Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Start Center

2013-11-14 Thread Maximi89
Hi guys, probably a good option should be to add a way to select multiple
files with a select box, because some times some of us use 4 documents and
need to open the 4 at same time and not start to pick one by one.


2013/11/14 Pedro pedl...@gmail.com

 Hi Kendy, all


 Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote
  Is there any way to merge the Start Center proposed in this topic and
 the
  existing in 4.2 Alpha with several tabs?
 
  I'm sorry - too late...  I've just implemented the new design :-)
 
  http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~kendy/design-list/startcenter-new.png

 Damn...
 Anyway, it looks good much better than the current one (except for the
 missing tabs :) )
 Well done!


 Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote
  Having played with the new startcenter myself, I like it a lot, and I
  very much prefer the tab-less design; please try the next nightly build
   report bugs - hopefully it works for you well too.

 I will try the nightly build. Hopefully there won't be any bugs to report
 ;)


 Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote
  Rodolfo will be hopefully able to spend some time on the keyboard
  navigation too; but still, that is something that we can fix during the
  beta phase.

 That is good (I'm a keyboard man, so I will be using those). I noticed you
 changed some of the hotkeys (it makes more sense that Open is either Alt+O
 or Ctrl+O) but be aware that some people will be annoyed for changing the
 keys that were already standard since (at least) OpenOffice.org...

 Using Alt+E for Templates AND Extensions is a bad idea :) It was a GOOD
 idea
 to remove the Edit and the Window menus (they were useless when only the
 Start Center is open) but maybe not for the View and Options which allowed
 people to have a toolbar (personally I never used it) and to configure
 Extensions and other options from the Start Center...

 Best regards,
 Pedro



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Start-Center-tp4082013p4083134.html
 Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted




-- 
Maximiliano Augusto Castañón Araneda
Santiago, Chile
Linux user # 394821

XMPP:
maxim...@mamalibre.com.ar
maxim...@jabberes.org
e-mail:
maxim...@gmail.com

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] LO 4 banner idea

2013-02-06 Thread Maximi89
That image looks very nice, it liked me too :D


2013/2/6 Mirek M. maz...@gmail.com

 Hi Issa,

 On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Issa Alkurtass ialkurt...@kacst.edu.sa
 wrote:

  Hello Daniel, k-j,
 
  Updated the time and removed Get it now because I thought it made it
  cluttered https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lo4-airport-ad.png
  Also uploaded an editable version for localization and whatsoever
  https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Lo4-airport-ad.zip (although
 the
  led text is hand drawn so we should probably keep it in English).
 

 It looks great!
 Unfortunately, as it's in the PSD format, it's not accessible for our
 translators.
 I don't know if you could manage to convert it to GIMP's XCF format with
 editable text, but please remember to do so next time. You can either make
 the whole file in GIMP or create the bitmap parts in Photoshop and add text
 layers in GIMP. Or, if you create the image in Inkscape, that's even
 better! :)

 Thanks for the contribution.

 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted




-- 
Maximiliano Augusto Castañón Araneda
Santiago, Chile
Linux user # 394821

XMPP/Jabber: maxim...@gmail.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-design] LO Writer UI Analysis

2013-01-29 Thread Maximi89
As a user, one option who left and it`s commonly used is the page
numeration, and by default it should be disabled in the first page because
it`s the frontpage... and an easy way to disable numeration or activate it
for page or pair and odd pages.

Just my opinion, that is fraquently asked by the users, because the common
user need it, I guess this could have a button in the UI and an option to
configurate in the same page and TOP or BOTTOM.

Thanks


2013/1/29 Stefan Knorr (Astron) heinzless...@gmail.com

 Hi Thibaut,

 this all looks really, really nice. I haven't read everything yet, but
 I wanted to comment on some things at least:

  1. Needed UI elements
  =
 [...]
  Image: http://ubuntuone.com/7TZkH1e7vo88B637NEIjEc

 Well, the interesting thing is that we actually have data about how
 the toolbar elements in Impress are used (from Ooo 3.1). See [1].

 We don't have the equivalent image for Writer – but we do have the
 corresponding data that is just waiting to be analysed. It's on the
 same page, look for the Usage Feedback Data spreadsheet. It would be
 phenomenal if you were interested in doing that to prove/disprove your
 various hypotheses.
 (Of course, it is entirely another thing to judge which functions of
 those not used often to emphasise more, so users can use them more,
 and which to simply remove from toolbars.)


  1a - Remove the area to grab a toolbar. Instead, choose the same toolbar
  arrangement method as Firefox. The user has to right click on the toolbar
  and select 'Customize'. Most users don't change the arrangement of the
  toolbar, therefore there is no need to always display the grab area. My
  suggestion removes clutter and hides an advanced feature without making
 it
  too hard for a power user to guess where to find the functionality.

 There already is the possibility to lock toolbars (from the context
 menu) and that hides the grab area. Making this the default setting
 seems like a good change.


  1b - Remove the 'Edit File' button - useless.

 Indeed, LibO is not such a great application to simply read documents in.


  1c - Remove the 'Page Preview', the user can still find it on a common
  place - the file drop-down menu.

 This is a very complicated area. We currently have two previews: the
 page preview from the toolbar, and the preview that is in the Print
 dialogue itself. The former does not take into account actual page
 sizes that the printer can use, while the latter does. I regard this
 as a misfeature but there are people who defend this behaviour. :)


  1d - Remove the 'Spelling and Grammar' button. Why should there be two
 such
  buttons?

 In this case, I would have opted for removing the other button. Why
 wouldn't you want misspelt text to be highlighted (i.e. why would you
 want a toggle for that in the toolbar)? Being able to open the
 proofing window from the toolbar is imho a more valuable function.


  1e - Remove 'Table', 'Show draw Functions',

 Not sure I agree with these two. I use both rather often.

  'Navigator', 'Gallery' and the

 I use neither very often, the problem here is that neither is very
 good at what they do: the gallery currently has almost no contents and
 the navigator is pretty clumsy.


  'LibreOffice Help' buttons

 Agree. No need to have that in the toolbar.


  They are all a bit special and not needed by
  average users for most daily tasks. If a user wants to create a table, he
  can do so using the table menu, no need to have it visible all the time.

 Sure, but the table button makes creating a tables quite a bit faster
 since selecting the number of rows and columns is so much easier.


  1f - Remove the 'Styles and Formatting' button. Its an advanced feature -
  normal users just ignore it - no need to have it there - it clutters the
  UI.

 Again, I disagree – our implementation is not ideal, but the
 functionality in itself is great, especially when writing e.g. papers,
 documentation ...


  1g - Remove the button labeled 'Default' in the lower left corner. Its
  label is unclear and the button adds no value to the UI (remember average
  user point of view).

 This is a quick style switcher. Arguably, either this combo box or the
 style button should probably go in the longer run.


  1h - Remove the 'Standard selection' and the save status button next to
 it.
  Both don't add anything useful to the UI. If the document has unsaved
  changes it can be viewed by looking at the much bigger save icon in the
  upper left corner.

 We had a long discussion about this already, with no real conclusion
 and no developer willing to work on this. I completely agree, though,
 that we could just show the file status on the Save icon, no need to
 show it in the toolbar. About the selection modes: if you know about
 them, they can come in handy ... once every three years


  1i - Remove the small paper icons left from the zoom panel. I don't get
  what it is useful for after trying them several times and 

Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: 4.0 Branding poll

2013-01-29 Thread Maximi89
I agree, I have added my vote to the first email and then all follow the
email with lot of votes, don`t know if I were wrong or it was like expected.


2013/1/29 Paul Greindl paul.grei...@riseup.net

 Ähh I think it was intended to add the votes to the last mail, but then
 people stopped doing so, so now I think it's best to just send your vote
 and put everything in place later.

 And yes, I completely agree: this is a little chaotic and the vote
 should be redone with a voting system!

 Paul


 On 29/01/13 19:55, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'm not sure how the voting system is supposed to work. I took the
  last email, and added my votes to that. Others took the plain list
  from the first mail and added their votes to that.
  What is the right way?
 
  Maybe an online voting system would help?
 
  Samuel
 
  Am 29.01.2013 08:49, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
  Hi Kévin, Samuel and all voters,
 
  we should avoid such things like -3.
 
  Am 29.01.2013 08:24, schrieb Kévin PEIGNOT:
  V2 by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3
 
  Everybody has one vote for or against and do it so.
 
  At least doing such changes at a legal vote is making your whole vote
  uncountable in mostly every country.
 
  I will say that because the next one will do a +10 and a
  -1000.
 
 
 


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
 Problems?
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted




-- 
Maximiliano Augusto Castañón Araneda
Santiago, Chile
Linux user # 394821

XMPP/Jabber: maxim...@gmail.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted