[Bug 1325142] Re: failure to update libpam-systemd in 14.04 due to missing logind init script
I am reopening the Trusty task, as I've re-confirmed this bug in 14.04 chroot. apt upgrading will fail on libpam-systemd: root@x250:/# apt dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libfreetype6 os-prober Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y E: Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty (2: No such file or directory) Setting up libpam-systemd:amd64 (204-5ubuntu20.19) ... initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/systemd-logind not found. runlevel:/var/run/utmp: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing package libpam-systemd:amd64 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: libpam-systemd:amd64 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Note that I can work around this by disabling policy-rc.d and initctl as such: #!/bin/sh # Ensure that apt upgrades work in Ubuntu on Windows # environments, which do not use Ubuntu's /sbin/init # Install a dummy, exit-non-zero policy-rc.d cat >/usr/sbin/policy-rc.d < Confirmed ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325142 Title: failure to update libpam-systemd in 14.04 due to missing logind init script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1325142/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1503418] Re: [SRU] [REGRESSION] launching byobu from unity uses the terminal icon rather than the application icon
** Changed in: byobu (Ubuntu Wily) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1503418 Title: [SRU] [REGRESSION] launching byobu from unity uses the terminal icon rather than the application icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/1503418/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1503418] Re: [SRU] [REGRESSION] launching byobu from unity uses the terminal icon rather than the application icon
** Changed in: byobu (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1503418 Title: [SRU] [REGRESSION] launching byobu from unity uses the terminal icon rather than the application icon To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/1503418/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1512498] Re: gnome-terminal thinks it's Byobu Terminal
So this is caused by a bad fix for Bug: #1503418, where byobu thinks it's gnome-terminal. That was a regression introduced in Wily. We need a good fix for both... ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512498 Title: gnome-terminal thinks it's Byobu Terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1512498/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 745408] Re: evolution suffers from ecryptfs
This is possibly related to the ENAMETOOLONG bugs in ecryptfs, with encrypted filenames. Can you confirm that you're using encrypted filenames in your setup? How many lines does your $HOME/.ecryptfs/Private.sig file have? 2? ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745408 Title: evolution suffers from ecryptfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/745408/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 515155] Re: unlocking screensaver hangs when ecryptfs is unmounted
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515155 Title: unlocking screensaver hangs when ecryptfs is unmounted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/515155/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 860485] Re: bad default setting: suspend after 30min when plugged in
Wow, this bug is absolutely killing me :-( I'm leaving my laptop for a bit while it does some work (uploads a bunch of data, builds something really big, does some transcoding), and I'm very surprised to come back an hour later and find it suspended! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860485 Title: bad default setting: suspend after 30min when plugged in To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/860485/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 860485] Re: bad default setting: suspend after 30min when plugged in
Seb, eta for uploading the fix? This is release-critical, IMO. ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High = Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860485 Title: bad default setting: suspend after 30min when plugged in To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/860485/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792636] Re: Power section no longer allows configuration of when the lid is closed action in Oneiric
Having attended two conferences recently (LinuxCon and LinuxPlumbers), I heard this complaint over and over and over again about both Unity and Gnome3. I'm raising this bug to Critical (though I suspect it'll be lowered to High), nominating for Oneiric, and targeting at the 11.10 release. I've also noted in the bug description that this is a regression from previous versions of Ubuntu. Hopefully this bug will get some attention and get fixed! Cheers, Dustin ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Critical ** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Critical Status: Triaged ** Summary changed: - Power section no longer allows configuration of when the lid is closed action in Oneiric + [Regression] Power section no longer allows configuration of when the lid is closed action in Oneiric ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Oneiric) Milestone: None = ubuntu-11.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792636 Title: [Regression] Power section no longer allows configuration of when the lid is closed action in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/792636/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 737891] Re: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA
This bug is still affecting me in Oneiric. Adding an oneiric task. Boy, I sure would like to see this solved for Oneiric... ** Also affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Wishlist Status: Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737891 Title: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/737891/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 816669] [NEW] encrypted-home support in new user dialog
Public bug reported: seb128 asked me to file this bug... He noticed that the Gnome3 new user dialog does not support the encrypt- home-directory feature that was present in previous versions of Gnome. To solve this, the new user dialog would have a boolean checkbox (defaulted to un-checked), which asks if this new user's home directory should be created. Talk to mpt about the wordsmithing. If checked, then you need to add --encrypt-home to the 'adduser' invocation. Before running adduser, you'd also need to ensure that ecryptfs-utils is installed. For real security, you would also need to run (as root) ecryptfs-setup- swap, which would encrypt the user's swap space. This is necessary, as any files/data that gets swapped out to disk could be written in the clear, thereby circumventing the user's requested encryption. Further note that if swap is encrypted, hibernation should be disabled (suspend continues to work just fine). ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Low Assignee: Rodrigo Moya (rodrigo-moya) Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816669 Title: encrypted-home support in new user dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/816669/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 762058] Re: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty after gnome screensaver, can't click or focus
I can confirm this, as I see it from time to time on my 11.04 system. ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762058 Title: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty after gnome screensaver, can't click or focus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/762058/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 96676] Re: function keys don't work in gnome-terminal
Hmm, looks like this bug is preventing tmux from receiving shift-F-keys correctly through gnome-terminal (on 11.04). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96676 Title: function keys don't work in gnome-terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/96676/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 767095] Re: 1 pixel icons in notification-area-applet for qt softwares
Separating the tasks for Natty and Oneiric. This bug is killing me. Makes Skype basically unusable. I've marked the Natty task 'high' and targeted it at natty-updates. Hopefully, hopefully, hopefully the Desktop team can take a look at this and get it fixed in an SRU. I'll gladly do test natty-proposed packages. Thanks, Dustin ** Also affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu Natty) Milestone: None = natty-updates ** Summary changed: - 1 pixel icons in notification-area-applet for qt softwares + 1 pixel icons in notification-area-applet for qt softwares (e.g. Skype) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767095 Title: 1 pixel icons in notification-area-applet for qt softwares (e.g. Skype) -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 737891] Re: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA
Okay, I'm *finally* back home and was able to test this... I can confirm part of what Thierry suggested. I removed ~/.config/monitors.xml and that got rid of the Samsung flashing monitor on reboot. It comes up in cloned monitor mode, dropping down to the lowest common resolution, which is 1280x800. I am now working on my 24 monitor at 1280x800, which is better than the unusable flashing screen. Okay, so now I try to change the resolution of my Samsung monitor to its max. I disabled the laptop screen entirely, and then I set the external Samsung to 1920x1080, and boom, flashing green/black screen all over again :-( Give it 30 seconds, and it restores. Next, I tried enabling both screens, with my laptop at 1280x800 and my external monitor at 1920x1080. Surprisingly, this worked just fine. Unfortunately, this isn't my preferred working setup :-( I prefer to put my laptop in my docking station, lid closed, and go straight from a single screen with 1280x800 resolution, to a single external monitor with 1920x1080. Note that all of this works fine in 10.10. And also note that all of my testing is in the Gnome Classic Desktop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737891 Title: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 737891] Re: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA
Okay, one more interesting tidbit... I am actually unable to run *any* resolution on my external monitor, if I disable my laptop LCD in gnome's monitor configuration utility. Seems that something is very broken there... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737891 Title: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 737891] Re: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA
Bryce, No luck here :-( Still very, very broken in my home setup. A few pieces of information, though... 1) GDM seems to work correctly. ie, if I reboot my system with my external 24 Samsung 1920x1080 monitor hooked up, GDM comes up in mirror mode, full resolution and grandeur. When I log in, though, Classic or Unity, I get nothing on either monitor. Well, I get the flashing that Andres showed in his video. 2) I gave a talk today at Texas Linux Fest, and brought along a 10.04 LiveUSB. However, when I tested Natty against the monitors the conference provided, everything worked just fine. So perhaps the problem is monitor specific? My monitor is a relatively common Samsung SyncMaster 2333 24, that has worked perfectly from Hardy - Maverick. It's only Natty that's batty. Dustin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737891 Title: [Arrandale] gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 737891] Re: gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA
Same problem here, same hardware. This is a regression from Maverick. ** Changed in: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737891 Title: gnome-display-properties unable to correctly enable monitors connected to VGA -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 415586] Re: [Needs 0.27] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in handle_command()
I've confirmed that this patch is currently in Natty's xchat-gnome. ** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415586 Title: [Needs 0.27] xchat-gnome crashed with SIGSEGV in handle_command() -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630383] Re: Gnome-terminal paste keyboard shortcut does not work - menu not shown
** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libdbusmenu (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: libdbusmenu (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu Maverick) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630383 Title: Gnome-terminal paste keyboard shortcut does not work - menu not shown -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 630383] Re: Gnome-terminal paste keyboard shortcut does not work - menu not shown
Okay, I have fixed up the merge proposed branch, and uploaded to maverick-proposed. Please update the description of the bug with SRU testing details: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Thanks, Dustin -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630383 Title: Gnome-terminal paste keyboard shortcut does not work - menu not shown -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 722739] Re: Xchat and Xchat gnome lack plugin events for window close
Hi Jeremy, Is there an equivalent patch for xchat as well? ** Changed in: xchat (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722739 Title: Xchat and Xchat gnome lack plugin events for window close -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 722739] Re: Xchat and Xchat gnome lack plugin events for window close
So I created a debdiff for Jeremy's patch, adding it to debian/patches and creating the changelog entry. I declined to upload it, though, as I suspect that this is new functionality and probably requires a Feature Freeze Exception. ** Patch added: 722739.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xchat-gnome/+bug/722739/+attachment/1908248/+files/722739.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722739 Title: Xchat and Xchat gnome lack plugin events for window close -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 284443] Re: Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login
Martin, Is there anything we can do on the desktop side, to keep people from choosing auto login if their system is setup for encrypted home? That's easy enough to test. Just look for ~/.ecryptfs/auto-mount. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284443 Title: Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 576133] Re: Problem creating a user with encrypted home directory and automatic logon.
Thanks for the bug. Yes I confirmed this bug, talked to Martin Pitt. Definitely something we should fix. ** Package changed: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) = gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Problem creating a user with encrypted home directory and automatic logon. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576133 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
I've opened a vte task, marked it triaged/wishlist. Hopefully someone familiar with that package can comment as to the viability of the change. Thanks. ** Also affects: vte (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
Adding a gnome-terminal task, as I'm interested in their opinion too. ** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
From my little perspective, it seems like it would be nice if gnome- terminal defaulted to 80x25. A quick search and a read of wikipedia seems to indicate that 80x25 is the most common format: * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/80x25 By far the most common text mode used in DOS environments, and initial Windows consoles, is the default 80 columns by 25 rows, or 80×25, with 16 colors. This mode was available on practically all IBM and compatible personal computers. All 80×25 modes also had a virtual 80×24 mode, used by some applications that needed a status bar on the last row, like terminal emulators. In reality, it was the same 80×25 mode, but restrained by software to make the last row unaccesible. I'll copy the bug over to gnome-terminal, but I don't really want to get in the middle of flamewar about something like this. -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
I'm marking the qemu-kvm task invalid as I think qemu is doing the right thing, by emulating an 80x25 console. ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
And for completeness, this is totally configurable in gnome-terminal. Edit - Profile Preferences - Default Size - 25 rows ** Summary changed: - `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24 + gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 435472] Re: Cannot manually copy or backup encrypted home
** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Cannot manually copy or backup encrypted home https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 469571] Re: Cannot move any file outside of home folder to trash (ext4)
As another test, install a system (could be in a VM), which has /home on a separate partition from / and /tmp. Don't encrypt the home. See if the same problem exists. -- Cannot move any file outside of home folder to trash (ext4) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 469571] Re: Cannot move any file outside of home folder to trash (ext4)
This looks to me to be a problem with Nautilus (or whatever is providing the delete-trash mechanism). I suspect that it doesn't want to move files across mount points, as this can take a long time (as compared to flipping a few inodes). If your trash bin is in your encrypted Home, then to move a file from /tmp to Trash means encrypting it (which might take a few seconds if the file is big). Some special case handling (or optional configuration) might be required in Nautilus. I'm assigning this bug to the Nautilus package, as I think that's what provides the Trash bin. Thanks. ** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Cannot move any file outside of home folder to trash (ext4) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 507231] Re: Automatic umount ineffective on standard installation
I use Evolution and Encrypted Home, and I've never seen this issue. However, I certainly agree that there are situations when the home directory is not unmounted because of lingering processes. This is required to protect your data. I'm marking the bug against ecryptfs invalid, as this is behavior by design. The better question is why evolution is doing something like this. ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Automatic umount ineffective on standard installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 470129] Re: 9.10 karmic gdm login fails after changing password (users-admin) when home folder encrypted (ecryptfs)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307019 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 See step 4 in the bug report -- that's the problem. In versions of Ubuntu before Lucid (this is in fact fixed in Lucid), if an administrator changed a password using System - Administration - Users and Groups, they were able to force-change a user's password without entering the user's old password. This would break the encrypted home setup because both the old and new passwords are needed to re-wrap the wrapped-passphrase. The proper ways of changing a password has always worked with encrypted home -- that is, System - Preferences - About Me, and passwd. In any case, the other bug that this one is a duplicate of shows how this was fixed in gnome-system-tools. -- 9.10 karmic gdm login fails after changing password (users-admin) when home folder encrypted (ecryptfs) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/470129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu (via bug 307019). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 106621] Re: GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g)
From an eCryptfs perspective, this is a limitation of using Encrypted- Private, rather than Encrypted-Home. In both Jaunty and Karmic, you now have the ability to encrypt your entire home directory, which includes your Trash folder. Thus you can protect your Trash through Encrypted-Home. Truly, the Encrypted-Home feature was developed to handle situations like this, where users had to painstakingly identify what was to be marked Private. I'm switching the ecryptfs-utils task from invalid to wont-fix, since there's a viable, well-supported alternative. :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Won't Fix -- GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 435472] Re: Cannot manually copy or backup encrypted home
Hi David- I'm not familiar with file-roller. Out of curiosity, can you try tarring your home dir up, and copying that to your NFS partition? tar zcvf backup.tar.gz your encrypted dir Let's see if that basic test works, before getting too deep. :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- Cannot manually copy or backup encrypted home https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures with encrypted home directories
Brilliant! -- login-screen has no user-pictures with encrypted home directories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335809] Re: KVM activates (GNOME) Screensaver when inside SDL window
Hmm, I can't reproduce this in Karmic. I'm marking Fixed for now. If you can reproduce this in Karmic, please re-open the bug with detail instructions. :-Dustin ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- KVM activates (GNOME) Screensaver when inside SDL window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335809] Re: KVM activates (GNOME) Screensaver when inside SDL window
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- KVM activates (GNOME) Screensaver when inside SDL window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures
Thanks for the report. Obviously, this is because your home directory is not mounted at the time in which gdm tries to read your .face file. To solve this, we're going to need to read/write .face to a non- encrypted location. The best place for this is going to be /home/.ecryptfs/$USER. gdm will need to be modified to check this location for .face. And gnome-control-center will need to be modified to write .face to that location too, if it exists. :-Dustin ** Package changed: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) = gdm (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) ** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- login-screen has no user-pictures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- login-screen has no user-pictures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- login-screen has no user-pictures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures
Attaching a fix for gdm. I've tested that it does the right thing, looking for a .face file in /home/.ecryptfs/$USER/.face. I'm hoping that seb or pitti will have a look at this, upload to Ubuntu, and take care of upstreaming to Gnome. Thanks, :-Dustin ** Attachment added: 1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31550672/1 -- login-screen has no user-pictures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures
** Attachment added: 2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31550749/2 ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) = Sebastien Bacher (seb128) ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) = Sebastien Bacher (seb128) ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = karmic-alpha-6 ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = karmic-alpha-6 -- login-screen has no user-pictures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 426724] Re: login-screen has no user-pictures
Attaching a fix to gnome-control-center, that fixes the about-me dialog to write .face to /home/.ecryptfs/$USER, if that directory exists. Again, I've tested it and it does this. Subscribing seb and pitti, hoping that they'll have a look over it, upstream it to Gnome, and upload to Karmic. Thanks, :-Dustin -- login-screen has no user-pictures https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426724 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Removing myself as assignee. I grabbed this bug long ago, when it was tagged bite size. I created a fix that solved this problem for some shells, and in some cases (where ~ is expanded properly). However, that fix was reverted in that the solution was only partial, and incomplete. I don't really intend on returning to work on this bug. Sorry. :-Dustin ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-8.10-beta = None ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) = (unassigned) -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
Hi Pedro- I'm confirming this bug, and moving it to High. This is extremely bad functionality, and I think should be a High priority. Thanks, :-Dustin ** Changed in: liboobs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: liboobs (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = High ** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 390504] Re: gnome-settings-daemon should keep its opinions about my disk management to itself
Any idea when this might be released? This bug is driving me nuts... :-Dustin -- gnome-settings-daemon should keep its opinions about my disk management to itself https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328536] Re: confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles
** Changed in: byobu (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Confirmed ** Changed in: byobu Status: Triaged = Confirmed -- confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328536] Re: confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles
Marking invalid, and converting to a question. Launchpad hates me, so I'm going to create a new question, and link here. :-Dustin ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: byobu (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Won't Fix ** Package changed: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) = ubuntu ** Changed in: byobu Status: Confirmed = New ** Changed in: byobu Status: New = Invalid -- confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328536] Re: confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles
** Also affects: byobu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328536] Re: confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles
Marking won't fix against screen-profiles, and copying bug over to new byobu package. If this can be fixed, I'll fix it there. :-Dustin ** Changed in: screen-profiles (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix ** Changed in: byobu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: byobu (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 335809] Re: KVM activates (GNOME) Screensaver when inside SDL window
I can confirm this. This is annoying if you're spending a lot of time inside of kvm windows. I'm going to add a task against gnome- screensaver. Perhaps they'll have some advice on how to solve this. :-Dustin ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = Low -- KVM activates (GNOME) Screensaver when inside SDL window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335809 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 371363] Re: GDM doesn’t pick up my fa ce when home is encrypted
This is a can't fix from the ecryptfs perspective. If you face image is stored in your encrypted home directory, you can't read this data until you've entered your password. This is by design. GDM could perhaps store your picture some place other than your home directory (like i /var/lib perhaps). However, I suspect others would fairly complain that private data (their image) is being leaked to non- encrypted storage. Now, if you really want to work around this issue you could: 1) copy your non-encrypted image to some non-encrypted location, like /var/lib 2) create a symlink in your non-encrypted home directory to the non-encrypted image. :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils Status: New = Won't Fix -- GDM doesn’t pick up my face when home is encrypted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328536] Re: confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles
Thanks for the information. I'll add gnome-terminal as affected, and confirm the bug there. Hopefully a gnome developer can help out with this. :-Dustin ** Also affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- confusing scrollbar behavior in gnome-terminal when using screen-profiles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 353446] Re: GDM auto login won't work with ecryptfs
I'm sorry, but an encrypted home directory and gdm-autologin are two features that are simply incompatible. We handled this in the installer by allowing you to only one of 3 different options: 1) auto login (no password) 2) login with a password 3) login with a password and decrypt your home directory contents I believe this should be solved in the gdm Login Window Preferences - Security tab. The 'enable automatic login' option should be greyed out if the user has an encrypted home directory, $ mount | grep on $HOME type ecryptfs seb128, I'm going to wishlist this against gdm. :-Dustin ** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- GDM auto login won't work with ecryptfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 353446] Re: GDM auto login won't work with ecryptfs
Sebastien- If you encrypt your home directory, you absolutely *must* enter a password on login. If you want to add some code to GDM, when doing an auto-login that detects this, that's fine too. In fact, I think that might be a good idea. :-Dustin -- GDM auto login won't work with ecryptfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 106621] Re: GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g)
I'm running with my entire home directory encrypted (ecryptfs) I created a new file using Nautilus. Saved that file. Deleted that file. It was successfully deleted, and did not go to my Trash bin. :-Dustin -- GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
The new problem being experienced on Jaunty has been split out to Bug #328445. :-Dustin -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328127] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
See also Bug #328445, which looks like a dupe. :-Dustin -- gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 328445] Re: [Jaunty/amd64] Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 328127 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127 Actually, I can set SSH_AUTH_SOCK to anything (adsfasdfasdfasdf), or unset it. I'm going to mark this bug a duplicate of Bug #328127. :-Dustin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 328127 gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. -- [Jaunty/amd64] Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 328127). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 289700] Re: Typo in maintainer field
Thanks for the bug report and patch. I'm fixing and uploading. :-Dustin ** Changed in: gnome-doc-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- Typo in maintainer field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-doc-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
Marking confirmed, I'm experiencing this problem now on Jaunty as well. :-Dustin ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
Interestingly, if I regenerate my keypair, the new ones work. I'm using a 4096 bit rsa key. My system is an up-to-date Jaunty amd64 install. Also, the new, working key appears to be 4 bytes shorter... $ wc id_rsa orig/id_rsa 51 57 3239 id_rsa 51 57 3243 orig/id_rsa :-Dustin -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
** Also affects: liboobs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
Subscribed Kees, added liboobs, as he indicated the bug is actually in this (buggy) library. I'm attaching a screenshot to demonstrate the problem. This Users-and- Groups diaglog exposes a mechanism to administrative users to reset a password. Note that it's not prompting for the user's current password. This makes ecryptfs re-wrapping of the passphrase impossible. Lose. In this situation, the user's system passphrase will be changed to the new passphrase, but the user's ~/.ecryptfs/wrapped-passphrase file will still be wrapped with the previous passphrase. :-Dustin ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20354426/Screenshot.png -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 307019] Re: ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin
Attaching a second screen shot of the proper way for a user to change their password graphically, using System-Preferences-About Me. From the command line, one should use passwd. The problem really occurs when the Administrative user forcefully changes another user's password (or their own), without passing the user's current password to PAM. :-Dustin ** Attachment added: Screenshot-1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20354604/Screenshot-1.png -- ecryptfs Private directory not mounted after changing password in users-admin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to liboobs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 297993] Re: Cannot clear the ~/Private/.Trash-xxxx
I'm adding a task for Nautilus, as I'm not sure that there's something I can do about this in ecryptfs. Nautilus developers- Ideas? :-Dustin ** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot clear the ~/Private/.Trash- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 297993] Re: Cannot clear the ~/Private/.Trash-xxxx
Okay, I'm adding a gvfs task. gvfs-developers- Any suggestions? :-Dustin ** Also affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cannot clear the ~/Private/.Trash- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 297993] Re: Cannot clear the ~/Private/.Trash-xxxx
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106621 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106621 Thanks for the pointer! I'm going to mark as duplicate. :-Dustin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 106621 GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g) -- Cannot clear the ~/Private/.Trash- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 106621] Re: GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g)
Adding ecryptfs-utils for tracking purposes, since we've gotten a few reports. :-Dustin ** Also affects: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- GNOME Trash doesn't show deleted files on fuse partitions (ecryptfs / encfs / Private / ntfs-3g) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 291372] Re: unable to unmount Private
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 259799 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259799 You can unmount it from the command line with: $ umount.ecryptfs_private Otherwise, it will be automatically unmounted when you log out. Gnome/KDE will need to be updated to special case ecryptfs filesystems to call umount.ecryptfs_private rather than unmount. :-Dustin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 259799 Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus -- unable to unmount Private https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs (via bug 259799). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 276745] Re: can't login withough manually modprobing ecryptfs
Hi Muelli- What are you trying to use ecryptfs for, in this case? Are you trying to use the Encrypted Private Directory feature of Intrepid? If so, note bug #255799, which is a Wishlist known issue, asking for pam_ecryptfs to support fingerprint readers. :-Dustin -- can't login withough manually modprobing ecryptfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 290163] Re: Private drive icon appears on desktop
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 259799 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259799 See also: * bug #279422 * bug #259799 :-Dustin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 259799 Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus -- Private drive icon appears on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee (via bug 259799). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 259799] Re: Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the worst usability problems would be fixed with nautilus ignoring the ecryptfs mount entirely. This would get rid of the Private mount on the desktop and Places menu I agree that mounts with filesystem type ecryptfs should be ignored by Gnome, whatever creates the icon on the desktop and link under Places. and the inability to unmount (which isn't possible for an user anyway), and just keep the Private directory. Do you agree? That's not entirely accurate... A normal user can unmount, but they have to specifically use /sbin/umount.ecryptfs_private. However, on the whole, I agree with your direction. Thanks for opening the upstream bug. Cheers, :-Dustin -- Suggestion: support for ecryptfs in Nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 284443] Re: Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login
Okay, per discussion with pitti in IRC, I think the proper solution would involve: * changing the symlink in an un-mounted ~/Private directory to point to a wrapper script, instead of /sbin/mount.ecryptfs_private * having that wrapper script: * first try to perform the mount * if the required key is not found * Explain the situation * Prompt for the password using gksu/zenity/kdesu * Perform the mount This is Jaunty material, and will probably involve assistance from the desktop folks. :-Dustin -- Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 284443] Re: ecryptfs does not work with gdm auto-login
The encrypted private directory should absolutely NOT be mounted on automatic, password-less logins. That would entirely defeat its purpose. In fact, auto logins should never be used on any system where you care at all about security. I'll document this in the EncryptedPrivateDirectory wiki page, and eventually in the ecryptfs-setup-private manpage in a subsequent upstream release. I'm not going to clutter the ecryptfs dialogs with this information. I'll leave it to the gdmsetup developers to decide whether they want to include a note. :-Dustin ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: New = Won't Fix ** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ecryptfs does not work with gdm auto-login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 284443] Re: Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login
** Summary changed: - ecryptfs does not work with gdm auto-login + Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login -- Encrypted Private Directory is not automatically mounted when using gdm auto-login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 279422] Re: Impossible to remove Private directory desktop icon
I'm marking 'Invalid' against ecryptfs-utils, and adding a task against gconf2. ecryptfs-utils has nothing to do with the desktop icon. It simply establishes a mount point. The desktop then adds icons for dynamic mounts. Perhaps the desktop team has a way to blacklist the ~/Private mountpoint? To the question about automounting on login, that is a key design point. You can change this deleting ~/.ecryptfs/auto-mount. :-Dustin ** Also affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Impossible to remove Private directory desktop icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 274950] Re: Look into switching to bluez 4.x
Thinkpad X61 as Bluetooth host Palm Treo 755p Jabra Headset Success: * Both devices pair very easily * I can send files from the laptop to the Treo No Success Yet: * Sending files from the Treo to the Laptop * Syncing/backing up the Treo to the Laptop * Dial-up networking through my Treo and cellular provider from the Laptop * Playing sound via also device to the Headset * Recording voice from the headset to alsa on the Laptop All of these were working for me back in the Gutsy time frame, but have been broken through Hardy and Intrepid. :-Dustin -- Look into switching to bluez 4.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 251375] Re: gdm init script should support the 'status' action
Hi Andres- Patch looks good to me. My only comment would be that I tend to quote shell variables when referencing them, such as: * status_of_proc -p $PIDFILE $DAEMON gdm exit 0 || exit $? I suggest that you subscribe ubuntu-main-sponsors, and bug someone with core-dev privileges if it hasn't been sponsored within a week or so. Good work, thanks! :-Dustin -- gdm init script should support the 'status' action https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251375 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
One more followup... This debdiff adds support for fixing this on upgrades. :-Dustin ** Attachment added: pam.64064-b.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15540582/pam.64064-b.debdiff -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
** Tags removed: bitesize -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Hey Kees- I must admit that I don't entirely grasp the scope of the issue you're raising with /home living on a networked filesystem (sorry). * Is your concern a security one, where a malicious user gaining access to the network file server could potentially inject badness in various users ~/bin? * Or is it a performance concern, in that we're adding a search in PATH on a remote filesystem? * ...? In the mean time, I have a simple, one-line patch that adds ~/bin to the end of the initial PATH definition in /etc/environment. Depending on Kees' explanation of his concerns, I can add some additional logic to libpam-modules.postinst to affirm that no user's ~bin is on a networked filesystem at /etc/environment creation time. :-Dustin ** Attachment added: pam.64064.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15442148/pam.64064.debdiff -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I have tested my patch. It works well with: * bash * dash * ksh * ash But does not work with: * zsh * csh * fish * tcsh * es * rc * sash I did not see any ill-effects on the shells where it didn't work, besides not finding executables in ~/bin. And I think we have the vast majority of Ubuntu's shell users covered with (bash, dash, ksh, ash). :-Dustin -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
My patch also works with: * Gnome + Alt-F2 * XFCE + Alt-F2 * KDE This provides the desired behavior covers the main Ubuntu desktop managers, and the Bourne-compatible shells (dash, bash, ash, ksh) and would benefit the majority of [K/X/U]buntu users. It does *not* break functionality on non-Bourne shells. Users of these shells will need to update their ~/.pam_environment or other .*rc scripts to add a fully qualified /home/user/bin to the PATH environment variable. Or, actually just: eval PATH=$PATH as the problem seems to be that non-Bourne shells do not evaluate the ~ or the $HOME variables in the PATH declaration. Proposing for sponsorship for Intrepid. :-Dustin -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Marking in progress, assigning to myself since I tested/submitted a patch, targeting Intrepid. :-Dustin ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Dustin Kirkland (kirkland) Status: Confirmed = In Progress Target: None = ubuntu-8.10-beta -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221071] Re: evolution loses message preview configuration option
This appears to be related to the fact that I changed my local user name. I recursively changed ownership on all .evolution/ files. But apparently my former username must be embedded in some configuration files, breaking some parts of Evolution. :-Dustin -- evolution loses message preview configuration option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221061] [NEW] evolution: cannot select matching search messages and move to folder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution This seems to have changed very recently, probably in the last Evolution update for Hardy. This is a common use case for me, I use it many times a day. To reproduce: 1) Have an inbox with some messages 2) Search the inbox on some terms 3) All folders but the current folder is grayed (greyed) out, and therefore, you cannot move matching searched messages to a folder. This is inconvenient, as I like to read all messages matching a certain term (like [Activity]), and move them in bulk to my archive. Screenshot attached. :-Dustin ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evolution: cannot select matching search messages and move to folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221061] Re: evolution: cannot select matching search messages and move to folder
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13838402/Screenshot.png -- evolution: cannot select matching search messages and move to folder https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221061 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 221071] [NEW] evolution loses message preview configuration option
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I like the message preview window option. Ctrl-M If evolution crashes, or if I poweroff my system, or even logout of my desktop without first closing evolution, I have to turn message preview back on. Seems like this option should be persistent, stored to file, and read from config file on startup, regardless of the previous Evolution's exit status. It used to behave this way pre-Hardy. :-Dustin ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- evolution loses message preview configuration option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
