[Bug 1077376] Re: Evince crashes when using the latest version of libgeis1
Same issue here for opening pdf documents. Workaround: Downgrade libgeist1 version 2.2.13-0ubuntu1 to 2.2.12-0ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077376 Title: Evince crashes when using the latest version of libgeis1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1077376/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Reassigning this bug to Compiz. Some tracing points to Compiz and more specifically a Compiz struts issue. Details: windows.cpp CompWindow::updateStruts () struts [0]=0, [1]=0, [2]=300, [3]=0, struts [4]=0, [5]=0, [6]=0, [7]=0 struts [8]=100, [9]=419, [10]=0, [11]=0 The setting of struts [2] = 300 (top.height) is the one that causes this issue, i.e indicates a "panel" of height 300 pixels that in combination with the real unity panel of 24 pixels later leaves 276 pixels of unused height at the bottom of the screen causing icons in that area to be moved upwards. Futhermore, struts [8]=100 (top.x) and struts [9]=419 (top.width) are inaccurate values e.g for a screen 1366x768 running unity. However, there's also a race conditions issue with nautilus causing this to appear sporadic. Sam, hope this is enough info for solving this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) => compiz (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Tested that during the weekend but it didn't work then but for some magic reason now it mostly does :) > you would have no other way for maximized app when you want to drop on the left part Not sure what you mean here but probably a strong reason to keep the behaviour. However, not happy with that autohide launcher behaviour: - makes it less intuitive with reversed triggering - makes it harder to rearrange icons in the leftmost column - causes distraction (annoyance) when rearranging icons But never mind, it's just my opinion ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
> launcher is hidden by default and so we can have icon on the far left. Well, that would be great, but implies another launcher behavior when you drag an icon, right? As is today the hidden launcher always pops up when you drag an icon on the desktop which prevents you from using that leftmost part. So that means you instead have to trigger the launcher the usual way to throw an icon in the trash bin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Yes, that could be a workaround until we find out why reveived screen window margins sometimes have incorrect values. However, imo a final solution shall trust those margins and that those are the root cause of the problem. Margins here shall be controlled by Unity but I suspect that there are other players around too such as compiz that set/change those margins, mainly thinking of the left margin for the launcher. Then it's a question of how it should work. Just noticed, using launcher never hide mode, that desktop icons today really moves when changing the launcher width. Also checked in oneiric that acted the same way and there without any flickering, which thus has been introduced in precise. However, for launcher autohide mode the the desktop icons don't move, i.e appear static! An intentional behaviour? Another strange behaviour I noticed is that the leftmost desktop icons are moved below the launcher for the case setting the launcher width to 49! But the question remains, how shall it work? Is there any design decision made here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 932143] Re: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality
@Fitoschido: Nope ;) Consider the case when a user unlocks the home icon in the launcher. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932143 Title: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/932143/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Just tested the moving icon scenario now and found two side-effects: Glitching What happens here is that the desktop icon workarea is updated three times! - first update with a correct value for left margin - second update with left margin = 0 !!! - third update with a correct value for left margin Expected: one update only The second and third updates cause the glitch as the icons here are moved to the left edge and then back again to its correct posisions. This is probably doable to fix as the unity session is active and by assuming that a left margin = 0 is always wrong. Other possible ways are to find the root cause why there are three updates instead of one and/or why the left margin = 0 in the second update. Icons moving out of screen - This one I guess is a showstopper for this scenario. Assume a launcher width equals 32 and with some desktop icons placed at the right edge of the screen. Increasing the launcher width to 64 here will partly move those icons away from the screen but still possible to grab and drag back into the screen. There is no mechanism implemented as I know of in nautilus atm to do a re-layout of the icons and even if there were one this could cause icons to overlap eachother on the right side. Thus, remains the static left margin >= 64 that cause a "white" space between the launcher and icons on the left side. Looks buggy and wastes horizontal space but works. My conclusion is that there is no perfect (precise) solution to this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Another better solution is to always register the left margin (launcher width + any pad) to X independent of whether the launcher is visible or not and remove the adjustment "left += UNITY_LAUNCHER_WIDTH - 15". The pros is that there is no "visible" empty column between a visible launcher and the left most icons. The cons is that desktop icons will move when you change the launcher width. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
That bug does concider the fact that the desktop icon container shall be unchanged idependent of whether the kauncher is visible or not. That (design decision?) is stated in bug #684649. The the left margin might be decreased or adjusted but not too low as this causes side effect especially with the launcher popping up as soon as one drags an icon on the screen. Furthermore, the launcher's margin is registered i X and received from XGetWindowProperty. For a 32 pix wide launcher the left margin received is 49 pixels and for a hidden launcher it's 0 pixels. Tthis is why adding 66-15=51 to that left margin causes this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 938999] Re: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
Here's a proposed patch for the package nautilus_3.3.90-0ubuntu2. ** Patch added: "nautilus_left_margin.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+attachment/2772267/+files/nautilus_left_margin.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999 Title: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 938999] Re: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999 Title: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 938999] [NEW] Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
Public bug reported: The desktop icon container left margin differs dependent on whether the launcher is autohide or not. My interpretation is that the icon container's left margin shall be static, i.e the same, independent of the choice of the two launcher options, acc to a design decision. Also see bug #684649. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Feb 22 21:57:53 2012 GsettingsChanges: org.gnome.nautilus.window-state geometry '1049x200+2+24' org.gnome.nautilus.window-state sidebar-width 202 org.gnome.nautilus.window-state start-with-status-bar true InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=sv:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999 Title: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 932143] Re: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality
Why! What's wrong with multiple options to achieve something? Furthermore, the bookmark menu in the launcher's quicklist is premature., i.e not sorted the right way and this is known but not acted upon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932143 Title: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/932143/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
For clarity, the patch "top margin patch" is for the precise package nautilus_3.3.90-0ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
The issue causing desktop icons at the bottom of the screen to be moved upwards and in some cases (sporadically) overlap other icons is caused by multiple setups of the desktop icon container in combination with a first too high top margin value setting the height of the desktop icon container. Futhermore, if a desktop icon container has been drawn it will not be redrawn with new margin values, see module libnautilus- private/nautilus-icon-container.c/redo_layout_internal. In my case this issue occurs when a top margin value of 300 pixels appears (from Xlib XGetWindowProperty) and then is used to finally set the desktop icon container height. As the Unity panel is 24 pixels the the empty part in the lower part of the screen will be 300-24 = 276 pixels. So any icons in that lower empty area will then be moved upwards into the desktop icon container. As the function redo_layout_internal today does not support redrawal of the desktop icon container one way is to filter "bad" margin values. As it only seems to be caused by a too high top margin value this can be done in the module src/nautilus-desktop-icon- view.c/icon_container_set_workarea. The highest value to be passed is set to 49 in the following patch but can be reduced further down to max of panel height (top margin) for any sessions supported by ubuntu. Furthermore, it might be included into the patch 02_additional_marge_for_unity.patch. ** Patch added: "top margin patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+attachment/2768289/+files/nautilus_top_margin.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 833397] Re: indicator power displayed twice on panel
Confirmed, gnome battery applet back again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833397 Title: indicator power displayed twice on panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/833397/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 922678] Re: System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
Respecting design decisions in general I however think this is an odd one. I guess this implicitly means that the same restrictive approach will apply to icons, fonts, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678 Title: System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/922678/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 922678] Re: System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678 Title: System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/922678/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 922678] [NEW] System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
Public bug reported: System Settings > Appearance only lists the themes Adwaita, Ambiance, Radiance, HighContrast and HighContrastInverse. This while Advanced Settings (Gnome Tweak Tool) also lists Greybird and Raleigh plus any Gtk+ themes in the user's ~/.themes. There may be an intentional drop of the themes Greybird and Raleigh though but at least themes in the user's ~/.themes should be made selectable in the list. $ apt-cache policy gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: Installed: 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 Candidate: 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 Version table: *** 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-11.19-generic 3.2.1 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 27 17:11:58 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 21.2-0ubuntu4 gnome-bluetooth3.2.1-1ubuntu4 indicator-datetime 0.3.1-0ubuntu5 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678 Title: System Settings > Appearance theme list lacks existing themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/922678/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
> We can maybe link to that, but we have to take into account the case where > there > is no nautilus window opened, raise to focus this one, move your current > workspaces > and such. All that work for e.g. firefox even when there is no current firefox window but I guess nautilus is not designed to support this behaviour fully and easily as one have to patch nautilus to implement the quicklist. > I would though gladly accept a patch doing it :) I would gladly help if I had the skills ;) Hope that someone having that and time will look into this. Thanks anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
I would rather prefer that shortcuts in the quicklist open new tabs than new windows. That was also what I expected the first time I tested this new Home quicklist. Myself I use a number of customized quicklists and one example here is firefox. There I use "firefox -new-tab " to achieve that and the firefox window is always focused. That's to me an expected behaviour not new windows each time crowding the desktop. However, I was going to test that case for nautilus but can't find a command option for setting up a new nautilus tab. Maybe that's why this behaviour was not implemented? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
I prefixed the bookmarks from the top folders with "|> " without quotes as a wotkaround. This will list top folder (Desktop, Documents, Downloads, Music etc) first and "remaining" bookmarks last in the quicklist. I think this is the preferred way as top folder are few (at least if only default folders are listed) and bookmarks can be numerous. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
Ok, I see. Anyhow, one approach could be to use the output from command ls below cd ~ ls -d */ which lists ALL not hidden user top folders. Another approach is to extract the default top folders from the file ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and adding the home folder. >From that those top folders can be removed from the "bookmark list" in the quicklist. The second approach is more in line with Nautilus computer folder list content. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
A comment to this fix: It's not a good idea to alphabetically sort folders and bookmarks as one group of objects. The quicklist should group Computer folders and Bookmarks separatelly and preferably in that order. Confer the presentation in Nautlius sidebar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 910936] Re: Folder and File of same name cannot coexist in a directory
Creating a folder and a file with the same name in a folder is not allowed. The reason is that a folder is a special type of a file, i.e it's a file including the file mode bit d. Also see e.g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_file_types Thus, this does not work touch ~/Downloads/test mkdir ~/Downloads/test an nor does this mkdir ~/Downloads/test cat > ~/Downloads/test Ctrl+D Marking the bug invalid. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910936 Title: Folder and File of same name cannot coexist in a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/910936/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 915600] Re: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission
This bug is fixed in gnome-settings-daemon 3.2.2-0ubuntu10 $ apt-cache policy gnome-settings-daemon gnome-settings-daemon: Installed: 3.2.2-0ubuntu10 Candidate: 3.2.2-0ubuntu10 Version table: *** 3.2.2-0ubuntu10 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.2.2-0ubuntu9 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915600 Title: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/915600/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 915600] Re: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission
Confirmed, this issue still not solved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915600 Title: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/915600/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 915600] Re: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission
A workaround is to downgrade gnome-settings-daemon to version 3.2.2-0ubuntu7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915600 Title: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/915600/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
I experience this issue too in Precise. After an upgrade of Oneiric on 2011-12-21 (previous upgrade: 2011-12-05) I also see this behaviour in Oneiric. However, not sure that this upgrade introduced the issue in Oneiric as it's sporadic and I mainly run Precise. It seems that a wrong screen resolution is handed over to Nautilus and as James indicates this might very well be a race condition issue as it's sporadic. A workaround (tested in Oneiric so far) is to log out and in again, so desktop icon positions all are intact. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 833397] Re: indicator power displayed twice on panel
The patch works for Precise as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833397 Title: indicator power displayed twice on panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/833397/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 826771] Re: indicator-appmenu leads to have a nautilus menubar displayed on top of the screen
@Dmitry: Yes, but it's still an issue that needs to be solved for Unity as well. Probably needs to be solved in appmenu-gtk/qt? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826771 Title: indicator-appmenu leads to have a nautilus menubar displayed on top of the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-foundations/+bug/826771/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 826771] Re: indicator-appmenu leads to have a nautilus menubar displayed on top of the screen
It did't disappear for the Unity shell, still there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826771 Title: indicator-appmenu leads to have a nautilus menubar displayed on top of the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-foundations/+bug/826771/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 843769] Re: 'undefined symbol: g_unix_signal_add_watch_full' error, needs to be updated to 3.1.91
There is no fix released for evolution yet so please revert back to In Progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843769 Title: 'undefined symbol: g_unix_signal_add_watch_full' error, needs to be updated to 3.1.91 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/843769/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 843800] Re: Evolution dont load: undefined symbol: g_unix_signal_add_watch_full
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 843769 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843769 This is a duplicate of bug #843769 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 843769 evolution not start -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843800 Title: Evolution dont load: undefined symbol: g_unix_signal_add_watch_full To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/843800/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 826331] Re: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 826771 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826771 Yes, very likely. The background behaves the same way, that is, moving down the height of the nautilus "panel" at login. So marking this one as a duplicate of bug #826771. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 826771 indicator-appmenu leads to have a nautilus menubar displayed on top of the screen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826331 Title: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/826331/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 826331] Re: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel
Unmarking this bug as a duplicate of #805252 as this bug has nothing to do with the appmenu issue. This bug displays two (2) panels, one unity panel and another nautilus panel behind the unity panel. This is due when appmenu is uninstalled, ie when the global menu is removed. The nautilus panel and its menus (File, etc) are not clickable but visible only when the unity panel is made transparent. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826331 Title: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/826331/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 826331] Re: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 805252 appmenu shows nautilus menu when desktop is displayed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826331 Title: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/826331/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 835966] Re: file-roller doesnt know about .zip files
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 829169 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829169 Marking this as a duplicate of #829169 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 829169 Archive Manager refuses to open zip-type archives -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835966 Title: file-roller doesnt know about .zip files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/835966/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 682120] Re: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV
In my case this issue, as far as I can remember, was solved by a following update so Evo now works both in Natty and Oneiric. Sorry for forgetting to mention that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682120 Title: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution-data-server/+bug/682120/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 826331] Re: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel
I've noticed the same (similar) issue for unity-2d, gnome-panel (fallback) and gnome-shell even though it's harder to reveil the nautilus menu behind those main panels. So it's more likely a nautilus/gtk issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826331 Title: Nautilus menu hidden under the Unity panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/826331/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 817991] Re: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager
Just adding that I have the exact same problem on two installations, this one originating from Natty and another clean alpha2 install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817991 Title: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/817991/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 817991] Re: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager
The problem occurred on upgrading from 3.1.2-0ubuntu1 to 3.1.3-0ubuntu1 and the log for 3.1.3-0ubuntu1 says: gnome-power-manager (3.1.3-0ubuntu1) oneiric; urgency=low * New upstream release * debian/rules: * debian/patches/08-desktop-bugreport-path.patch: - Remove mentions of no longer existing gnome-power-bugreport.sh and autostart * debian/patches/02_autostart_init.patch: * debian/patches/14_fix_no_xbacklight_crash.patch: * debian/patches/14-critical-message-timeout.patch: * debian/patches/15-nodisplay-autostart.patch: - Remove obsolete patches * debian/patches/16-onlyshowin-unity.patch: - Remove upstreamed patch and I guess it has to do with this change: * debian/patches/14_fix_no_xbacklight_crash.patch: -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817991 Title: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/817991/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 817991] Re: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager
** Tags added: regression -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817991 Title: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/817991/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 817991] [NEW] Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager
Public bug reported: The screen brightness can no longer be adjusted using the Fn+arrow keys. This feature is gone for: gnome-power-manager (3.1.3-0ubuntu1/0ubuntu2) Workaround is to downgrade to: gnome-power-manager (3.1.2-0ubuntu1) Furthermore, the brightness cannot be adjusted in the gnome control center Command: gnome-control-center screen This feature also is gone for: gnome-control-center (1:3.1.4-0ubuntu1/0ubuntu2) Workaround is to downgrade to: gnome-control-center (1:3.1.3-0ubuntu5) gnome-control-center-data (1:3.1.3-0ubuntu5) libgnome-control-center1 (1:3.1.3-0ubuntu5) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gnome-power-manager 3.1.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-7.8-generic 3.0.0 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jul 29 13:21:24 2011 GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No GnomeSessionInhibitors: None GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: No InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R580/R590 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-7-generic root=UUID=52c4a378-4960-4eb5-b56e-fd789daaa5fb ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: gnome-power-manager UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: 11JB.M044.20100622.hkk dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: R580/R590 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr11JB.M044.20100622.hkk:bd06/22/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR580/R590:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR580/R590:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: R580/R590 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. gnome-power-bugreport: Error: [Errno 2] Filen eller katalogen finns inte ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric regression running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817991 Title: Cannot change screen brightness after upgrading gnome-power-manager To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/817991/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 794761] Re: No valid active connections found
Package glib2.0 ver 2.29.6-0ubuntu1 installed. TEST CASE 1: LightDM and GDM installed. Package glib2.0 ver 2.29.6-0ubuntu1 installed. Running the System preferences > Network in the terminal: $ gnome-control-center network After some 80 seconds the Network windows pops up together with an alert: "The system network services are not compatible with this version." Only the option Network Proxy shows up, ie Wired and Wireless are missing! Downgrade and this works too. TEST CASE 2: Removing LightDM, rebooting and thus running GDM. Package glib2.0 ver 2.29.6-0ubuntu1 installed. Running the System preferences > Network in the terminal: $ gnome-control-center network The Network window pops up at once also showning the options Wired and Wireless. No downgrade needed. CONCLUSION: The problem can be isolated to LightDM as far as I can see. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794761 Title: No valid active connections found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/794761/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 794761] Re: No valid active connections found
It seems, at least in my case, that the problem depends on whether I run GDM or LightDM but also if I use autologin or not. In my previous comment I ran LightDM and manual login. After some tests between GDM/LightDM and auto/manual login it seems that autologin works better for both DMs concerning network setup. At the moment I'm running LightDM and autologin and it mostly works. However, trying to access the Network confiuration under System preferences hangs and I'm forced to do a force quit to close that window. So there is a network issue introduced by the glib2.0 update. Downgrading "solves" the issue at the moment. Then why this /etc/etc folder being created? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794761 Title: No valid active connections found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/794761/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 794761] Re: No valid active connections found
This bug still exists in glib2.0 version 2.29.6-0ubuntu1 and causes freezing at logout, reboot and shutdown. Furthermore, no network access, neither wired nor wireless works. Downgrade to version 2.28.6-0ubuntu1 is a workaround. There seems to be a misconfiguration in the package creating an /etc/etc folder containing $ ls -l /etc/etc totalt 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2011-06-09 13:37 bash_completion.d Thus, bash completion is affected and obviously some other glib- functions as well addressing /etc/etc instead of /etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/794761 Title: No valid active connections found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/794761/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 785274] Re: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 785319 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785319 I'm marking this bug as a duplicate of bug #785319 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 785319 package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug 785319 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/785319/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785274 Title: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 785349] Re: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 785319 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785319 I'm marking this bug as a duplicate of bug #785319 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 785319 package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 * You can subscribe to bug 785319 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/785319/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785349 Title: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 785319] Re: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
The problem is due to an existing but empty schema file, i.e /usr/share/gconf/schemas/tomboy.schemas. Removing (actually hiding by renaming) the tomboy.schemas solves the problem for other affected application schemas. Thus, the package tomboy 1.6.1-0ubuntu1 needs to be rebuilt with a correct tomboy.schemas. ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785319 Title: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 724285] Re: assertion failure: g_bus_unwatch_name: assertion `watcher_id > 0' failed
@Neil J. Patel The Nautilus crash when clicking the close button is due to one of the overlay-scrollbar packages. Don't know which one but running without those overlay-scrollbar packages works. So it seems to be an inconsistency in the implementation of the scroll button in the Nautilus window and probably a Nautilus issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724285 Title: assertion failure: g_bus_unwatch_name: assertion `watcher_id > 0' failed -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 682120] Re: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV
** Visibility changed to: Public -- e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 644312] Re: Unable to save default display settings
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 646076 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646076 Marking this as a duplicate of bug #646076 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 646076 gnome-display-properties: cannot save systemwide resolution * You can subscribe to bug 646076 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/646076/+subscribe -- Unable to save default display settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 644312] Re: Unable to save default display settings
I confirm this malfunction. A workaround is to manually add the two missing directories. $ sudo mkdir /etc/gnome-settings-daemon $ sudo mkdir /etc/gnome-settings-daemon/xrandr ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Unable to save default display settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 626171] Re: On my first attempt to log in, GDM crashes and restarts.
I experience the same behaviour for the desktop version at login. When using autologin the same also happens at first prompt of a password, eg for evolution and synaptic, where it crashes and returns back to the gdm login window. At next login everything seems to be back to normal. Confirming. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- On my first attempt to log in, GDM crashes and restarts. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626171 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 372647] Re: Clock and Weather applet don't show any weather info
More investigations show that in my case (not behind proxy) the problem is that my ISP DNSes bar IWS servers, i.e DNS lookups fail for some reason. Switching e.g to Googles public DNSes makes it work again. Thus, this is my workaround until my ISP fixes this issue. -- Clock and Weather applet don't show any weather info https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 372647] Re: Clock and Weather applet don't show any weather info
Doesn't work neither in Lucid nor Maverick. I've tried all the suggestions with no luck but once. No proxy is used. That once when (for the n:th time) I deleted ~/.gconf the weather info popped up again both in the Clock and in the Weather Report. Tested both reboots and logout/login and it still worked. Next day when I colded started the computer again those infos were gone and have never showed up again. It seems that both of them are waiting to get the info, e.g. the Weather Report is kept in status Updating... So one question is, how do we track this down as we can't use tools like strace? -- Clock and Weather applet don't show any weather info https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 597987] Re: gimp does not show gradients, layers and brushes
@KaySL There does not seem to be a released ubuntu version yet neither for lucid nor maverick. If so, please specify the chromium-browser packages incl the fix per Ubuntu release. -- gimp does not show gradients, layers and brushes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 530760] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in gnome-keyring code
Installing evolution-data-server 2.28.3.1-0ubuntu5 from lucid-proposed seems to solve my crash problems. Before I could reduce the crash frequency by only having one or two mail accounts active. After installing evolution-data-server 2.28.3.1-0ubuntu5 I've run Evolution 15 hours by now with five accounts active searching for new messages each and every minute with no crashes so far. That's quite an improvement ;) Installed fixes: libgnome-keyring0 2.30.1-0ubuntu1 evolution-data-server 2.28.3.1-0ubuntu5 -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in gnome-keyring code https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 586771] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in em_format_snoop_type()
One could expect a reference to that particular bug. Assuming you refer to bug #584536 so checking on that one. -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in em_format_snoop_type() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 586771] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in em_format_snoop_type()
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257149/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257150/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257151/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257152/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257153/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: "Registers.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257154/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: "Stacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257155/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49257156/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Description changed: Binary package hint: evolution Maverick: evolution 2.30.1.2-2ubuntu1 - The crash appears when showing or opening mails where the Subject is prefixed by =?iso-8859-1?Q?. - Other mails work fine. + The crash appears when showing or opening mails where the Subject is + prefixed by =?iso-8859-1?Q?. Other mails work fine. - Showning/opening those mails in Lucid running evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu9 + Showing/opening those mails in Lucid running evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu9 works fine so it seems to be a regression. + ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: evolution 2.30.1.2-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.34-4.11-generic-pae 2.6.34 Uname: Linux 2.6.34-4-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Fri May 28 11:54:54 2010 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429) ProcCmdline: evolution ProcCwd: /home/rolf ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=sv_SE:sv:en_GB:en - LANG=sv_SE.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANGUAGE=sv_SE:sv:en_GB:en + LANG=sv_SE.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: - Segfault happened at: 0x6b9c430 : mov 0x4(%eax),%edx - PC (0x06b9c430) ok - source "0x4(%eax)" (0x0003) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! - destination "%edx" ok - Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment) + Segfault happened at: 0x6b9c430 : mov 0x4(%eax),%edx + PC (0x06b9c430) ok + source "0x4(%eax)" (0x0003) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)! + destination "%edx" ok + Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment) SegvReason: reading NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: evolution StacktraceTop: - em_format_snoop_type () - em_format_part_as () - em_format_part () - ?? () from /usr/lib/evolution/2.30/libemformat.so.0 - em_format_part_as () + em_format_snoop_type () + em_format_part_as () + em_format_part () + ?? () from /usr/lib/evolution/2.30/libemformat.so.0 + em_format_part_as () Title: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in em_format_snoop_type() UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1488): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in em_format_snoop_type() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 530760] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_timeout_handle()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in dbus_timeout_handle() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514562] Re: Default values stripped from schemas with empty "short_desc" attribute
Same here, 1ubuntu5 fixed it for me too. @Geir Ove Myhr Can it be some interference with your local .gconf settings? -- Default values stripped from schemas with empty "short_desc" attribute https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514562 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514281] Re: lost gconf schema defaults
Sorry, I meant todays Lucid build. -- lost gconf schema defaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514281] Re: lost gconf schema defaults
Actually, yesterdays built incl gconf - 2.28.0-1ubuntu4 acted the same strange way for keystrokes so I don't think that package solved this issue. Questinn is if this included Chris Coulsons remark in bug #514562 on empty short_desc attributes in the schemas. -- lost gconf schema defaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 514281 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514281 The bug #514281 does not fix this bug! As I wrote i comment #24 I made a new install including gconf - 2.28.0-1ubuntu4 before installing awn. The install of awn still fails with unassigned key values. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
Made another Lucid install from the today's build. Installing awn then resulted in all awn gconf key default values being unassigned (no value). Starting up awn-settings failed as well. The current awn version was released about two weeks ago so it's most probably an awn bug. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
Nope, no progress. Now sitting with all awn keys unassigned even after an awn complete reinstall! There's some strange going on, but I'll have a deeper look at it tomorrow. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
As I said, I've reinstalled all awn packages but still no progress. I'll run that gconftool-2 command later tonight for the untouched install. In the current boot I've tried to reset key values but the command awn-settings after some resets pointed to other awn settings under /apps/avant-window-navigator/.. that also showed up to contain keys with values missing so it all seems to be a mess. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
@Mark Lee There is no package avant-window-navigator-trunk I've reinstalled all awn packages, no progress so far. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
Forgot to mention that the update to gconf version 1ubuntu4 didn't cure the problem. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3
I've found corruptions of awn gconf key data, ie quite a few keys have lost their values in /apps/instances/avant-window-navigator/panel-1/panel I'll try to restore those and see if I get get awn working again. Here is the output trying to start up Awn Settings in the System menu using the terminal: $ awn-settings Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/awn-settings", line 1102, in awnmanager = awnManagerMini() File "/usr/bin/awn-settings", line 968, in __init__ self.prefManager = awnPreferencesMini(self.wTree) File "/usr/bin/awn-settings", line 192, in __init__ self.wTree.get_object(wtree_name), False) File "/usr/share/avant-window-navigator/awn-settings/awnSettingsHelper.py", line 142, in bind_to_gtk_component config.BIND_METHOD_FALLBACK) glib.GError: Could not find the key specified: /apps/instances/avant-window-navigator/panel-1/panel/orient. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 331571] Re: disable Mail Notification eplugin by default
> In this case I think it's entirely reasonable to just > suppress the applet itself, but leave the plugin running. I don't think this is a good enough solution. Sure, creating a bridge for bug #1 users is one thing but to adopt to it's annoying behaviour is not an option. This applet aka alert! makes no sense nor do the OK and Cancel buttons. So, please make this event informative, cf a printout job. -- disable Mail Notification eplugin by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316947] Re: URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly
This bug has now been fixed by package libgtkhtml3.14-19 1:3.25.90-0ubuntu1 $ apt-cache policy libgtkhtml3.14-19 libgtkhtml3.14-19: Installed: 1:3.25.90-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:3.25.90-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:3.25.90-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status The fix emanates from the solution of this bug: Bug 567697 – Plain text emails render links with ampersand characters stripped out http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567697 gtkhtml3.14 (1:3.25.90-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low * New upstream version: Bug Fixes: - #464064 (BNC) : Evolution crashed - pressing ctrl+z (undo) in composer window - #465432 (BNC) : Deleting Text In Table Deletes To End Of String - #532165 : Do not crash when factory gone. - #567697 : Do not strip invalid entities, rather return them back as text. - #567733 : Handle the "popup-menu" signal. -- Sebastien Bacher Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:29:16 +0100 ** Changed in: gtkhtml3.14 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkhtml3.14 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316947] Re: URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly
Just discovered that linux was smarter than me! After a restart the corresponding symlink /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19 was updated to point to the original /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19.1.0 so had to fix that too. Anyhow, the bug has been introduced in the Jaunty version of libgtkhtml, unintentionally caused by another fix not (yet) implemented in the Intrepid version. -- URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkhtml3.14 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316947] Re: URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly
I've just made a test by replacing the file /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19.1.0 installed for Jaunty with the corresponding one installed for Intrepid and the missing ampersands in the url-link popped up again in Evolution and everything seems fine. Thus this bug seems to have been introduced somewhere inbetween the two libgtkhtml versions. Jaunty -- $ apt-cache policy libgtkhtml3.14-19 libgtkhtml3.14-19: Installed: 1:3.25.5-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:3.25.5-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:3.25.5-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ ls -l /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19.1.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 688404 2009-01-31 17:46 /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19.1.0 Intrepid $ apt-cache policy libgtkhtml3.14-19 libgtkhtml3.14-19: Installed: 1:3.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:3.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:3.24.1.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:3.24.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages $ ls -l /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19.1.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 674196 2008-11-14 10:47 /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19.1.0 -- URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkhtml3.14 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 295519] Re: vlc/gnome-sound-recorder sound has glitchs
Thanks Daniel, disabling the timer-based scheduling (tsched=0) fixed it for me! >From a PA perspective I had to manually do - install vlc-plugin-pulse - configure VLC sound output to "Pulse audio output" - disabling the timer-based scheduling (tsched=0) to get a glitch-free sound I guess those settings should be the defaults for Ubuntu installations. The last one, adding the fix tsched=0, then only needed until the PA and Alsa driver issue is solved. -- vlc/gnome-sound-recorder sound has glitchs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295519 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-media in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316947] Re: URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly
Now tested in Gutsy as well and this type of url works fine there too! So, it seems that the issue is introduced in a version update of gtkhtml only being used in Jaunty at the moment. Note: The url address here contains explicit & sign and not the & ditto -- URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkhtml3.14 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316947] Re: URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly
You're right Sebastien. The reason why I flagged it as Jaunty was that this problem neither appears in Intrepid nor Hardy. But it might be present in Gutsy, haven't checked it yet. Pedro, yes that's may opinion too that gtkhtml is the issue here. Furthermore, I've tested this on another Jaunty installation in a Virtualbox environment with the same result so the problem seems to be consistent anyway. It's also reproducable, ie copying the first paragraph in this report containg the links and then send it to yourself using Jaunty and Evolution. So it shouldn't be that hard to debug either. -- URL-links including ampersands listed in evolution mails are not rendered correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtkhtml3.14 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 208282] Re: Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply
It seems that the new 3.0.28a-1ubuntu3 version cured my problem with Nautilus and the FTP-server. Thus I assume that this was a MIME conversion problem. -- Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 208282] Re: Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply
I'm not convinced this is not a bug. I can confirm that this problem has occurred recently, actually about one week ago. I have a Dlink DNS-323 connected to my network over SMB. The FTP-server has worked throughout Edgy, Feisty, Gutsy and Hardy alpha/beta without any complains. I don't use it daily but a week ago when samba among other things was updated i Hardy it just stopped working. Actually not true, it works for 1-3 minutes of browsing around and then it hangs and after another minute or two after which I get this messages saying that a reponse (DBUS_ERROR_NO_REPLY) is never returned. When booting my Gutsy and Windows everything works fine. I checked what happened a week ago at the time when the problem arose. Among other things I found the most suspected in my mind was that - samba was upgraded from 3.0.28a-0ubuntu3 to 3.0.28a-1ubuntu1 - smbclient was upgraded from 3.0.28a-0ubuntu3 to 3.0.28a-1ubuntu1 - samba-common was upgraded from 3.0.28a-0ubuntu3 to 3.0.28a-1ubuntu1 I thought (hoped) that maybe 3.0.28a-1ubuntu2 should cure the problem but it didn't so. I also made at backup of my smb.conf and let i update that one acc to the author even though there were just a few minor changes. -- Dbus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
