[Bug 8422] Re: Error message on ending VNC session
@robbert: s/Linux/Ubuntu/ ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (46312). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8422 Title: Error message on ending VNC session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tsclient/+bug/8422/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
Hey, regardless of the nature of this controversy, cheers at least for the head honcho actually keeping involved with the process AND community input. You can't say that for most. *holds up pint* -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
Not that this adds, in any way shape or form, any kind of useful information...but there was a story posted regarding Ubuntu's Lucid entering beta: http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/03/23/2348232/Ubuntus-Lucid-Lynx- Enters-Beta?art_pos=1 And the first comment (and subsequent replies) are about the window button placement. ;) -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
Obviously this UI change is 'hot' enough to warrant an easily accessible choice by the user. At the *very least*, please include an option in System - Preferences - Appearance to put the buttons on right/left/middle/whatever the user sees as their own individual preference. Please don't force it on us and make it hard for 90% of users to change. The UI design of window control buttons on the right goes way beyond Windows/Mac/Linux. It is the standard in almost any software windowing system anywhere. It's almost universal, and this UI change causes confusion and frustration (obviously). -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize, maximize, close
From a support standpoint this is a nightmare. I can see that if this was a smaller project, it wouldn't create many waves. But come on, Ubuntu is #1. I'm moving to Lucid from Hardy because of LTS. I run LTSP servers for thousands of students and teachers. They are ALL going to complain to me. As easy as it is to fix w/gconf, this is going to make Ubuntu look very inconsistent to them. That is not good for the image of Ubuntu to its users. -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize,maximize,close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize, maximize, close
@Mark Shuttleworth: You said in #248, Most people don't scroll with the scrollbar any more. The use the scrollbar to gauge how much fo the document am I seeing. Can you site any references to this? Scrolling through this bug report, for instance, would take a LONG time with a mouse wheel. -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize,maximize,close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize, maximize, close
@Atel, Yes, the web is broken. Ubuntu is changing it's design, and the web is not compatible with it. The web must change. Seriously? -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize,maximize,close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 108951] Re: Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness
FWIW, it looks like Gnome 2.29.91 (tested in Ubuntu Lucid) fixes this issue. It has a very small delay but it isn't anywhere near as bad - looks like it just takes a second to slide out (probably making it actually look like an opening drawer - very smooth). -- Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108951 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 108951] Re: Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness
I'm giving up on this personally. Obviously no Gnome devs give a sh*t about it, even with the triaged bug report on Gnome Bugzilla. -- Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108951 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 433276] [NEW] Typing hotkeys in Facebook textboxes not recognized as text input
Public bug reported: Reproducable under (at least) Ubuntu 8.04 i386 / 9.04 AMD64 Steps to reproduce: 1) Launch epiphany-browser 2) Log onto Facebook 3) Attempt to update your status. Use an apostraphe ('). Watch the Find Text bar pop up instead of typing an apostraphe. Not sure what kind of code is driving Facebook text input boxes but Epiphany should recognize it. I'm sure this is the same for any other hotkey as well. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 $ apt-cache policy epiphany-browser epiphany-browser: Installed: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Typing hotkeys in Facebook textboxes not recognized as text input https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 108951] Re: Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness
I can confirm myself that this happens in Fedora 11.. If everyone can comment on the Gnome Bugzilla report at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514298 maybe we can get some more heads in the game. -- Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108951 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 108951] Re: Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness
@Jim: This bug is not tied to Compiz. I have experienced this bug on numerous releases of Ubuntu as well as a 'stock' F11 install without Compiz enabled. -- Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108951 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 398072] [NEW] WISHLIST: Integrated search into notes of files/dirs
Public bug reported: It would be really nice as a quasi-tagging system to be able to search the notes you enter for files/directories. For instance, I have a bunch of randomly named .wma files (from a voice recorder) with lots of small bass riffs I've recorded. I'd like to use the notes to put in tags (fast tempo, slow tempo, melodic, etc.) and other information regarding the files (such as @1:42m changes riffs). If there was a search functionality in the notes, I could search for all fast tempo files in my dir hierarchy (which is normally by date recorded), which would rule. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- WISHLIST: Integrated search into notes of files/dirs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 108951] Re: Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness
So I think we've narrowed this down to gnome-panel (Ubuntu at least)...? Can we get people to comment on whether this affects more than Ubuntu? I don't have any other distributions as virtual machines (I will soon, but...) so if anyone is using Fedora, Debian, openSuSE, etc. can you quickly add a drawer to the Gnome panel, add some items to it, then open/close it and report whether this bug is present there as well? Let's get this thing taken care of, it's been way too long since this bug has been reported. I'd rather see no drawer at all than having a broken/sludgy one! =) -- Gnome drawer applet delays and unresponsiveness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108951 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225950] Re: [8.04] Drawing evolution window on screen very slow
Someone needs to look at the code responsible for it and see what they can find. IMHO it's pretty obvious there's something funky going on when you're using remote X, whether in LTSP or not. -- [8.04] Drawing evolution window on screen very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 225950] Re: [8.04] Drawing evolution window on screen very slow
Anthony, you should try the lts.conf option LDM_DIRECTX = True to disable SSH tunneling temporarily for your LTSP network. Reboot your thin clients with that option and try again. If Evolution speeds up, you can be certain that it's an SSH tunneling issue with Evolution rather than simply a remote X issue. -- [8.04] Drawing evolution window on screen very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225950 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 259163] Re: users-admin does not sort when Name/Login/Homedir field clicked
Wishlist? Don't you all think that sorting is kind of important for any system with 10 users? This is pretty basic functionality that I would assume just works OOTB...Wishlist doesn't sit right with me on this. -- users-admin does not sort when Name/Login/Homedir field clicked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 206583] Re: System Monitor crashes when lowering nice value of process
Please see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549760#c6 for another workaround using gconf: Setting /apps/gksu/disable-grab to True makes the problem disappear. Hopefully this sheds some light on the core issue so we can get it fixed for real :) -- System Monitor crashes when lowering nice value of process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206583 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269541] Re: gconfd-2 becomes orphane when parent process crashes
This bug causes LTSP users grief without a stale process 'cleanup' program such as gnome-watchdog. It will cause unexpected behavior when logged out (thus the gconfd-2 process stays alive) and logging back in, as there is conflicting processes, causing crashes and other unexpected GNOME behavior. It should be treated with a higher priority as it affects virtually all LTSP users. -- gconfd-2 becomes orphane when parent process crashes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 153356] Re: Switch User option available in the close session box
I can confirm this bug. The workaround I've used in the past is the following: Edit GConf key: /desktop/gnome/lockdown: disable_user_switching (enable) Edit GConf key: /apps/panel/global/disabled_applets (add OAFIID:GNOME_FastUserSwitchApplet w/o quotes into list) Make both keys mandatory. This workaround will remove user switching options in Gnome without having to hack the logout sequence for no confirmation. -- Switch User option available in the close session box https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 239342] Re: Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 227146 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227146 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 227146 vnc4server too slow with xinetd/gdm -- Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 211372] Re: gnome panel drawer animation wierdness
I was actually about to try disabling animations...but now that AusIV already did, I don't want to lose my panels. =p -- gnome panel drawer animation wierdness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 269541] Re: gconfd-2 becomes orphane when parent process crashes
Please also see http://logicalnetworking.net/other/watchdog.txt and search for all instances of 'gconfd-2' . Seems that it is pretty common for it to hang around upon normal exit of an LTSP TC session, which package gnome-watchdog sees and forcefully kills to keep stale processes to a minimum. -- gconfd-2 becomes orphane when parent process crashes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 211372] Re: gnome panel drawer animation wierdness
This bug has been around for a long time - at least since Feisty. Happens to me on Compiz, non-Compiz, standalone and LTSP cilent sessions. -- gnome panel drawer animation wierdness https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211372 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 239342] Re: Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc
Running: gconftool-2 --set --type boolean /apps/gnome-settings- daemon/plugins/mouse/active false Did *not* work for me. -- Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 239342] Re: Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc
David, FYI I upgraded from Gutsy (7.10) to Hardy, I run vnc4server via a WAN (over ssh tunnel), and use inetd (not xinetd) to launch vnc sessions. So that takes 3 of 4 commonalities out of the mix. Sincerely, Jordan David McNeill wrote: I'm seeing similar errors: Common theme: * Upgraded from Dapper 6.06 to Hardy 8.04 * VNC to problem box on local lan * xinetd to launch vnc * Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display :1.0. I'm running Kubuntu, and see this error on lots of apps, not just gnome- settings-daemon. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net OCZ NIA Brain - Computer Gaming Interface What does it take to get a new PC with XP? The laptop drive of shame -- Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 239342] Re: Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc
I should also add that this happens with: - A non-upgraded (Fresh Hardy) install - A newly created user - Manually changing theme to a non-default theme. -- Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 239342] .xsession-errors contents
/etc/gdm/Xsession: Beginning session setup... Setting IM through im-switch for locale=en_US. Start IM through /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/all_ALL linked to /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/default. SESSION_MANAGER=local/binkleyubuntu:/tmp/.ICE-unix/4398 ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4446): WARNING **: The X Server does not support the XRandR extension. Runtime resolution changes to the displa y size are not available. ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4446): WARNING **: numlock: XkbQueryExtension returned an error ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4446): WARNING **: Neither XKeyboard not Xfree86's keyboard extensions are available, no way to support keyboard autorepeat rate settings ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4446): WARNING **: Unable to start a11y_keyboard manager: XKB functionality is disabled. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. E: authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/home/lns/.pulse-cookie': Permission denied E: authkey.c: Failed to load authorization key '/home/lns/.pulse-cookie': Invalid argument xrdb: *Label.background on line 220 overrides entry on line 150 xrdb: *Text.background on line 226 overrides entry on line 191 xrdb: *Label.foreground on line 232 overrides entry on line 151 xrdb: *Text.foreground on line 238 overrides entry on line 192 Checking for Xgl: not present. xset q doesn't reveal the location of the log file. Using fallback /var/log/Xorg.0.log No whitelisted driver found aborting and using fallback: /usr/bin/metacity Window manager warning: Failed to read saved session file /home/lns/.metacity/sessions/default0.ms: Failed to open file '/home/lns/.metaci ty/sessions/default0.ms': No such file or directory Window manager warning: Log level 32: could not find XKB extension. E: authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/home/lns/.pulse-cookie': Permission denied E: authkey.c: Failed to load authorization key '/home/lns/.pulse-cookie': Invalid argument Connection failure: Connection refused The program 'gnome-settings-daemon' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadWindow (invalid Window parameter)'. (Details: serial 2424 error_code 3 request_code 20 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4519): WARNING **: The X Server does not support the XRandR extension. Runtime resolution changes to the display size are not available. ** (nm-applet:4513): WARNING **: WARN nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service. dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection :1.71 is not allowed to own the service org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerInfo due to security policies in the configuration file' ** (nautilus:4461): WARNING **: Unable to add monitor: Not supported ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4519): WARNING **: numlock: XkbQueryExtension returned an error ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4519): WARNING **: Neither XKeyboard not Xfree86's keyboard extensions are available, no way to support keyboard autorepeat rate settings ** (gnome-settings-daemon:4519): WARNING **: Unable to start a11y_keyboard manager: XKB functionality is disabled. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. Xlib: extension XInputExtension missing on display 127.0.0.1:3.0. E: authkey.c: Failed to open cookie file '/home/lns/.pulse-cookie': Permission denied E: authkey.c: Failed to load authorization key '/home/lns/.pulse-cookie': Invalid argument xrdb: *Label.background on line 220 overrides entry on line 150 xrdb: *Text.background on line 226 overrides entry on line 191 xrdb: *Label.foreground on line 232 overrides entry on line 151 xrdb: *Text.foreground on line 238 overrides entry on line 192 ** (nm-applet:4513): WARNING **: WARN nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service. dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection :1.71 is not allowed to own the service org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerInfo due to security policies in the configuration file' ** (nm-applet:4513): WARNING **: WARN nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service. dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection :1.71 is not allowed to own the service org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerInfo due to security policies in the configuration file' ** (nm-applet:4513): WARNING **: WARN nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service. dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection :1.71 is not
[Bug 239342] [NEW] Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc
Public bug reported: This is a peculiar problem because local GDM login as well as LTSP thin- client logins work fine. Only when I am logged in via VNC (vnc4server is configured to spawn a new GDM session while tunneled through SSH over a WAN) does this happen - and only after a Gutsy - Hardy upgrade (This issue is consistent with 4 newly upgraded servers). I created the post http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=569451 which describes my setup. This method in Gutsy worked perfectly and immediately after a Hardy upgrade, this behavior starts to happen. After logging into Gnome, the theme constantly changes between the default and another (not sure which, but it's pretty fugly) on its own. Fonts, window borders, menus, etc. are constantly cycling back and forth - usually when I open an app (say, Firefox) I will get the error message shown in the screenshot below regarding gnome-settings-daemon. Not sure what other information to give you - the various servers I take care of are mostly the same hardware, but one is completely different - yet experiences the exact same issue. Thanks for any help, and I'm glad to provide any additional information to get this bug resolved. - Jordan ** Affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 239342] Re: Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc
** Attachment added: Screenshot of gnome-settings-daemon error http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15223180/gnomesettingsdaemonerror.png -- Error starting gnome-settings-daemon while logged in via vnc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203265] Re: When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed
Sebastien, thank you for the guidance - it looks like what I want *can* be handled in GConf, I wasn't aware (as I wasn't aware that the launcher was for the default e-mail client and not Evolution specifically). Thank you for the info - time to hit the GConf books some more =) -- When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203265] [NEW] When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution This has happened on a lot of my new Ubuntu Gutsy (and as far back as Dapper) installs. Steps to reproduce on a clean Gutsy install: 1) Create a new user and log in, noting the Evolution top panel launcher icon that appears when you log in 2) Run the following command (as root or w/sudo): - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/lns# apt-get --purge remove evolution* Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Note, selecting evolution-common for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-jescs for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-data-server-dbg for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-webcal for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-data-server-dev for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting libevolution3.0-cil for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-exchange for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-dbg for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-dev for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-rss for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-plugins-experimental for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting openoffice.org-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-scalix for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting mail-notification-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting openoffice.org2-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting beagle-backend-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-data-server1.2 for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting python2.4-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting python-evolution instead of python2.4-evolution Note, selecting librevolution-ruby for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting libevolution2.0-cil for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-plugins for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-data-server for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting librevolution-ruby1.8 for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting opensync-plugin-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting python2.5-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting python-evolution instead of python2.5-evolution Note, selecting libevolution-cil for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting libmultisync-plugin-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting python-evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting b2evolution for regex 'evolution*' Note, selecting evolution-data-server-common for regex 'evolution*' The following packages will be REMOVED: ekiga* evolution* evolution-common* evolution-data-server* evolution-data-server-common* evolution-exchange* evolution-plugins* evolution-webcal* openoffice.org-evolution* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 9 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 83.6MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 133567 files and directories currently installed.) Removing ekiga ... Purging configuration files for ekiga ... Removing evolution-plugins ... Removing evolution-exchange ... Purging configuration files for evolution-exchange ... Removing evolution ... Purging configuration files for evolution ... Removing evolution-common ... Purging configuration files for evolution-common ... Removing evolution-data-server ... Removing evolution-data-server-common ... Removing evolution-webcal ... Purging configuration files for evolution-webcal ... Removing openoffice.org-evolution ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/lns# - 3) Log out and log back in as your test user 4) Notice the defunct springboard panel launcher icon (was the old Evolution icon) This is kind of a pain in the arse for large multi-user systems (such as my LTSP installations) when all you'd like to do is remove Evolution. I know some applications, when you log in after they're uninstalled, will tell you that it cannot be found and it gives you a choice to see if you'd like to delete the launcher. This would be satisfactory as it would at least bug the user until they hit 'Delete'...although for Evolution, this doesn't happen, and leaves cruft behind instead. This is also more of an issue than 'simply delete the launcher', because I lock down my Gnome panels for security reasons (I run my LTSP installations in elementary/primary schools). Any insight, or bugfixes would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! (Screenshots following) --- # cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.10 --- ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203265] Re: When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed
** Attachment added: User session w/Evolution panel launcher http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12709086/with-evolution.png -- When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 203265] Re: When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed
** Attachment added: After removing Evolution (and clicking on springboard launcher) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12709094/without-evolution.png -- When removing Evolution, default Gnome top-panel icon does not get removed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 147844] Re: Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen
...In the upper-left corner of (most) any window, right-click and select Move. Move your mouse upward and watch the titlebar disappear. To me, this bug is clearly that of confusion as the end-result to the user. At the very least, if you can't resize the window when the titlebar is offscreen, don't turn the mouse cursor into an arrow that implies that you can, and instead display a menu when the user wants to re-size to possibly get the titlebar back onscreen. That will confuse anyone. Martijn van de Streek wrote: But the only way to get your title bar off-screen in the first place is by Alt+dragging the window.. which means it can't go off-screen if the user doesn't know right click or modifiers in the first place... I think you've got your chicken and egg mixed up :) -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 147844] Re: Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen
Not on my system (Ubuntu Gutsy i386 w/Compiz enabled)... This was a matter of preference last time it came up in a bug report, IIRC. I dunno if any Gnome/Ubuntu people are even willing to fix it since, to some, it's not really a bug. - Jordan Mark Schouten wrote: Jordan Erickson wrote: ...In the upper-left corner of (most) any window, right-click and select Move. Move your mouse upward and watch the titlebar disappear. I'm sorry, but you are mistaking. When you select move, and go upwards, the window resizes and goes halfway down. You are unable to move the titlebar out of the screen without using tha alt button. Also, I agree on the caused confusion. So, can this be fixed? -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 194584] [NEW] nautilus-cd-burner crashes when you copy 1145 files (1146 or more) files to DVD icon for burning
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus-cd-burner I was bewildered by trying to copy a directory with more than 1145 files in it to my blank DVD CD-Burning window. It would crash with the Force Quit dialog. I made a new directory and copied 500, 900, 1001, 1101, and 1145 files into it. They all showed no issues, until I copied a single file into it - then it crashed. I removed a DIFFERENT file (leaving the file count at 1145) and tried again - it worked. Tried 1146 again (with yet another different file) and it crashed when I drug/dropped the folder into the DVD burning window. Most of the crashes happened when I would copy the directory into the Nautilus window itself containg the blank DVD contents to burn. I was able to copy files directly onto the DVD icon once, but when I double- clicked on it to remove it and try something else, the Deleting Files window hung and crashed Nautilus. --- $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=7.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=gutsy DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 7.10 --- ii nautilus-cd-burner 2.20.0-0ubuntu1 --- ** Affects: nautilus-cd-burner (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nautilus-cd-burner crashes when you copy 1145 files (1146 or more) files to DVD icon for burning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194584 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus-cd-burner in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
Thank you!!! Just saw it download from the ropes. =) =) =) Sebastien Bacher wrote: you need to restart nautilus to get the new version running -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 8422] Re: Error message on ending VNC session
** Attachment added: vncviewer disconnect error (via tsclient) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12092026/Screenshot-VNC%3A%20x11-1.png -- Error message on ending VNC session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 8422] Re: Error message on ending VNC session
Not sure about Hardy but I still encounter this issue (related to the keyboard map) in Gutsy. It doesn't seem to be rdesktop/vncviewer specific, as different errors (are they errors or just debug info?) occur at disconnect. See my two attachments for rdesktop and vncviewer sessions (via tsclient) respectively. ** Attachment added: rdesktop disconnect error (via tsclient) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12092025/Screenshot-VNC%3A%20x11.png -- Error message on ending VNC session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
I thought at first the similarities were dual-core CPUS - I'm having this issue on HP Proliant ML370 (G5) servers - 2x dualcore Xeon 1.6GHz (i386 *and* AMD64 installs). They are all Ubuntu LTSP servers that serve entire labs. I have seen Nautilus hog 100% of the CPU when I am the only one logged in (and then out), after the first login after installation. I don't have to launch an actual filebrowser window for it to come up (Nautilus loads automatically to show desktop icons, etc. anyway). What's changed in Gutsy? Well, Compiz (which I don't use on my servers), desktop-applet/tracker (which I have removed)... Is only happens when someone is logging out. There has to be some sort of cleanup/other routine that is triggering it. I agree it can't be SO huge that *everyone* is experiencing this issue. So here is my setup, hopefully people who are having this issue can post their setups as well so we can find some commonalities. Server: Ubuntu 7.10 (A mix of i386 AMD64, server desktop installs, all with latest linux-image-server kernels, all acting as LTSP servers for i386 clients). All on HP Proliant ML370 G5 servers, 8GB RAM (using PAE in the kernel to address all 8GB), 146GB RAID 1 arrays (2 SAS disks). All of them running Gnome with the latest updates. All instances of 100% CPU hogging happens with users who have not modified Nautilus settings in any way (or have even opened filebrowser windows). It's definitely stock, out of the box behavior. It doesn't happen every time, but definitely at least 30-50% of the time, whenever someone logs out. HTH, Jordan jlinho wrote: Does everybody here have a Core 2 XXX CPU ? I have a Core 2 Quad CPU. Maybe hardware has an influence for this bug? I just can't imagine that everybody who installs Ubuntu 7.10 has such an enormous bug (The 100% CPU Nautilus bug appears on a fresh Gutsy install). Also I am not using a 64 bits install, just a 32 bits one. 2008/1/20, Alen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It is bugged out of the box... Maybe I'm wrong, but it happened on my machine on the fresh install and also after upgrading from feisty. All I have to do is start nautilus from Places menu on the secondary screen and then close it. Or log off one of the users. Simple as that: start/close or logoff. -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
Oh man...Ok sorry everyone, I'm not sure why my brain farted and I forgot that there is already a fix for this (released in Hardy, not backported to Gutsy). --- nautilus (1:2.20.0-0ubuntu8) hardy; urgency=low * debian/patches/18_disable_signal_handler.patch: - Don't use the logging code signal handler it's buggy and makes nautilus being stuck and eat cpu on crash (LP: #150471) --- Everyone who is having this issue needs to go to the actual bug report in Launchpad, at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/nautilus/+bug/150471 Make an account if you don't already have one, and post a comment on the bug requesting a backport to Gutsy. That way, the developers will see how many people this bug is currently affecting in Gutsy and hopefully will shift some momentum to it to backport it. =) - Jordan Jordan Erickson wrote: I thought at first the similarities were dual-core CPUS - I'm having this issue on HP Proliant ML370 (G5) servers - 2x dualcore Xeon 1.6GHz (i386 *and* AMD64 installs). They are all Ubuntu LTSP servers that serve entire labs. I have seen Nautilus hog 100% of the CPU when I am the only one logged in (and then out), after the first login after installation. I don't have to launch an actual filebrowser window for it to come up (Nautilus loads automatically to show desktop icons, etc. anyway). What's changed in Gutsy? Well, Compiz (which I don't use on my servers), desktop-applet/tracker (which I have removed)... Is only happens when someone is logging out. There has to be some sort of cleanup/other routine that is triggering it. I agree it can't be SO huge that *everyone* is experiencing this issue. So here is my setup, hopefully people who are having this issue can post their setups as well so we can find some commonalities. Server: Ubuntu 7.10 (A mix of i386 AMD64, server desktop installs, all with latest linux-image-server kernels, all acting as LTSP servers for i386 clients). All on HP Proliant ML370 G5 servers, 8GB RAM (using PAE in the kernel to address all 8GB), 146GB RAID 1 arrays (2 SAS disks). All of them running Gnome with the latest updates. All instances of 100% CPU hogging happens with users who have not modified Nautilus settings in any way (or have even opened filebrowser windows). It's definitely stock, out of the box behavior. It doesn't happen every time, but definitely at least 30-50% of the time, whenever someone logs out. HTH, Jordan jlinho wrote: Does everybody here have a Core 2 XXX CPU ? I have a Core 2 Quad CPU. Maybe hardware has an influence for this bug? I just can't imagine that everybody who installs Ubuntu 7.10 has such an enormous bug (The 100% CPU Nautilus bug appears on a fresh Gutsy install). Also I am not using a 64 bits install, just a 32 bits one. 2008/1/20, Alen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It is bugged out of the box... Maybe I'm wrong, but it happened on my machine on the fresh install and also after upgrading from feisty. All I have to do is start nautilus from Places menu on the secondary screen and then close it. Or log off one of the users. Simple as that: start/close or logoff. -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
Yikes. Nevermind again, I didn't know this was being copied to the bug report already. My signal-to-noise ratio is getting worse. ;) Jordan Erickson wrote: Oh man...Ok sorry everyone, I'm not sure why my brain farted and I forgot that there is already a fix for this (released in Hardy, not backported to Gutsy). --- nautilus (1:2.20.0-0ubuntu8) hardy; urgency=low * debian/patches/18_disable_signal_handler.patch: - Don't use the logging code signal handler it's buggy and makes nautilus being stuck and eat cpu on crash (LP: #150471) --- Everyone who is having this issue needs to go to the actual bug report in Launchpad, at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/gutsy/+source/nautilus/+bug/150471 Make an account if you don't already have one, and post a comment on the bug requesting a backport to Gutsy. That way, the developers will see how many people this bug is currently affecting in Gutsy and hopefully will shift some momentum to it to backport it. =) - Jordan Jordan Erickson wrote: I thought at first the similarities were dual-core CPUS - I'm having this issue on HP Proliant ML370 (G5) servers - 2x dualcore Xeon 1.6GHz (i386 *and* AMD64 installs). They are all Ubuntu LTSP servers that serve entire labs. I have seen Nautilus hog 100% of the CPU when I am the only one logged in (and then out), after the first login after installation. I don't have to launch an actual filebrowser window for it to come up (Nautilus loads automatically to show desktop icons, etc. anyway). What's changed in Gutsy? Well, Compiz (which I don't use on my servers), desktop-applet/tracker (which I have removed)... Is only happens when someone is logging out. There has to be some sort of cleanup/other routine that is triggering it. I agree it can't be SO huge that *everyone* is experiencing this issue. So here is my setup, hopefully people who are having this issue can post their setups as well so we can find some commonalities. Server: Ubuntu 7.10 (A mix of i386 AMD64, server desktop installs, all with latest linux-image-server kernels, all acting as LTSP servers for i386 clients). All on HP Proliant ML370 G5 servers, 8GB RAM (using PAE in the kernel to address all 8GB), 146GB RAID 1 arrays (2 SAS disks). All of them running Gnome with the latest updates. All instances of 100% CPU hogging happens with users who have not modified Nautilus settings in any way (or have even opened filebrowser windows). It's definitely stock, out of the box behavior. It doesn't happen every time, but definitely at least 30-50% of the time, whenever someone logs out. HTH, Jordan jlinho wrote: Does everybody here have a Core 2 XXX CPU ? I have a Core 2 Quad CPU. Maybe hardware has an influence for this bug? I just can't imagine that everybody who installs Ubuntu 7.10 has such an enormous bug (The 100% CPU Nautilus bug appears on a fresh Gutsy install). Also I am not using a 64 bits install, just a 32 bits one. 2008/1/20, Alen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It is bugged out of the box... Maybe I'm wrong, but it happened on my machine on the fresh install and also after upgrading from feisty. All I have to do is start nautilus from Places menu on the secondary screen and then close it. Or log off one of the users. Simple as that: start/close or logoff. -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
Wow - unacceptable, unprofessional? Somehow I think relevant information regarding when, how and with what equipment would be worth more than simply throwing stones. This *is* open source, guys. The community helps improve itself by working together. - Jordan --- Kyle M Weller wrote: Pjotr12345, you are totally right, this is totally unacceptable, my company is already thinking of switching back to windows because of this issue. It is indeed very unprofessional as well. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
I'd like to reiterate that it my instance of 100% CPU utilization of Nautilus, it is a brand new install of Gutsy. I was able to reproduce it the first time the first created user logged out (with extremely minimal usage of Gnome, not including the actual browsing through the Nautilus file manager window). -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
I am still having this (horrible) issue as well, at multiple LTSP sites (which effectively slows the entire lab down). I would greatly appreciate a backport to Gutsy. It has effectively turned one of my customers away from Linux all together - and they're strongly considering moving their computer lab back to Windows. -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
I would think, opening up a Gnome session, navigating in Nautilus, doing other misc. tasks, and then logging out would cause the bug to trigger - for me, it's not EVERY time, but definitely more times than not. Sebastien Bacher wrote: Opening a gutsy task. Does anybody has an easy way to trigger the issue and could try if the patch works correctly on gutsy? ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Gutsy) Importance: Undecided = High Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Gutsy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
Interesting... The sites that I'm experiencing this on are dual CPUs (Dual Core-2 Xeon 1.6GHz)...One is AMD64 build of Gutsy, the other i386 build. I haven't experienced it on any UPGRADED machines, only new Gutsy (Desktop) installs (with server kernels). FatButtLarry wrote: Worth noting, 7.10 at work (Dual Processor Xeon) does this, but 7.10 at home (AMD64) I haven't seen it yet. Might be because I haven't run updates at home (can't remember). -Tres -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net RFID Passports coming in 2008 Peru orders 260,000 OLPC laptops for kids, Mexico 50,000 CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 75159] Re: all panel objects of type != launcher disappeared after dragdrop
This *just* happened to me about 10 minutes ago, with pretty much exactly the same scenario as the bug description. I accidentally drug a Firefox URL (from the address bar) onto the top panel and ALL of my launchers (read: not applets), including my drawers full of launchers, dissapeared (so did my main menu). All that was left was a new launcher for the URL I accidentally drug there. Here is my ~/.xsession-errors: ... ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ** (gnome-panel:29321): CRITICAL **: panel_applet_clean: assertion `info != NULL' failed ***Note that I got my launchers back (thanks to Juhaz on ##gnome on freenode.net) by going to ~/.gnome2/panel2.d/default/launchers and dragging them back (I had to re-create my drawers, however, and my terminal launcher wasn't there for some reason). This scared the SH*T out of me, as I had many critical ssh launchers with IPs in them (basically just a bunch of information that would have been hell to try to get back). This should be considered a very bd bug. My current setup is Ubuntu Gutsy (i386) and Gnome 2.20.1. -- all panel objects of type != launcher disappeared after dragdrop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 75159] Re: all panel objects of type != launcher disappeared after dragdrop
Sorry, Gome 2.20.1 is my version. -- all panel objects of type != launcher disappeared after dragdrop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 176983] Screens and Graphics controls never save resolution or refresh rate settings (and is redundant with Screen Resolution controls)
Public bug reported: I have noticed that on 3 different Ubuntu Gutsy installs on differing hardware (all of them various ATI Radeon video adapters, though), the new System - Administration - Screens and Graphics controls seem to never save either the screen resolution or refresh rate. My most current experience with this was last night at a friend's house, shortly after he installed Gutsy (new install). He has an ATI Radeon 9800 and a Dell P1110 CRT - he was confused that his refresh rate was not sticking upon logout (after using Screens and Graphics). He tried this with both the default ATI driver and the proprietary ATI driver from the website (the Restricted driver didn't launch X at all). He prefers 1024x768 @75Hz, which he set, multiple times in Screens and Graphics - but upon logout/login, it reverts to 1024x768 @60Hz. He was able to make changes stick via System - Preferences - Screen Resolution. This should be filed as both a bug for Screens and Graphics as well as counter-intuitive that both Screen Resolution and Screens and Graphics exist in a default Gutsy install. How's a user to know which one to change, and which one works? Thanks! ** Affects: meta-gnome2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Screens and Graphics controls never save resolution or refresh rate settings (and is redundant with Screen Resolution controls) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for meta-gnome2 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 164804] Re: Gnome Login Error
I can also confirm this on a brand new (as well as other separate) install of Gutsy (using LTSP5). I have noticed that this happens a lot when I go from logging in directly at the server console, and then login via an LTSP client (or even VNC to the server). It seems that there's something happening when different login methods are used. Maybe any earlier commenters can confirm this behavior? If not, it could be isolated (although I have 3 LTSP networks and it seems to be consistent on them all). - Jordan (Screenie attachment of errors) ** Attachment added: Screenshot of errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10850989/Screenshot.png -- Gnome Login Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164804 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
nautilus (1:2.20.0-0ubuntu8) hardy; urgency=low * debian/patches/18_disable_signal_handler.patch: - Don't use the logging code signal handler it's buggy and makes nautilus being stuck and eat cpu on crash (LP: #150471) --- Is there any way this will be ported to Gutsy? I have a hard time believing this is a low urgency, as I have the same result in multiple live X/LTSP servers, which slows the powerful machines to a crawl when nautilus misbehaves (daily)... -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
I should also add that trackerd is *not* running on either of my servers, as a troubleshooting step from earlier posts. Compiz/Desktop effects are also not in the equation. -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 150471] Re: [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again
I can also confirm this on 2 seperate Ubuntu Gutsy (64-bit) installs as LTSP servers. Since these are LTSP servers (and serve many clients), GDM is not a factor in my equation (LTSP uses LDM instead, and the 100% CPU Nautilus processes are from people logged into thin clients). Help would be greately appreciated as I have to manually go in and kill rampant Nautilus processes daily after complaints of slowness on the whole LTSP network. -- [Gutsy] high processor activity after logging out and then logging in again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 133124] Re: MASTER [GUTSY] firefox crashed [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] from libcairo
I can also verify, on a new Gutsy AMD64 install with all updates applied as of 2007/10/29, Firefox will crash semi-instantly (you can see the window appear, and then close out, with a Segmentation fault (core dumped) message on the console. Switching Gnome theme from Human to Glossy causes Firefox to load normally. This is with VESA video drivers loaded. -- MASTER [GUTSY] firefox crashed [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] from libcairo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133124 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for libcairo in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 147844] Re: Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen
Sebastien, what can I do to make this a feature request to remove then? I personally cannot see how this is an intuitive feature at all - I am a seasoned Linux professional and this feature had me very confused when I wanted to do nothing but resize my window while the titlebar was off-screen. It is very much easy enough to ALT+click/drag to move a window back, and right-click, if a user really is that confused, could give them the context menu. I find it extremely counter-intuitive. Thank you for your consideration. -- Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 147844] Re: Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen
Thomas (and all), thank you very much! This is great. I was fumbling around for days wondering why I'd get a context menu (along with the actual 'move' mouse cursor). Weird behavior IMHO. There's got to be a better way (like ALT+click/drag).. =) - Jordan Thomas Thurman wrote: Sebastien was correct: it was a feature added in the constraints- experiments branch at revision 2275 on 14 November '05: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/metacity/branches/constraints_experiments/src/frames.c?annotate=2275 which made it into trunk along with everything else from that branch five days later: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/metacity?view=revisionrevision=2306 (For reference, the code originally began if (!meta_core_titlebar_is_onscreen but was changed by me to if (!titlebar_is_onscreen) in June of this year.) That latter checkin includes a huge comment giving the rationale for all these changes, but this one doesn't appear to be specifically explained. So I suggest we ask Elijah what he thinks about all this; I'll ping him. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net CNet to Microsoft: Ditch Vista A Logical Choice in Education Spammers using Adobe .PDF attachments at full force -- Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 147844] Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen
Public bug reported: When I ALT+click/drag any window so the title bar is off-screen (above the top panel), and I try to resize the window by clicking/dragging the window's lower left or right corner, it displays the window menu containing Minimize/Maximize/Move/Etc instead of actually allowing me to resize the window. Steps to reproduce: 1) ALT+click and drag any window so the top titlebar is above the top Gnome panel 2) Try to resize the window by clicking and dragging either the lower left or lower right corner. Version Information: Gnome 2.18.1 Ubuntu 7.04 Desktop (i386) ** Affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-desktop in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 147844] Re: Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen
** Attachment added: Screenie of context menu when trying to resize Firefox while titlebar is offscreen http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9628270/Screenshot.png -- Resize window broken when titlebar is off-screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147844 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-desktop in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 116902] Re: [feisty] gnome/nautilus doesn't allow sshfs mount icon 'eject' / 'delete'
Like I said before, I am not completely sure how he mounted it - it could have been from the Places - Network or Places - Connect to Server dialog (not technically Nautilus?), but when he brought me over to show me, it was already mounted on his desktop. I simply tried to right-click/Unmount Volume, but it gave me an error, not unlike what you see when you manually mount an SSHFS volume using the 'sshfs' command. --- Unable to unmount the selected volume. Error: Could not determine real path of the device: no such file or directory. --- -- [feisty] gnome/nautilus doesn't allow sshfs mount icon 'eject' / 'delete' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 122805] Re: Terminal Server Client error on logout
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 8422 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8422 The fix is simple, install Win XP. That worked for me :) -- Believe it or not, some people like to use this system to report/track bugs, not to post immature comments. Please keep it professional. -- Terminal Server Client error on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (via bug 8422). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 122805] Re: Terminal Server Client error on logout
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 8422 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8422 Just a note that I am experiencing this as well with Ubuntu Feisty AMD64 in an LTSP environment. Looking forward to a fix! =) Thank you guys. -- Terminal Server Client error on logout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122805 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (via bug 8422). -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 116902] Re: [feisty] gnome/nautilus doesn't allow sshfs mount icon 'eject' / 'delete'
Sure Sebastien - sorry for the delay, I didn't know you replied. If you mount an sshfs volume in Gnome using Nautilus, you don't have the ability to eject or unmount it - it gives you a Permission denied or similar message. -- [feisty] gnome/nautilus doesn't allow sshfs mount icon 'eject' / 'delete' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 116902] [feisty] gnome/nautilus doesn't allow sshfs mount icon 'eject' / 'delete'
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus From Freenode/#ltsp IRC Chat (edited for relevant content): - lns ...not being able to remove an accidentally mounted ssh volume icon from the desktop... ogra-classmate yeah, the ssh volum4e is a deswign problem ogra-classmate well, its a feature ogra-classmate using local devices doesnt need an eject option, so that is disabled globally in the gui for all users on thin clients automatically ogra-classmate indeed that brings probs if you have something like sshfs volumes lns so it sees sshfs volumes as local devices? ogra-classmate no, because you use a thin client eject is globally disabled ogra-classmate we're working on an implementation that uses virtual hal devices for gutsy vagrantc lns: are you actually using sshfs, or LTSP's local devices support? ogra-classmate there is will be possible to specify unmounting functionallity per device and that prob should be solved ogra-classmate vagrantc: i assumed sshfs * vagrantc makes no assumptions when troubleshooting or bug reporting lns vagrantc, to tell you the truth i'm not sure - the principal at the school accidentally mounted an ssh volume from a client and couldn't 'unmount/eject/move to trash' lns it was sshfs vagrantc ok. lns at least that's what the icon said (ssh) ogra-classmate likely from the network servers dialog in gnome lns ogra-classmate, yes lns when he tried to drag to trash it said permission denied or similar ogra-classmate you can tell him its a design bug we're aware of and are working on to solve it ;) lns ogra-classmate, yes i will for sure. ogra-classmate but dont hesitate to file it please, my brain is a sieve sometimes, having reminder bugs helps a lot :) - Please let me know if there is more information I can provide. - Jordan ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [feisty] gnome/nautilus doesn't allow sshfs mount icon 'eject' / 'delete' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 93234] Re: [Feisty] gnome-screenshot should not take a screenie of itself
Just wanted to say this is happening to me too. I used 'Current window' and 'grab immediately' and it grabbed the actual screenshot utility window before it dissapeared completely (you can see that just the bare window and no content shows). ** Attachment added: ss.jpg http://librarian.launchpad.net/7727587/ss.jpg -- [Feisty] gnome-screenshot should not take a screenie of itself https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 52274] Re: [Bug 52274] Re: Memory leak causing problems with dia
=) Thank you thank you thank you!! =) You are the some of the shining stars of open source. Sincerely, Jordan Colin Watson wrote: Accepted into dapper-updates. Expect binary packages to be available in a couple of hours. -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions - We'll make it work. http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net Defending against website banner ads with Firefox Helio display shows images in thin air Happy SysAdmin Day (7/28/2006) - Woohoo! -- Memory leak causing problems with dia https://launchpad.net/bugs/52274 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 52274] Re: Memory leak causing problems with dia
Is there any hope in getting 1.13 / patched version of 1.12 in Dapper? I'm desperately needing this fix :( -- Memory leak causing problems with dia https://launchpad.net/bugs/52274 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 48887] Re: [Bug 48887] Re: Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak?
Klaus, you absolutely rock. Thank you!! =) I feel so disabled as a non-programmer, I wish I could troubleshoot things like that myself. Thanks again!! Jordan Klaus Stengel wrote: A patch is available in GNOME Bugzilla, but as you can see there, I'm still waiting for the confirmation that it works like expected: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344766 -- Jordan Erickson Owner, Logical Networking Solutions - We'll make it work. http://www.logicalnetworking.net 707-636-5678 Latest LNS Blogs - http://blogs.logicalnetworking.net LNS Technology Assurance contract customers! Best Buy Destroyed Hard Drive Found at Flea Market California Earthquake tracking site (did you feel it on Sat?) -- Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak? https://launchpad.net/bugs/48887 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 48887] Re: Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak?
Is there any way we can progress on this bug? I rely on Dia to create network diagrams..I am not a programmer but if there is anything at all I can do please let me know! I really would like to be able to use it, and right now as the bug stands unconfirmed, after just a few minutes of using Dia my entire workstation grinds to a halt... :( -- Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak? https://launchpad.net/bugs/48887 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 48887] Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dia First time using Dia after Dapper 6.06 LTS dist-upgrade, I opened an existing (as well as new) Dia drawing and proceeded to add a text box, as well as zoom to 200%. After a few random tasks within the drawing, my CPU utilization would reach 100% and stay there, causing extremely slow system response time. Upon attempting to 'kill -9' Dia process, it would become 'defunct'. For some reason, this would cause firefox-bin and gaim processes to get killed due to 'Out of Memory' errors (see below). Here are some system logs that I assume are related: --- [4296798.183000] oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0 [4296798.183000] Mem-info: [4296798.183000] DMA per-cpu: [4296798.183000] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [4296798.183000] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [4296798.183000] DMA32 per-cpu: empty [4296798.183000] Normal per-cpu: [4296798.183000] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:20 [4296798.183000] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:5 [4296798.183000] HighMem per-cpu: empty [4296798.183000] Free pages:4392kB (0kB HighMem) [4296798.183000] Active:61351 inactive:60454 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free :1098 slab:2841 mapped:121243 pagetables:503 [4296798.183000] DMA free:2068kB min:88kB low:44kB high:88kB active:5684kB inact ive:5188kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:512 all_unreclaimable? no [4296798.183000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 495 495 [4296798.183000] DMA32 free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kBpresent:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [4296798.183000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 495 495 [4296798.183000] Normal free:2324kB min:2804kB low:1400kB high:2804kB active:239 720kB inactive:236628kB present:507840kB pages_scanned:42293 all_unreclaimable?no [4296798.183000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [4296798.183000] HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:32kB high:64kB active:0kB inacti ve:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [4296798.183000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [4296798.183000] DMA: 7*4kB 3*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1 *1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2068kB [4296798.183000] DMA32: empty [4296798.183000] Normal: 173*4kB 28*8kB 8*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 0*5 12kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2324kB [4296798.183000] HighMem: empty [4296798.183000] Swap cache: add 258559, delete 258559, find 7941/10868, race 0+ 0 [4296798.183000] Free swap = 0kB [4296798.183000] Total swap = 498004kB [4296798.183000] Free swap:0kB [4296798.186000] 131056 pages of RAM [4296798.186000] 0 pages of HIGHMEM [4296798.186000] 2150 reserved pages [4296798.186000] 507 pages shared [4296798.186000] 0 pages swap cached [4296798.186000] 0 pages dirty [4296798.186000] 0 pages writeback [4296798.186000] 121243 pages mapped [4296798.186000] 2841 pages slab [4296798.186000] 503 pages pagetables [4296798.186000] Out of Memory: Killed process 5402 (gaim). [4296812.229000] oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0 [4296812.229000] Mem-info: [4296812.229000] DMA per-cpu: [4296812.229000] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [4296812.229000] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 0, batch 1 used:0 [4296812.229000] DMA32 per-cpu: empty [4296812.229000] Normal per-cpu: [4296812.229000] cpu 0 hot: low 0, high 186, batch 31 used:29 [4296812.229000] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 62, batch 15 used:19 [4296812.229000] HighMem per-cpu: empty [4296812.229000] Free pages:4356kB (0kB HighMem) [4296812.229000] Active:61171 inactive:60714 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free :1089 slab:2859 mapped:121676 pagetables:498 [4296812.229000] DMA free:2024kB min:88kB low:44kB high:88kB active:5780kB inact ive:5128kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:11369 all_unreclaimable? yes [4296812.229000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 495 495 [4296812.229000] DMA32 free:0kB min:0kB low:0kB high:0kB active:0kB inactive:0kBpresent:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [4296812.229000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 495 495 [4296812.229000] Normal free:2332kB min:2804kB low:1400kB high:2804kB active:238 904kB inactive:237728kB present:507840kB pages_scanned:97296 all_unreclaimable?no [4296812.229000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [4296812.229000] HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:32kB high:64kB active:0kB inacti ve:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no [4296812.229000] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [4296812.229000] DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1 *1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2024kB [4296812.229000] DMA32: empty [4296812.229000] Normal: 223*4kB 14*8kB 3*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 0*5 12kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB
[Bug 48887] Re: Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak?
This actually seems to only happen when an existing drawing is being edited (from the old version in Breezy?) and occurs for me usually when mouse-scrolling and clicking around/editing in a text box. Things become increasingly slower when I do this and eventually the system just grinds to a halt. -- Zooming/Text functions cause 100% CPU Utilization possible memory leak? https://launchpad.net/bugs/48887 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 37253] Re: [Bug 37253] Re: Switch User should be disabled when not running under GDM
I had only tried it from the arrow/door applet to switch user/log off. Jordan Sebastien Bacher wrote: from where do you try to switch user? From the screensaver dialog? from the session dialog? from the fast-switch-user-applet? -- Switch User should be disabled when not running under GDM https://launchpad.net/bugs/37253 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 37253] Switch User should be disabled when not running under GDM
Public bug reported: Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Severity: Normal Priority: (none set) Assignee: Oliver Grawert Status: Unconfirmed Description: When attempting to use Switch User function within Edubuntu/LTSP environment, error message states You do not seem to be logged in on the console message details Starting a new login only works correctly on the console - this is because Switch User requires GDM and Edubuntu/LTSP commonly uses LDM for a login manager. Note: the original reporter indicated the bug was in package 'gnome- desktop'; however, that package was not published in Ubuntu. -- Switch User should be disabled when not running under GDM https://launchpad.net/bugs/37253 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs