Re: [Declude.Virus] Which scanner caught it??

2002-12-06 Thread R. Scott Perry


When we are running two scanners, is there a way to know which one caught 
a particular virus?  And if knowing that one caught more than the other, 
would there be an advantage of placing it first in the sequence?

If you use LOGLEVEL MID, you'll see in the logs which scanner detected the 
virus.

The order in which they are run shouldn't matter, as far as Declude Virus 
is concerned -- just so long as one or both catch the virus, the E-mail 
will be quarantined.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.Virus] change in logs info with 1.64

2002-12-06 Thread John Shacklett
Scott, you'll have to start signing as J. Scott Perry to qualify in our new
secret society.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Friday, 06 December 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] change in logs info with 1.64


Only as long as Scott is a member.

John C

John Tolmachoff wrote:
It's getting very nearly time to start the declude.john list.


 LOL.

 John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
 IT Manager, Network Engineer
 RelianceSoft, Inc.
 Fullerton, CA  92835
 www.reliancesoft.com


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] Update the Updater?

2002-12-06 Thread Doug McKee

Declude Beta updated to Version 160

That's the email I just got from my declude updater.
It was set to beta.
Is there an update for the updater?
Thanks,
Doug
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Which scanner caught it??

2002-12-06 Thread John Carter
Duh. I see now.  Interesting - in this one (below) Scanner 1 (F-Prot) 
reported Lentin and Scanner 2 (McAfee) says Yaha.  I see what you mean 
now about no advantage of order of scanner.  I was kinda wondering if 
scanner 1 found something, whether it invoked the second scanner or just 
went ahead and handled the virus processing.  Would that speed things up 
any (skipping #2 if #1 found a virus)?

TGIF  Thanks,
John


12/06/2002 11:11:03 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 Outlook 'MIME Header' 
Vulnerability: type=audio/x-wav, name=friendscr.scr.
12/06/2002 11:11:04 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 Scanner 1: Virus=: W32/Lentin.F@mm 
Attachment=friendscr.scr [1] I
12/06/2002 11:11:04 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 Scanner 2: Virus= the 
W32/Yaha.g@MM virus !!! Attachment=friendscr.scr [1] I
12/06/2002 11:11:04 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 File(s) are INFECTED [13]
12/06/2002 11:11:04 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 Scanned: CONTAINS A VIRUS [Prescan 
OK][MIME: 2 29617]
12/06/2002 11:11:04 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
***@jcjc.edu
12/06/2002 11:11:04 Qda0e4a6301ee7871 Subject: Fw: Wonderfool stuff to 
ur friends

R. Scott Perry wrote:


When we are running two scanners, is there a way to know which one 
caught a particular virus?  And if knowing that one caught more than 
the other, would there be an advantage of placing it first in the 
sequence?


If you use LOGLEVEL MID, you'll see in the logs which scanner detected 
the virus.

The order in which they are run shouldn't matter, as far as Declude 
Virus is concerned -- just so long as one or both catch the virus, the 
E-mail will be quarantined.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Re: [Declude.Virus] Which scanner caught it??

2002-12-06 Thread R. Scott Perry


Duh. I see now.  Interesting - in this one (below) Scanner 1 (F-Prot) 
reported Lentin and Scanner 2 (McAfee) says Yaha.  I see what you mean now 
about no advantage of order of scanner.  I was kinda wondering if scanner 
1 found something, whether it invoked the second scanner or just went 
ahead and handled the virus processing.  Would that speed things up any 
(skipping #2 if #1 found a virus)?

There would be a very slight increase in processing speed.  However, since 
all legitimate E-mails are scanned twice, scanning an E-mail with a virus 
twice doesn't add any unexpected load.
   -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Virus Scanning Question

2002-12-06 Thread Keith Johnson
Title: Virus Scanning Question






According to the Virus Manual (Declude) it lists the following:

(for outgoing web messaging E-mails, you can have an on-access scanner scanning only the \IMail\spool\ directory).

I was wondering how others were handling your users Outgoing email sent our your Server (scanning wise). Thanks for the aid...


___


Keith Johnson, MCP

Network Engineer

Network Advocates, Inc.

Tel: 502.412.1050

Fax: 502.412.1058

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Good pings come in small packets






RE: [Declude.Virus] Virus Scanning Question

2002-12-06 Thread John Tolmachoff
 I was wondering how others were handling your users Outgoing email sent
our your Server (scanning wise).  

Being that to send a virus through web messaging, a user would have to
manually add an infected file.

The likely hood of that happening is pretty slim. So I don't worry about it.

It is much riskier to have a virus scanner scanning the spool file than
worry about a user manually attaching an infected file.

John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA  92835
www.reliancesoft.com



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.Virus] Is this safely ignored...

2002-12-06 Thread Keith Johnson
Title: Is this safely ignored...






In the virxxx.log, I found this error. Can this be safely ignored? 

Warning: EOF in middle of MIME segment [] [---



___


Keith Johnson, MCP

Network Engineer

Network Advocates, Inc.

Tel: 502.412.1050

Fax: 502.412.1058

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Good pings come in small packets