[Bug 720434] [NEW] Cannot add a Google addressbook to Evolution: invalid query

2011-02-16 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

Hello,

I am trying to add my GMail address book with all its contacts to
Evolution.

I've tried a lot of different variations, but no matter what options I
choose (username with or without @gmail.com, for example), I always get
no contacts and an error.

The error says:

=== Unable to open address book 
This address book cannot be opened.  This either means that an incorrect URI 
was entered, or the server is unreachable.
Detailed error message: Cannot authenticate user: Invalid query

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: evolution 2.32.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-3.30-generic 2.6.38-rc4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-3-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Feb 16 23:58:02 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=it_IT:it:en_GB:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 LC_MESSAGES=it_IT.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: evolution

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720434

Title:
  Cannot add a Google addressbook to Evolution: invalid query

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 720434] Re: Cannot add a Google addressbook to Evolution: invalid query

2011-02-16 Thread Matteo Settenvini


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720434

Title:
  Cannot add a Google addressbook to Evolution: invalid query

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 720434] Re: Cannot add a Google addressbook to Evolution: invalid query

2011-02-16 Thread Matteo Settenvini
This issue appears when clicking on the left sidebar on the name of the
address book (Contatti).

** Attachment added: Screenshot of the issue
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/720434/+attachment/1855188/+files/evolution-error.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720434

Title:
  Cannot add a Google addressbook to Evolution: invalid query

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 704088] Re: e-addressbook-factory crashed with signal 5 in g_object_unref()

2011-01-17 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704088

Title:
  e-addressbook-factory crashed with signal 5 in g_object_unref()

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 676488] Re: dbus.proxies:Introspect error when cleaning up prevents clean up action

2011-01-03 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Happens also in gnome-keyboard-properties in Natty when you try to apply
globally your changes (try running that from the console, and look for
the output):

r...@orchid:~# gnome-keyboard-properties 
dpy: 0x1babc50
evt/error/major/minor: 97/156/1/0

(gnome-keyboard-properties:4093): Gtk-CRITICAL **:
IA__gtk_window_resize: assertion `width  0' failed

(gnome-keyboard-properties:4093): Gtk-WARNING **: Can't set a parent on
a toplevel widget

dpy: 0x1babc50
evt/error/major/minor: 97/156/1/0
dpy: 0x1babc50
evt/error/major/minor: 97/156/1/0

(gnome-keyboard-properties:4093): Gtk-WARNING **: Can't set a parent on
a toplevel widget

Caught remote method exception org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.Error.Failed:
Error getting subject: Error parsing unix-process subject: Value for key
`start-time' found but is of type i and type t was expected

** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676488

Title:
  dbus.proxies:Introspect error when cleaning up prevents clean up action

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 574771] Re: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in brasero_file_node_is_ancestor()

2010-05-03 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650267/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650268/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650269/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650270/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650271/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650272/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650273/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650274/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47650275/XsessionErrors.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in brasero_file_node_is_ancestor()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574771
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 407158] Re: Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very slow speed.

2009-10-02 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I forgot to add this is probably a dupe of 395932.

-- 
Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very 
slow speed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407158
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 427356] Re: Boot Performance Updates

2009-09-23 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I use cryptsetup only for removable media which isn't connected at
startup, and for filesystems mounted manually as loopback devices. Thus,
can't we avoid using usplash if /etc/crypttab is empty/non-
existant/contains only comments? That'll help a lot.

-- 
Boot Performance Updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 407158] Re: Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very slow speed.

2009-08-30 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31018398/lspci-vvnn.txt

-- 
Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very 
slow speed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407158
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 407158] Re: Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very slow speed.

2009-08-30 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Hi,

it appears that Xv doesn't get initialized on my system, so this is not a bug 
in Totem itself.
I'm attaching my xorg.0.log and lspci -vvnn so to diagnose the problem.

** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31018378/Xorg.0.log

-- 
Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very 
slow speed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407158
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 413627] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in raise()

2009-08-14 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316011/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316012/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316013/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316014/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316015/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316016/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30316017/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in raise()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413627
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 413021] [NEW] [karmic] iPod always mounted as root upon connection

2009-08-13 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

In Jaunty I hadn't this problem, so it's a regression for me.

Whenever I plug in my FAT32 iPod classic, it gets mounted as root
instead of my current user, making impossible writing to it with e.g.
gtkpod. I've got to sudo unmount it via shell, and then using gnome-
mount -d /dev/sdc1 makes the correct thing.

/etc/fstab doesn't contain anything pertinent. Other USB media devices
are mounted correctly with ownership set to the current user.

Please tell what other informations I could provide.

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
[karmic] iPod always mounted as root upon connection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 413235] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in raise()

2009-08-13 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280221/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280222/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280223/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280224/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280225/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280226/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30280227/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 in raise()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 407158] Re: Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very slow speed.

2009-08-12 Thread Matteo Settenvini
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #591608
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591608

** Also affects: totem via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591608
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Totem 2.27 uses the CPU at a 100% and the movies have been played at a very 
slow speed.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407158
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2009-08-06 Thread Matteo Settenvini
There's a patch attached to the bug upstream, can someone review it and include 
it in karmic for testing purposes?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=139388action=view

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2009-08-06 Thread Matteo Settenvini
There's a patch attached to the bug upstream, can someone review it and include 
it in karmic for testing purposes?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=139388action=view

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2009-06-18 Thread Matteo Settenvini
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #586211
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586211

** Also affects: gtk via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586211
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2009-06-18 Thread Matteo Settenvini
(Gnome bugzilla was slow to respond, and even if the connection timed
out thrice, the bugs were submitted. Updating with the first bug
submitted upstream.)

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #586207
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586207

** Changed in: gtk
   Status: New = Unknown

** Changed in: gtk
 Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #586211 = GNOME Bug Tracker #586207

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 154096] Re: Print options shouldn't be saved across different sessions

2009-03-17 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Sorry, I had to add a note; anyway eog is affected by this bug too.
Do you want me to copy the very description of this bug and to create a new one 
with the same text?
Isn't that just a duplicate?

-- 
Print options shouldn't be saved across different sessions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 154096] Re: Print options shouldn't be saved across different sessions

2009-03-16 Thread Matteo Settenvini
** Also affects: eog (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Print options shouldn't be saved across different sessions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 319813] Re: xorg eating 100% of CPU after upgrading to gnome 2.25.5

2009-02-14 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Fixed with xserver-xorg-core 2:1.5.99.902-0ubuntu6.

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Fix Released

-- 
xorg eating 100% of CPU after upgrading to gnome 2.25.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 319813] Re: xorg eating 100% of CPU after upgrading to gnome 2.25.5

2009-02-14 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Was a problem with xserver-xorg-core, not the nv driver.

** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-nv (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
xorg eating 100% of CPU after upgrading to gnome 2.25.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 326582] Re: sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical

2009-02-07 Thread Matteo Settenvini
This was discussed years ago on the relevant mailing lists, and it was
chosen to be the intended behaviour. I don't think it will ever be
changed. Imagine saving a large number of screenshots, or using wget for
downloading some files:

for i in `seq 0 100`; do touch ${i}.txt; done

The current behaviour is what most users would expect.
If I recall correctly, also konqueror (now dolphin) behaves the same.

-- 
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 319813] Re: xorg eating 100% of CPU after upgrading to gnome 2.25.5

2009-02-07 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I'm not sure it's nvidia-glx-177 the problem.

It's more than one month I'm experiencing this, and hell if it is
annoying; I've got at least four users complaining! The system is barely
usable.

They have all iMac PPC64 G5 machines, with an nvidia card.

However, using a PPC machine, they can't use the binary nvidia drivers. 
Instead, the nv opensource driver is in use.
NOTICE: when the screen fades to black due to gnome-screensaver, the CPU goes 
back to normal. Logging in with something else other than GNOME doesn't hog the 
CPU, too.

Using gdb as per the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Troubleshooting/HighCPU
guide, I see almost always the SmartScheduleStartTimer () function at
the top of the stack:

(gdb) bt full
#0  0x0f995874 in setitimer () from /lib/libc.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#1  0x1010b3dc in SmartScheduleStartTimer () at ../../os/utils.c:1236
timer = {it_interval = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 2}, it_value = {
tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 2}}
#2  0x10103ba4 in WaitForSomething (pClientsReady=0x103d7b40)
at ../../os/WaitFor.c:232
i = 0
waittime = {tv_sec = 270467104, tv_usec = 270427012}
wt = (struct timeval *) 0x101ecaf4
timeout = value optimized out
clientsReadable = {fds_bits = {0 repeats 32 times}}
clientsWritable = {fds_bits = {18, 0, 18, 36, 0, 0, 272777608, 
-956192, 270608992, 257411340, 272813256, -956128, 256982472, 257617456, 
2359314, -956160, 257556312, 270608992, 273026680, -956144, 0, 272460784, 
32, 0, 32, 270422968, 32, -956112, 269543400, 36, 273138440, 273133608}}
curclient = value optimized out
selecterr = 0
nready = value optimized out
devicesReadable = {fds_bits = {0 repeats 32 times}}
now = value optimized out
someReady = 0
#3  0x10048768 in Dispatch () at ../../dix/dispatch.c:367
result = 0
client = (ClientPtr) 0x1047b028
nready = -1
start_tick = 6420
#4  0x10028c88 in main (argc=10, argv=0xfff16d44, envp=0x1020)
at ../../dix/main.c:383
i = 1
alwaysCheckForInput = {0, 1}


Strace says:

Process 6828 attached - interrupt to quit
^CProcess 6828 detached
% time seconds  usecs/call callserrors syscall
-- --- --- - - 
 59.083.378467   6549108   select
 40.842.335165   2   1098214   setitimer
  0.070.004228  11   368   184 read
  0.010.000345  1035   writev
-- --- --- - - 
100.005.718205   1647725   184 total

** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-nv (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
xorg eating 100% of CPU after upgrading to gnome 2.25.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 326582] Re: sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical

2009-02-07 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I'm not a nautilus developer, either. I'm an end user. And I can tell
you I don't want to pollute the preferences with options confusing and
unneeded by most people.

However, you're trolling. It has been clearly stated here that you
should either report this issue upstream or shut up. If you're too lazy
to spend two minutes by registering on b.g.o, then this issue is not
important even to you.

And keep in mind: this is opensource. To prove your point, patches are
welcome.

-- 
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 326582] Re: sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical

2009-02-07 Thread Matteo Settenvini
If you're not a developer, you're always free to set a bounty in money
for others to implement; that'll foster development. It seems to me that
people complaining mistake free as in speech for free as in beer,
and also take for granted that, just because a community exists, they
have to abuse it giving little in change.

Quite a lot of GNOME contributors are volunteers. They deserve more
respect than be bullied around at every user request. If you really want
to discuss this issue, bring it up on the desktop-devel-l...@gnome.org.

Of course there are *always* someone asking for something that isn't
there. I've seen all sort of issues across bugzilla; some reasonable,
some not. The ability to set priority and tasks, and also the great
burden to say 'no' and disgruntle someone in the user base, is a painful
and too-often underestimated process: it takes time, effort, and even
the best diplomacy sometimes turns out to be wasted. This is very
discouraging. *A lot* of devs got so fed up at people *pretending*
things, that they now start ignoring them in the first place. This is
sad, of course; but the best way to avoid this happening surely isn't
being so vocal in the wrong place.

In the end, someone has to steer the wheel. The decision that has been
taken with nautilus has been the one most requested at the time of
implementation. Please also research bugs complaining about
lexicographical ordering, and MLs. Yours isn't a proof people want to
change implementation, just that there exist someone disgruntled (a
person, in the comment you pointed out, that hasn't been active in
bugzilla apart from that). Your reasoning is faulty there.

As a side note, try push a feature request like this up to, say,
Microsoft or Apple, since Ubuntu will never be the OS for the masses.
Please keep us posted on their response. They tell me that even a phone
call is around 18€ in Microsoft. This kind of angst-driven comments
really makes me take the other side of the discussion, despite the
technical merits.

---

By the way, to stay more on this bug contents: if an implementation of
this really needs to be there, the right way in my opinion to have it is
by adding a new gconf key retaining current sorting behaviour by
default, but *not* adding a new UI element in the nautilus preferences
dialog.

Please note that lexicographical ordering is hard nevertheless in the
UTF-8 world.

-- 
sort order of files listings in nautilus is not alphabetical
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 326178] Re: evolution-alarm-notify 2.25.90-0ubuntu1 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2009-02-06 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045168/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045169/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045170/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045171/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045172/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045173/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045174/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22045176/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
evolution-alarm-notify 2.25.90-0ubuntu1 crashed with SIGSEGV in 
g_main_context_dispatch()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 310171] Re: Evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 fetches email, but doesn't show it in the treeview

2009-01-13 Thread Matteo Settenvini
It was evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 as per bug title. However, I did save
the mailbox files somewhere else a couple of weeks ago, removed the
entire ~/.evolution directory, and re-imported the backup.

It worked, and it seems okay now, so I don't really know what happened.
Cannot reproduce the bug now, so this bug may be closed.

-- 
Evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 fetches email, but doesn't show it in the treeview
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2009-01-02 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Still happening. Very annoying since it blocks the whole application for
30+ seconds to do some kind of network check when you click on the
printer connected to a shutted down host. No window repaint happens, and
the whole application is unusable, leading the user to try and close the
window (thinking it has hung), terminating it.

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 186186] Re: web page background render errors

2008-12-27 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Confirming this happens also for me in Jaunty on two PCs: a laptop using
the intel driver, and a powerpc64 using a nVidia card. In both cases
lesser artifacts are seen in *every* page you visit.

I have to add that other problems have arisen also for other parts of
the desktop using gtk+  cairo for rendering (icons in gnome-panel,
toolbars in applications, widgets, etc.), so it's not related to firefox
imo. Mostly the problem seems to arise when using pixbufs (?).

-- 
web page background render errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 310171] Re: Evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 fetches email, but doesn't show it in the treeview

2008-12-26 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Thanks Pedro,

* no message is shown after Thu 18, so yes, the problem is reproducible. Just 
fire up evolution and your messages AREN'T there. ;-)
* specific steps: open evolution; click on Show deleted messages in the 
View menu so to be sure you're not cheating, open with gedit 
~/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox, see that messages more recent than the last 
shown exist. On the server, there's no message left, because evolution fetched 
them all already. Despair.
* attaching a screenshot of the issue: above there's the evolution GUI, showing 
no new message since Dec 18. Below, gedit with the Inbox file open, showing an 
highlighted message from Dec 24  Dec 18.
* the log file is coming.

** Attachment added: Screenshot of the issue
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20750486/screenshot.png

-- 
Evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 fetches email, but doesn't show it in the treeview
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 310171] [NEW] Evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 fetches email, but doesn't show it in the treeview

2008-12-21 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

Since last Thursday (18 Dec), evolution does indeed fetch emails from
servers (they aren't there, and you can open in gedit in
~/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox and scroll to the end to see them).

However, the treeview from the evolution GUI doesn't show any mail, read
or unread, after Thursday. Gosh!

This is also critical since it usually removes emails from server. If I
didn't get suspicious, I could have lost very important emails! Most
users don't know how to deal with this.

Please, it's important.

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Evolution 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 fetches email, but doesn't show it in the treeview
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2008-12-18 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Still here in Jaunty.

Moreover, if I try clicking on the offline printer in the printing
dialog, the whole application (e.g. evince) freezes for more than 30
seconds, and doesn't event repaint itself on the screen.

Any help with this?

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 283633] Re: gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_path_next()

2008-10-15 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554303/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554304/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554305/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554306/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554307/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554308/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554309/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18554310/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
gedit crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_path_next()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 283978] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()

2008-10-15 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578379/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578380/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578381/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578382/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578383/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578384/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578385/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18578386/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283978
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 133561] Re: Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer

2008-09-09 Thread Matteo Settenvini
A quick update: should be fixed as of now in Intrepid; I'm using
gstreamer 0.10.10-1 and totem plays it okay.

-- 
Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 254030] Re: Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down

2008-09-08 Thread Matteo Settenvini
The attached image show also the output of lpstat -p.
The host Dahlia is indeed shutted down.

** Attachment added: Screenshot of the issue
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17421409/Schermata.png

-- 
Cannot queue jobs to a remote printing server if shutted down
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 259134] Re: epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing tabs

2008-08-19 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Sorry, I linked the bug with epiphany in the first place because both
Firefox and Epiphany use xulrunner, afaik.

However, firefox doesn't exhibit this problem. So I thought it was an
implementation problem on the epiphany side.

So, I assume there is nothing doable to fix this, or workaround this?

-- 
epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing 
tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 259134] Re: epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing tabs

2008-08-19 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Thanks Sebastien; unfortunately by installing libflashsupport I get bug
#239182, so that's definitely not a solution at least for me (both in
epiphany and firefox).

-- 
epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing 
tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 259134] [NEW] epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing tabs

2008-08-18 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

I can reproduce this with epiphany 2.22.3-1ubuntu2, but it doesn't
happens with firefox (at least, so far).

Using flashplugin-nonfree, and making sure libflashsupport is NOT
installed, still makes epiphany crash if I've three-four tabs opened
with youtube videos, and I try to close the current tab of a playing
clip.

This seems to be random, but happens frequently, making epiphany almost
unusable on flash sites (not only youtube is in fact affected).

Attaching a backtrace. It's strange that firefox doesn't exhibit this
behaviour.

** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing 
tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 259134] Re: epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing tabs

2008-08-18 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: Full backtrace
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16903593/gdb-epiphany.txt

** Also affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
epiphany-gecko frequently crashes with flashplugin-nonfree videos and closing 
tabs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259134
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 233922] Re: [new-upstream] Firefox 3.0 RC1 is available

2008-05-29 Thread Matteo Settenvini
devhelp_0.19-1ubuntu3 fails to build.

-- 
[new-upstream] Firefox 3.0 RC1 is available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/233922
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to devhelp in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 235222] Re: Totem Gstreamer Hue Keep Changing (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS)

2008-05-27 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Maybe I can help with this, since it's at least 6 months I'm seeing this
intermittently on my PPC machine (could be related to the nv video
drivers, dunno).

What happens is:
* start a movie in Totem, for example a mpeg4 video; the color is not very 
bright, 
and sometimes a kind of sepia tone.
* go to Preferences, and look at the Hue and Saturation sliders. They're all in 
the middle. You can reset them with the appropriate button if necessary: the 
movie colors still don't show right.
* bring the slider of Hue to the right-end of the line
* now colors of the movie are back to normal: of an acceptable intensity and 
the movie is watchable.

The Hue and Saturation sliders seem to have an effect only on some cases
and not on others; for example, I can reproduce this bug without problem
on my PPC machine with an nVidia card, but those sliders do absolutely
nothing no matter how I set them on my x86 machine with an i810 driver.
But maybe this is a different kind of bug.

I'll try and see if I can take a screenshot of the issue -- but as I
said, this bug is intermittent.

-- 
Totem Gstreamer Hue Keep Changing (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 235222] Re: Totem Gstreamer Hue Keep Changing (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS)

2008-05-27 Thread Matteo Settenvini
This is a screenshot taken with my camera and hue set to the default
values. You can see how the movie is desaturated.

** Attachment added: screenshot-wrong-default-hue.JPG
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14753052/screenshot-wrong-default-hue.JPG

-- 
Totem Gstreamer Hue Keep Changing (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 235222] Re: Totem Gstreamer Hue Keep Changing (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS)

2008-05-27 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Hue changed for this specific movie. If I do reboot, open some other movie or 
what else, chances are I have to set the hue manually again.
I've also had some problems on the x86 (i810 card) but not with the Hue -- 
there it was the contrast to be too high for the default value.

** Attachment added: screenshot-right-custom-hue.JPG
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14753066/screenshot-right-custom-hue.JPG

-- 
Totem Gstreamer Hue Keep Changing (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235222
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 210783] Re: Cannot save/copy images properly from evince

2008-05-24 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Hi, I finally managed to upload on my PPA the new poppler libraries; a
build of evince 2.22.1.1 using this version of poppler should be ready
in an hour or so.

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/tchernobog/ubuntu hardy main

-- 
Cannot save/copy images properly from evince
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 210783] Re: Cannot save/copy images properly from evince

2008-04-26 Thread Matteo Settenvini
It may be interesting bumping to poppler 0.8.1.
Attached is the debian sub-directory of my poppler-0.8.1 package, 
downloadable from http://poppler.freedesktop.org/poppler-0.8.1.tar.gz

I then just took care of rebuilding packages I wanted using the new
library; for me they were evince, inkscape, tracker and gimp. Maybe it's
only me, but I noticed a speedup when rendering PDFs.

** Attachment added: Files to build a deb of the 0.8.1 poppler package
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13940526/poppler-0.8.1-mydiffs.tar.gz

-- 
Cannot save/copy images properly from evince
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 211945] [NEW] nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2008-04-04 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Private bug reported:

Binary package hint: nautilus

Reproducible whenever I start refreshing some times in a row a sftp
network folder. I always wait the end of the nautilus window update
before hitting refresh again (in fact, I wait some more). I do that to
monitor for changes in directories when I use conduit to synchronize
remote folders (don't ask).

Anyway, the third/fourth time I hit refresh, Nautilus crashes.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Apr  4 21:44:49 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus
Package: nautilus 1:2.22.1-1ubuntu3
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdline: nautilus --sm-config-prefix /nautilus-qCGZCO/ --sm-client-id 
117f0100011960074330322350005 --screen 0
ProcEnviron:
 
PATH=/usr/lib/colorgcc/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nautilus
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_check_instance_cast ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
 ?? ()
Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-14-386 i686
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy kmem lpadmin netdev 
plugdev powerdev pulse-rt sambashare scanner video

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash need-i386-retrace

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 211945] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2008-04-04 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118673/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118674/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118675/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118676/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118677/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118678/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118679/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13118680/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Visibility changed to: Private

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 210783] Re: Cannot save/copy images properly from evince

2008-04-02 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: PDF test-case for the bug
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13046622/bug-evince-image-save.pdf

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #310008
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310008

** Also affects: evince via
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310008
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Cannot save/copy images properly from evince
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 210783] [NEW] Cannot save/copy images properly from evince

2008-04-02 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

Using latest Hardy, on many PDFs I cannot save or copy the correct image
(that is to say, almost all of the ones I've tried). If PDF image-saving
support is so buggy, it should be temporarily disabled in the final
Hardy release instead that kept there as a half-working feature -- at
least imho.

In the attached test-case (even if quite ugly, I just took some random
images lying there on my hard disk), try copying/saving the images you
see into e.g. OpenOffice.org Writer. There are a lot of issues:

* Transparent PNGs are rendered with a black background. 
* If you try to select the image on the background (the one with the flag), you 
probably get any of the other images saved instead. For example, try in the 
upper-right corner of the picture, where you see the blue sky. No image is 
stacked above that area, neither a transparent one.
* Then there's the transparence issue: try copying the image in space labeled 
as A. You don't get the chest, but the image of the zealot. Transparence 
should be taken in account and images with alpha 255 on a particular point 
(where you do your right click) ignored in the z-stack -- users expect the 
chest to be copied, because that's what they see.

Probably at least part of this gets fixed by updating poppler to 0.8.0 for 
Hardy. See also GNOME bug #310008.
I can attach other test-cases if needed, I should be able to find easily 
something under a CC license.

** Affects: evince
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: poppler (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Cannot save/copy images properly from evince
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210783
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to poppler in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 207341] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ft_glyphslot_free_bitmap()

2008-03-26 Thread Matteo Settenvini
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
evince crashed with SIGSEGV in ft_glyphslot_free_bitmap()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207341
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 201950] Re: Cannot close opened tabs in Epiphany 2.22.0-0ubuntu4

2008-03-14 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Seems to be fixed with the 2.22.0-0ubuntu5 rebuild of today.

-- 
Cannot close opened tabs in Epiphany 2.22.0-0ubuntu4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 201950] [NEW] Cannot close opened tabs in Epiphany 2.22.0-0ubuntu4

2008-03-13 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: epiphany-browser

Should be specific of 2.22.0-0ubuntu4 (doesn't happen with other 2.22.0 
released versions as far as I can tell).
Cannot close any opened tabs either with CTRL+W, by clicking on the (X) icon on 
the tab, or by right-clicking on the tab title and selecting Close. In other 
words, there's *no way* I can tell to close a tab.

** Affects: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Cannot close opened tabs in Epiphany 2.22.0-0ubuntu4
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201950
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 187200] Re: gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in g_data_input_stream_read_line()

2008-03-03 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Fixed for me; closeable.

-- 
gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in g_data_input_stream_read_line()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187200
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 194406] Re: gnome-dictionary crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-03-01 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I believe that gnome-dictionary is in gnome-utils; however, I don't know
where to find the -dbgsym package, along with the gdict-dbgsym one. Can
someone point me in the right direction? I can't find them in the
official debug repositories.

Then I'll be more than happy to produce a full backtrace.

-- 
gnome-dictionary crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194406
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 188101] Re: gnome-terminal doesn't show any items in menubar

2008-02-08 Thread Matteo Settenvini
2.21.90 here.

-- 
gnome-terminal doesn't show any items in menubar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 188101] [NEW] gnome-terminal doesn't show any items in menubar

2008-02-01 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-terminal

Since updating gnome-terminal to the 2.21.x series in Hardy, I cannot see any 
item in the menubar anymore. However, if I try to randomly click on the left of 
the menubar, drop down menus appear, so at least they're there.
I'm using the italian locale. I tried to do export LC_ALL=C  
gnome-terminal, but it doesn't seem to work. Not sure if it's a locale problem 
or a bug in gnome-terminal itself.

See screenshot.

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gnome-terminal doesn't show any items in menubar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-terminal in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 188101] Re: gnome-terminal doesn't show any items in menubar

2008-02-01 Thread Matteo Settenvini

** Attachment added: Screenshot of the problem (see empty menubar)
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11703219/Schermata-Terminale.png

-- 
gnome-terminal doesn't show any items in menubar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188101
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-terminal in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 185441] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()

2008-01-30 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Andreas, you're right. I'm attaching a backtrace I generated by opening
a sftp folder, starting copy some files in it and cancelling the
operation before it ends. Hope it helps.

** Attachment added: Full backtrace
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11644535/gdb-nautilus2.txt

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185441
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 18970] Re: Evolution does not honor #tag in html messages

2008-01-30 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Anybody working on this anymore?

-- 
Evolution does not honor #tag in html messages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 185441] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()

2008-01-29 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I can't reproduce this with gvfs 0.1.6 and nautilus 2.21.90, that just hit the 
repos.
May be fixed upstream, although I'll test it for the next days to come.

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185441
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 186546] Re: gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_data_input_stream_read_line()

2008-01-29 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Sorry for the spam, but I can't reproduce this with gvfs 0.1.6 and nautilus 
2.21.90, that just hit the repos.
May be fixed upstream, although I'll test it for the next days to come.

-- 
gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_data_input_stream_read_line()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186546
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 186546] Re: gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_data_input_stream_read_line()

2008-01-29 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I can't downgrade correctly (if I try it, even the trash:/ position
stops working, nautilus doesn't manage sftp:// urls anymore, and I see a
lot of quirks -- maybe some gconf key out of place?). I guess I'll have
to wait for 0.1.6 dbg packages.

-- 
gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_data_input_stream_read_line()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186546
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 186546] Re: gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_data_input_stream_read_line()

2008-01-29 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I'll be more than happy to produce a backtrace as soon as I the right dbg pkg 
is available, if the bug is still there with latest gvfs versions. 
gvfs is now at version 0.1.6, and the dbg packages at 0.1.4.

-- 
gvfsd-sftp crashed with SIGSEGV in IA__g_data_input_stream_read_line()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186546
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 116236] Re: evince shows a mostly blank pdf

2007-12-17 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Fixes the rendering of the first page of the Firefox ad 
(http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9611234/nytimes-firefox-final.pdf) -- thanks! 
However, the firefox logo on the second page isn't showed, whereas it should be 
present. So I guess either that is a different problem, or it requires a 
different solution.

-- 
evince shows a mostly blank pdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116236
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 154096] Print options shouldn't be saved across different sessions

2007-10-18 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

Every time I use an application which makes use of the GtkPrint dialog,
and I change the settings listed there, my choiches are remembered and
reused for the next time I want to print.

This leds to some confusion in my opinion. For example, it happened to me to 
print a PDF in evince on a day, selecting it with two pages per sheet, and 
asking myself the next day (the following time I did printing in evince) why 
all my curriculum vitae where split in two. 
Or, more frequently, print 10 copies of a leaflet, and then forget to check it 
for the next print which is a Shakespeare's complete novel, going to buy me a 
coffee, and return after half an hour with three or four spare copies of 
Macbeth. Not to count the problems the famigerate page selection options, 
expecially when you've to handle over your work to your colleagues during a 
meeting, and you discover too late you've got a lot of odd pages of your 
presentation, but no even-numbered one!

In short, it would be a sensible behaviour if evince or GtkPrint (I
think the culprit is the second one, but feel free to correct me if I'm
mistaken) would save my choiches across _any printing operation for the
same document_ (until the document changes, or the application is
closed) instead of _any printing operation for any document_.

If needed, a Save as default options button could be added to the
printing dialog.

Cheers,
m.

** Affects: evince (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Also affects: evince (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Print options shouldn't be saved across different sessions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for evince in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 145278] Re: [gutsy] getting Error Printing: Too many failed attempts error when printing through GtkPrintOperation

2007-10-09 Thread Matteo Settenvini
I'm seeing this together with bug 66379: Error in POST Success, and
only on PPC.

-- 
[gutsy] getting Error Printing: Too many failed attempts error when printing 
through GtkPrintOperation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145278
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for evince in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 116236] Re: evince shows a mostly blank pdf

2007-09-30 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Also the attached PDF is mostly blank, whereas Adobe Acrobat shows it
correctly. Is it also due to this problem, or due to transparency? Can
anyone check?

** Attachment added: Firefox ad: PDF wrongly rendered by evince
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9611234/nytimes-firefox-final.pdf

-- 
evince shows a mostly blank pdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116236
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 133561] Re: Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer

2007-08-22 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Sebastien: Yes, the problem is GStreamer related. I can see (hear?) the
problem doing as you suggest, with gst-launch.

-- 
Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 133561] Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer

2007-08-19 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Public bug reported:

There are files that play fine in mplayer, but are played with incorrect
sound/very-low volume in Totem using Gstreamer. I don't have any DB
Surround 5.1 hardware, just my laptop speakers on a cheap Intel
soundcard :-).

I'm attaching one of the culprits. It's a nine-second sample re-encoded
with video low-quality, but audio left untouched in AC-3. This should
qualify as fair use by US copyright law, afaik.

** Affects: totem (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for totem in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 133561] Re: Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer

2007-08-19 Thread Matteo Settenvini
This sample shows the problem. This happens with latest Gstreamer
0.10.14 and Totem 2.19.6 on Gutsy.

** Attachment added: A sample that shows the problem
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8891446/buggy-sample.avi

-- 
Incorrect audio in AC-3 encoded AVI file with Totem/Gstreamer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for totem in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 85371] Re: Gstreamer returns wrong total time in audio tracks

2007-04-05 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Okay, an update. I explicitly tried to encoding a file in CBR mode via 
gstreamer using sound-juicer. I used lame and set a fixed bitrate of 192 kbps.
This still produced wrong duration times.

However, right clicking on _some_ (not all, that's the strange thing!) of these 
files in nautilus and selecting the Audio tab, reports a bitrate of 32 kbps.
These are the files with a wrong duration, probably because the value gstreamer 
returns for bitrate is used when calculating song total length.

Jan, could you please check in nautilus the bitrate of a song that is
affected by this bug? So at least we could have a confirmation of the
hypothetical cause of the problem.

-- 
Gstreamer returns wrong total time in audio tracks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85371
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gst-plugins-ugly0.10 in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 85371] Re: Gstreamer returns wrong total time in audio tracks

2007-03-09 Thread Matteo Settenvini
Could it be that this happens only on VBR mp3 / ogg files? Doesn't seem
to happen with CBR ones as far as I can tell (I've just a bunch of them,
most of my music library is in VBR).

-- 
Gstreamer returns wrong total time in audio tracks
https://launchpad.net/bugs/85371

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs