inserting missing values

2010-12-14 Thread Patrick Meyer
What is the best way to handle missing values. For example, suppose I have
an array that I want to insert into a table, like double[] row = {1.0, 2.0,
MISSING,  4.0} where MISSING indicates a value that is missing. (I realize
this is not a valid double value). I have been using a prepared statement to
set a null value anytime I have missing data like, pstmt.setNull(i+1,
Types.DOUBLE); However, the problem is that using rs.getDouble(3) returns a
value of zero instead of null. The problem is that zero is a legitimate
double value, not a missing or null value. Is it better to inset data using
Double.NAN like pstmt.setDouble(i+1, Double.NaN);? What is the best way to
handle missing data?

Thanks


Re: inserting missing values

2010-12-14 Thread Peter Ondruška
You need to check using wasNull method whether the value is null. See jdbc
javadocs for ResultSet class.
On Dec 14, 2010 8:46 PM, Patrick Meyer meyer...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is the best way to handle missing values. For example, suppose I have
 an array that I want to insert into a table, like double[] row = {1.0,
2.0,
 MISSING, 4.0} where MISSING indicates a value that is missing. (I realize
 this is not a valid double value). I have been using a prepared statement
to
 set a null value anytime I have missing data like, pstmt.setNull(i+1,
 Types.DOUBLE); However, the problem is that using rs.getDouble(3) returns
a
 value of zero instead of null. The problem is that zero is a legitimate
 double value, not a missing or null value. Is it better to inset data
using
 Double.NAN like pstmt.setDouble(i+1, Double.NaN);? What is the best way to
 handle missing data?

 Thanks


Re: inserting missing values

2010-12-14 Thread Patrick Meyer
Aha! That's just what I needed. Thank you!

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Peter Ondruška peter.ondru...@gmail.comwrote:

 You need to check using wasNull method whether the value is null. See jdbc
 javadocs for ResultSet class.
 On Dec 14, 2010 8:46 PM, Patrick Meyer meyer...@gmail.com wrote:
  What is the best way to handle missing values. For example, suppose I
 have
  an array that I want to insert into a table, like double[] row = {1.0,
 2.0,
  MISSING, 4.0} where MISSING indicates a value that is missing. (I realize
  this is not a valid double value). I have been using a prepared statement
 to
  set a null value anytime I have missing data like, pstmt.setNull(i+1,
  Types.DOUBLE); However, the problem is that using rs.getDouble(3) returns
 a
  value of zero instead of null. The problem is that zero is a legitimate
  double value, not a missing or null value. Is it better to inset data
 using
  Double.NAN like pstmt.setDouble(i+1, Double.NaN);? What is the best way
 to
  handle missing data?
 
  Thanks