[Bug 290918] Re: user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64064 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 64064 would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH -- user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu (via bug 64064). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250000] Re: gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 66004] Re: .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 Actually, I'm going to file these under the original .bash_profile bit, .. Rather than dupe them.. Check out bug 64064 for more dialog on ~/bin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber (via bug 17962). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 69700] Re: .bash_profile never executed for graphical logins.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 66004 .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- .bash_profile never executed for graphical logins. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber (via bug 17962). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] Re: HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
This is exploitable in a very easy fashion using the following command gnome-terminal --hide-menubar --full-screen -e "ssh host-with-passkey" On the flip side can this agent easily be disabled, I'd prefer to explicitly opt-in to agent with ssh-add are there any disadvantages to yanking it -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 218822] Re: gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# ps -p 5682 -F UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD ecarroll 5682 1 0 3651 2668 0 Jun02 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon -d --login -- gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] Re: HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
irc.freenode.net/#ubuntu-bugs 02:14 < nicolasvw> EvanCarroll: I can confirm I didn't get the prompt when in fullscreen. Killing gnome-keyring-ask I was able to regain control of the terminal. 02:14 < EvanCarroll> yea, but you had to drop to tty to do it right? 02:15 < nicolasvw> EvanCarroll: yes 02:15 < EvanCarroll> that's all i need. thanks a ton moving to confirmed -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
** Changed in: gnome-themes-extras (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-themes-extras in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 121041] Re: secure passwords don't work
Can not confirm, not existing in Hardy. -- secure passwords don't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] [NEW] HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring This bug is not a bug about gnome-ssh-askpass simply failing to popup. If another gnome app already has the locks that gnome-ssh-askpass is attempting to obtain, gnome-ssh-askpass will fail. And often as a bunk side effect it will destroy the IO of what ever other app previously had the locks. This is easy to see in any gnome application that utilizes full-screen for example gnome-terminal. Steps to reproduce with a locked key: * open gnome-terminal * fullscreen it (f11) * ssh to something Type and you will see some characters (mainly whitespace) pass through to gnome-terminal. gnome-ssh-askpass will never obtain focus over the gnome-terminal which is already running full-screen. It will however eat pty's IO. *You can not exit, without killing it from a non-x TTY.* ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 218822] Re: gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open
I do have the issue on Hardy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# lsof +c 0 /dev/console lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/ecarroll/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME console-kit-dae 5239 root 11r CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console gdm 5444 root6w CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console gnome-keyring-d 5682 ecarroll6w CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# ps -p 5239 -F UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD root 5239 1 0 1971 2356 0 Jun02 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon -- gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
In order for this to be a problem, the networked file system would have to have a ~/bin created. If someone has a ~/bin created and they're relying on it not being added to PATH= they kinda deserve it. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
~/bin is most definitely universal; google hasn't even heard of your ~/shs. Not to mention there would be no reason to make it an executable-directory specific to the contents of the executable. It would be rather counter-unixey. Case and point, - git installs to ~/bin. Half of the files are scripts; the other half are executables. On 3/19/08, Sven Boden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shs=shellscripts... another convention used in some unix environment > systems. Just to point out that ~bin is not universal. > > > -- > would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Evan Carroll System Lord of the Internets -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
I just wanted to add, I can confirm this bug also applies with the i810 driver if it is driver specific. -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 289739] [NEW] mutliple copies, 2+ pages per print-page, wo collate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Evince, not sure if this is some library that all gnome apps use or not, permits you to print non-collated multiple copies, with multiple pages per print-page. This results in getting x/y pages of each page in the series. ie. it is a totally useless copy. STEPS TO REPRODUCE. Select 5 copies, with 2 pages fit to each printer page. RESULT you'll end up with 1 page front and back of the same content, and one of one page, also with the same content. very few pages of the set will be salvageable. ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mutliple copies, 2+ pages per print-page, wo collate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
still present in Ibex. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
Ibex uses 2.24.1. I did the same thing except I restricted my print to pages to 1-5, and printed double sided. One page had on one side the terminal page for the ending copy on the obverse, and the starting page on the reverse side. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
it apears as if this can happen even with even numbers ie, 1-6 on double sided pages with 2 pages per side. you'll have the second page printed with half of one side, half of another. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I want to see it the default -- and your argument either makes no sense, or is so contrived as to be near useless. At least you disclaim the usefulness in the same response. The first question you should ask, is what script can install with +x (so you can mistakingly execute them) and not just execute them itself? The home directory is owned, and grouped by the respective user of the directory by default. A non-user, non-group can only read files in home. So to install the files in ~/bin, you must be the USER or root. If a malicious script installs the files, presumably it has the user's permission, and after the permission level is compromised no amount of tomfoolery can make it all that much worse. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Anyone want to start a donation pot to get this fixed? -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
This is a screen shot of a message left with the new Leave-Message on gnome's screen lock. ** Attachment added: "screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9511372/Screenshot.png -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-themes Gutsy's Darklooks theme has (past month) got a borked message box. The little system-notifier for gnome-panel has a bad theme, white on yellow, the yellow should almost certainly be charcoal for theme consistency. A screen shot is attached. ** Affects: gnome-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
the problem is in /usr/share/themes/Darklooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc the theme assumes tooltips_fg_color:#00 is going to change the font-color of the tooltips and it does no such thing. My guess is this might have worked at one point, but it presumably imports style info from Clearlooks as well. I'm new at this so I could just be talking out my arse. I guess clearlooks is a baseclass of style for many gnome themes (the suffix -looks seems to support this,) seems Human has a bunch of mentions of it too. I suspect something changed in Clearlooks and that Darklooks inherits from and it cascades borking that style. Rough guestimation plz get fixed before launch!! Darklooks is awesome. ** Changed in: gnome-themes (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 51169] Error in ssh:// protocol handler.
Public bug reported: In the event you get files by using an ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED] URI, you will find that if the servers rsa key changes on the remote machine, rather than giving the user the typical console caveat about the man-in- the-middle attack, it fails, claiming: The rsa key easily change, as in the event of a live cd lab, in which they are constantly in flux. --START DIALOG BOX Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[uri location]" Please select another viewer and try again. --END DIALOG BOX A remedy is of coarse to delete the coresponding ~/.ssh/known_hosts file, but the dialog box should be more informative of the error at hand. The typical console caveat is include for reference: @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is ff:bd:00:27:27:db:f8:4a:6d:2f:cf:25:ef:15:07:df. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts:1 RSA host key for 192.168.0.105 has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Error in ssh:// protocol handler. https://launchpad.net/bugs/51169 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 51169] Re: Error in ssh:// protocol handler.
** Description changed: In the event you get files by using an ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED] URI, you - will find that if the ssh key changes on the remote machine, rather than - giving the user the typcical console caveat about the man-in-the-middle - attack, it fails, claiming: + will find that if the servers rsa key changes on the remote machine, + rather than giving the user the typical console caveat about the man-in- + the-middle attack, it fails, claiming: + The rsa key easily change, as in the event of a live cd lab, in which + they are constantly in flux. --START DIALOG BOX Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[uri location]" Please select another viewer and try again. --END DIALOG BOX A remedy is of coarse to delete the coresponding ~/.ssh/known_hosts file, but the dialog box should be more informative of the error at hand. The typical console caveat is include for reference: @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is ff:bd:00:27:27:db:f8:4a:6d:2f:cf:25:ef:15:07:df. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts:1 RSA host key for 192.168.0.105 has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. -- Error in ssh:// protocol handler. https://launchpad.net/bugs/51169 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 81349] LDAP gives wrong title name.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution The evolution entry that corresponds to data retrieved from LDAP directory should be titled after the displayName attribute if present. This is the behavoir of Microsoft's Address Book; and, it makes more sense and is more intuitive than to list a random commonName: (cn:.) ( the current behavior. ) dn: cn=jgiuliano,dc=mychevy,dc=com,ou=clients,o=Dealermade objectclass: inetOrgPerson displayName: Joseph Giuliano cn: jgiuliano gn: Jospeh sn: Giuliano Again, in the entry above, `Joseph Giuliano` should be the name that shows up as the title in Evolution, not 'jgiuliano'. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- LDAP gives wrong title name. https://launchpad.net/bugs/81349 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 81349] Re: LDAP gives wrong title name.
using edgy now -- LDAP gives wrong title name. https://launchpad.net/bugs/81349 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 82704] TERM value should be changed.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal Just wanted to suggest by proxy of the discussion http://www.mail- archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg03804.html , that gnome- terminal's TERM variable be changed and the difference reflected in terminfo ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- TERM value should be changed. https://launchpad.net/bugs/82704 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 43619] Re: No screensaver if xinerama is enabled
I also can not confirm as it stands with: 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) and i810 Xorg. Please provide more info. -- No screensaver if xinerama is enabled https://launchpad.net/bugs/43619 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 73793] Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders.
Public bug reported: Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders. I personally believe these folders should be pegged, and moving them should be impossible. There Is no real reason to allow deviation from the outlook'ish default, and it just confuses users when they are able to move their inbox, into their sent items, into the trash, into drafts. This should also be flagged as low priority. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders. https://launchpad.net/bugs/73793 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I think ~/.bin is silly, however I'm having the problem now with ~/bin (
git (from source) installs to ~/bin, and the version in the feisty repos
is old. ).. Currently I'm confused on this matter, as ~/.bash_profile (
by proxy of /etc/skel/.bash_profile) contains
# set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
fi
Which applies for all login shells and subprocs that are initiated
through a bash login. Now while I haven't tested this, this should mean
that the bug is in fact in G/K/X-DM. If $PATH is changed, all subshells
(forks etc) should inherit the modified $PATH variable. As long as that
method's login-script has a stanza like the above.
If your login shell, or parent process is GDM/KDM then a non-existent-
bash-login won't execute the bash-login-shell script ~/.bash_profile.
This is a failed assumption by someone possibly years old.
The proof would be to shutdown gdm/gnome, login through a term (bash -l
shell), call gnome manually and echo $PATH; ~/bin should be there.
A patch is supplied for gdm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/gdm/Init# diff Default new-Default -c1
*** Default 2006-10-20 18:36:24.0 -0500
--- new-Default 2007-05-17 11:47:10.0 -0500
***
*** 5,7
! PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
OLD_IFS=$IFS
--- 5,7
! PATH=~/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
OLD_IFS=$IFS
Please move this bug to gdm, apply the patch, mark as resolved, and give
to the kubuntu guys so they can fix kdm too.
** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Ok so everyone is for doing this pam, I found a (slightly) better place
to do this than gdm anyway. Someone should make note if this is done in
pam to remove the related lines in ~/.bash_profile too. I applied a
patch instead of to gdm, too: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99x11-common_start
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11/Xsession.d$ diff 99x11-common_start
99x11-common_start2 -c1
*** 99x11-common_start 2007-05-17 13:58:52.0 -0500
--- 99x11-common_start2 2007-05-17 13:59:05.0 -0500
***
*** 4,5
--- 4,10
+ # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
+ if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
+ PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
+ fi
+
exec $STARTUP
I chose to patch this into /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99x11-common_start
because that way it would work despite what graphical login shell was
used.
This works perfectly, and can be used as a fix until someone hacks a
patch into pam.
--
would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 95778] SSH Causes hang up.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm having problems using Nautilus to browse mounts via ssh, ie, scp. ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, ltrace shows it from g_direct_hash ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm having problems using Nautilus to browse mounts via ssh, ie, scp. - ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, strace shows it from + ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, ltrace shows it from g_direct_hash -- SSH Causes hang up. https://launchpad.net/bugs/95778 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] Re: HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
This is exploitable in a very easy fashion using the following command gnome-terminal --hide-menubar --full-screen -e "ssh host-with-passkey" On the flip side can this agent easily be disabled, I'd prefer to explicitly opt-in to agent with ssh-add are there any disadvantages to yanking it -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 218822] Re: gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# ps -p 5682 -F UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD ecarroll 5682 1 0 3651 2668 0 Jun02 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon -d --login -- gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] Re: HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
irc.freenode.net/#ubuntu-bugs 02:14 < nicolasvw> EvanCarroll: I can confirm I didn't get the prompt when in fullscreen. Killing gnome-keyring-ask I was able to regain control of the terminal. 02:14 < EvanCarroll> yea, but you had to drop to tty to do it right? 02:15 < nicolasvw> EvanCarroll: yes 02:15 < EvanCarroll> that's all i need. thanks a ton moving to confirmed -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
** Changed in: gnome-themes-extras (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-themes-extras in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 121041] Re: secure passwords don't work
Can not confirm, not existing in Hardy. -- secure passwords don't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] [NEW] HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring This bug is not a bug about gnome-ssh-askpass simply failing to popup. If another gnome app already has the locks that gnome-ssh-askpass is attempting to obtain, gnome-ssh-askpass will fail. And often as a bunk side effect it will destroy the IO of what ever other app previously had the locks. This is easy to see in any gnome application that utilizes full-screen for example gnome-terminal. Steps to reproduce with a locked key: * open gnome-terminal * fullscreen it (f11) * ssh to something Type and you will see some characters (mainly whitespace) pass through to gnome-terminal. gnome-ssh-askpass will never obtain focus over the gnome-terminal which is already running full-screen. It will however eat pty's IO. *You can not exit, without killing it from a non-x TTY.* ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 218822] Re: gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open
I do have the issue on Hardy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# lsof +c 0 /dev/console lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/ecarroll/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME console-kit-dae 5239 root 11r CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console gdm 5444 root6w CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console gnome-keyring-d 5682 ecarroll6w CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# ps -p 5239 -F UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD root 5239 1 0 1971 2356 0 Jun02 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon -- gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 289739] [NEW] mutliple copies, 2+ pages per print-page, wo collate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Evince, not sure if this is some library that all gnome apps use or not, permits you to print non-collated multiple copies, with multiple pages per print-page. This results in getting x/y pages of each page in the series. ie. it is a totally useless copy. STEPS TO REPRODUCE. Select 5 copies, with 2 pages fit to each printer page. RESULT you'll end up with 1 page front and back of the same content, and one of one page, also with the same content. very few pages of the set will be salvageable. ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mutliple copies, 2+ pages per print-page, wo collate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
still present in Ibex. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
Ibex uses 2.24.1. I did the same thing except I restricted my print to pages to 1-5, and printed double sided. One page had on one side the terminal page for the ending copy on the obverse, and the starting page on the reverse side. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
it apears as if this can happen even with even numbers ie, 1-6 on double sided pages with 2 pages per side. you'll have the second page printed with half of one side, half of another. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
~/bin is most definitely universal; google hasn't even heard of your ~/shs. Not to mention there would be no reason to make it an executable-directory specific to the contents of the executable. It would be rather counter-unixey. Case and point, - git installs to ~/bin. Half of the files are scripts; the other half are executables. On 3/19/08, Sven Boden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shs=shellscripts... another convention used in some unix environment > systems. Just to point out that ~bin is not universal. > > > -- > would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Evan Carroll System Lord of the Internets -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
In order for this to be a problem, the networked file system would have to have a ~/bin created. If someone has a ~/bin created and they're relying on it not being added to PATH= they kinda deserve it. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
This is a screen shot of a message left with the new Leave-Message on gnome's screen lock. ** Attachment added: "screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9511372/Screenshot.png -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-themes Gutsy's Darklooks theme has (past month) got a borked message box. The little system-notifier for gnome-panel has a bad theme, white on yellow, the yellow should almost certainly be charcoal for theme consistency. A screen shot is attached. ** Affects: gnome-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
the problem is in /usr/share/themes/Darklooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc the theme assumes tooltips_fg_color:#00 is going to change the font-color of the tooltips and it does no such thing. My guess is this might have worked at one point, but it presumably imports style info from Clearlooks as well. I'm new at this so I could just be talking out my arse. I guess clearlooks is a baseclass of style for many gnome themes (the suffix -looks seems to support this,) seems Human has a bunch of mentions of it too. I suspect something changed in Clearlooks and that Darklooks inherits from and it cascades borking that style. Rough guestimation plz get fixed before launch!! Darklooks is awesome. ** Changed in: gnome-themes (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
I just wanted to add, I can confirm this bug also applies with the i810 driver if it is driver specific. -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 290918] Re: user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64064 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 64064 would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH -- user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu (via bug 64064). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250000] Re: gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 66004] Re: .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 Actually, I'm going to file these under the original .bash_profile bit, .. Rather than dupe them.. Check out bug 64064 for more dialog on ~/bin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber (via bug 17962). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 69700] Re: .bash_profile never executed for graphical logins.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 66004 .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- .bash_profile never executed for graphical logins. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber (via bug 17962). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 95778] SSH Causes hang up.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm having problems using Nautilus to browse mounts via ssh, ie, scp. ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, ltrace shows it from g_direct_hash ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm having problems using Nautilus to browse mounts via ssh, ie, scp. - ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, strace shows it from + ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, ltrace shows it from g_direct_hash -- SSH Causes hang up. https://launchpad.net/bugs/95778 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I want to see it the default -- and your argument either makes no sense, or is so contrived as to be near useless. At least you disclaim the usefulness in the same response. The first question you should ask, is what script can install with +x (so you can mistakingly execute them) and not just execute them itself? The home directory is owned, and grouped by the respective user of the directory by default. A non-user, non-group can only read files in home. So to install the files in ~/bin, you must be the USER or root. If a malicious script installs the files, presumably it has the user's permission, and after the permission level is compromised no amount of tomfoolery can make it all that much worse. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 43619] Re: No screensaver if xinerama is enabled
I also can not confirm as it stands with: 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) and i810 Xorg. Please provide more info. -- No screensaver if xinerama is enabled https://launchpad.net/bugs/43619 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 73793] Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders.
Public bug reported: Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders. I personally believe these folders should be pegged, and moving them should be impossible. There Is no real reason to allow deviation from the outlook'ish default, and it just confuses users when they are able to move their inbox, into their sent items, into the trash, into drafts. This should also be flagged as low priority. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders. https://launchpad.net/bugs/73793 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Anyone want to start a donation pot to get this fixed? -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 81349] LDAP gives wrong title name.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution The evolution entry that corresponds to data retrieved from LDAP directory should be titled after the displayName attribute if present. This is the behavoir of Microsoft's Address Book; and, it makes more sense and is more intuitive than to list a random commonName: (cn:.) ( the current behavior. ) dn: cn=jgiuliano,dc=mychevy,dc=com,ou=clients,o=Dealermade objectclass: inetOrgPerson displayName: Joseph Giuliano cn: jgiuliano gn: Jospeh sn: Giuliano Again, in the entry above, `Joseph Giuliano` should be the name that shows up as the title in Evolution, not 'jgiuliano'. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- LDAP gives wrong title name. https://launchpad.net/bugs/81349 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 81349] Re: LDAP gives wrong title name.
using edgy now -- LDAP gives wrong title name. https://launchpad.net/bugs/81349 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 82704] TERM value should be changed.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal Just wanted to suggest by proxy of the discussion http://www.mail- archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg03804.html , that gnome- terminal's TERM variable be changed and the difference reflected in terminfo ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- TERM value should be changed. https://launchpad.net/bugs/82704 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I think ~/.bin is silly, however I'm having the problem now with ~/bin (
git (from source) installs to ~/bin, and the version in the feisty repos
is old. ).. Currently I'm confused on this matter, as ~/.bash_profile (
by proxy of /etc/skel/.bash_profile) contains
# set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
fi
Which applies for all login shells and subprocs that are initiated
through a bash login. Now while I haven't tested this, this should mean
that the bug is in fact in G/K/X-DM. If $PATH is changed, all subshells
(forks etc) should inherit the modified $PATH variable. As long as that
method's login-script has a stanza like the above.
If your login shell, or parent process is GDM/KDM then a non-existent-
bash-login won't execute the bash-login-shell script ~/.bash_profile.
This is a failed assumption by someone possibly years old.
The proof would be to shutdown gdm/gnome, login through a term (bash -l
shell), call gnome manually and echo $PATH; ~/bin should be there.
A patch is supplied for gdm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/gdm/Init# diff Default new-Default -c1
*** Default 2006-10-20 18:36:24.0 -0500
--- new-Default 2007-05-17 11:47:10.0 -0500
***
*** 5,7
! PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
OLD_IFS=$IFS
--- 5,7
! PATH=~/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
OLD_IFS=$IFS
Please move this bug to gdm, apply the patch, mark as resolved, and give
to the kubuntu guys so they can fix kdm too.
** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Ok so everyone is for doing this pam, I found a (slightly) better place
to do this than gdm anyway. Someone should make note if this is done in
pam to remove the related lines in ~/.bash_profile too. I applied a
patch instead of to gdm, too: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99x11-common_start
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11/Xsession.d$ diff 99x11-common_start
99x11-common_start2 -c1
*** 99x11-common_start 2007-05-17 13:58:52.0 -0500
--- 99x11-common_start2 2007-05-17 13:59:05.0 -0500
***
*** 4,5
--- 4,10
+ # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
+ if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
+ PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
+ fi
+
exec $STARTUP
I chose to patch this into /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99x11-common_start
because that way it would work despite what graphical login shell was
used.
This works perfectly, and can be used as a fix until someone hacks a
patch into pam.
--
would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] Re: HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
This is exploitable in a very easy fashion using the following command gnome-terminal --hide-menubar --full-screen -e "ssh host-with-passkey" On the flip side can this agent easily be disabled, I'd prefer to explicitly opt-in to agent with ssh-add are there any disadvantages to yanking it -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 218822] Re: gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# ps -p 5682 -F UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD ecarroll 5682 1 0 3651 2668 0 Jun02 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon -d --login -- gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] Re: HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
irc.freenode.net/#ubuntu-bugs 02:14 < nicolasvw> EvanCarroll: I can confirm I didn't get the prompt when in fullscreen. Killing gnome-keyring-ask I was able to regain control of the terminal. 02:14 < EvanCarroll> yea, but you had to drop to tty to do it right? 02:15 < nicolasvw> EvanCarroll: yes 02:15 < EvanCarroll> that's all i need. thanks a ton moving to confirmed -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
** Changed in: gnome-themes-extras (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-themes-extras in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 121041] Re: secure passwords don't work
Can not confirm, not existing in Hardy. -- secure passwords don't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121041 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 236988] [NEW] HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring This bug is not a bug about gnome-ssh-askpass simply failing to popup. If another gnome app already has the locks that gnome-ssh-askpass is attempting to obtain, gnome-ssh-askpass will fail. And often as a bunk side effect it will destroy the IO of what ever other app previously had the locks. This is easy to see in any gnome application that utilizes full-screen for example gnome-terminal. Steps to reproduce with a locked key: * open gnome-terminal * fullscreen it (f11) * ssh to something Type and you will see some characters (mainly whitespace) pass through to gnome-terminal. gnome-ssh-askpass will never obtain focus over the gnome-terminal which is already running full-screen. It will however eat pty's IO. *You can not exit, without killing it from a non-x TTY.* ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- HARDY: gnome-ssh-askpass does *not* grab keyboard or focus if contested with other apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236988 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 218822] Re: gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open
I do have the issue on Hardy. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# lsof +c 0 /dev/console lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon file system /home/ecarroll/.gvfs Output information may be incomplete. COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME console-kit-dae 5239 root 11r CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console gdm 5444 root6w CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console gnome-keyring-d 5682 ecarroll6w CHR5,1 6392 /dev/console [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ecarroll# ps -p 5239 -F UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD root 5239 1 0 1971 2356 0 Jun02 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/console-kit-daemon -- gnome-keyring-manager holds /dev/console open https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
In order for this to be a problem, the networked file system would have to have a ~/bin created. If someone has a ~/bin created and they're relying on it not being added to PATH= they kinda deserve it. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 289739] [NEW] mutliple copies, 2+ pages per print-page, wo collate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince Evince, not sure if this is some library that all gnome apps use or not, permits you to print non-collated multiple copies, with multiple pages per print-page. This results in getting x/y pages of each page in the series. ie. it is a totally useless copy. STEPS TO REPRODUCE. Select 5 copies, with 2 pages fit to each printer page. RESULT you'll end up with 1 page front and back of the same content, and one of one page, also with the same content. very few pages of the set will be salvageable. ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- mutliple copies, 2+ pages per print-page, wo collate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289739 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
still present in Ibex. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
Ibex uses 2.24.1. I did the same thing except I restricted my print to pages to 1-5, and printed double sided. One page had on one side the terminal page for the ending copy on the obverse, and the starting page on the reverse side. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.
it apears as if this can happen even with even numbers ie, 1-6 on double sided pages with 2 pages per side. you'll have the second page printed with half of one side, half of another. -- evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 290918] Re: user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64064 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 64064 would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH -- user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu (via bug 64064). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 250000] Re: gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- gnome-terminal not started as an "interactive shell" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 66004] Re: .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 Actually, I'm going to file these under the original .bash_profile bit, .. Rather than dupe them.. Check out bug 64064 for more dialog on ~/bin ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber (via bug 17962). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 69700] Re: .bash_profile never executed for graphical logins.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17962 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17962 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 66004 .bash_profile is not sources when X session starts ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17962 newly opened gnome-terminal windows don't have .bash_profile sourced -- .bash_profile never executed for graphical logins. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/69700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber (via bug 17962). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
~/bin is most definitely universal; google hasn't even heard of your ~/shs. Not to mention there would be no reason to make it an executable-directory specific to the contents of the executable. It would be rather counter-unixey. Case and point, - git installs to ~/bin. Half of the files are scripts; the other half are executables. On 3/19/08, Sven Boden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shs=shellscripts... another convention used in some unix environment > systems. Just to point out that ~bin is not universal. > > > -- > would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- Evan Carroll System Lord of the Internets -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 182038] Re: Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy]
I just wanted to add, I can confirm this bug also applies with the i810 driver if it is driver specific. -- Black rectangle instead of image in FF3 [Hardy] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Anyone want to start a donation pot to get this fixed? -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 51169] Error in ssh:// protocol handler.
Public bug reported: In the event you get files by using an ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED] URI, you will find that if the servers rsa key changes on the remote machine, rather than giving the user the typical console caveat about the man-in- the-middle attack, it fails, claiming: The rsa key easily change, as in the event of a live cd lab, in which they are constantly in flux. --START DIALOG BOX Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[uri location]" Please select another viewer and try again. --END DIALOG BOX A remedy is of coarse to delete the coresponding ~/.ssh/known_hosts file, but the dialog box should be more informative of the error at hand. The typical console caveat is include for reference: @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is ff:bd:00:27:27:db:f8:4a:6d:2f:cf:25:ef:15:07:df. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts:1 RSA host key for 192.168.0.105 has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Error in ssh:// protocol handler. https://launchpad.net/bugs/51169 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 51169] Re: Error in ssh:// protocol handler.
** Description changed: In the event you get files by using an ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED] URI, you - will find that if the ssh key changes on the remote machine, rather than - giving the user the typcical console caveat about the man-in-the-middle - attack, it fails, claiming: + will find that if the servers rsa key changes on the remote machine, + rather than giving the user the typical console caveat about the man-in- + the-middle attack, it fails, claiming: + The rsa key easily change, as in the event of a live cd lab, in which + they are constantly in flux. --START DIALOG BOX Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[uri location]" Please select another viewer and try again. --END DIALOG BOX A remedy is of coarse to delete the coresponding ~/.ssh/known_hosts file, but the dialog box should be more informative of the error at hand. The typical console caveat is include for reference: @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is ff:bd:00:27:27:db:f8:4a:6d:2f:cf:25:ef:15:07:df. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts:1 RSA host key for 192.168.0.105 has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. -- Error in ssh:// protocol handler. https://launchpad.net/bugs/51169 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
This is a screen shot of a message left with the new Leave-Message on gnome's screen lock. ** Attachment added: "screenshot" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9511372/Screenshot.png -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-themes Gutsy's Darklooks theme has (past month) got a borked message box. The little system-notifier for gnome-panel has a bad theme, white on yellow, the yellow should almost certainly be charcoal for theme consistency. A screen shot is attached. ** Affects: gnome-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145071] Re: Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable
the problem is in /usr/share/themes/Darklooks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc the theme assumes tooltips_fg_color:#00 is going to change the font-color of the tooltips and it does no such thing. My guess is this might have worked at one point, but it presumably imports style info from Clearlooks as well. I'm new at this so I could just be talking out my arse. I guess clearlooks is a baseclass of style for many gnome themes (the suffix -looks seems to support this,) seems Human has a bunch of mentions of it too. I suspect something changed in Clearlooks and that Darklooks inherits from and it cascades borking that style. Rough guestimation plz get fixed before launch!! Darklooks is awesome. ** Changed in: gnome-themes (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Darklooks gnome-panel msg unreadable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-themes in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I want to see it the default -- and your argument either makes no sense, or is so contrived as to be near useless. At least you disclaim the usefulness in the same response. The first question you should ask, is what script can install with +x (so you can mistakingly execute them) and not just execute them itself? The home directory is owned, and grouped by the respective user of the directory by default. A non-user, non-group can only read files in home. So to install the files in ~/bin, you must be the USER or root. If a malicious script installs the files, presumably it has the user's permission, and after the permission level is compromised no amount of tomfoolery can make it all that much worse. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 43619] Re: No screensaver if xinerama is enabled
I also can not confirm as it stands with: 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) and i810 Xorg. Please provide more info. -- No screensaver if xinerama is enabled https://launchpad.net/bugs/43619 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 73793] Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders.
Public bug reported: Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders. I personally believe these folders should be pegged, and moving them should be impossible. There Is no real reason to allow deviation from the outlook'ish default, and it just confuses users when they are able to move their inbox, into their sent items, into the trash, into drafts. This should also be flagged as low priority. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Can move default folders, ie inbox, trash into other folders. https://launchpad.net/bugs/73793 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 81349] LDAP gives wrong title name.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution The evolution entry that corresponds to data retrieved from LDAP directory should be titled after the displayName attribute if present. This is the behavoir of Microsoft's Address Book; and, it makes more sense and is more intuitive than to list a random commonName: (cn:.) ( the current behavior. ) dn: cn=jgiuliano,dc=mychevy,dc=com,ou=clients,o=Dealermade objectclass: inetOrgPerson displayName: Joseph Giuliano cn: jgiuliano gn: Jospeh sn: Giuliano Again, in the entry above, `Joseph Giuliano` should be the name that shows up as the title in Evolution, not 'jgiuliano'. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- LDAP gives wrong title name. https://launchpad.net/bugs/81349 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 81349] Re: LDAP gives wrong title name.
using edgy now -- LDAP gives wrong title name. https://launchpad.net/bugs/81349 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 82704] TERM value should be changed.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal Just wanted to suggest by proxy of the discussion http://www.mail- archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg03804.html , that gnome- terminal's TERM variable be changed and the difference reflected in terminfo ** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- TERM value should be changed. https://launchpad.net/bugs/82704 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 95778] SSH Causes hang up.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm having problems using Nautilus to browse mounts via ssh, ie, scp. ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, ltrace shows it from g_direct_hash ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm having problems using Nautilus to browse mounts via ssh, ie, scp. - ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, strace shows it from + ssh://any_address causes a killed by SIGTRAP, ltrace shows it from g_direct_hash -- SSH Causes hang up. https://launchpad.net/bugs/95778 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
I think ~/.bin is silly, however I'm having the problem now with ~/bin (
git (from source) installs to ~/bin, and the version in the feisty repos
is old. ).. Currently I'm confused on this matter, as ~/.bash_profile (
by proxy of /etc/skel/.bash_profile) contains
# set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
fi
Which applies for all login shells and subprocs that are initiated
through a bash login. Now while I haven't tested this, this should mean
that the bug is in fact in G/K/X-DM. If $PATH is changed, all subshells
(forks etc) should inherit the modified $PATH variable. As long as that
method's login-script has a stanza like the above.
If your login shell, or parent process is GDM/KDM then a non-existent-
bash-login won't execute the bash-login-shell script ~/.bash_profile.
This is a failed assumption by someone possibly years old.
The proof would be to shutdown gdm/gnome, login through a term (bash -l
shell), call gnome manually and echo $PATH; ~/bin should be there.
A patch is supplied for gdm:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/gdm/Init# diff Default new-Default -c1
*** Default 2006-10-20 18:36:24.0 -0500
--- new-Default 2007-05-17 11:47:10.0 -0500
***
*** 5,7
! PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
OLD_IFS=$IFS
--- 5,7
! PATH=~/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
OLD_IFS=$IFS
Please move this bug to gdm, apply the patch, mark as resolved, and give
to the kubuntu guys so they can fix kdm too.
** Also affects: gdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
Ok so everyone is for doing this pam, I found a (slightly) better place
to do this than gdm anyway. Someone should make note if this is done in
pam to remove the related lines in ~/.bash_profile too. I applied a
patch instead of to gdm, too: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99x11-common_start
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11/Xsession.d$ diff 99x11-common_start
99x11-common_start2 -c1
*** 99x11-common_start 2007-05-17 13:58:52.0 -0500
--- 99x11-common_start2 2007-05-17 13:59:05.0 -0500
***
*** 4,5
--- 4,10
+ # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists
+ if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then
+ PATH=~/bin:"${PATH}"
+ fi
+
exec $STARTUP
I chose to patch this into /etc/X11/Xsession.d/99x11-common_start
because that way it would work despite what graphical login shell was
used.
This works perfectly, and can be used as a fix until someone hacks a
patch into pam.
--
would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 51169] Error in ssh:// protocol handler.
Public bug reported: In the event you get files by using an ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED] URI, you will find that if the servers rsa key changes on the remote machine, rather than giving the user the typical console caveat about the man-in- the-middle attack, it fails, claiming: The rsa key easily change, as in the event of a live cd lab, in which they are constantly in flux. --START DIALOG BOX Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[uri location]" Please select another viewer and try again. --END DIALOG BOX A remedy is of coarse to delete the coresponding ~/.ssh/known_hosts file, but the dialog box should be more informative of the error at hand. The typical console caveat is include for reference: @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is ff:bd:00:27:27:db:f8:4a:6d:2f:cf:25:ef:15:07:df. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts:1 RSA host key for 192.168.0.105 has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Error in ssh:// protocol handler. https://launchpad.net/bugs/51169 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 51169] Re: Error in ssh:// protocol handler.
** Description changed: In the event you get files by using an ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED] URI, you - will find that if the ssh key changes on the remote machine, rather than - giving the user the typcical console caveat about the man-in-the-middle - attack, it fails, claiming: + will find that if the servers rsa key changes on the remote machine, + rather than giving the user the typical console caveat about the man-in- + the-middle attack, it fails, claiming: + The rsa key easily change, as in the event of a live cd lab, in which + they are constantly in flux. --START DIALOG BOX Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[uri location]" Please select another viewer and try again. --END DIALOG BOX A remedy is of coarse to delete the coresponding ~/.ssh/known_hosts file, but the dialog box should be more informative of the error at hand. The typical console caveat is include for reference: @@@ @WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is ff:bd:00:27:27:db:f8:4a:6d:2f:cf:25:ef:15:07:df. Please contact your system administrator. Add correct host key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this message. Offending key in /home/ecarroll/.ssh/known_hosts:1 RSA host key for 192.168.0.105 has changed and you have requested strict checking. Host key verification failed. -- Error in ssh:// protocol handler. https://launchpad.net/bugs/51169 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 290918] Re: user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 64064 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 64064 would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH -- user's 'bin' PATH isn't exported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu (via bug 64064). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
