[Bug 2009687] Re: [lunar] Nvidia GPU unused but still powered

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This might be related to a triple buffering issue:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1441#note_1679803

If it is caused by triple buffering then you will find the issue is
temporarily fixed in mutter 44~rc (which lacks triple buffering), and
will return later in 44.0.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009687

Title:
  [lunar] Nvidia GPU unused but still powered

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2009687/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012225] Re: mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from g_assertion_message_cmpnum() ["assertion failed (glCheckFramebufferStatus (GL_FRAMEBUFFER) == GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMP

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This also looks relevant, though only appears in one crash report:

gnome-shell[10846]: JS ERROR: GLib.Error cogl-framebuffer-error-quark: Failed 
to create an OpenGL framebuffer object
_prepareAnimationInfo@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/windowManager.js:1285:34
_sizeChangeWindow@resource:///org/gnome/shell/ui/windowManager.js:1277:18

** Tags added: nvidia

** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: gtk4 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012225

Title:
  mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from
  g_assertion_message_cmpnum() ["assertion failed
  (glCheckFramebufferStatus (GL_FRAMEBUFFER) ==
  GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE): (0x8cdd == 0x8cd5)"] from
  gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target() [gskglcommandqueue.c:1279]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/2012225/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012225] Re: /usr/libexec/mutter-x11-frames:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_cmpnum:gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target:gsk_gl_driver_create_render_target:gsk_gl_render_job_visit_b

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
This was meant to be fixed in bug 2007766, but it's still happening for
some.

** Summary changed:

- 
/usr/libexec/mutter-x11-frames:6:g_assertion_message:g_assertion_message_cmpnum:gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target:gsk_gl_driver_create_render_target:gsk_gl_render_job_visit_blurred_outset_shadow_node
+ mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from 
g_assertion_message_cmpnum() from gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target() 
from gsk_gl_driver_create_render_target() from 
gsk_gl_render_job_visit_blurred_outset_shadow_node()

** Summary changed:

- mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from 
g_assertion_message_cmpnum() from gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target() 
from gsk_gl_driver_create_render_target() from 
gsk_gl_render_job_visit_blurred_outset_shadow_node()
+ mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from 
g_assertion_message_cmpnum() ["assertion failed (glCheckFramebufferStatus 
(GL_FRAMEBUFFER) == GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE): (0x8cdd == 0x8cd5)"] from 
gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target() [gskglcommandqueue.c:1279]

** Package changed: mutter (Ubuntu) => gtk4 (Ubuntu)

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues #5392
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5392

** Also affects: gtk via
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5392
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012225

Title:
  mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from
  g_assertion_message_cmpnum() ["assertion failed
  (glCheckFramebufferStatus (GL_FRAMEBUFFER) ==
  GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE): (0x8cdd == 0x8cd5)"] from
  gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target() [gskglcommandqueue.c:1279]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/2012225/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012225] [NEW] mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from g_assertion_message_cmpnum() ["assertion failed (glCheckFramebufferStatus (GL_FRAMEBUFFER) == GL_FRAMEBUFFER_CO

2023-03-19 Thread errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge
Public bug reported:

The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
mutter.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
44~rc-1ubuntu3, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/7164cde08dbb940e13b49c4e92d4914b24e6c7dc 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

** Affects: gtk
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: gtk4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: lunar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012225

Title:
  mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message() from
  g_assertion_message_cmpnum() ["assertion failed
  (glCheckFramebufferStatus (GL_FRAMEBUFFER) ==
  GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE): (0x8cdd == 0x8cd5)"] from
  gsk_gl_command_queue_create_render_target() [gskglcommandqueue.c:1279]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/2012225/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012223] Re: mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGSEGV in fetch_request_mode() from fetch_request_mode() from gtk_widget_get_request_mode() from gtk_window_compute_default_size() from toplevel_compu

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Summary changed:

- 
/usr/libexec/mutter-x11-frames:11:fetch_request_mode:fetch_request_mode:gtk_widget_get_request_mode:gtk_window_compute_default_size:toplevel_compute_size
+ mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGSEGV in fetch_request_mode() from 
fetch_request_mode() from gtk_widget_get_request_mode() from 
gtk_window_compute_default_size() from toplevel_compute_size()

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012223

Title:
  mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGSEGV in fetch_request_mode() from
  fetch_request_mode() from gtk_widget_get_request_mode() from
  gtk_window_compute_default_size() from toplevel_compute_size()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2012223/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012223] Re: /usr/libexec/mutter-x11-frames:11:fetch_request_mode:fetch_request_mode:gtk_widget_get_request_mode:gtk_window_compute_default_size:toplevel_compute_size

2023-03-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012223

Title:
  mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGSEGV in fetch_request_mode() from
  fetch_request_mode() from gtk_widget_get_request_mode() from
  gtk_window_compute_default_size() from toplevel_compute_size()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2012223/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012223] [NEW] mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGSEGV in fetch_request_mode() from fetch_request_mode() from gtk_widget_get_request_mode() from gtk_window_compute_default_size() from toplevel_com

2023-03-19 Thread errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge
Public bug reported:

The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
mutter.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
44~beta-3ubuntu2, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/461ff881978d26b3ab6a55c3a8b0cef1af4b5473 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: lunar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012223

Title:
  mutter-x11-frames crashed with SIGSEGV in fetch_request_mode() from
  fetch_request_mode() from gtk_widget_get_request_mode() from
  gtk_window_compute_default_size() from toplevel_compute_size()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2012223/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2011271] Re: gdm3: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2012068 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012068

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 2012068

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011271

Title:
  gdm3: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong."

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2011271/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2003168] Re: SIdebar, files gets unresponsive after unlocking locked season.

2023-03-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) because there
has been no activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003168

Title:
  SIdebar, files gets unresponsive after unlocking locked season.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/2003168/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1966905] Re: Memory access errors in gnome-shell from accountsservice

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Also tracking in
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/d85747462e756cb405d1e87b9c59b0b995a7d394

** Description changed:

+ https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/d85747462e756cb405d1e87b9c59b0b995a7d394
+ 
  Valgrind memory errors in gnome-shell 42 from accountsservice:
  
  ==60511== Invalid read of size 8
  ==60511==at 0x4D207FA: g_type_check_instance_cast (gtype.c:4120)
  ==60511==by 0x1E421CA2: free_fetch_user_request (act-user-manager.c:1708)
  ==60511==by 0x1E4298E7: on_find_user_by_name_finished 
(act-user-manager.c:1187)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: UnknownInlinedFun (gtask.c:1300)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: g_task_return (gtask.c:1256)
  ==60511==by 0x4C298BA: reply_cb (gdbusproxy.c:2576)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: UnknownInlinedFun (gtask.c:1300)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: g_task_return (gtask.c:1256)
  ==60511==by 0x4C2107E: g_dbus_connection_call_done 
(gdbusconnection.c:5895)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C4C: complete_in_idle_cb (gtask.c:1244)
  ==60511==by 0x4D9CC23: UnknownInlinedFun (gmain.c:3417)
  ==60511==by 0x4D9CC23: g_main_context_dispatch (gmain.c:4135)
  ==60511==  Address 0x185b5110 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 64 free'd
  ==60511==at 0x484B27F: free (in 
/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
  ==60511==by 0x4D1F7D4: g_type_free_instance (gtype.c:2008)
  ==60511==by 0x1E428ECA: UnknownInlinedFun (act-user.c:562)
  ==60511==by 0x1E428ECA: UnknownInlinedFun (act-user.c:557)
  ==60511==by 0x1E428ECA: _act_user_update_from_object_path 
(act-user.c:1346)
  ==60511==by 0x1E42966F: fetch_user_incrementally (act-user-manager.c:1789)
  ==60511==by 0x1E4298E7: on_find_user_by_name_finished 
(act-user-manager.c:1187)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: UnknownInlinedFun (gtask.c:1300)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: g_task_return (gtask.c:1256)
  ==60511==by 0x4C298BA: reply_cb (gdbusproxy.c:2576)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: UnknownInlinedFun (gtask.c:1300)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: g_task_return (gtask.c:1256)
  ==60511==by 0x4C2107E: g_dbus_connection_call_done 
(gdbusconnection.c:5895)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==  Block was alloc'd at
  ==60511==at 0x4848899: malloc (in 
/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
  ==60511==by 0x4DA5718: g_malloc (gmem.c:125)
  ==60511==by 0x4DBCB64: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1072)
  ==60511==by 0x4DBD1CD: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1098)
  ==60511==by 0x4D24E61: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1911)
  ==60511==by 0x4D0BF4C: g_object_new_internal (gobject.c:2011)
  ==60511==by 0x4D0D1AC: g_object_new_with_properties (gobject.c:2181)
  ==60511==by 0x4D0DCB0: g_object_new (gobject.c:1821)
  ==60511==by 0x1E422792: create_new_user (act-user-manager.c:706)
  ==60511==by 0x1E429BD8: act_user_manager_get_user 
(act-user-manager.c:1879)
  ==60511==by 0x68ADE2D: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.8.1.0)
  ==60511==by 0x68AA492: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.8.1.0)
- ==60511== 
+ ==60511==
  ==60511== Invalid read of size 8
  ==60511==at 0x4D206E9: g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a 
(gtype.c:4091)
  ==60511==by 0x4D06E9A: g_object_set_data (gobject.c:3982)
  ==60511==by 0x1E421CB6: free_fetch_user_request (act-user-manager.c:1708)
  ==60511==by 0x1E4298E7: on_find_user_by_name_finished 
(act-user-manager.c:1187)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: UnknownInlinedFun (gtask.c:1300)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: g_task_return (gtask.c:1256)
  ==60511==by 0x4C298BA: reply_cb (gdbusproxy.c:2576)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: UnknownInlinedFun (gtask.c:1300)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0E0A: g_task_return (gtask.c:1256)
  ==60511==by 0x4C2107E: g_dbus_connection_call_done 
(gdbusconnection.c:5895)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C08: g_task_return_now (gtask.c:1230)
  ==60511==by 0x4BC0C4C: complete_in_idle_cb (gtask.c:1244)
  ==60511==  Address 0x185b5110 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 64 free'd
  ==60511==at 0x484B27F: free (in 
/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
  ==60511==by 0x4D1F7D4: g_type_free_instance (gtype.c:2008)
  ==60511==by 0x1E428ECA: UnknownInlinedFun (act-user.c:562)
  ==60511==by 0x1E428ECA: UnknownInlinedFun (act-user.c:557)
  ==60511==by 0x1E428ECA: _act_user_update_from_object_path 
(act-user.c:1346)
  ==60511==by 0x1E42966F: fetch_user_incrementally (act-user-manager.c:1789)
  ==60511==by 0x1E4298E7: on_find_user_by_name_finished 
(act-user-manager.c:1187)
  

[Bug 2012218] Re: /usr/bin/gnome-shell:11:g_type_check_instance_cast:free_fetch_user_request:fetch_user_incrementally:on_find_user_by_name_finished:g_task_return_now

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1966905 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966905

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1966905
   Memory access errors in gnome-shell from accountsservice

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012218

Title:
  /usr/bin/gnome-
  
shell:11:g_type_check_instance_cast:free_fetch_user_request:fetch_user_incrementally:on_find_user_by_name_finished:g_task_return_now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2012218/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012218] [NEW] /usr/bin/gnome-shell:11:g_type_check_instance_cast:free_fetch_user_request:fetch_user_incrementally:on_find_user_by_name_finished:g_task_return_now

2023-03-19 Thread errors.ubuntu.com bug bridge
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1966905 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966905

Public bug reported:

The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding 
gnome-shell.  This problem was most recently seen with package version 
44~rc-1ubuntu2, the problem page at 
https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/d85747462e756cb405d1e87b9c59b0b995a7d394 
contains more details, including versions of packages affected, stacktrace or 
traceback, and individual crash reports.
If you do not have access to the Ubuntu Error Tracker and are a software 
developer, you can request it at http://forms.canonical.com/reports/.

** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: lunar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012218

Title:
  /usr/bin/gnome-
  
shell:11:g_type_check_instance_cast:free_fetch_user_request:fetch_user_incrementally:on_find_user_by_name_finished:g_task_return_now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2012218/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1966905] Re: Memory access errors in gnome-shell from accountsservice

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: accountsservice (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Medium => High

** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966905

Title:
  Memory access errors in gnome-shell from accountsservice

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/accountsservice/+bug/1966905/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2011801] Re: gdm3 crashes after installing the 'fuse' package

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1717878 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717878

Thanks. Yes that confirms it is bug 1717878.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1717878
   gdm3/gdm-session-worker crashed with SIGTRAP logging "GdmSession: no session 
desktop files installed, aborting..." from get_fallback_session_name from 
get_default_session_name from get_session_name from get_session_filename from 
gdm_session_is_wayland_session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011801

Title:
  gdm3 crashes after installing the 'fuse' package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/2011801/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2011751] Re: openbox crashed with SIGABRT

2023-03-19 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
I believe we have a working patch for the problem. A quick summary of
what it looks like is happening:

Openbox maintains a list of windows organized by stacking order from
highest to lowest. This is a doubly-linked list.

There is a function in Openbox called client_calc_layer that uses a
pointer into this list to walk through it while modifying it. When
client_calc_layer modifies the list, it also messes up the pointer that
it is actively using to walk through the list. The next element that
Openbox loads contains a dangling pointer, and that promptly results in
a segfault when Openbox tries to dereference that pointer.

To solve the problem, I added a patch that makes Openbox save a pointer
to the list element *before* the current element before modifying the
list. When the list is then modified, the still-valid pointer to the
previous list element is used to get a new (and actually usable!)
pointer to the current list element. The old, broken pointer is then
overwritten by the new, working pointer, and the segfaults stop.

Using the patch, I am no longer able to reproduce this bug when
following the testcase (open a browser fullscreen, right-click a link,
and click "Open in new window"). I have the patched Openbox uploaded to
a PPA here: https://launchpad.net/~arraybolt3/+archive/ubuntu/openbox

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011751

Title:
  openbox crashed with SIGABRT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2011751/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1968040] Re: Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit: Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
That's not this bug then, so please open a new one by running:

  ubuntu-bug gnome-shell

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968040

Title:
  Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit:
  Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1968040/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2011803] Re: Fullscreen games repeatedly fullscreen/unfullscreen in 44~rc

2023-03-19 Thread Daniel van Vugt
It was fixed in this instead:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2921

** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: fixed-in-mutter-44.0 fixed-upstream

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011803

Title:
  Fullscreen games repeatedly fullscreen/unfullscreen in 44~rc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2011803/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1980080] Re: Unable to eject SDcard -getting remounted immediately

2023-03-19 Thread Bartłomiej Żogała
Also wondering - my lspci output shows line:
72:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTS5260 PCI 
Express Card Reader (rev 01)


I'm wondering about the 'unassigned class' - might it be related to this issue. 
As most other devices besides NVMe disk starts from 00:, where NVMe starts from 
01: Might this 72: mean that SD card reader has priority over NVMe disk ? 

** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980080

Title:
  Unable to eject SDcard -getting remounted immediately

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1980080/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1332623] Re: Thunar behaves inconsistently with USB flash drive FAT32 partitions

2023-03-19 Thread Richard Elkins
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332623

Title:
  Thunar behaves inconsistently with USB flash drive FAT32 partitions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1332623/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012199] [NEW] nautilus crashes during search or bulk filename editing

2023-03-19 Thread Luke Goshen
Public bug reported:

EVERY search or bulk file renaming action causes nautilus to crash
immediately. All searches cause nautilus to crash immediately. No search
ever comes through. Simple typing in the search bar, or as much as
clicking on it causes nautilus to crash.

Once multiple files are selected and Fn+F2 (Rename) action is selected,
nautilus crashes even without allowing the rename dialog box to appear.
Note that single file renaming still works.

The crashed window gives the option to wait, but waiting never solves
the problem, and I am always forced to restart nautilus after force-
quitting.

What is causing this problem? If this issue is not widespread enough to
receive a bugfix, could the developers guide me with this. I find doing
a fresh install risky because of lack of enough storage for a complete
PC backup.

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Package changed: grub-installer (Ubuntu) => nautilus (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012199

Title:
  nautilus crashes during search or bulk filename editing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2012199/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 2012199] [NEW] nautilus crashes during search or bulk filename editing

2023-03-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

EVERY search or bulk file renaming action causes nautilus to crash
immediately. All searches cause nautilus to crash immediately. No search
ever comes through. Simple typing in the search bar, or as much as
clicking on it causes nautilus to crash.

Once multiple files are selected and Fn+F2 (Rename) action is selected,
nautilus crashes even without allowing the rename dialog box to appear.
Note that single file renaming still works.

The crashed window gives the option to wait, but waiting never solves
the problem, and I am always forced to restart nautilus after force-
quitting.

What is causing this problem? If this issue is not widespread enough to
receive a bugfix, could the developers guide me with this. I find doing
a fresh install risky because of lack of enough storage for a complete
PC backup.

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
nautilus crashes during search or bulk filename editing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012199
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop 
Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1968040] Re: Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit: Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

2023-03-19 Thread Islam
The workaround doesn't fix the problem for me.
It's not only doesn't wake up the screen, it freezes the whole system and I 
have to hard reset!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968040

Title:
  Blanked screen doesn't wake up after locking [drmModeAtomicCommit:
  Argument invalide] [drmModeAtomicCommit: Invalid argument]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1968040/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs