[Bug 623657] Re: New Upstream Release 2.30.3
ACK from SRU team. -- New Upstream Release 2.30.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623657 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 574262] Re: [SRU] Please backport to Karmic GDM fix for bug #463376
ACK from SRU. -- [SRU] Please backport to Karmic GDM fix for bug #463376 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 33288] Re: Evince doesn't handle columns properly
ACK from the SRU team for the new debdiff. -- Evince doesn't handle columns properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 566474] Re: crashes when open a svg image
ACK from SRU team for lucid (though 2.26.2-0ubuntu1.1 would be more appropriate SRU versioning) -- crashes when open a svg image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to librsvg in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160862] Re: users-admin (System-Administration-Users and Groups) overwrites group file
Thanks for clarifying. That makes me sleep a little bit better at night :) -- users-admin (System-Administration-Users and Groups) overwrites group file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 160862] Re: users-admin (System-Administration-Users and Groups) overwrites group file
*cringe* ACK from ubuntu-sru for the 5bad3f... upstream git patch. Personal commentary, though, is IMO there's something fundamentally broken about zapping all the groups if the dbus backend dies. This seems to be a defective/fragile design to me. -- users-admin (System-Administration-Users and Groups) overwrites group file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 270976] Re: [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero
Jaunty tasks are open for SRU, other tasks are closed already. -- [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 270976] Re: [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero
This is an ACK from MOTU-SRU for Jaunty for adding the build-dep. However, please correctly version the package version for a SRU. ** Also affects: brasero (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gst-plugins-bad-multiverse0.10 (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [SRU] gst-plugins-bad0.10 needs rebuilding with mjpegtools to enable burning video with Brasero https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 365770] Re: Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev)
MOTU-SRU is waiting on a properly formatted debdiff (see comment #42/43). Please resubscribe motu-sru once this is available. Thanks. -- Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 365770] Re: Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev)
As pointed out in IRC, a re-ack from motu-sru for the minor changes above is pedantic; Consider this an ACK from motu-sru to continue with uploading a correctly versioned and targeted package. -- Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 459423] Re: Unable to play video from Youtube plugin results
Please adjust versioning to SRU convention (2.26.1-0ubuntu5.1) other than that it looks good for SRU-ing. (this is a main SRU, so I can't ACK it ;-) ) ** Also affects: ffmpeg (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: totem (Ubuntu Jaunty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu Jaunty) Status: New = Invalid -- Unable to play video from Youtube plugin results https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459423 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 410407] Re: [READ DESCRIPTION] Flash is not recognizing mouse clicks in multiple situations
Looks to me like the correct fix is to patch nspluginwrapper to set whatever GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 does. -- [READ DESCRIPTION] Flash is not recognizing mouse clicks in multiple situations https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 365770] Re: Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev)
+kaffeine (0.8.7-1ubuntu6) jaunty; urgency=low NACK; version number should preferably by 1ubuntu5.1, target should be jaunty-updates. -- Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 365770] Re: Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev)
Whoops, I meant jaunty-proposed above. -- Screensaver starts while playing a Video with Kaffeine (missing build-dependency on libxtst-dev) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 324888] [NEW] 0.8.2: 32-bit size overflow in ISO burning UI
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero On a fully updated Intrepid x86_64 machine, when I burn a 4.3GiB ISO image, the burn completes successfully, but the final summary screen tells me that it burned 381MB (roughly 4.3GiB - 4.0GiB); I suspect there's a 32-bit overflow somewhere in this UI? ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 0.8.2: 32-bit size overflow in ISO burning UI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 293684] Re: evolution crashed with SIGILL in start_thread()
Hi Pedro, thanks for the quick response and apologies for not providing all the info the first place. I've attached a trace with glib, evolution, and libcamel dbsyms (which I could tell from my hunch were needed to show the symbols) Please let me know if I need any more dbgsyms :) ** Attachment added: backtrace, try 1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19390477/gdb.log.txt -- evolution crashed with SIGILL in start_thread() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 278112] Re: Screensaver doesn't start
Not on any of my devices either, updated this morning. Same symptoms as before. -- Screensaver doesn't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 216756] Re: Impossible install Gnome starting from ubuntu netboot installation
I accepted the Hardy nomination for this task -- please prepare a debdiff complaint to StableReleaseUpdates guidelines (version 2ubuntu0.1, targeted at hardy-proposed instead of hardy) Thanks -- Impossible install Gnome starting from ubuntu netboot installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216756 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 260755] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 260597 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260597 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 260597 gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() -- gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 180239] Re: Please backport gthumb 3:2.10.6-0ubuntu3 from Hardy
Rejecting the backports side of this bug, and refiling against gthumb, nominated against gutsy. I hope the Desktop Team considers this for a gutsy-proposed upload. ** Also affects: gthumb (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gthumb (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: gutsy-backports Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix -- Please backport gthumb 3:2.10.6-0ubuntu3 from Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180239 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gthumb in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 64064] Re: would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH
There are risks -- users can add in-path executables to the system, making it easier for an exploit to be leashed against the user. A malicious script can install a bunch of tools under similar names to existing commands (i.e. ks instead of ls) so that the next time the user types that on accident, something bad happens. Of course, if a program has been compromised enough to let this happen, then this should be the LEAST of your concerns ;-) I would personally like to see this configurable and not enabled by default, as it's not really standard practice on any distro currently and not everyone would like it. -- would be nice to add ~/bin to the default PATH https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64064 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 172755] Re: Rebuild for libgpod2 - libgpod3 transition
Thanks. I'll take care of gtkpod-aac ** Changed in: gtkpod-aac (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = John Dong (jdong) Status: New = Confirmed -- Rebuild for libgpod2 - libgpod3 transition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 128896] Re: Please backport rhythmbox 0.11.2 to Feisty
Yes, the version currently frozen in Gutsy is the one I'd like backported Thanks -- Please backport rhythmbox 0.11.2 to Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 128896] Re: Please backport rhythmbox 0.11.1 to Feisty
Sorry for the delay, I verified Gutsy's version does build without issue, so I'm approving Gutsy-Feisty backport. ** Changed in: feisty-backports Status: New = In Progress -- Please backport rhythmbox 0.11.1 to Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 89660] Re: control-cursor-key regression in vim
I don't think this is a backports suitable bug. It should be handled via a SRU. ** Changed in: feisty-backports Status: New = Invalid -- control-cursor-key regression in vim https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145123] Re: Keyboard shortcut works even when the screen is locked
2.20.0-0ubuntu4.2 still posesses this problem for me on fglrx 8.42.3, AIGLX, Compiz (apart from fglrx, no unofficial stuff) Lock screen, I can still alt-tab and see the running windows. I am unsure if this is an fglrx bug, but somehow I don't think so. -- Keyboard shortcut works even when the screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gnome-screensaver. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145123] Re: Keyboard shortcut works even when the screen is locked
UPDATE: It only seems to work when freshly logged in, lock screen, then ALT+TAB without triggering the lock screen dialog. After unlocking once, further relocking does not allow the escape. It seems to be a fix, but still with some fringe cases unresolved? -- Keyboard shortcut works even when the screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gnome-screensaver. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 145123] Re: Keyboard shortcut works even when the screen is locked
After talking to Travis a bit, this is probably a fglrx 8.42 bug Just to make sure, I'll provide my steps to reproduce; if nobody else can reproduce it then please ignore me :) (1) Lock screen (2) Note that alt+tab doesn't work, and gnome-screensaver's dialog has the focus (3) Hold down super, and scroll (as if trying to zoom in) (4) You'll notice gnome-screensaver loses focus and zooming actually works (5) ALT+F2 and killall gnome-screensaver -- Keyboard shortcut works even when the screen is locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145123 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gnome-screensaver. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 146862] Re: Should not allow to paste in the Leave Message box
I marked this as a security bug, which IMO it is. This breaches the privacy of anything on your mouse-paste or copy-paste buffer to any arbitrary person walking by. ** This bug has been flagged as a security issue -- Should not allow to paste in the Leave Message box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gnome-screensaver. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 129439] Re: [gutsy] azureus Open new torrent(s) dialog locks up with recent libgtk2.0
This is fixed in Hardy (Similar/related to bug 57875) ** Changed in: azureus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [gutsy] azureus Open new torrent(s) dialog locks up with recent libgtk2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 128896] Re: Please backport rhythmbox 0.11.1 to Feisty
gpod backports can be dangerous to reverse-compatibility of other gpod-depending apps too -- Please backport rhythmbox 0.11.1 to Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128896 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 36321] Re: Incomplete logout options with XGL
This is not a bug, but rather misconfiguration.. If you start Xgl as a session (rather than having GDM hosted on Xgl), X cookies are not forwarded by default. Make sure your Xgl starter script contains two lines like: cookie=$(xauth -i nextract - :0 | cut -d ' ' -f 9) xauth -i add :1 . $cookie and you will get full logout options. ** Changed in: xserver-xgl (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Rejected ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Rejected -- Incomplete logout options with XGL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36321 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 92069] Re: desktop-file-utils 0.12
Sebastien, this bug sounds more candidate for a SRU, no? -- desktop-file-utils 0.12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 92069] Re: desktop-file-utils 0.12
After talking with Sebastien in IRC, I now approve this backport. ** Changed in: edgy-backports (upstream) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- desktop-file-utils 0.12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92069 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 36321] Re: Incomplete logout options with XGL
Comment #21 has the correct workaround for this (giving Xgl the X cookie to talk to dbus properly) -- Incomplete logout options with XGL https://launchpad.net/bugs/36321 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 94048] Re: [feisty] Slow gnome application startup due to /etc/hosts misconfiguration
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/26419 Because it has been marked as a duplicate of another bug. -- [feisty] Slow gnome application startup due to /etc/hosts misconfiguration https://launchpad.net/bugs/94048 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85575] Re: gnome-terminal reacting very sluggishly
I'm experiencing this too since 20070220 Feisty daily updates, VTE and X client (1.2.0?) updates were pulled in. Scrolling in terminals is significantly slower and also it seems like Beryl glitches after that update too I will later today try rolling back updates and trying to isolate a culprit. -- gnome-terminal reacting very sluggishly https://launchpad.net/bugs/85575 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85142] Re: No notification for unmount triggered from right-click bookmark pane
I'm sorry -- it appears like gnome-mount only pops up notify bubbles when media has unflushed data well IMO this deserves another bug ticket, but this one is closed. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected -- No notification for unmount triggered from right-click bookmark pane https://launchpad.net/bugs/85142 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 50477] Re: Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports
Rejected due to unsatisfiable build deps. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: In Progress = Rejected -- Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports https://launchpad.net/bugs/50477 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85010] Re: Opens in offline mode
NetworkManager is not installed right now because my wired is managed by hand and wireless by wifi-radar (basically same as by hand) -- Opens in offline mode https://launchpad.net/bugs/85010 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85010] Re: Opens in offline mode
Is there something I can do to help diagnose this further? -- Opens in offline mode https://launchpad.net/bugs/85010 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85010] Re: Opens in offline mode
Please mark as duplicate of aforementioned bug -- I did indeed have networkmanager installed just I wasn't using it :D -- Opens in offline mode https://launchpad.net/bugs/85010 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85142] No notification for unmount triggered from right-click bookmark pane
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Unmounting a removable volume from right-clicking its icon in Nautilus's left bookmark pane and selecting Unmount does not trigger an unmount libnotify popup -- which can lead to data loss as the user may think it's safe to rip out the volume. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- No notification for unmount triggered from right-click bookmark pane https://launchpad.net/bugs/85142 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85142] Re: No notification for unmount triggered from right-click bookmark pane
This was last tested on Feisty but Dapper and below all have this issue too. -- No notification for unmount triggered from right-click bookmark pane https://launchpad.net/bugs/85142 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 85010] Opens in offline mode
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I'm using Evolution 2.9.91-0ubuntu1 on Feisty and have a single IMAP mailbox set up. Every time I launch Evolution it starts in offline mode and I have to manually hit the icon to switch to online mode. I'm not using NetworkManager. Is Evolution setting modes based on NetworkManager feedback or is this just a plain bug? ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Opens in offline mode https://launchpad.net/bugs/85010 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 80853] Re: Nautilus unmount progress dialog should show up for writable DVD+RW/DVD-RAM media
Ah, I am using Edgy, so I don't know how much this bug pertains to Feisty -- Nautilus unmount progress dialog should show up for writable DVD+RW/DVD-RAM media https://launchpad.net/bugs/80853 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 80853] Nautilus unmount progress dialog should show up for writable DVD+RW/DVD-RAM media
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm guessing due to the fix for bug #34274, unmount dialogs on CD/DVD media were suppressed. However, DVD+RW and DVD-RAM are both random-access devices, and it is becoming a more common use case to format those media with either udf via udftools or vfat or ext2 and use them as general-purpose rewritable media. In these cases, ejecting the medium from Nautilus or the panel icon does not trigger an unmount progress dialog, but instead data is being written in the background. This isn't too bad as far as data loss is concerned, because the CD tray is still locked before all the writing is complete, but is unpleasant from the UI standpoint of why is my DVD+RW eject taking 5 minutes? (300MB of data in writeback cache will probably take that long to write) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Nautilus unmount progress dialog should show up for writable DVD+RW/DVD-RAM media https://launchpad.net/bugs/80853 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 48380] Re: Unmount progress dialog doesn't show when unmounting via the side panel
Martin Pitt has requested to be assignee for this bug... ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs = Martin Pitt -- Unmount progress dialog doesn't show when unmounting via the side panel https://launchpad.net/bugs/48380 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 45345] Re: Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel
Not being to control the volume for a large portion of Intel HDA users is a minor bug? -- Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel https://launchpad.net/bugs/45345 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 45345] Re: Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel
I am currently cherry-picking that patch from the bug report and seeing if it fixes my problem. If so, can this be candidate for SRU? -- Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel https://launchpad.net/bugs/45345 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 45345] Re: Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel
yes! the patch attached to the GNOME bug tracker works :) -- Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel https://launchpad.net/bugs/45345 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60989] Re: HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
Mainly because this affects relatively few laptop models, and the fix proposed here will break more laptops than it fixes -- HAL reports incorrect battery percentages https://launchpad.net/bugs/60989 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60989] Re: HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
On our laptops yes, but previous versions had incorrect battery reporting on many other laptops, too. The fix, a corrected metric unit conversion, unfortunately breaks our laptops but also fixes the other ones. -- HAL reports incorrect battery percentages https://launchpad.net/bugs/60989 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 54684] Re: High CPU usage
Fixes the problem for me! Requires a killall nautilus to take effect after installing, but I can no longer reproduce this bug :). Thank you so much! -- High CPU usage https://launchpad.net/bugs/54684 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 54684] Re: High CPU usage
I don't think there's much of a need to echo confirmations... It's pretty consistently reproducible and I've experienced this in all the GNOME 2.16's I've tried. -- High CPU usage https://launchpad.net/bugs/54684 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 65615] Re: Stopping udev causes gnome-screensaver to accept any password
This happens on a stock Edgy i386 box, no PAM changes... -- Stopping udev causes gnome-screensaver to accept any password https://launchpad.net/bugs/65615 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 65615] Stopping udev causes gnome-screensaver to accept any password
Public bug reported: Summary: If one stops udev, gnome-screensaver will accept any password for unlocking the screen... even if one restarts udev (i.e. to test a new udev rule) To Reproduce: (1) Run /etc/init.d/udev stop (2) Run /etc/init.d/udev start (3) Lock screen (4) Type gibberish into password box What happens: Screen unlocks What should happen: The screen should stay locked. At worst it should display an error and refuse to accept any password, but it certainly shouldn't just unlock with any password. ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Visibility changed to: Public -- Stopping udev causes gnome-screensaver to accept any password https://launchpad.net/bugs/65615 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
Attached is a tarball with sources and binaries of my proposed fix (to remove hunk #1 of the faulty patch) On my system, this allow the logoff dialog to pop up, while none of the GPM actions cause unexpected session savings.. Please test the deb and report back. ** Attachment added: proposed fix http://librarian.launchpad.net/4713570/gpm.tar.gz -- regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
Given the reports of stripping debian/patches resulting in a working compile, I don't think this is an upstream issue. -- regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
I'm still building and verifying, but I think the culprit is
debian/patches/56-disable-session-save-on-shutdown.patch
@@ -865,9 +865,11 @@
} else if (strcmp (action, ACTION_INTERACTIVE) == 0) {
manager_explain_reason (manager, GPM_GRAPH_EVENT_NOTIFICATION,
_(GNOME interactive logout), reason);
+ /* This confuses too many people, so we commented it out
gnome_client_request_save (gnome_master_client (),
GNOME_SAVE_GLOBAL,
TRUE, GNOME_INTERACT_ANY, FALSE,
TRUE);
+ */
This hunk removes all action from the interactive branch, so all it does is log
an interactive logout event to the information panel, but doesn't execute any
action.
--
regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
Hah, indeed, removing that patch makes the dialog show up again. What was the original purpose of that patch again? As far as I can research via google, that is the perfectly proper way to bring up the logout dialog. -- regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
Removing this second hunk will prevent an unprompted session save. I think that was the original intent of the patch? So hunk 1 should be taken out and hunk 2 left in? @@ -1080,10 +1083,11 @@ return FALSE; } + /* This confuses too many people, so we commented it out gnome_client_request_save (gnome_master_client (), GNOME_SAVE_GLOBAL, FALSE, GNOME_INTERACT_NONE, FALSE, TRUE); - + */ gpm_hal_reboot (manager-priv-hal); ret = TRUE; -- regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 54684] Re: High CPU usage
On Edgy, I am also seeing this with AVI's. To reproduce, use Acidrip to rip something to an AVI (default settings are fine, 1-pass is faster). Have Nautilus go into the directory where the AVI is being outputted. Press refresh a few times, then close the nautilus window, then close acidrip. Now nautilus is stuck at 100% CPU. Doing a backtrace, I get: Thread 1 (Thread -1227446608 (LWP 27640)): #0 0xb75f9448 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 #1 0xb758bf39 in g_main_context_acquire () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #2 0xb758d451 in g_main_context_check () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #3 0xb758db89 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #4 0xb7aca574 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #5 0x0807bb4a in main (argc=2, argv=0xbf819054) at nautilus-main.c:372 #6 0xb73118cc in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #7 0x08067621 in _start () #0 0xb75f9448 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 -- High CPU usage https://launchpad.net/bugs/54684 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
NOT fixed for me, dist-upgraded also. I have no idea where you're getting your gnome-power-manager, but I have 2.16.0-0ubuntu3, and Launchpad agrees with me that this is the latest release. Edgy-changes also does not show anything newer. -- regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60989] Re: HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
Removing debian/patches/00upstream-02-mWh-conversion.patch does fix this problem for me. Attached another lshal. ** Attachment added: lshal when patch is reversed. http://librarian.launchpad.net/4542740/lshal.txt -- HAL reports incorrect battery percentages https://launchpad.net/bugs/60989 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60989] Re: HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
Here's what /proc/acpi has to say about my battery. ** Attachment added: /proc/acpi/battery contents http://librarian.launchpad.net/4542743/battery.tar.gz -- HAL reports incorrect battery percentages https://launchpad.net/bugs/60989 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 36251] Re: Unreadable Font Size for GDM Login/Password
Noticed that backporters got subscribed. Is there something that we need to do? -- Unreadable Font Size for GDM Login/Password https://launchpad.net/bugs/36251 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 62219] Burnfree should be enabled by default
Public bug reported: Ever since nautilus-cd-burner has been around, burn-free had been turned off by default, but can be activated via a GConf key. Given how fast modern CD-R's can be written, a highly fragmented BitTorrent download on a slower system (or laptop) can feasibly create a buffer underrun situation. Every other CD burning application that I've used under Linux activates burn-free whenever it's available, but Nautilus implements it as a hidden option that 90% of people don't know exist. Can we activate this feature by default? ** Affects: nautilus-cd-burner (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Burnfree should be enabled by default https://launchpad.net/bugs/62219 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60989] HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
Public bug reported:
Ever since the most recent HAL update, GNOME Power Manager and lshal
have been giving me ridiculous values for battery life. It directly
contradicts what acpi -V tells me. For example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ acpi -V
Battery 1: discharging, 96%, 02:33:40 remaining
Thermal 1: ok, 54.0 degrees C
AC Adapter 1: off-line
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lshal | grep battery
battery.remaining_time = 14400 (0x3840) (int)
battery.charge_level.percentage = 100 (0x64) (int)
battery.charge_level.rate = 1 (0x1) (int)
battery.charge_level.last_full = 4 (0x4) (int)
battery.charge_level.current = 4 (0x4) (int)
battery.voltage.current = 1 (0x1) (int)
battery.reporting.rate = 1637 (0x665) (int)
battery.reporting.current = 4231 (0x1087) (int)
battery.charge_level.capacity_state = 'ok' (string)
battery.rechargeable.is_discharging = true (bool)
battery.rechargeable.is_charging = false (bool)
battery.is_rechargeable = true (bool)
battery.charge_level.unit = 'mWh' (string)
battery.charge_level.granularity_2 = 473 (0x1d9) (int)
battery.charge_level.granularity_1 = 473 (0x1d9) (int)
battery.charge_level.low = 2590 (0xa1e) (int)
battery.charge_level.warning = 4440 (0x1158) (int)
battery.charge_level.design = 71040 (0x11580) (int)
battery.voltage.design = 14800 (0x39d0) (int)
battery.voltage.unit = 'mV' (string)
battery.reporting.granularity_2 = 32 (0x20) (int)
battery.reporting.granularity_1 = 32 (0x20) (int)
battery.reporting.low = 175 (0xaf) (int)
battery.reporting.warning = 300 (0x12c) (int)
battery.reporting.design = 4800 (0x12c0) (int)
battery.reporting.last_full = 4382 (0x111e) (int)
battery.reporting.unit = 'mAh' (string)
battery.technology = 'LION' (string)
battery.serial = '10320' (string)
battery.model = 'ZB01' (string)
battery.vendor = 'SONY' (string)
battery.present = true (bool)
info.capabilities = {'battery'} (string list)
info.category = 'battery' (string)
battery.type = 'primary' (string)
linux.acpi_path = '/proc/acpi/battery/BAT1' (string)
It continues to report either 100% or 75% until my battery goes dead.
** Affects: hal (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60989
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60989] Re: HAL reports incorrect battery percentages
Attached a full lshal. ** Attachment added: lshal http://librarian.launchpad.net/4292283/lshal.txt -- HAL reports incorrect battery percentages https://launchpad.net/bugs/60989 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: [Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
On one of my systems where this problem recurred, removing and mkdir'ing /var/run/console, then rebooting fixed the problem -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 52405] Re: [Bug 52405] Re: gnome-panel eats 50% cpu for half an hour and flickers
This problem hasn't showed up for me since last week. I've installed a few edgy boxes from dailies since then. -- gnome-panel eats 50% cpu for half an hour and flickers https://launchpad.net/bugs/52405 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60115] Gaim randomly crashes when open during logout
Public bug reported: Sometimes I leave GAIM open when I log out of GNOME. When I log back in, apport informs me that gaim has crashed. ** Affects: gaim (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Gaim randomly crashes when open during logout https://launchpad.net/bugs/60115 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 60115] Re: Gaim randomly crashes when open during logout
Attached apport crashdump ** Attachment added: apport crash report http://librarian.launchpad.net/4242839/_usr_bin_gaim.1000.crash -- Gaim randomly crashes when open during logout https://launchpad.net/bugs/60115 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 59232] Re: [Bug 59232] Re: libhal1 0.5.7.1-0ubuntu8 with new dbus breaks vmware
Can we get our vmware-player package fixed to use the LD_PRELOAD hack? -- libhal1 0.5.7.1-0ubuntu8 with new dbus breaks vmware https://launchpad.net/bugs/59232 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 59232] Re: libhal1 0.5.7.1-0ubuntu8 with new dbus breaks vmware
Confirmed for vmware-player in Edgy, vmware-server from vmware.com. Apparently our recompile against newer dbus has broken libhal ABI compatibility, in which case we should really be bumping the soname. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- libhal1 0.5.7.1-0ubuntu8 with new dbus breaks vmware https://launchpad.net/bugs/59232 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 57872] Re: regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog
Also confirmed on a Acer Aspire 5672, and a Toshiba Satellite M35X-S109 Under g-p-m's event log tab, it states that it's going to bring up interactive shutdown dialog because power button is pressed, each time that I press the power button. So it would look to me like g-p-m is getting the event, but somehow the way it's activating the logout dialog box is not working. -- regression: pressing power button no longer brings up logout dialog https://launchpad.net/bugs/57872 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 45345] Re: Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel
Simple mixer control 'PCM',0 Capabilities: pvolume Playback channels: Front Left - Front Right Limits: Playback 0 - 255 Mono: Front Left: Playback 255 [100%] Front Right: Playback 255 [100%] Simple mixer control 'Front',0 Capabilities: pvolume pswitch Playback channels: Front Left - Front Right Limits: Playback 0 - 31 Mono: Front Left: Playback 5 [16%] [on] Front Right: Playback 5 [16%] [on] Simple mixer control 'Line',0 Capabilities: pvolume pswitch Playback channels: Front Left - Front Right Limits: Playback 0 - 31 Mono: Front Left: Playback 0 [0%] [on] Front Right: Playback 0 [0%] [on] Simple mixer control 'Mic',0 Capabilities: pvolume pswitch Playback channels: Front Left - Front Right Limits: Playback 0 - 31 Mono: Front Left: Playback 0 [0%] [off] Front Right: Playback 0 [0%] [off] Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0 Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined Playback channels: Mono Mono: Playback [off] Simple mixer control 'Capture',0 Capabilities: cvolume cswitch Capture channels: Front Left - Front Right Limits: Capture 0 - 31 Front Left: Capture 31 [100%] [on] Front Right: Capture 31 [100%] [on] Simple mixer control 'Capture',1 Capabilities: cvolume cswitch Capture channels: Front Left - Front Right Limits: Capture 0 - 31 Front Left: Capture 0 [0%] [on] Front Right: Capture 0 [0%] [on] Simple mixer control 'Input Source',0 Capabilities: enum Items: 'Mic' 'Line' Item0: 'Mic' Simple mixer control 'Input Source',1 Capabilities: enum Items: 'Mic' 'Line' Item0: 'Mic' That's the output. -- Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel https://launchpad.net/bugs/45345 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 59342] Re: hal don't find that I'm on a laptop
I've got the same problem on my Acer Aspire 5672, dmidecode also not being able to find info about the chasis. laptop-detect correctly detects I have a laptop, though... Maybe hal needs workarounds similar to what laptop-detect uses? -- hal don't find that I'm on a laptop https://launchpad.net/bugs/59342 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 45345] Re: Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel
Daniel, On a related note, I've set via the mixer preferences to track and control Front instead of PCM. Now, the tray applet correctly changes Front instead of PCM. However, the laptop's volume hotkeys still change PCM. This behavior is very inconsistent and looks to me like a bug. Doesn't it make sense for the laptop buttons to behave consistently with the mixer applet? -- Mixer applet: Recognize Front as a Master channel https://launchpad.net/bugs/45345 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
Another confirmation on another edgy box -- after the latest dist- upgrade it broke hal in the same way. Only this time, the packages upgraded were upstart and upstart-compat-sysv. Could this be upstart related? I reverted from upstart to sysvinit, but it did NOT resolve the problem. ** Also affects: upstart (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
I was able to recreate this on another machine by installing a kubuntu knot2 livecd, then installing upstart + upstart-compat-sysv, then dist- upgrading. As a result, I'm marking upstart as affected. I will investigate further to see if upstart is really involved, but it looks like a suspect right now. -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
I was able to recreate this on another machine by installing a kubuntu knot2 livecd, then installing upstart + upstart-compat-sysv, then dist- upgrading. As a result, I'm marking upstart as affected. I will investigate further to see if upstart is really involved, but it looks like a suspect right now. -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 31286] Re: [Bug 31286] Re: Displays repeated keyring dialogs on resume from suspend
I experience exactly what Chris experiences. -- Displays repeated keyring dialogs on resume from suspend https://launchpad.net/bugs/31286 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
Yes, adding console output does fix this problem for me. It seems like that does make a difference to hal, or the lack of console output somehow screws up libpam-foreground or something? Either way, it now seems like an upstart bug and not a hal bug anymore. ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
Reject the hal portion of this bug for now -- doesn't seem to be hal's fault. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Rejected -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
Hmm, that's not it... After a few more updates rolled in, I tried to reproduce this bug on another system. I could not. Coming to think of it, with the other system I did do a dist-upgrade AND apply the console option at the same time, which fixed the problem. When I get home, I'll play with removing the console option again... -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58165] Re: security policy error with hald after latest updates
Confirmed on latest edgy dist-upgrade, with kubuntu-desktop and ubuntu- desktop installed. In addition, knetworkmanager refuses to interface with its backend for the same reason. Strangely, I have another edgy, pure kubuntu box that does not exhibit this behavior. Nonetheless, I think this confirms this problem... I've done some googling about libpam-foreground, and from what I see it is configured correctly on this system. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- security policy error with hald after latest updates https://launchpad.net/bugs/58165 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 52405] Re: gnome-panel eats 50% cpu for half an hour and flickers
Confirmed here on edgy, confirmed workarounds do work, but still.. that's not the answer to the problem. -- gnome-panel eats 50% cpu for half an hour and flickers https://launchpad.net/bugs/52405 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58101] Re: Please update ekiga to 2.0.2
Thanks for your input, Daniel. At this point, I just plan to leave ekiga the way it is. -- Please update ekiga to 2.0.2 https://launchpad.net/bugs/58101 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 58137] Re: Please backport Evolution 2.7 or 2.6.3
Backports team can only select packages in Edgy, but 2.7 is an unstable release that I do not feel comfortable pulling into Edgy. As a result, I'm going to reject this from the Backports side The mentioned bug should be fixed via dapper-updates. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected ** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- Please backport Evolution 2.7 or 2.6.3 https://launchpad.net/bugs/58137 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 50477] Re: Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports https://launchpad.net/bugs/50477 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
** Also affects: dapper-backports (upstream) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: [Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
Ugh, I don't know, it sounds risky but may be worth the try, as I don't think you can have a version of Totem any more unstable on my two 1280x800 machines than this! :) On 7/13/06, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, you don't want to backport totem 1.5.4 to dapper, do you? -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 50477] Re: Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports
Alright, I'll have to check up on the regression of 32173 on Edgy's package, and we'll see from there. Can anyone else confirm the transparency bug? -- Please backport newer rhythmbox to dapper-backports https://launchpad.net/bugs/50477 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: [Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
I'm just saying, at this point, totem with the xine backend does not even open on my system without these workarounds, so something has to be done about it. I will not push a buggy version of totem into backports either, but totem is such an important program for the GNOME desktop and honestly a good chunk of totem users are using the xine backed for better media compatibility anyway, so please do consider doing some kind of fix for this. On 7/13/06, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what version is unstable? the dapper one? if that's the case you should open bug and not push a new unstable version to user based on your experience because totem is not that unstable for other people -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: [Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
I'm not saying that it requires a backport of an unstable version; I'm just saying that if by chance using dapper-updates to backport that patch does not work, we can now accomplish the same task via the dapper-backports manual upload mechanism. Just another failover for this pesky bug :) On 7/13/06, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's what that bug is about, patching for the logo issue, why do you think it requires a backport or an unstable version rather than an easy patch? -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
To be fixed via dapper-updates. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Confirmed = Rejected -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 35229] Re: [Bug 35229] Re: totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside)
On 7/13/06, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: isn't backport supposed to be a build of the new distribution without source change? Yes, in general it is, but now we have the infrastructure to make exceptions to that when necessary. anyway it'll be fixed with dapper-updates so no need of a backport task Alright, glad to hear that. I'll reject the Backports bug then. Thanks for your hard work! -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- totem-xine crash on logo (workaround inside) https://launchpad.net/bugs/35229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
