[Bug 1476705] Re: postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

2015-07-22 Thread cliddell
Bruno,

To be honest, I don't know what differs between the two tools, as they
both come from Cairo, I assumed that pdftops was just a small wrapper
around the same code as pdftocairo but with the options pre-set for PS
output.

I'm a Ghostscript developer, so I can't really answer specifics about
Cairo - I know about the problems with the Cairo PDF output, as we've
performance problems in Ghostscript with those, and have had some fairly
lengthy (and heated) discussions with Cairo developers on the subject.

And I have helped debug a lot of these problems with the Ghostscript
output, so I can give general suggestions as I did above.

If I had to guess, I would say that pdftocairo is possibly spotting that
the PDF originated as a Cairo file, and is using inside knowledge of
how those are constructed to convert it back into Cairo internal
representation, which is then outputs to Postscript - with that level of
extra information, it can probably be much, much smarter about when
there is real transparency that it has to render, and when everything
opaque, and remain in high level form. Whilst, pstops may be doing a
simpler, one step PDF to Postscript conversion.


Ideally, what you'd want to try is (if possible) to keep the ProRes (I 
thought it was ImageRET) mode, but still tell pdftocairo to use 600 dpi, as 
you then may get the benefits of more the accurate dot placement, better 
halftone results, and possibly better color management, whilst keeping the 
quicker processing of the smaller image data.

It's hard to know without deep inside knowledge, but (again) if I had to
guess, I would suggest that the slightly lower quality halftone screen
is what's causing the slight intensity shift you mention. HP are pretty
tight lipped about these technologies, but I know other such systems
tend to allow the halftoning to represent more shades of the color,
without losing detail (generally there is a trade off: you can
approximate lots of shades, but lose detail, or have great detail, but
very few shades).

Chris

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1476705

Title:
  postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1476705/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1476705] Re: postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

2015-07-22 Thread James Cloos
pdftops and pdftocairo are both from poppler.

pdftops is based on the original xpdf code and does not use cairo at
all.

modern cairo tries to limit the size of tranparency groups to just where
it is needed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1476705

Title:
  postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1476705/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1477251] [NEW] st_segment_to_stream_time: assertion 'segment-format == format' failed

2015-07-22 Thread dimi
Public bug reported:

My Rhythmbox (3.1-1ubuntu3) is crashing very often. The last few times I
opened it from command line instead of via menu and got this error:

GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_segment_to_stream_time: assertion
'segment-format == format' failed

Twice it happened when Rhythmbox was about to start playing a next MP3,
but the third time I started the MP3 that it crashed on before and now
it is playing.

Other crashes seem pretty random. Don't hav any info or log from those.
Unless there is some log where Rhythmbox automatically writes crash
reports?

I'm using Ubuntu 15.04, kernel 3.19.0-22-generic.

** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477251

Title:
  st_segment_to_stream_time: assertion 'segment-format == format'
  failed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1477251/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 797485] Re: Status Bar Covers File Name at Bottom

2015-07-22 Thread Rudolf
Indeed *extremely* annoying - at renaming a file and other occasions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797485

Title:
  Status Bar Covers File Name at Bottom

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/797485/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1476705] Re: postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

2015-07-22 Thread cliddell
The problem, I suspect, is the way Cairo rights PDF files (the gmap.pdf
file you attached above was created by Cairo). The Cairo *always* writes
the page contents into one or more PDF transparency groups - even when
all the contents are really opaque.

The issue is that, due to the way PDF works (and PDF transparency in
particular) the only way to be sure that all the page contents are
opaque would be to pre-process each page, checking for non-opaque
content, and then re-interpret the page using the information gleaned in
the first pass - which would, frankly, result in an unacceptable
performance drop for the vast majority of PDF files.

Most interpreters I know will pre-scan the quickly accessible elements
of a PDF page, and if no transparency constructs are found, will then
elide the extra processing transparency requires. Unfortunately, those
easily accessible elements don't contain (or, at least, don't reliably
contain) the actual opacity information. So, in most cases I know, just
the existence of the transparency constructs means that extra processing
is enabled, regardless of the actual opacity values.

Now, secondly, Postscript cannot represent PDF transparency in high
level (vector etc) operations. So, the only way to get a visually
accurate representation of a PDF containing transparency in Postscript
is to flatten the transparency by rendering it to a sampled image -
and clearly, sampled images end up being larger than vector graphics.

Hence we have the result that basically every Cairo produced PDF will
convert to Postscript as one or more sampled images per page.

And that explains why the Postscript is so much larger than the PDF.

Now, looking at the Postscript file you posted, it *appears* that the
rendering for transparency flattening is being done at 1200dpi which is,
frankly, ridiculous for a couple of reasons. First is, your printer has
a maximum physical resolution of 600dpi (the ImageRET modes provide
enhanced quality, claimed to be equivalent to 2400 and, IIRC, 3600 dpi,
but the printer is still a 600 dpi printer). Secondly, our experience
with Ghostscript's Postscript output, is that many printers are much,
*much* faster at upsampling images than downsampling.

So, my first suggestion would be to poke around the CUPS dialogues
and/or the PPD, and see if you can drop the claimed resolution of the
printer to at most 600dpi and, frankly, I'd even try 300 dpi. As a rule
of thumb, in the printing world, it's generally claimed that dropping
continuous tone, sampled image resolution by 50% from the physical
resolution results in almost no visible loss of quality. Where that
falls down, in cases like this, is because there is text involved, and
the small details inherent in text shapes may well suffer visibly.

Another thing we've found with the Postscript output from Ghostscript is
that many printers are very, very slow at decompressing data, so if you
can find an option to avoid compressing image data, that *might* make a
difference - but that is highly printer dependent.

I'd like to take this opportunity to rant (again): this kind of thing is
the reason that PDF is such poor, poor choice as a print spool format.
PDF has a *hugely* rich imaging model, *far* more so than Postscript,
PCL5/PXL or any of the proprietary page description languages (PDL),
which means for almost any low/midrange PDL based printer, there is a
very high chance that the PDF content cannot be converted to a high
level, vector representation, and must be rendered and sent as sampled
images (bitmaps). Perhaps a PDF/A or PDF/X variant would be a better
choice..

And I'm sure someone will point out that more and more printers are
supporting direct PDF printing, but that really just moves the
bottleneck: PDF transparency is (over!) complex, and is extremely
processor and memory intensive. So a low/mid range printer, with limited
memory and processing power, is going to struggle to print a file like
these ones. In truth, many such PDF printers get around this by either
not supporting transparency at all, or supporting only relatively
trivial subset of the full PDF transparency model.

Also, with more and more applications integrating Cairo to do their PDF
output, with the transparency problems outlined above, the situation is
only set to get worse. /rant


Anyway, as I said, look into adjusting the resolution, and possibly
compression settings, and let us know how you fare.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1476705

Title:
  postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1476705/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1414930] Re: [Lenovo ThinkPad 2015 models] Buttons of Synaptics trackpad doesn't work

2015-07-22 Thread Timo Aaltonen
** Changed in: hwe-next
   Status: In Progress = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1414930

Title:
  [Lenovo ThinkPad 2015 models] Buttons of Synaptics trackpad doesn't
  work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1414930/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1410765] Re: GIMP uses more system resources than necessary

2015-07-22 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gimp
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1410765

Title:
  GIMP uses more system resources than necessary

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gimp/+bug/1410765/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1468199] Re: package gconf2 3.2.6-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 子进程 已安装 post-installation 脚本 返回错误状态 1

2015-07-22 Thread Antti Nilakari
This happens if /usr/bin/python points to a Python 3 interpreter.

The gconf2 python scripts at /usr/sbin/gconf-schemas and /usr/bin
/update-gconf-defaults expect a python2 environment.

One way to fix it in live is to edit those files and change the first
line to #!/usr/bin/python2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1468199

Title:
  package gconf2 3.2.6-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 子进程 已安装 post-
  installation 脚本 返回错误状态 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/1468199/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1477106] [NEW] Cups directive Browsing Off ignored by print dialog

2015-07-22 Thread Roland65
Public bug reported:

On Ubuntu 15.04, I have cups configured with the Browsing Off option
in the /etc/cups/cupsd.conf to disallow listing non local printers (I'm
on a huge network where there are many  printers).

This works well with non Gnome applications (LibreOffice, Adobe Reader
for example). But the print dialog of Gnome GTK3 applications seems to
ignore the Browsing Off directive and lists a lot of remote
printers...

The same problem arises with Gnome GTK2 applications...

cups  version: 2.0.2-1ubuntu3.2
gtk3 version: 3.14.13-0ubuntu1
gtk2 version: 2.24.27-0ubuntu1

The package cups-browsed is not installed.

Here is the content of my cupsd.conf:

#
# Configuration file for the CUPS scheduler.  See man cupsd.conf for a
# complete description of this file.
#

# Log general information in error_log - change warn to debug
# for troubleshooting...
LogLevel warn
PageLogFormat

# Deactivate CUPS' internal logrotating, as we provide a better one, especially
# LogLevel debug2 gets usable now
MaxLogSize 0

# Only listen for connections from the local machine.
Listen localhost:631
Listen /var/run/cups/cups.sock

# Show shared printers on the local network.
Browsing Off
BrowseLocalProtocols dnssd

# Default authentication type, when authentication is required...
DefaultAuthType Basic

# Web interface setting...
WebInterface Yes

# Restrict access to the server...
Location /
  Order allow,deny
/Location

# Restrict access to the admin pages...
Location /admin
  Order allow,deny
/Location

# Restrict access to configuration files...
Location /admin/conf
  AuthType Default
  Require user @SYSTEM
  Order allow,deny
/Location

# Set the default printer/job policies...
Policy default
  # Job/subscription privacy...
  JobPrivateAccess default
  JobPrivateValues default
  SubscriptionPrivateAccess default
  SubscriptionPrivateValues default

  # Job-related operations must be done by the owner or an administrator...
  Limit Create-Job Print-Job Print-URI Validate-Job
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  Limit Send-Document Send-URI Hold-Job Release-Job Restart-Job Purge-Jobs 
Set-Job-Attributes Create-Job-Subscription Renew-Subscription 
Cancel-Subscription Get-Notifications Reprocess-Job Cancel-Current-Job 
Suspend-Current-Job Resume-Job Cancel-My-Jobs Close-Job CUPS-Move-Job 
CUPS-Get-Document
Require user @OWNER @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  # All administration operations require an administrator to authenticate...
  Limit CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer CUPS-Delete-Printer CUPS-Add-Modify-Class 
CUPS-Delete-Class CUPS-Set-Default CUPS-Get-Devices
AuthType Default
Require user @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  # All printer operations require a printer operator to authenticate...
  Limit Pause-Printer Resume-Printer Enable-Printer Disable-Printer 
Pause-Printer-After-Current-Job Hold-New-Jobs Release-Held-New-Jobs 
Deactivate-Printer Activate-Printer Restart-Printer Shutdown-Printer 
Startup-Printer Promote-Job Schedule-Job-After Cancel-Jobs CUPS-Accept-Jobs 
CUPS-Reject-Jobs
AuthType Default
Require user @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  # Only the owner or an administrator can cancel or authenticate a job...
  Limit Cancel-Job CUPS-Authenticate-Job
Require user @OWNER @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  Limit All
Order deny,allow
  /Limit
/Policy

# Set the authenticated printer/job policies...
Policy authenticated
  # Job/subscription privacy...
  JobPrivateAccess default
  JobPrivateValues default
  SubscriptionPrivateAccess default
  SubscriptionPrivateValues default

  # Job-related operations must be done by the owner or an administrator...
  Limit Create-Job Print-Job Print-URI Validate-Job
AuthType Default
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  Limit Send-Document Send-URI Hold-Job Release-Job Restart-Job Purge-Jobs 
Set-Job-Attributes Create-Job-Subscription Renew-Subscription 
Cancel-Subscription Get-Notifications Reprocess-Job Cancel-Current-Job 
Suspend-Current-Job Resume-Job Cancel-My-Jobs Close-Job CUPS-Move-Job 
CUPS-Get-Document
AuthType Default
Require user @OWNER @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  # All administration operations require an administrator to authenticate...
  Limit CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer CUPS-Delete-Printer CUPS-Add-Modify-Class 
CUPS-Delete-Class CUPS-Set-Default
AuthType Default
Require user @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  # All printer operations require a printer operator to authenticate...
  Limit Pause-Printer Resume-Printer Enable-Printer Disable-Printer 
Pause-Printer-After-Current-Job Hold-New-Jobs Release-Held-New-Jobs 
Deactivate-Printer Activate-Printer Restart-Printer Shutdown-Printer 
Startup-Printer Promote-Job Schedule-Job-After Cancel-Jobs CUPS-Accept-Jobs 
CUPS-Reject-Jobs
AuthType Default
Require user @SYSTEM
Order deny,allow
  /Limit

  # Only the owner or an administrator can cancel or authenticate a job...
  Limit Cancel-Job CUPS-Authenticate-Job
AuthType Default
   

[Bug 1477322] [NEW] Select-by-typing select hidden files even if they are not shown

2015-07-22 Thread teo1978
Public bug reported:

I was going to report this upstream, but then I remembered that type-
ahead selection of files was removed by retarted upstream Nautilus
maintainers, and it has been patched back by Ubuntu as per
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1164016

So:

Steps to reproduce:

1) Have a folder with these files:

  aaa.txt
  aaa.txt~ (hidden)
  aab.txt~ (hidden)
  aac.txt

2) Open the folder in Nautilus; make sure that the show hidden files
option is NOT enabled

 = so you only see aaa.txt and aac.txt

3) Type: aa

4) Hit the down arrow key several times.

Expected behavior:
* Since hidden files are not being shown, they should not be selectable by 
type-ahead. Hence,
- after typing aa, aaa.txt should be selected
- at the first keystroke on the down arrow, aac.txt should be selected

Observed behavior:
- After typing aa, aaa.txt is selected, as expected
- At the first keystroke on the down arrow, no file seems to be selected. 
aaa.txt is no longer highlighted but aac.txt isn't either. Under the hood, I 
guess the aaa.txt~ file is somehow selected (but if you hit Enter nothing 
happens, thank god)
- At the second keystroke, still nothing seems to change: still no file 
apparently selected. But under the hood, aab.txt~ is probably somehow selected
- At the third keystroke, finally aac.txt is selected, proving that Nautilus is 
somehow selecting files even if they are hidden.

Behaving like a file is selected (in that the previous selected one is
unselected and that you can skip to the next one) while it is not even
visible is INCONSISTENT.

The most reasonable expected behavior is to select and loop through only
visible files, so, if hidden files aren't being shown, only non-hidden
files must be considered, while if hidden files are being shown, then
they must be considered.

Another sensible behavior could be to make the hidden files that match
the typed string become visible, and highlight them when they are
selected, but that would eventually lead to counterintuitive behavior
and design issues (what do you do when the type-ahead box disappear?
turn back the hidden files to invisible?)

== ANOTHER EXAMPLE ==

Say you have, in a folder:
  aaa.txt~ (hidden)
  aab.txt

You type aa

Expected: aab.txt should be highlighted and selected

Observed: nothing is highlighted, which is exactly the same that would
happen if no file matching the typed string existed. So you may even
think the file doesn't exist (if you don't look carefully enough, which
usually you don't want to, because that is why you use type-ahead in the
first place), or you see it right in front of your eyes and you say why
the heck isn't it found??. Only if you think about using the arrow keys
you will realize that the file you're looking for actually exists.

Which means that TYPE-AHEAD IS BASICALLY UNRELIABLE: you type something,
you see nothing selected, and that's no guarantee that no matching file
exists, until you use up/down arrow keys. (actually, you will never be
sure: what if there were hundreds of hidden files starting with the
typed string? Unlikely but possible)

The whole design of the type-ahead find thingie (which is a very useful,  vital 
feature) is actually shitty. It lacks at least one of two things: either
1) showing the number of matches found
or
2) changing the color of the typed text or its background when no match is found

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: nautilus 1:3.10.1-0ubuntu9.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-55.94-generic 3.13.11-ckt20
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-55-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Wed Jul 22 23:29:18 2015
GsettingsChanges:
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'use-tree-view' b'true'
 b'org.gnome.nautilus.list-view' b'default-column-order' b['name', 'size', 
'type', 'date_modified', 'date_accessed', 'owner', 'group', 'permissions', 
'mime_type', 'where']
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-10-11 (649 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424)
SourcePackage: nautilus
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-05-24 (424 days ago)

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

** Description changed:

  I was going to report this upstream, but then I remembered that type-
  ahead selection of files was removed by retarted upstream Nautilus
  maintainers, and it has been patched back by Ubuntu as per
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1164016
  
  So:
  
  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1) Have a folder with these files:
  
-   aaa.txt
-   aaa.txt~ (hidden)
-   aab.txt~ (hidden)
-   aac.txt
+   aaa.txt
+   aaa.txt~ (hidden)
+   aab.txt~ (hidden)
+   aac.txt
  
  2) Open the folder in Nautilus; make sure that the show hidden files
  option is NOT enabled
  
-  = so you only see aaa.txt and aac.txt
+  = so you only see aaa.txt and aac.txt
  
  3) Type: aa
  
  4) Hit the 

[Bug 1477322] Re: Select-by-typing select hidden files even if they are not shown

2015-07-22 Thread teo1978
Please for god's sake don't underestimate the importance of this bug. I
would hate to see this rated as low or even medium.

Please read the second use case example carefully.

This fulfills at least the criteria for high:
- has a severe* impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)
Checking for existence of a file and getting a false negative is definitely a 
severe impact

- Has a moderate impact on a large portion of Ubuntu users (estimated)
I think users who use type-ahead at all are a large portion (large enough that 
Ubuntu decided to reintroduce a feature that had been retardedly removed 
upstream), and the impact is at least moderate in common use cases

And probably:
- Renders essential features or functionality of the application or 
dependencies broken or ineffective
It might be questioned whether type-ahead is an essential feature of 
Nautilus, but the bug definitely renders it broken *and* ineffective.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477322

Title:
  Select-by-typing select hidden files even if they are not shown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1477322/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1476705] Re: postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

2015-07-22 Thread bruno
@cliddell Wow, thank you for all these informations.

As I said before, my first sample (gmap.pdf) prints quickly now with
pdftocairo. For this document, it seems that few extra processing is
done.

However, the second sample (see appout of my printer test page, also
created by Cairo) was still slow to print, even with pdftocairo (with
much extra processing, as you describe). If I choose (as you suggested)
600 dpi instead ProRes 1200, this sheet is printed in less than a
minute. It's not quick but acceptable now for my home need. I see some
differences on the intensity of the logo and dashed lines, but overall
the quality appears to be good enough.

So I now set this printer in 600 dpi by default.

I continue to observe that pdftocairo is quicker (big difference for
gmap.pdf), so I conserve this setting also. Is there any drawback to
this? If not, why not set pdftocairo as the default renderer, for
postscript printers?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1476705

Title:
  postscript printer hideously slow in some cases (pdftops)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/1476705/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1477182] [NEW] Transparency failing gnome-terminal

2015-07-22 Thread The Unknown
Public bug reported:

After recently changing from Ubuntu 15.04 with Unity, to Ubuntu Gnome
15.04, I have noticed that in Ubuntu Gnome, if I go into the profile
settings and enable Transparency for gnome-terminal, it will only take
effect once I have resized the gnome-terminal window by the means of
pulling the window to another side of my screen and make it snap to a
certain size (so if I pull it to the top it will maximize, if to the
side, it will only then take up half of the screen).

I have also noticed that if I open any other gnome-terminal window that
I must go into the settings, and change the settings slightly for the
Transparency (turning it off and on again, or moving the slider), even
though the settings show it to be on, then I must get it to do the
resize by dragging it to one edge of my screen (as I mentioned earlier)
for the gnome-terminal to be transparent, otherwise it stays whatever
colour I have set it to.

---

OS Information:

No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 15.04
Release:15.04
Codename:   vivid

Package Information:

gnome-terminal:
  Installed: 3.14.2-0ubuntu3
  Candidate: 3.14.2-0ubuntu3
  Version table:
 *** 3.14.2-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ vivid/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: ubuntu-gnome
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477182

Title:
  Transparency failing gnome-terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1477182/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs