[Bug 1095068] Re: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline'
I'm not sure why you come to that conclusion, but I always authorize the accounts whenever requested (the top right menu button turns red). In fact, I repeatedly authorized and unauthorized the gtalk account when debugging the problem, trying to make Empathy show the contacts. In any case the problem seems mitigated, it happens infrequently now (and never does if I just use the messaging icon workaround). Sorry if it's still a problem on my end. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095068 Title: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1095068/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1095068] Re: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline'
This only seems to happen if I launch Empathy from the Unity Launcher. It works correctly when I set my status to Online through the Unity Panel and then launch Empathy from there as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095068 Title: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1095068/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1095068] [NEW] Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline'
Public bug reported: This problem happens in two computers, whether I use auto-login or not, with Ubuntu 12.10. I configured two accounts on the Online Accounts window: Facebook and Google. My Facebook contacts always appear on Empathy, but gTalk contacts almost never appear, with the error message status is set to offline appearing in red at the top of Empathy's main window. I have to restart Empathy several times until I get lucky and it shows my gTalk contacts. I also try setting my status to Online in various ways: through the Unity Panel, through Empathy's main-window 'Go Online' button, and through Empathy's main-window dropdown box. The symptoms are the same no matter what I do. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: empathy 3.6.0.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-21.32-generic 3.5.7.1 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu9 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Jan 1 16:18:51 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-11-28 (33 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: empathy UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1095068 Title: Empathy: No contacts on gtalk: 'status is set to offline' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/1095068/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542207] [NEW] nautilus draws white bars on desktop
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I'm running Lucid Beta 1. Nautilus version: 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu1 Whenever I change my theme in System Preferences Appearance, nautilus draws two white bars in the desktop, as if the wallpaper didn't fill the whole screen. They are located in the left and right borders of the screen, between panels. The problem persists even if I choose 'Solid Color' as a wallpaper, and can only be fixed if I kill nautilus and then bring it up again. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Mar 19 20:45:48 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318) Package: nautilus 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- nautilus draws white bars on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542207] Re: nautilus draws white bars on desktop
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323563/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323564/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- nautilus draws white bars on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 542207] Re: nautilus draws white bars on desktop
It can be hard to see if your image viewer / browser has a light background, but here is a screenshot. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41326990/Screenshot.png -- nautilus draws white bars on desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize, maximize, close
I agree with Adam Williamson and I think a lot of the heat this is generating comes from the fact that we don't know what is the Cool New Stuff that is being envisioned for the now free space. I think most people can't really see improvements with this change and maybe it would open our minds a bit if we knew what sort of plans Mark/the Design Team have in store for us. -- [light-theme] please revert the order of the window controls back to menu:minimize,maximize,close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 401823] Re: (firefox:24993): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead - overeager XID caching
I would like to know meanwhile the recommended practice ? Delete xsession-errors every week ? I'm getting 30MB+ .xession-errors files per session, will this keep increasing ? -- (firefox:24993): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead - overeager XID caching https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
seems like the main culprit is really usplash it tinkers with ttys in initramfs scripts. ** Package changed: gdm (Ubuntu) = usplash (Ubuntu) -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
fair enough, at least for the 4th line (the other 3 i could try to challenge). would you anyway be able to hint which file i could look into, haven t find anything in /etc/init.d (only some references to fgconsole check in usplash) ? -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
Sebastien I beg to differ. Though sure this is not a critical bug, it certainly is one since it's well documented that new vts should be created sequentially, vt7, vt8, etc... Also before I came to the startx discovery I've found quite a few complaints, some very old dating from hardy or 2005 (like this https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- users/2005-November/056772.html) from a standard user). I'm sure many people quit complaining as they assume that vt8 anyway is allocated to usplash and have not been told you can redirect it. I can say myself this is a regression as it worked ok in Feisty/Gutsy. More importand yet, there are a number of indirect bugs probably related to this, like bug #172444 running since Gutsy Also please note that the behaviour occurs inside gdm but also from pure startx command. For the time being I've modified gdm to start at vt9. Startx then launches at vt7 and a second startx session launches at vt...10. Could you maybe give a hint of which file I should hack to get startx behaving as specified or is it hardcoded ? Bottom line, I would ask you to raise to medium so that I can see it fixed one day. It doesn't seem too hard to fix and the benefits may be greater than it appears. -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
Just a comment, the startx discovery meant that vt8 was not actually locked by usplash as I had thought since Gutsy, -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 429616] Re: x display manager won't open session on next free vt
seems like gdm is rather managing this ** Package changed: xdm (Ubuntu) = gdm (Ubuntu) -- x display manager won't open session on next free vt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 352716] Re: Gnome-panel won't start when run through NX session
I could notice that the bug disappeared when I disable the Fast User switch and that consequently I had all my logout menu entries restored. I guess this is somehow linked at the way the menu probes for checking if the FUS is set to appear. Since then my remote logins on NX have been working fine, I m actually writing fron one right now. If you don+ t know about FUS, do a search. FUS automatically disables other logout methods. -- Gnome-panel won't start when run through NX session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 325973] Re: gnome-session keeps respawning nautilus when no desktop is drawed
So Sebastien, We have all understood this is a well known bug and in fact I've landed here because i wanted to upgrade form 8.10 and read about. The problem is that despite this there seems to be no 100% workaround or patch. Does this daily iso fix mean that any delta upgrade from 8.10 will also automatically contain the fixed packages ? And is this crash fix solving the issues point in this thread or is a different bug as mentioned just above ? Otherwise good luck for any beta feedback. -- gnome-session keeps respawning nautilus when no desktop is drawed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 346976] Re: gedit-plugins doesn't install
Fixed as of today's updates (March 23) ** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- gedit-plugins doesn't install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit-plugins in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 346976] [NEW] gedit-plugins doesn't install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit-plugins Standard Ubuntu Jaunty daily build, fully updated, with minimal configuration. When trying to install the package gedit-plugins, apt always fails with the following output: Selecting previously deselected package gedit-plugins. (Reading database ... 119901 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gedit-plugins (from .../gedit-plugins_2.25.3-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... Setting up gedit-plugins (2.25.3-0ubuntu1) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2147, in module main() File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2141, in main rv = action.run(global_options) File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1457, in run self.options.exclude, byte_compile_default=True) File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1053, in install self.default_runtime.byte_compile(self.private_files, bc_option, AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'byte_compile' dpkg: error processing gedit-plugins (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gedit-plugins E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ** Affects: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gedit-plugins doesn't install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit-plugins in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 27109] Re: nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session
I think that this is not right way to handle a bug that has been reported since three years and through even more distros releases. I've just landed here for the first time since I'm using nautilus for sftp and was worried by this strange cpu activity even - and especially - after the download would end, fearing that my transfers could not have been cleanly closed. True that ie used in the past (more than a year ago) sftp and didn't recall this behaviour. I can reproduce at any tine: just open a remote sftp window and transfer (I've dragged the directory from my local directory window and dropped). Can see any other special setup that could influence, except that I 'm running a SSVNC session thus having two ssh sessions. Also I'm using key authentication, in case this matters. -- nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 27109] Re: nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session
Just another hint that just happened: I've tried to unmount the sftp folder and the desktop was frozen (only, other app widows would work normally) then all icons simply disappeared. Killing the sftp process made reappear the desktop icons. So maybe it a problem rather linked to the display of the sftp volume on the desktop. In the past I had complain to no avail to the rather lousy implementation of this desktop icon, which bring you back to root directory after first login, so maybe it's more a dbus issue or whatever. -- nautilus uses 100% cpu after closing a ssh session https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 210957] Re: Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location
I´ve now seen now that bug #198857 is indeed a duplicate technically speaking, but from my average-joe perspective I was far away from guessing the issues behind of what seems now majorly a basic UI bug rather than an architecture issue. Simply stated, I just wanted like a granma to connect to a sftp folder (true, based on the previous experience from gutsy), and expected the behaviour of the installed icon to be the same of the window opened. My suggestion is that it is a bad compromise (probably with good intention of providing legacy) and better not to display any icon on the desktop rather than a useless (for granma) and annoying (for me) root folder . Of course the best still seems to me to have the gutsy config, a folder icon opening on my home folder. -- Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 210957] Re: Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location
Just to comment that I semm to understand now that it was more coincidence than legacy intent as the mounted folder appears automatically on the desktop. Seems like the best way would be to disable display of these lesser mounted volumes -- Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 210957] Re: Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location
Same problem here, first connection is right. Wonder why is listed invalid. Pretty much annoying, despite being ranked low priority. Couldn't find where it has been report before except here, as it seems slightly different from other natilus root redirection issues. -- Connect to server sftp mount does not save folder location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
