for an small Internet provider, all of the
employees here >are well aware of the severe beatings they will receive
(from customer and co->worker alike) if they try anything cute like
that.

But if each person has there own public IP address, I can not see how
that person would send say 80 or 100 legitimate e-mails internally
within say 1 hour.

I am assuming that each person has a separate Public IP address by the
fact that you are trying to whitelist a entire 255.255.255.0/24 subnet.

If there are one or two or a few, it is better to just whitelist those
specific IP addresses.

John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com




---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

2002-07-29 Thread Stic.Net

-- Original Message --
From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Mon, 29 Jul 2002 16:36:11 -0700

>But wouldn't that defeat the purpose of protecting against some one in
>the office sending out bulk junk e-mail, which is the primary purpose of
>Hijack?

Point taken.  But working for an small Internet provider, all of the employees here 
are well aware of the severe beatings they will receive (from customer and co-worker 
alike) if they try anything cute like that.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

2002-07-29 Thread John Tolmachoff

But wouldn't that defeat the purpose of protecting against some one in
the office sending out bulk junk e-mail, which is the primary purpose of
Hijack?

John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of STIC.NET
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 4:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

Sorry if this is a bit off-topic, but I was wondering if you can use the
ALLOWIP line in the Hijack.cfg file to allow unlimited SMTP traffic for
an entire class C subnet.  Occasionally machines in our office send out
a lot of internal messages, enough to go over Hijacks second threshold
so I'm trying to figure out a work-around without having to add an
ALLOWIP line for every machine.

For example, would ALLOWIP 2.2.2 allow anyone with a 2.2.2.xx IP address
unlimited SMTP traffic?

Thanks
Bart Lackorn
STIC.NET
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Question (somewhat OT)

2002-07-29 Thread R. Scott Perry


>Sorry if this is a bit off-topic, but I was wondering if you can use the 
>ALLOWIP line in the Hijack.cfg file to allow unlimited SMTP traffic for an 
>entire class C subnet.  Occasionally machines in our office send out a lot 
>of internal messages, enough to go over Hijacks second threshold so I'm 
>trying to figure out a work-around without having to add an ALLOWIP line 
>for every machine.
>
>For example, would ALLOWIP 2.2.2 allow anyone with a 2.2.2.xx IP address 
>unlimited SMTP traffic?

Yes, you can do exactly that -- the "ALLOWIP 2.2.2." format is the best way 
to do it, and it would allow all E-mail from 2.2.2.x to send unlimited traffic.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .