[Bug 1764091] Re: gjs-console crashed with SIGSEGV in JS_GetContextPrivate()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1751194 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751194 This bug is said to be a duplicate of 1751194 which seems to be non existing or private (?). The result is that when gjs-console crashes, I get other crashes proposed, but never "in JS_GetContextPrivate()", so that I have the choice of not reporting the bug, or creating a new bug each time… then declared duplicate. I want to be helpful but I do not know how. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gjs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764091 Title: gjs-console crashed with SIGSEGV in JS_GetContextPrivate() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gjs/+bug/1764091/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221112]
(In reply to comment #69) … Regarding the voting, is there generic popular Linux-oriented site in France? Like slashdot.org or smth... There is a popular Linux-oriented site in France (linuxfr.org) and the final ajustments of this layout were done after discussion on this site. I realise there is a vocal minority that does not like some of those choices A site like linuxfr.org may well be a vocal minority in itself. Nothing proves that linuxfr.org is representative of ordinary users. And even on linuxfr.org I have seen posts saying where is my CRTL-R gone? or my keyboard is broken since some new version of Ubuntu. In a way, suppressing one of the customary CTRL keys is intrinsically a minority point of view. [Furthermore, the French layout for the Belgian keyboard depends on the French layout for the French keyboard. I do not see why a discussion on linuxfr.org should decide that Belgians have no use of right CTRL.] but 1. the other alternatives used in the ancestors of this layout generated a lot more hate mail I doubt having a right CTRL key ever generated hate mail. That hate mail was about other questions. 2. because I knew there was no choice everyone would like spacebar layout is modular (and I'm the person who modularized it as part of the creation of this layout). People can choose the previous behaviour if they want and a few other possibilities were added as part of the modularization We are not here discussing space bar, but right CTRL. Is right CTRL modular? Is there an option easily accessible to the ordinary user to restore right CTRL? 3. so far no one proposed any better option appart from removing symbols which are necessary to write proper French (arguably proper French is not the same as C code). It's a lot easier to clamor for removal of the bits you do not use than to try to design a general-purpose solution without cutting corners The clamor is not against proper French of for removal of anything. Furthermore, how could an ordinary user try to design a solution? The user wants a common PC keyboard with CTRL keys, without having to write the code himself. The clamor is: do what you can to allow writing proper French —and thank you for your trying to do it— but leave the right CTRL. --- If no agreement can be reached, would it be possible to have the old layout accessible, even under another name? I do not know how many variants are allowed, by design, or by freedesktop conventions. Of course a new variant would be useless if it didn’t appear in the choices offered to an ordinary user by the most popular GNU Linux distributions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221112 Title: Can't use space bar in search bar when using french alternative keyboard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libgnomekbd/+bug/221112/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221112]
I feel extremely uneasy because I am a user of free software and I am full of respect and gratitude for the people who make this possible, including of course Nicolas Mailhot. I am an amateur and I am conscious that I rely entirely on the work of devoted paid and unpaid professionals. But in this case, I must crudely say, because it was hinted that we should have a vote: the vote already happened, here in Bugzilla, and in Launchpad, and elsewhere in many forums. The result obviously is: Nicolas Mailhot against the rest of the world. I think the rest of the world constitutes a majority compared to Nicolas Mailhot alone. Therefore one should immediately revert to the last good version with two Control keys. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221112 Title: Can't use space bar in search bar when using french alternative keyboard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libgnomekbd/+bug/221112/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221112]
More arguments in favor of reverting to an normal behaviour of Ctrl-R: -- Most computers in most operating systems, languages (including French until recently), desktops... have two identical Ctrl keys. It is queer to have French keyboards doing otherwise since a few years. -- Like having two Shift keys, two Ctrl keys are better for easy fast typing. By the way, breaking the French keyboard breaks the Belgian keyboard too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221112 Title: Can't use space bar in search bar when using french alternative keyboard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libgnomekbd/+bug/221112/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 591895] Re: removing a keyboard layout is not persistent across reboots
New install of 12.04 Using Gnome Classic (no effects) In gconf-editor /desktop/gnome/peripherals/keyboard/kbd/layouts = be oss but the keyboard behaves like an ordinary be -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591895 Title: removing a keyboard layout is not persistent across reboots To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdm/+bug/591895/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 421381] [NEW] Nautilus should support FTPES (Auth TLS)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Aparently Nautilus (2.26.2) does not support the FTPES protocol (Auth TLS) for FTP. I want to connect a ProFTPd 1.3.1 server with Auth TLS security. I cannot connect with Nautilus. (Filezilla connects but with an error.) I do connect with FireFTP 1.0.4 in the Firefox 3.0.13 of Ubuntu 9.04. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Nautilus should support FTPES (Auth TLS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 331439] Re: [Jaunty] gdmgreeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865651/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865652/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865653/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865654/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865655/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865656/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22865657/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- [Jaunty] gdmgreeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 331324] Re: gdmgreeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()
Using Intel 945G as hardware, lspci 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) but as vesa because of a bug in xorg-intel. Gdmgreeter problem solved for me after upgrade a few minutes ago. -- gdmgreeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 329835] Re: totem-gstreamer-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22657310/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22657312/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22657313/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22657314/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22657315/Registers.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- totem-gstreamer-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 165260] Re: second X server takes ages
Dominique Meeùs a écrit ce qui suit, le 05.04.2008 18:21 : Basilio Kublik a écrit ce qui suit, le 27.03.2008 05:37 : […] We were wondering is this still an issue for you? I did some googling on this issue and found somebody recommending the installation of package dbus-x11, which I did. I do not have any more problem since. (I am aware that this is not a sufficient proof that dbus-x11 was the solution.) Sorry, I am mistaken. This seems irrelevant for the disappearing of my gdm problem. I reported the gdm bug in november, the problem disappeared quite soon after that, and I seem to have installed dbus-x11 only in february. Now I remember that I sometimes got There was an error starting the GNOME Settings Daemon (actually Il y a eu une erreur lors du démarrage du démon des préférences GNOME in French), the googling was about this and the installation of dbus-x11 was an attempt (seemingly successful by the way) to solve this daemon problem, not the gdm one. -- second X server takes ages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 165260] Re: second X server takes ages
Basilio Kublik a écrit ce qui suit, le 27.03.2008 05:37 : […] We were wondering is this still an issue for you? I did some googling on this issue and found somebody recommending the installation of package dbus-x11, which I did. I do not have any more problem since. (I am aware that this is not a sufficient proof that dbus-x11 was the solution.) Can you try with the development version of Ubuntu, Hardy Heron? I love seeing new improvements appear, and play with them, but I also like to do more serious things with my computer. A computer (with its OS and applications as a whole) is (1) a tool (2) for doing something. You have to keep the balance between hacking your tool for the pleasure of hacking (I am more an end user than a hacker, even if I love it); and the pleasure to use this tool for something else more important. Thus, as a rule, I refrain (with difficulty) from installing versions before they are considered stable (you know the phrase this beta is not recommended for production systems). I could install the beta of 8.04 on another partition, but if I use 7.10 and 8.04beta with the same /home, I could have problems with my configuration files in /home (mixture of options relating to 7.10 and 8.4) and this would not be an interesting testbed for 8.04. There are only a very few more weeks to wait for the real 8.4. Thanks […] -- Amitiés, Dominique, [EMAIL PROTECTED], +32 (473) 61 31 75, http://www.meeus-d.be/ -- second X server takes ages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 165260] second X server takes ages
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 7.10 (new install 17-10-2007) I am using [servers] 0=Standard 1=Standard in gdm.conf (now gdm.conf-custom) for years without problems. I use this in combination with [daemon] AutomaticLoginEnable=true AutomaticLogin=[myownloginname] This was also the case with 7.10 until recently. Normally, I see server 0 starting on vt7 and then server 1 on vt9, that remains active for me to log a guest, or go Ctrl+Alt+F7 find my own session open on vt7. Since a few days (?) it happens (in about half of boot tentatives) that I get only server 0 on vt7. Vt9 remains black and accepts Alt+F7 (not only Ctrl+Alt+F7). Server 1 then ultimately starts with gdm login prompt about 1 hour (!) later. But half of the time also, everything goes normally. I am not aware of having changed anything myself but I accept all proposed upgrades and I see 2007-11-17 20:15:41 upgrade gdm 2.20.0-0ubuntu6 2.20.1-0ubuntu1 in dpkg.log. ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- second X server takes ages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/165260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 49413] Re: [Bug 49413] Re: menu calls smeg which doesn't exist anymore (alacarte)
Sebastien Bacher a écrit ce qui suit, le 15/06/06 12:29 : [...] Does locate smeg.desktop lists any such .desktop? [...] Indeed, in my .local/share/applications. -- menu calls smeg which doesn't exist anymore (alacarte) https://launchpad.net/bugs/49413 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 49417] Re: [Bug 49417] Re: [Bug 49417] Double-clicking a word processing document in Nautilus gives no result
Sebastien Bacher a écrit ce qui suit, le 15/06/06 12:20 : Le dimanche 11 juin 2006 à 23:37 +, Dominique Meeùs a écrit : How to change association of a file type with a default (or other) application seems to be a well preserved secret so that most users cannot correct this themselves. What is the use of a such comment? That's a wrong statement. What do you expect to win from it? Conflict with people who might help you to fix your issue? I am really sorry. I was hoping options in the open with dialog. Then I searched for a configuration file. To that point my search was unsuccesful and I felt the need to stress that the bug was rather serious for the users. (My aim was not to fix /my/ issue but maybe a /general/ issue.) I did not mean to attack anybody but I must admit that my style was quite inappropriate. I felt still more sorry for having written this when somebody pointed out to me, afterwards, that it was very easy to change file associations through file properties. (I didn't look there at first, thinking: file properties is about /one/ file at a time, like permissions, my problem is about a /type/ of file.) (In Gnome also, menu Applications/Bureautique/OpenOffice.org2 writer is proposed as first but does not function. But OpenOffice.org word processor does.) The issue is noticable on your box because you probably have a ooo2-writer.desktop somewhere. Does locate ooo2-writer.desktop lists something? I did updatedb just now and found (sudo root) no ooo2-writer.desktop in my box. My only ooo2*.desktop systemwide is .local/share/applications/ooo2-calc-usercustom.desktop. I do not remember having deleted the ooo2*.desktop while trying to solve the problem but I cannot be 100 % sure. Next time I'll write down immediately what I do :-) -- Double-clicking a word processing document in Nautilus gives no result https://launchpad.net/bugs/49417 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 49417] Re: [Bug 49417] Re: [Bug 49417] Double-clicking a word processing document in Nautilus gives no result
Dennis Kaarsemaker a écrit ce qui suit, le 12/06/06 10:18 : OpenOffice.org2 does not exist in dapper. It's called OpenOffice.org. That's the point: ooo2 doesn't exist in Dapper but it appears above others in the Applications menu and it is the default application for ooo documents in Nautilus. After some research with Google, I found that the buggy /etc/gnome/defaults.list alias /usr/share/applications/defaults.list is the cause of the Nautilus bug. I could not find yet the buggy configuration file responsible for the menu bug but I corrected it through alacarte (after correcting first the smeg bug in the menus!). These bugs reveal a feature problem (in Gnome? Ubuntu?): these questions are poorly documented for the average user and there is no open with editor or dialog at hand. If the configuration files received with the distribution are buggy (as is the case with Dapper), there is little an average user can do (except light a candle :-). -- Amitiés, Dominique, +32 (473) 61 31 75, http://www.meeus-d.be/, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Double-clicking a word processing document in Nautilus gives no result https://launchpad.net/bugs/49417 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 49413] menu calls smeg which doesn't exist anymore (alacarte)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-menus In my new Dapper installation in French, when I choose Applications/Outils système/Éditeur de menu Gnome (menu editor, as you may guess even if you don't speak French), I get an error message that smeg doesn't exist. Indeed, it is no more to be found at all in the Dapper distribution but was replaced by alacarte. Alacarte virtually provides smeg but not its name. (I did not upgrade from Breezy, I did a new installation. But I DID keep my /home partition and did mount it as the new /home in Dapper. Is this the reason?) Having a menu error in the very Menu editor is annoying! Still, it is possible to launch alacarte from a terminal to correct the menu by replacing the smeg command by alacarte. Another way round would be to place a link to alacarte named smeg in /usr/bin, I suppose. ** Affects: gnome-menus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- menu calls smeg which doesn't exist anymore (alacarte) https://launchpad.net/bugs/49413 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 49414] OpenOffice.org2 writer menu not functioning
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-menus New Dapper installation, French. Menu Applications/Bureautique/OpenOffice.org2 writer does not function (because ooffice2 does not exist in /usr/bin?). But OpenOffice.org word processor does. (In Nautilus also, OpenOffice.org2 writer is the default for Microsoft Word and OpenOffice documents. Thus double-clicking such a document in Nautilus gives no result.) ** Affects: gnome-menus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- OpenOffice.org2 writer menu not functioning https://launchpad.net/bugs/49414 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 49417] Double-clicking a word processing document in Nautilus gives no result
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus New Ubuntu Dapper installation, French. In Nautilus, OpenOffice.org2 writer is the default for Microsoft Word and OpenOffice documents. Double-clicking such a document in Nautilus gives no result (because ooffice2 does not exist in /usr/bin?). How to change association of a file type with a default (or other) application seems to be a well preserved secret so that most users cannot correct this themselves. (In Gnome also, menu Applications/Bureautique/OpenOffice.org2 writer is proposed as first but does not function. But OpenOffice.org word processor does.) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Double-clicking a word processing document in Nautilus gives no result https://launchpad.net/bugs/49417 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
