[Bug 1064584] Re: Locked gnome session unlocks without password authentication
This is a key bit: Jan 17 07:54:33 workstation gnome-session[2959]: WARNING: Application 'gnome-shell.desktop' killed by signal 11 The lock screen is integrated into the compositor (gnome-shell) in 3.6. An unfortunate side effect of this is that if the compositor crashes, it will get auto-restarted, and we fail open. In prior versions of GNOME, gnome-screensaver was an indepenent process. Clearly it would make sense to attempt to preserve the screen is locked state, but that'd still allow a window in which the session was accessible. The real fix here is to figure out why gnome-shell is crashing and ensure it doesn't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064584 Title: Locked gnome session unlocks without password authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/1064584/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1064584] Re: Locked gnome session unlocks without password authentication
Tentative patch submitted here https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691987 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #691987 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691987 ** Also affects: gdm via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691987 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064584 Title: Locked gnome session unlocks without password authentication To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/1064584/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740815]
GJS changes to support this release: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646369 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Hi Wes, thanks a ton for your work here! * You seem to have configure checked in to the hg repo, since it's generated it shouldn't be (and it's not in mozilla-central) Actually I'm getting a build error on RHEL6 I need to debug before I do further checking. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740815]
A couple more things: * The js-config script will conflict. Not quite sure what to do with it; most distros ship pkg-config, which is really better in all conceivable ways. * Speaking of pkg-config, this does *not* ship a .pc file (it lives in mozilla-central/xulrunner/installer). Would you take a patch to add one, say spidermonkey-185.pc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #20) Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source tarball (which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate autoconf-2.13 as a dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and building from (or incorporating) the source tarball. Normal practice is to only ship generated files in the foo.tar.gz, not in revision control. In the same way that firefox-4.0.source.tar.bz2 includes configure, but mozilla-central doesn't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740815]
Created attachment 521641 add pkg-config file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 740815]
(In reply to comment #30) Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to 1.9.0, would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right. I don't think it matters a lot, honestly. I really would rather we ship. libspidermonkey does make more sense to me though if someone cares to rework the tree though, so we're *very* clearly distinguished from --enable-shared-js from mozilla-central. I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox version number or the Gecko one. So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey-4.so ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 175904] Re: Firefox-3.0 window moves to current workspace
Just a note, Fedora is currently using the patch from the GNOME bug for Fedora 9. -- Firefox-3.0 window moves to current workspace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 175904] Re: Firefox-3.0 window moves to current workspace
I would really appreciate if Hardy and Fedora 9 both used the same behavior, as it reduces user confusion. Your suggestion would change the behavior of the single-workspace case. The reason I chose to patch Metacity is simple - it makes Firefox match the behavior it has on both Windows and MacOS X (and how IE works on Windows, and I'd bet Safari on OS X). Please consider the Metacity patch. Thanks! -- Firefox-3.0 window moves to current workspace https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175904 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
